Search

BACKGROUND Spinal arachnoid webs are rarely described bands of thickened arachnoid tissue in the dorsal thoracic spine. Much is unknown regarding their origins, risk factors, natural history, and outcomes. OBJECTIVE To present the single largest case series, detailing presenting symptoms and outcomes amongst operative and nonoperative patients, to better understand the role of intervention. METHODS This retrospective chart review identified 38 patients with arachnoid webs. Patient demographics, radiologic signs, symptoms, and surgical history data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Symptoms were divided by location and character. 28 patients were successfully contacted for follow up outcome surveys. RESULTS 26 patients (68%) underwent surgical intervention, 12 (32%) were managed non-operatively. 15 (39%) patients had undergone a previous unsuccessful surgery at a different site for their symptoms prior to arachnoid web diagnosis. Commonly presenting symptoms included myelopathy (68%), focal thoracic back pain (68%), lower extremity weakness (45%), numbness and sensory changes (58%), and lower extremity radicular pain (42%), upper extremity weakness (24%), and radicular pain (37%). Focal thoracic pain was associated with thoracic level (P

Objective Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a commonly utilized treatment for lumbosacral radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation or stenosis. Although effective in certain patient populations, ESIs have been associated with serious complications, including paralysis and death. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning on the risk of injecting corticosteroids into the epidural space. The aims of this article were to review the neurological complications associated with ESIs and to compare the formulations, safety, and effectiveness of commercially available corticosteroids given by transforaminal (TF), interlaminar (IL) or caudal (C) injection. Methods Serious adverse events associated with ESIs were identified by search of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate and particulate corticosteroid formulations. Results Neurological complications with ESIs were rare and more often associated with the use of particulate corticosteroids administered by transforaminal injection. Among the ten comparative-effectiveness studies reviewed, 7 found nonparticulate steroids had comparable efficacy to particulate steroids, and 3 studies suggested reduced efficacy or shorter duration of effect for nonparticulate steroids. Discussion The risk of complications for transforaminal ESI is greater with particulate corticosteroids. Nonparticulate corticosteroids, which are often recommended as a first line therapy, may have a short duration of effect and many commercial formulations contain neurotoxic preservatives. The safety profile of ESIs may continue to improve with the development of safer, sterile formulations that reduce the risk of complications while maintaining efficacy.

Patients presenting to an outpatient spine clinic frequently report symptoms of low back pain with associated buttock, groin, and lower extremity pain. While many of these individuals suffer from lumbar spine radiculopathy, a number of different orthopedic pathologies can mimic these symptoms. Management depends substantially on a detailed history and physical examination, in addition to working from a broad list of differential diagnoses when evaluating these patients. It is imperative that spine practitioners have a comprehensive understanding of the differential diagnoses that may mimic those originating from the lumbar spine, especially when a patient's symptoms are atypical from classic radicular pain. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary testing and treatment, while delaying an accurate clinical assessment and treatment plan. This review highlights common orthopedic diagnoses that may present similar to lumbar spine pathologies and the evidence-based evaluation of these conditions.

STUDY DESIGN Prospective clinical pilot study and cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the spread of an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks (UGIPBs) and its potential efficacy for cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Cervical radiculopathy is a common disorder, potentially leading to severe pain and disability. Conservative treatment with cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) is limited by concerns regarding their safety. UGIPBs are used in cervical surgical procedures as part of the multimodal postoperative analgesia regimen however, were not described for cervical radiculopathy. METHODS Twelve patients with acute cervical radicular pain who failed conservative treatment and were candidates for surgery were offered a cervical retrolaminar injection. A solution of 4 mL lidocaine 0.5% and 10 mg dexamethasone was injected, assisted by ultrasound guidance, at the posterior aspect of the cervical lamina corresponding to the compressed nerve root level. Additionally, a cadaver study was carried to evaluate the contrast spread and infiltration into near structures, both anatomically and radiographically. RESULTS Twelve patients underwent the procedure, with a mean follow-up time of 14.5 weeks. Average numerical rating scale improved from 7.25 at baseline to 2.83 following the injection (P

Background The frequency with which sensory disturbances occur in patients with radicular leg pain and disc herniation is not well known, and the efficacy of tests to identify such changes are not firmly established. The presence of sensory disturbances is a key sign of nerve root involvement and may contribute to the diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation, identify patients for referral to spinal imaging and surgery, and improve disease classification. Questions/purposes In this study, we sought: (1) to determine the frequency with which abnormal sensory findings occur in patients with lumbar disc herniation-related radicular pain, using a standard neurological sensory examination; (2) to determine what particular standard sensory test or combination of tests is most effective in establishing sensory dysfunction; and (3) to determine whether a more detailed in-depth sensory examination results in more patients being identified as having abnormal sensory findings. Methods Between October 2013 and April 2016, 115 patients aged 18 to 65 years referred to secondary health care with radicular leg pain and disc herniation were considered potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. Based on these inclusion criteria, 79% (91) were found eligible. Ten percent (11) were excluded because of other illness that interfered with the study purpose, 3% (3) because of cauda equina syndrome, 2% (2) because of spinal stenosis, 2% (2) because of prior surgery at the same disc level, and 2% (2) because of poor Norwegian language skills. Three percent (4) of the patients did not want to participate in the study. Of the 91 eligible patients, 56% (51) consented to undergo a comprehensive clinical examination and were used for analysis here. The sample for the purposes of the present study was predetermined at 50. These patients were first examined by a standard procedure, including sensory assessment of light touch, pinprick, vibration, and warmth and cold over the back and legs. Second, an in-depth semiquantitative sensory testing procedure was performed in the main pain area to assess sensory dysfunction and improve the detection of potential positive sensory signs, or sensory gain of function more precisely. Sensory loss was defined as sensations experienced as distinctly reduced in the painful side compared with the contralateral reference side. In contrast, sensory gain was defined as sensations experienced as abnormally strong, unpleasant, or painful and distinctly stronger than the contralateral side. Ambiguous test results were coded as a normal response to avoid inflating the findings. The proportions of abnormal findings were calculated for each sensory modality and for all combinations of the standard examination tests. Results The standard examination identified at least one abnormal finding in 88% (45 of 51) of patients. Sensory loss was present in 80% (41), while sensory gain was present in 35% (18). The combination of pinprick and light touch identified all patients who were classified as having abnormal findings by the full standard examination. The semiquantitative procedure identified an additional three patients with an abnormal finding. Conclusion We suggest that the combination of pinprick and light touch assessment is an adequate minimal approach for diagnostic and classification purposes in patients with lumbar radicular pain. Level of evidence Level I, diagnostic study.

Study design This is a retrospective case review. Objective The objective of this study was to present an anatomic approach to transpsoas interbody fusion without psoas stimulated electromyography (sEMG) and to evaluate the rate of neurological and approach-related complications. Background The transpsoas approaches have become commonly utilized for lumbar interbody fusion and may have certain advantages compared with other methods of interbody stabilization. Traditionally, transpsoas approaches have been performed utilizing sEMG as it has been purported to reduce the risk of injury to the lumbar plexus; however, an anatomic approach to transpsoas surgery is also possible as cadaveric studies have demonstrated the anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus. Methods Patients who underwent transpsoas interbody fusion using an anatomic approach without psoas sEMG between 2005 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. The preoperative and postoperative medical records for this cohort were carefully reviewed to identify any new or persistent radicular symptoms, neurological deficits or approach-related complications. Results A total of 133 patients (48 males, 85 females) underwent transpsoas interbody fusion at 222 levels in this cohort-which had a mean age of 63 (61, 65) years and body mass index of 28.8 (27.8, 29.9). New neurological complications were seen in 5 patients (3.8%) and 5 patients (3.8%) were found to have new postoperative radicular pain, up to 3 months postoperatively. The total number of perioperative, approach-related complications was 7 (5.3%) for the entire cohort. Conclusion An anatomic transpsoas approach to the interbody space without psoas sEMG demonstrated a rate of neurological and approach-related complications that was comparable or superior to the rate of complications reported using the traditional transpsoas approach with sEMG.

BACKGROUND Spinal anesthesia using a surface landmark-guided technique can be challenging in patients with anatomical alterations of the lumbar spine; however, it is unclear whether using ultrasonography can decrease the technical difficulties in these populations. We assessed whether an ultrasound-assisted technique could reduce the number of needle passes required for block success compared with the landmark-guided technique in patients with abnormal spinal anatomy. METHODS Forty-four patients with abnormal spinal anatomy including documented lumbar scoliosis and previous spinal surgery were randomized to receive either surface landmark-guided or preprocedural ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia. All spinal procedures were performed by 1 of 3 experienced anesthesiologists. The primary outcome was the number of needle passes required for successful dural puncture. Secondary outcomes included the success rate on the first pass, total procedure time, periprocedural pain scores, and the incidences of radicular pain, paresthesia, and bloody tap during the neuraxial procedure. Intergroup difference in the primary outcome was assessed for significance using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The median (interquartile range [IQR; range]) number of needle passes was significantly lower in the ultrasound group than in the landmark group (ultrasound 1.5 [1-3 {1-5}]; landmark 6 [2-9.3 {1-15}]; P < .001). First-pass success was achieved in 11 (50.0%) and 2 (9.1%) patients in the ultrasound and landmark groups, respectively (P = .007). The total procedure time, defined as the sum of the time for identifying landmarks and performing spinal anesthesia, did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (ultrasound 141 seconds [115-181 seconds {101-336 seconds}]; landmark 146 seconds [90-295 seconds {53-404 seconds}]; P = .888). The ultrasound group showed lower periprocedural pain scores compared with the landmark group (ultrasound 3.5 [1-5 {0-7}]; landmark 5.5 [3-8 {0-9}]; P = .012). The incidences of complications during the procedure showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS For anesthesiologists with experience in neuraxial ultrasonography, the use of ultrasound significantly reduces the technical difficulties of spinal anesthesia in patients with abnormal spinal anatomy compared with the landmark-guided technique. Our results can lead to practical suggestions that encourage the use of neuraxial ultrasonography for spinal anesthesia in such patients.

Background Presentation of degenerative facet cysts (FC) as radicular pain in patients is well established. The traditional treatment of FCs has been decompressive laminectomy with a medial facetectomy and cyst excision. A major disadvantage of open procedures with medial facetectomy is predisposition to further instability. Objective To describe a contralateral bi-portal endoscopic excision of FC along with minimizing facet joint resection. Methods Thirteen patients between March 2016 and December 2017 were evaluated retrospectively for clinical, radiological, and morphometric outcomes. Patients with complaints of unilateral radiculopathy with associated neurogenic claudication from degenerative lumbar FC were included. Clinical evaluation was by NRS leg pain and ODI scores, radiological evaluation was by MRI. For morphometric analysis, cross-sectional area of facet joint (CSA-FJ) was measured on MRI in square millimeters. Results Thirteen FCs were decompressed (no adverse events) NRS leg pain and ODI improved from 6.85 ± 0.69 and 65.08 ± 7.95 preoperatively to 1 ± 0.91 and 13.46 ± 5.19 at 1-yr follow-up, respectively. CSA-FJ remained relatively well preserved from 212.83 ± 58.05 to 189.77 ± 62.93 post decompression (statistically insignificant, P = .3412). Conclusion Bi-portal endoscopic decompression of FC can be performed with good clinical and radiological outcomes. This surgical technique may be recommended for further evaluation as an addition in the armamentarium of a spine surgeon for treatment of degenerative lumbar FC.

A 79-year-old man anteriorly treated for primary central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with MRI complete response after immunochemotherapy was referred 1 year later for 18FDG PET/CT because of right persistent lombosciatic radicular pain for 6 months with negative medullary and spine MRI and negative cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Linearly intense uptake was observed in several roots of lumbosacral plexus, highly suggestive of peripheral neurolymphomatosis relapse. No specific treatment was engaged because of rapid decrease of performance status leading to death.

Brucellosis, an endemic zoonosis in Portugal, is a multisystem disease, presenting with neurological manifestations in up to 25% of cases. Neurobrucellosis diagnostic criteria include evidence of central nervous system invasion, either by documenting increased blood-brain barrier permeability that normalizes after treatment or by Brucella isolation. We report 2 patients with systemic brucellosis presenting with neurological symptoms: A 28-year-old female with progressive hemiparesis associated with severe refractory thoracic and lumbar pain, whose spinal magnetic resonance imaging identified longitudinally extensive myelitis. Brucella agglutination test was positive in blood; however, cerebrospinal fluid cytochemical, serological testing, and cultures were negative. A 58-year-old male with intermittent fever in the evening, associated with severe refractory cervical and lumbar spinal and radicular pain. Blood workup identified leukocytosis, elevated inflammatory markers and positive Brucella agglutination test. Cerebrospinal fluid presented mild protein increase and negative serological testing and cultures. Electromyogram revealed demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. In both cases, antibiotic therapy induced symptom resolution. Despite the neurological presentation, no evidence of direct nervous system infection was found. An indirect mechanism appears to be involved, such as a parainfectious syndrome or circulating endotoxins release by the bacteria. Brucellosis should be considered in patients presenting with inflammatory neurological symptoms in endemic regions. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are important as chronic infection has significant morbidity.

Giant schwannomas are defined as intradural extramedullary tumors that span >2 vertebral body lengths. Although uncommon, these lesions can cause significant mass effect on the spinal cord and subsequent neurologic compromise. Gross total resection is the goal of operative intervention, however, is extremely challenging in cases where the tumor occupies a ventral, midline position within the lower cervical thecal sac. Using a representative case presentation, we describe an adult male with insidious progression of upper extremity radicular pain and paresthesias, found to have a ventral, solid/cystic C5-C7 giant schwannoma. We demonstrate the step-by-step surgical technique for an anterior approach 2-level cervical corpectomy, microsurgical resection of an intradural giant schwannoma, watertight dural closure, and lastly 360-degrees instrumented stabilization of the cervicothoracic spine. In addition we incorporate the utilization of a portable intraoperative computed tomography for stereotactic localization and 3-dimensional navigation-guided screw implantation. Finally, we discuss various preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative considerations that can have profound impact on successful outcomes.

Using prospectively collected data from their neurosurgical referral center, Dr. Hoeritzauer et al. summarize their observations regarding patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES), with and without imaging confirmation. Among patients in this cohort, 69% lacked radiographic evidence of cauda equina compression and were referred to as “scan-negative” (normal MRI) or “mixed” (root enhancement without cauda compression). History or presence of functional symptoms, along with normal patellar reflexes, more severe pain, and panic attack at presentation were associated with a “scan-negative” condition. It is of interest that disturbances of urine or bowel function were no less common among patients with “scan-negative” CES. Dr. Amelot and colleagues highlight the importance of follow-up and education for patients at risk of CES (e.g., those with pre-existing disk disease). They also suggest that patients with scan-negative CES may be vulnerable to underlying somatization or anxiety over the threat of possible neurologic dysfunction. In response, Dr. Hoeritzauer et al. affirm that even patients with “scan-negative” CES were followed for several years after their initial presentation to evaluate the cause of their symptoms. Furthermore, the investigators maintain the objective of their study was to determine risk factors for “scan-negative” vs “scan-positive” CES, which includes functional neurologic disease, medications, pain, and panic. The investigators have referred clinicians and patients to their fact sheet on “scan-negative” CES for more information. Professor Beucler also emphasizes the clinical presentation of CES typically begins with radicular pain, followed by motor and later bowel or bladder symptoms. Using prospectively collected data from their neurosurgical referral center, Dr. Hoeritzauer et al. summarize their observations regarding patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES), with and without imaging confirmation. Among patients in this cohort, 69% lacked radiographic evidence of cauda equina compression and were referred to as “scan-negative” (normal MRI) or “mixed” (root enhancement without cauda compression). History or presence of functional symptoms, along with normal patellar reflexes, more severe pain, and panic attack at presentation were associated with a “scan-negative” condition. It is of interest that disturbances of urine or bowel function were no less common among patients with “scan-negative” CES. Dr. Amelot and colleagues highlight the importance of follow-up and education for patients at risk of CES (e.g., those with pre-existing disk disease). They also suggest that patients with scan-negative CES may be vulnerable to underlying somatization or anxiety over the threat of possible neurologic dysfunction. In response, Dr. Hoeritzauer et al. affirm that even patients with “scan-negative” CES were followed for several years after their initial presentation to evaluate the cause of their symptoms. Furthermore, the investigators maintain the objective of their study was to determine risk factors for “scan-negative” vs “scan-positive” CES, which includes functional neurologic disease, medications, pain, and panic. The investigators have referred clinicians and patients to their fact sheet on “scan-negative” CES for more information. Professor Beucler also emphasizes the clinical presentation of CES typically begins with radicular pain, followed by motor and later bowel or bladder symptoms.

Rationale: Lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition characterized by excessive overgrowth of extradural fat within the lumbar spinal canal. Surgical decompression is commonly performed to treat symptomatic SELs. Fenestration or laminectomy with epidural fat debulking was a routine surgical procedure according to the literature, that may be causing postoperative lumbar instability. In the present study, we presented a brief report of lumbar SEL and introduced another surgical approach. Patient concerns: A 55-year-old man complained of severe low back pain and right leg radicular pain for a year, accompanied by neurogenic intermittent claudication. He received a variety of conservative treatments, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acupuncture, and physical therapy. However, his pain did not diminish. Finally, a posterior epidural mass in the dorsal spine extending from the L3 to L5 level, which caused dural sac compression was found on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. This mass was homogeneously hyperintense in both T1W1 and T2W1 images, suggestive of epidural fat accumulation. Diagnoses: Lumbar SEL. Interventions: The patient underwent lumbar laminectomy, epidural fat debulking, and spinous process-vertebral plate in situ replantations. Outcomes: The patient presented with complete recovery of radiculopathy and low back pain after surgery. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed that the increased adipose tissue disappeared, and the dural sac compression was relieved. A computed tomography scan revealed the lumbar lamina in situ. He was able to walk normally and remained relatively asymptomatic for 12 months after the operation at the last follow-up visit. Lessons: Lumbar laminotomy and replantation provide an ideal option to treat lumbar SEL because it can achieve sufficient and effective decompression, simultaneously reconstruct the anatomy of the spinal canal, and reduce the risk of iatrogenic lumbar instability.

Lumbar spine synovial cysts develop from degenerated zygapophyseal joints. Symptomatic patients present with radicular pain and weakness or neurogenic claudication.1 In the absence of significant concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis, symptomatic patients can be managed with a laminectomy and microsurgical resection of the cyst, without the need for instrumented fusion.2,3 In this video, we present the microsurgical resection of a left-sided L4-5 synovial cyst in a 68-yr-old man with radicular pain refractory to conservative management. The radiographical features, relevant surgical anatomy, and salient operative steps are reviewed, and strategies for preventing cyst recurrence are emphasized. There were no complications, the postoperative course was unremarkable, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 1 with significant improvement in his presenting symptoms. No identifying information is present, and patient consent was obtained for the procedure and for publishing the material included in this video.

Background The effect of adding alpha lipoic acid (ALA) to pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treatment of lumbar-sacral pain was evaluated. Objective to evaluate the effect of using ALA as an adjuvant therapy with PRF for treatment of chronic lumbosacral radicular pain caused by herniated disc. Methods One hundred twenty patients with lumbo-sacral radicular pain allocated into 2 groups. Group I: treated with PRF at 42°C for 120 seconds. Group II: treated as in group I, plus oral ALA 600 mg (Thiotacid 600 mg, EVA PHARMA, Egypt) three times per day (1800 mg/day) for 3 weeks then 600 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The lumbo-sacral radicular pain evaluated using the numerical rating pain score and Oswestry Disability Index. Results Success rate was significantly higher in group II at 3 and 6 months after intervention. The median values of the numerical rating pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index were significantly lower in group II with no significant difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale. No major complications were reported in both groups. Conclusion The current study supports the use of ALA with PRF on the dorsal root ganglion for treating lumbosacral radicular pain.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with chronic radicular pain, we aimed to evaluate subgroup differences in 1-yr response to transforaminal epidural steroid injection. DESIGN: In this longitudinal cohort study of 100 subjects, 170 transforaminal epidural steroid injections were performed for 1 yr. The sample was stratified by type of disc herniation (protrusion n = 57, extrusion n = 27), by location of disc herniation (central/subarticular n = 60, foraminal n = 24), by grade of nerve root compression (low-grade compression n = 61, high-grade subarticular nerve compression n = 14, high-grade foraminal nerve compression n = 25), and by positive Slump test (n = 67). Treatment response was evaluated by visual analogue scale leg pain and self-reported disability (Oswestry Disability Index). Logistic regression was used to analyze the predictive value of baseline characteristics including the stratified subgroups. RESULTS: High-grade subarticular nerve compression predicted the 1-yr improvement in both visual analogue scale leg pain (P = 0.046) and Oswestry Disability Index (P = 0.027). Low age (P < 0.001), short duration of leg pain (P = 0.015), and central/subarticular disc herniation (P = 0.017) predicted improvement in Oswestry Disability Index. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with one or several transforaminal epidural steroid injections due to chronic lumbar radicular pain, clinical findings failed to predict the 1-yr treatment response. Low age, short duration of leg pain, central/subarticular disc herniation, and high-grade subarticular nerve compression predicted a favorable 1-yr response to transforaminal epidural steroid injection. (Less)

Introduction Dysfunction of the third cranial nerve can result from lesions anywhere along its course between the midbrain and the orbit. Lymphoma is a rare cause of isolated oculomotor nerve palsy (OMP), with only 19 cases reported in the literature. We describe a case of an isolated OMP leading to the diagnosis of disseminated Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Case report A 37-year-old man presented with acute onset diplopia and right ptosis and was found to have a right pupillary sparing OMP. The diagnostic workout was unremarkable, including contrast-enhanced brain and orbital magnetic resonance imaging, MR angiography, exhaustive laboratory tests, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. After a course of high-dose intravenous steroid therapy, the patient recovered almost completely. Three weeks after the discharge, he developed lumbar radicular pain and lower limbs weakness followed by the relapse of the right OMP. A second lumbar puncture revealed the presence of "small monomorphic lymphocytes," consistent with leptomeningeal lymphomatosis. A whole-body positron emission tomography scan disclosed a mediastinal mass, whose histopathologic "starry sky" appearance was pathognomonic for BL. Conclusions Reviewing the literature, we were able to find only 3 cases of OMP as the presenting manifestation of BL, all occurring in patients with predisposing HIV infection.Our case of isolated OMP highlights some "red flags" for a lymphomatous etiology, including young age, a progressive course, a response to high-dose steroid therapy, and relapse upon steroid discontinuation; these cases require a comprehensive evaluation, including repeated cytological cerebrospinal fluid analysis and sensitive imaging techniques to detect a possible primary lesion.

OBJECTIVE Success rates of surgical interventions for lumbar disorders vary significantly depending on multiple factors and, among them, the duration of symptoms. It is not clear whether there is a "cutoff" time when decompression and fusion surgery becomes less effective in the conditions with chronic nerve root compression symptomatology. The main objective of this study was to analyze whether duration of symptoms has any effect on clinical outcomes and primarily resolution of radicular pain symptoms due to degenerative disk disease and stenosis with spondylolisthesis in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS The prospective observational study was performed. Eighty-four patients with radicular symptoms due to degenerative disk disease and stenosis with spondylolisthesis with no previous fusion surgeries and undergoing 1- to 3-level TLIF surgery were enrolled. Fifteen patients (18%) were lost to follow-up and were excluded from this analysis leaving a total of 69 patients. Standardized questionnaires were used to analyze clinical outcomes and were administered preoperatively within 3 months of scheduled surgery, and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. To emphasize the change in clinical outcome scores, the relevant scores were calculated as the ratio of minimal clinically important difference values and change scores. The change scores were calculated by subtracting the postoperative scores from the baseline scores. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship of the duration of symptoms and relevant minimal clinically important difference ratio values while controlling for independent variables. Further, a comparison between 2 groups of patients was performed to analyze the changes of clinical outcomes for the patients who underwent fusion within

A retrospective analysis.To evaluate the association between early postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) and radicular pain.The correlation between postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and postoperative neurological symptoms after lumbar decompression surgery is controversial.This study included 115 patients who underwent lumbar decompression surgery followed by MRI within 7 days postoperatively. There were 46 patients with early postoperative radicular pain, regardless of whether the pain was mild or similar to that before surgery. The intervertebral level with the smallest DCSA was identified on MRI and compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Risk factors for postoperative radicular pain were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. Subanalysis according to absence/presence of a residual suction drain also was performed.Multivariate regression analysis showed that smaller postoperative DCSA was significantly associated with early postoperative radicular pain (per -10 mm; odds ratio, 1.26). The best cutoff value for radicular pain was early postoperative DCSA of 67.7 mm. Even with a cutoff value of70 mm, sensitivity and specificity are 74.3% and 75.0%, respectively. Early postoperative DCSA was significantly larger before suction drain removal than after (119.7±10.1 vs. 93.9±5.4 mm).Smaller DCSA in the early postoperative period was associated with radicular pain after lumbar decompression surgery. The best cutoff value for postoperative radicular pain was 67.7 mm. Absence of a suction drain at the time of early postoperative MRI was related to smaller DCSA.

BACKGROUND Fluoroscopy-guided epidural steroid injection (ESI) commonly is performed to treat radicular pain yet can lead to adverse events if the needle is not advanced with precision. Accurate preoperative assessment of the distance from the skin to the epidural space holds the potential for reducing the risks of adverse effects from ESI. It was hypothesized that the distance from the skin to the epidural space as measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would agree with the distance traveled by a Tuohy needle to reach the epidural space during midline, interlaminar ESI. This study compared the final needle depth measurement at the point of loss of resistance (LOR) from cervical or lumbar ESI to the distance from the skin to the anterior and posterior borders of the epidural space on the associated cervical and lumbar preoperative MRI. METHODS This retrospective chart review analyzed the procedure notes, MRI, and demographic data of patients who received a prone, interlaminar ESI at an outpatient chronic pain clinic between June 1, 2013, and June 1, 2015. The following data were collected: body mass index (BMI), age, sex, intervertebral level of the ESI, and LOR depth. We then measured the distance from the skin surface to the anterior border of the ligamentum flavum (ligamentum flavum depth [LFD]) and dura (dura depth [DD]) on MRI. A total of 335 patients were categorized into the following patient subgroups: age ≥65 years, age

Study design Retrospective review of CT scan. Objective To investigate the accuracy and safety of pedicle screws placed in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. Summary of background data The reported pedicle screws perforation rates for corrective AIS surgery vary widely from 1.2% to 65.0%. Knowledge regarding the safety of pedicle screws in scoliosis surgery is very important in preventing complications. Methods This study investigates the accuracy and safety of pedicle screws placed in 140 AIS patients. CT scans were used to assess the perforations that were classified according to Rao et al (2002): grade 0, grade 1 ( 4 mm). Anterior perforations were classified into grade 0, grade 1 ( 6 mm). Grade 2 and 3 (excluding lateral grade 2 and 3 perforation over thoracic vertebrae) were considered as critical perforations. Results A total of 2020 pedicle screws from 140 patients were analyzed. The overall total perforation rate was 20.3% (410 screws) with 8.2% (166 screws) grade 1, 2.9% (58 screws) grade 2 and 9.2% (186 screws) grade 3 perforations. Majority of the perforations was because of lateral perforation occurring over the thoracic region, as a result of application of extrapedicular screws at this region. When the lateral perforations of the thoracic region were excluded, the perforation rate was 6.4% (129 screws), grade 2, 1.4% (28 screws) and grade 3, 0.8% (16 screws). There were only two symptomatic left medial grade 2 perforations: one screw at T12 presented with postoperative iliac crest numbness and another screw at L2 presented with radicular pain that subsided with conservative treatment. There were six anterior perforations abutting the right lung, four anterior perforations abutting the aorta, two anterior perforations abutting the esophagus, and one abutting the trachea was noted. Conclusion Pedicle screws insertion in AIS has a total perforation rate of 20.3%. After exclusion of lateral thoracic perforations, the overall perforation rate was 8.6% with a critical perforation rate of 2.2% (44/2020). The rate of symptomatic screw perforation leading to radicular symptoms was 0.1%. There was no spinal cord, aortic, esophageal, or lung injuries caused by malpositioned screws in this study. Level of evidence 4.

Study design We prospectively evaluated adjacent disc levels after anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty (ACDA) using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain functional radiographs. Objective ACDA is an established treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of kinematic MRI for assessing the range of motion (ROM) before and after ACDA compared with plain functional radiographs and to evaluate adjacent degenerative disc disease (aDDD) at mid-term follow-up. Summary of background data Twenty patients (12 females, 8 males; median age 45.6 ± 6.9 yrs) treated by ACDA (BryanDisc; Medtronic, MN) underwent plain functional radiography and kinematic MRI of the cervical spine at 3 T before and 6 and 24 months after surgery. Methods A sagittal T2-weighted (T2w) 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence and a 3D T2w dataset with secondary axial reconstruction were acquired. Signal intensity of all nonoperated discs was measured in regions of interest (ROI). Disc heights adjacent to the operated segment were measured. ROM was evaluated and compared with plain functional radiographs. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for head, neck and radicular pain, and the neck disability index (NDI). Results Mean ROM of the cervical spine on functional plain radiographs was 21.25 ± 8.19°, 22.29 ± 4.82°, and 26.0 ± 6.9° preoperatively and at 6-month and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Mean ROM at MRI was 27.1 ± 6.78°, 29.45 ± 9.51°, and 31.95 ± 9.58°, respectively. There was a good correlation between both techniques. Follow-up examinations demonstrated no signs of progressive degenerative disc disease of adjacent levels. All patients had clinical improvement up to 24 months after surgery. Conclusion After ACDA, kinematic MRI allows evaluation of the ROM with excellent correlation to plain functional radiographs. Mid-term follow-up after ACDA is without evidence of progressive DDD of adjacent segments. Level of evidence 3.

Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate, clinically and radiographically, the efficacy of mini-open retroperitoneal anterior lumbar discectomy followed by anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for recurrent lumbar disc herniation following primary posterior instrumentation. Summary of Background Data. Recurrent disc herniation following previous disc surgery occurs in 5 to 15% of cases. This is often treated by further surgical intervention where posterior approach is generally preferred. However, posterior surgery may be problematic if the initial surgery involved posterior instrumentation. An anterior approach may be indicated in these patients, and recent findings suggest that a “mini-open” procedure may have some benefits when compared with traditional open techniques and their associated morbidities. Methods. A total of 35 recurrent lumbar disc herniation patients (10 male, 25 female) following primary posterior instrumentation with an average age of 52.8 years (range: 34–70 yrs) who underwent the mini-open ALIF procedures between August 2001 and February 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. The ALIF was performed at the levels L4-L5 (n = 14), L5-S1 (n = 15), or both L4-L5 and L5-S1 (n = 6). Visual Analog pain Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) together with radiological results were assessed. Results. The mean operating time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were 115 minutes, 70 mL, and 6 days, respectively. No blood transfusion was needed. Transient complication was recorded in two patients. Postoperative follow-up was a minimum 24.3 months. VAS score and ODI percentage decreased significantly from 7.9 ± 0.8 and 78.8% ± 12.4% pre-operatively to 1.4 ± 0.6 and 21.7 ± 4.2% at final follow-up, respectively. There was no neurological worsening and radicular pain improved significantly compared with pre-operation in all the patients. Computed tomographic reconstruction 12 and 24 months after surgery showed bony fusion, normal position, and morphology of the fusion cage in all patients. Conclusion. Mini-open retroperitoneal ALIF is an effective treatment for patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation following primary posterior instrumentation. Conclusion. Level of Evidence: 4

Background Accumulating evidence indicates that spinal inflammatory and immune responses play an important role in the process of radicular pain caused by intervertebral disk herniation. Resolvin D1 (RvD1) has been shown to have potent antiinflammatory and antinociceptive effects. The current study was undertaken to investigate the analgesic effect of RvD1 and its underlying mechanism in rat models of noncompressive lumbar disk herniation. Methods Rat models of noncompressive lumber disk herniation were established, and mechanical thresholds were evaluated using the von Frey test during an observation period of 21 days (n = 8/group). Intrathecal injection of vehicle or RvD1 (10 or 100 ng) was performed for three successive postoperative days. On day 7, the ipsilateral spinal dorsal horns and L5 dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) were removed to assess the expressions of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-10, and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)/p65 and phospho-extracellular signal–regulated kinase (p-ERK) signaling (n = 30/group). Results The application of nucleus pulposus to L5 DRG induced prolonged mechanical allodynia, inhibited the production of IL-10 and TGF-β1, and up-regulated the expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB/p65, and p-ERK in the spinal dorsal horns and DRGs. Intrathecal injection of RvD1 showed a potent analgesic effect, inhibited the up-regulation of TNF-α and IL-1β, increased the release of IL-10 and TGF-β1, and attenuated the expression of NF-κB/p65 and p-ERK in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions The current study showed that RvD1 might alleviate neuropathic pain via regulating inflammatory mediators and NF-κB/p65 and p-ERK pathways. Its antiinflammatory and proresolution properties may offer novel therapeutic approaches for the management of neuropathic pain.

Ten years after placement of a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) and resolution of pain, this patient presented with progressive paraplegia, worsening thoracic radicular pain at the same dermatome level of the electrodes, and bowel and bladder incontinence. Computed tomographic myelogram confirmed thoracic spinal cord central canal stenosis at the level of electrodes. After removal of the fibrotic tissue and electrodes, the patient had resolution of his thoracic radicular pain and a return of his pre-SCS pain and minimal neurologic and functional return. To the authors' knowledge, no studies have been identified with thoracic SCS lead fibrosis in the United States causing permanent paraplegia. Only one other case has been reported in Madrid, Spain. Patients with SCS presenting with loss of pain relief, new-onset radicular or neuropathic pain in same dermatome(s) as SCS electrodes, worsening neuromuscular examination, or new bladder or bowel incontinence need to be evaluated for complications regarding SCS implantation causing spinal stenosis and subsequent cord compression to avoid permanent neurologic deficits.

A microRNA (miRNA) study.The purpose of this study was to identify intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD)-specific miRNAs, followed by functional validation of results.IDD is the major contributor to back radicular pain, and the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease are not completely understood. Accumulating evidence suggests that miRNAs play an important role in IDD, but the role of specific miRNAs involved in this disease remains elusive.An initial screening of nucleus pulposus (NP) tissues, miRNA expression by miRNA microarray, was performed using samples from 10 patients with degenerative disc disease and 10 patients with lumbar fracture (as controls). Subsequently, differential expression was validated using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). The level of differentially expressed miRNAs in degenerative NP tissues was investigated, and then functional analysis of the miRNAs in regulating collagen II expression was carried out. Western blotting and luciferase reporter assays were also used to detect the target gene.We identified 23 miRNAs that were differentially expressed (16 upregulated and 7 downregulated) in patients compared with controls. After qRT-PCR confirmation, miR-27b was significantly downregulated in degenerative NP tissues when compared with controls. Moreover, its level was correlated with grade of disc degeneration. Overexpression of miR-27b promoted type II collagen expression in NP cells. Bioinformatics target prediction identified matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) as a putative target of miR-27b. Futhermore, luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that miR-27b directly targets MMP13 and affects the protein expression of MMP13 in NP cells. Expression of MMP13 negatively correlated with miR-27b expression in degenerative NP tissues.The downregulation of miR-27b induces type II collagen loss by directly targeting MMP13, leading to the development of IDD. Our study also underscores the potential of miR-27b as a novel therapeutic target in human IDD.3.

Background Among patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), approximately 37% show signs of a neuropathic pain component (radicular pain). Treatment of this condition remains challenging. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of CLBP patients with neuropathic leg pain. Methods The study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial. CLBP with a visual analog scale (VAS) score greater than 5 and a neuropathic component that was assessed clinically and by the painDETECT questionnaire (score > 12) were required for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either duloxetine or placebo for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period before they crossed over to the alternate phase that lasted another 4 weeks. Duloxetine was titrated up to 120 mg/day. The primary outcome parameter was mean VAS score during the last week of treatment in each phase (VASweek4). Results Of 41 patients, 21 patients completed both treatment phases. In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 25), VASweek4 was significantly lower in the duloxetine phase compared with placebo (4.1 ± 2.9 vs. 6.0 ± 2.7; P = 0.001), corresponding to an average pain reduction of 32%. The painDETECT score at the end of each treatment phase was significantly lower in the duloxetine phase compared with placebo (17.7 ± 5.7 vs. 21.3 ± 3.6 points; P = 0.0023). Adverse events were distributed equally between the duloxetine (65%) and placebo phases (62%) (P = 0.5). Conclusion In this crossover study, duloxetine proved to be superior to placebo for the treatment of CLBP with a neuropathic leg pain.

Study Design. A systematic review. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sequestrectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Summary of Background Data. Open surgery for LDH can be performed by sequestrectomy (removal of disc fragments) or conventional discectomy (removal of disc fragments and disc). Sequestrectomy might be associated with a higher risk of recurrence but less low back pain (LBP) after surgery. Methods. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1980 to November 2014. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized prospective studies of conventional discectomy versus sequestrectomy for adult patients with LDH that evaluated the following primary outcomes: radicular pain or LBP as measured by a visual analog scale, or neurological deficits of the lower extremity. We also evaluated the following secondary outcomes: complications of surgery, reherniation rate, duration of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic use, and health-related quality-of-life measures. Two authors independently reviewed citations and articles for inclusion. We assessed the risk of bias, synthesized data, and the level evidence using standard methodological procedures as recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. Results. We identified 5 studies (746 participants) of sequestrectomy versus microdiscectomy. One study was RCT and the other 4 were nonrandomized prospective comparisons; all studies were assessed as being at a high risk of bias. There were no significant differences for leg pain, LBP, functional outcomes, complications, and hospital stay or recurrence rate for 2 years (level of evidence: Low). Sequestrectomy was associated with less analgesic consumption versus discectomy (level of evidence: Very low). Conclusion. Sequestrectomy and standard microdiscectomy were associated with similar effects on pain after surgery, recurrence rate, functional outcome, and complications; more evidence is needed to determine whether sequestrectomy is associated with less postoperative analgesic consumption. © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Objective Although the comparative efficacy of particulate vs. nonparticulate steroids for the treatment of radicular pain with transforaminal epidural steroid injection has been investigated, there is minimal literature comparing particulate steroids. The authors aimed to determine whether transforaminal epidural steroid injection with triamcinolone or betamethasone, two particulate corticosteroids, more effectively reduces lumbosacral radicular pain. Design This is a longitudinal cohort study of 1021 patients (1568 transforaminal epidural steroid injections) who received betamethasone or triamcinolone between January 2006 and October 2007 in an academic spine center. The frequency of greater than 50% pain reduction was compared between groups. Results This study included 42.4% (433) male and 57.6% (588) female patients, with a mean (SD) age of 54.1 (16.7) yrs. Betamethasone and triamcinolone were used in 78.8% (1235) and 21.2% (333) of subjects, respectively. Significantly more patients who received triamcinolone (44.4% [95% confidence interval, 36.2%-52.8%]) experienced greater than 50% pain reduction at short-term follow-up (1-4 wks) compared with patients who received betamethasone (26.8% [95% confidence interval, 22.7%-31.4%]). Conclusions Patients who received transforaminal epidural steroid injection with triamcinolone reported more frequent pain relief of greater than 50% at short-term follow-up compared with those who received betamethasone. These findings further develop the literature on comparative effectiveness in epidural steroid injections. However, given the exploratory and retrospective nature of this investigation, further study is needed.

We report a patient who developed a positional headache and pseudomeningocele after multiple lumbar surgeries for low back and radicular pain. An epidural blood patch via a lumbar approach was not feasible as a result of distorted lumbar anatomy after multiple back surgeries. An epidural blood patch was performed via catheter-threaded cephalad from a caudal approach. The patient had immediate relief after the procedure and at 1 year was still symptom-free. This combination technique may be considered as an alternative approach when a percutaneous lumbar epidural blood patch is disadvantageous.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text, Background: Previous systemic reviews have examined the efficacy of individual therapeutic agents, but which type of treatment is superior to another has not been pooled or analyzed. The objective of the current study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of epidural steroid injection (ESI) versus conservative treatment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain. Methods: A systematic search was conducted with MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases with a double-extraction technique for relevant studies published between 2000 and January 10, 2019. The randomized controlled trials which directly compared the efficacy of ESI with conservative treatment in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain were included. Outcomes included visual analog scale, numeric rating scale, Oswetry disability index, or successful events. Two reviewers extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality of papers using the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. A meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.2 software. The heterogeneity of the meta-analysis was also assessed. Results: Of 1071 titles initially identified, 6 randomized controlled trials (249 patients with ESI and 241 patients with conservative treatment) were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The outcome of the pooled analysis showed that ESI was beneficial for pain relief at short-term and intermediate-term follow-up when compared with conservative treatment, but this effect was not maintained at long-term follow-up. Successful event rates were significantly higher in patients who received ESI than in patients who received conservative treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in functional improvement after ESI and conservative treatment at short-term and intermediate-term follow-up. The limitations of this meta-analysis resulted from the variation in types of interventions and small sample size. Conclusions: According to the results of this meta-analysis, the use of ESI is more effective for alleviating lumbosacral radicular pain than conservative treatments in terms of short-term and intermediate-term. Patients also reported more successful outcomes after receiving ESI when compared to conservative treatment. However, this effect was not maintained at long-term follow-up. This meta-analysis will help guide clinicians in making decisions for the treatment of patients with lumbosacral radicular pain, including the use of ESI, particularly in the management of pain at short-term.

In general, in digital infrared thermographic imaging (DITI) of patients with unilateral spinal radicular pain, the thermal pattern of the extremities of the side of lesion shows hypothermia compared to the opposite, intact side. However, sometimes, DITI shows hyperthermia on the side of the lesion, and this variation can cause confusion. We compared the data of both hypothermia and hyperthermia patients to clarify the factors determining different thermal characteristics in spinal radiculopathy. We retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent DITI at a single center. The final cohort (n = 224) was allocated into 2 groups, a hypothermia group (n = 180) or a hyperthermia group (n = 44). We compared the various factors, including demographic factors and symptom-related factors, that might affect the results of DITI. Except the presence of trauma history (13.9% vs 31.8%, odds ratio 2.893, P = .008), no significant intergroup difference was found in baseline demographic factors, including age, gender, diabetes mellitus, spinal level of pathology, and intervention history. Among symptom-related factors, in the hyperthermia group, the symptom duration was shorter (10.64 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.36–13.04] vs 2.10 weeks [95% CI 1.05-3.53], P

This video demonstrates the workflow of a minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) using a portable intraoperative CT (iCT) scanner, (Airo®, Brainlab AG, Feldkirchen, Germany), combined with state-of-the-art total 3D computer navigation. The navigation is used not only for instrumentation but also for intraoperative planning throughout the procedure, inserting the cage, therefore, completely eliminating the need for fluoroscopy. In this video, we present a case of a 72-yr-old female patient with a history of lower back pain, right lower extremity radicular pain and weakness for 2 yr due to L4-L5 spondylolisthesis with instability and severe lumbar spinal stenosis. The patient is treated by a L4-L5 unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) and MIS-TLIF. MIS-TLIF using total 3D navigation significantly improves the workflow of the conventional TLIF procedure. The tailored access to the spine is translated into smaller but more efficient surgical corridors. This modification in a "total navigation" modality minimizes the staff radiation exposure to 0 by navigating in real time over iCT obtained images that can be acquired while the surgical staff is protected or outside the OR. Furthermore, this technique makes real-time and virtual intraoperative imaging of screws and their planned trajectory feasible. 3D Navigation eliminates the need for K-Wires, thus decreasing the risk of vascular penetration injury due to K-Wire malpositioning. 3D navigation can also predict the positioning of the interbody cage, thereby, decreasing the risk of malpositioning or subsidence. Patient consent was obtained prior to performing the procedure.

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis can cause symptomatic neurogenic claudication alongside radicular pain and weakness. In appropriately selected patients, surgical intervention has been demonstrated to provide for improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life. This systematic review sought to define the utility and safety of such decompression with or without arthrodesis in the management of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis for elderly patients older than 65 years of age. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE for literature published through December 2014. The first question focused on the effectiveness of lumbar spinal surgery for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients (over age 65 y). The second question focused on safety of surgical intervention on this elderly population with emphasis on perioperative complication rates. Results: Review of 11 studies reveals that the majority of elderly patients exhibit significant symptomatic improvement, with overall benefits observed for pain (change visual analog scale 4.4 points) and disability (change Oswestry Disability Index 23 points). Review of 11 studies reveals that perioperative complications were infrequent and acceptable with pooled estimates of mortality (0.5%), inadvertent durotomy (5%), and wound infection (2%). Outcomes seem less favorable with greater complication rates among patients with diabetes or obesity. Conclusion: Based on largely low-quality, retrospective evidence, we recommend that elderly patients should not be excluded from surgical intervention for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of gluteal trigger point in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy with that in healthy volunteers. DESIGN In a cross-sectional, multistage sampling method, patients with clinical, electromyographic, and magnetic resonance imaging findings consistent with lumbosacral radiculopathy were examined for the presence of gluteal trigger point. Age- and sex-matched clusters of healthy volunteers were selected as the control group. The primary outcome of the study was the presence or absence of gluteal trigger point in the gluteal region of the patients and the control group. RESULTS Of 441 screened patients, 271 met all the inclusion criteria for lumbosacral radiculopathy and were included in the study. Gluteal trigger point was identified in 207 (76.4%) of the 271 patients with radiculopathy, compared with 3 (1.9%) of 152 healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). The location of gluteal trigger point matched the side of painful radiculopathy in 74.6% of patients with a unilateral radicular pain. There was a significant correlation between the side of the gluteal trigger point and the side of patients' radicular pain (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Although rare in the healthy volunteers, most of the patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy had gluteal trigger point, located at the painful side. Further studies are required to test the hypothesis that specific gluteal trigger point therapy could be beneficial in these patients.

Background: Epidural corticosteroid injections are a common treatment for radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and other disorders. Although rare, catastrophic neurologic injuries, including stroke and spinal cord injury, have occurred with these injections. Methods: A collaboration was undertaken between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safe Use Initiative, an expert multidisciplinary working group, and 13 specialty stakeholder societies. The goal of this collaboration was to review the existing evidence regarding neurologic complications associated with epidural corticosteroid injections and produce consensus procedural clinical considerations aimed at enhancing the safety of these injections. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safe Use Initiative representatives helped convene and facilitate meetings without actively participating in the deliberations or decision-making process. Results: Seventeen clinical considerations aimed at improving safety were produced by the stakeholder societies. Specific clinical considerations for performing transforaminal and interlaminar injections, including the use of nonparticulate steroid, anatomic considerations, and use of radiographic guidance are given along with the existing scientific evidence for each clinical consideration. Conclusion: Adherence to specific recommended practices when performing epidural corticosteroid injections should lead to a reduction in the incidence of neurologic injuries.

Study design Retrospective clinical study. Objective To evaluate the effect of the limitation of flexion rotation clinically and radiologically after interspinous soft stabilization using a tension band system in grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. Summary of background data Although several studies have been published on the clinical effects of limiting rotatory motion using tension band systems, which mainly targets the limitation of flexion rather than that of extension, they were confined to the category of pedicle screw-based systems, revealing inconsistent long-term outcomes. Methods Sixty-one patients with a mean age of 60.6 years (range, 28-76 yr) who underwent interspinous soft stabilization after decompression for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis between 2002 and 2004 were analyzed. At follow-up, the patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of their achievement or failure to achieve flexion limitation. The clinical and radiological findings were analyzed. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors for surgical outcomes. Results At a mean follow-up duration of 72.5 months (range, 61-82 mo), 51 patients were classified into the flexion-limited group and 10 into the flexion-unlimited group. Statistically significant improvements were noted only in the flexion-limited group in all clinical scores. In the flexion-unlimited group, there were significant deteriorations in flexion angle (P = 0.009), axial thickness of the ligamentum flavum (P = 0.013), and the foraminal cross-sectional area (P = 0.011), resulting in significant intergroup differences. The preoperative extension angle was identified as the most influential variable for the flexion limitation and the clinical outcomes. Conclusion The effects of the limitation of flexion rotation achieved through interspinous soft stabilization using a tension band system after decompression were related to the prevention of late recurrent stenosis and resultant radicular pain caused by flexion instability. The extension potential at the index level was recognized as a major prognostic factor that can predict the flexion limitation and the clinical results. Level of evidence 4.

Background:Less than 50% of patients experience sufficient pain relief with current drug therapy for neuropathic pain. Minocycline shows promising results in rodent models of neuropathic pain but was not studied in humans with regard to the treatment of neuropathic pain.Methods:In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with subacute lumbar radicular pain received placebo, amitriptyline 25 mg, or minocycline 100 mg once a day (n = 20 per group) for 14 days. Primary outcome measure was the pain intensity in the leg as measured by a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10 on days 7 and 14. Secondary outcome measures were the reduction of neuropathic pain symptoms in the leg as determined with a neuropathic pain questionnaire, consumption of rescue medication, and adverse events on days 7 and 14.Results:Sixty patients were randomized and included in an intention-to-treat analysis. After 14 days, patients in the minocycline and amitriptyline groups reported a reduction of 1.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–2.83; P = 0.035) and 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.05–2.78; P = 0.043), respectively, in the numeric rating scale compared to the placebo group. No differences were seen in the neuropathic pain questionnaire values at any time point during treatment between the three groups. The rate of adverse events in the amitriptyline group was 10% versus none in the minocycline and placebo groups. No differences were noted in the consumption of rescue medication.Conclusions:Although both groups differed from placebo, their effect size was small and therefore not likely to be clinically meaningful.

Background Intraspinal tumors are rare central nervous system neoplasms. The reported clinical features of intraspinal tumors have varied in previous studies. We present here the cases of 184 patients with intraspinal tumors treated surgically in our hospital and a review of the literature. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 184 patients with intraspinal tumors who underwent surgical treatment in our institution between 2002 and 2013. Their age, sex, initial presentation, tumor location, level of affected vertebral column, histological diagnosis, and primary origin of the metastatic tumor were reviewed and analyzed. Results Of these 184 patients, 97 (52.7%) were men and 87 (47.3%) were women. The mean age was 56.3 years (range 7–83 years). A total of 102 (55.4%) had primary tumors, while 82 (44.6%) patients had developed metastatic tumors. The histological diagnosis of the primary tumors included 55 (53.9%) schwannomas, 16 (15.7%) meningiomas, six (5.9%) ependymomas, five (4.9%) neurofibromas, three (2.9%) hemangiomas, two (2.0%) hemagioblastomas, and 15 (14.7%) other tumor types. The most common primary sites of the metastatic tumors were the lung and breast. Conclusion Primary tumors were more numerous than metastastic tumors in our series of patients. For the primary tumors, our study showed a higher proportion of nerve sheath cell tumors (schwannomas and neurofibromas) and fewer meningiomas and neuroepithelial tumors compared with reports from non-Asian countries. In addition, the lung was the most common origin of the metastatic tumors and more than half of these tumors were located at the thoracic spine. Back pain and radicular pain were the most common presentations in patients with intraspinal tumors.

Background: Cervical radicular pain is a major cause of disability. No studies have been published comparing different types of nonsurgical therapy. Methods: A comparative-effectiveness study was performed in 169 patients with cervical radicular pain less than 4 yr in duration. Participants received nortriptyline and/or gabapentin plus physical therapies, up to three cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) or combination treatment over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was average arm pain on a 0 to 10 scale at 1 month. Results: One-month arm pain scores were 3.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in the combination group, 4.2 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in ESI patients, and 4.3 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in individuals treated conservatively (P = 0.26). Combination group patients experienced a mean reduction of −3.1 (95% CI, −3.8 to −2.3) in average arm pain at 1 month versus −1.8 (CI, −2.5 to −1.2) in the conservative group and −2.0 (CI, −2.7 to −1.3) in ESI patients (P = 0.035). For neck pain, a mean reduction of −2.2 (95% CI, −3.0 to −1.5) was noted in combination patients versus −1.2 (CI, −1.9 to −0.5) in conservative group patients and −1.1 (CI, −1.8 to −0.4) in those who received ESI; P = 0.064). Three-month posttreatment, 56.9% of patients treated with combination therapy experienced a positive outcome versus 26.8% in the conservative group and 36.7% in ESI patients (P = 0.006). Conclusions: For the primary outcome measure, no significant differences were found between treatments, although combination therapy provided better improvement than stand-alone treatment on some measures. Whereas these results suggest an interdisciplinary approach to neck pain may improve outcomes, confirmatory studies are needed.

Study design Retrospective case series and literature review. Objective To describe our experience in diagnosis and management of patients with spine brown tumor (osteitis fibrosa cystica) as the initial manifestation of primary hyperparathyroidism and also to review the pertinent literature. Summary of background data The spine can be involved through reparative processes such as giant cell reparative granuloma and brown tumor, which lead to formation of lesions that can simulate tumors on neuroimaging. Brown tumor, an uncommon focal giant cell lesion, is a nonneoplastic and reactive process due to bone resorption and localized osseous lesion caused by primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism. Methods Among the cases of spine giant cell lesions treated surgically by the authors (2000-2013), there were 4 cases of spine brown tumor in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical, radiological, histopathologic, and surgical data of these 4 cases were collected, and the patients were followed from 5 to 7 years after the surgical intervention. Results There were 2 male and 2 female patients with age range of 16 to 52 years. The lesions were located in cervical (1 case), thoracic (1 case), and lumbar (2 cases) spine regions. Clinical presentations included neck and low back pain, radicular pain, paraparesis, and sphincter dysfunction. Surgical removal of the spine lesions was achieved in all cases. Spine fusion and instrumentation was done in 3 cases. Parathyroidectomy was performed in all 4 cases. Conclusion Spine involvement with brown tumor in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism is rare and may be the first manifestation of hyperparathyroidism. Brown tumor should be differentiated from other giant cell lesions involving the spine. Long-term surgical outcome was satisfactory with no recurrence. Level of evidence 4.

Study Design. Immunohistochemical and behavioral study using the SPARC (secreted protein, acidic, rich in cysteine)-null mouse model of low back pain (LBP) associated with accelerated intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Objective. To determine if behavioral signs of LBP in SPARC-null mice are accompanied by sensory nervous system plasticity. Summary of Background Data. IVD pathology is a significant contributor to chronic LBP. In humans and rodents, decreased expression of SPARC is associated with IVD degeneration. We previously reported that SPARC-null mice exhibit age-dependent behavioral signs of chronic axial LBP and radiating leg pain. Methods. SPARC-null and age-matched control young, middle-aged, and old mice (1.5, 6, and 24 mo of age, respectively) were evaluated. Cutaneous hind paw sensitivity to cold, heat, and mechanical stimuli were evaluated as measures of radiating pain. The grip force and tail suspension assays were performed to evaluate axial LBP. Motor impairment was assessed using an accelerating rotarod. IVD innervation was identified by immunohistochemistry targeting the nerve fiber marker PGP9.5 and the sensory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Sensory nervous system plasticity was evaluated by quantification of CGRP- and neuropeptide-Y-immunoreactivity (-ir) in dorsal root ganglia neurons and CGRP-ir, GFAP-ir (astrocyte marker), and Iba-1-ir (microglia marker) in the spinal cord. Results. SPARC-null mice developed hypersensitivity to cold, axial discomfort, age-dependent motor impairment, age-dependent increases in sensory innervation in and around the IVDs, age-dependent upregulation of CGRP and neuropeptide-Y in dorsal root ganglia, and age-dependent upregulation of CGRP, microglia, and astrocytes in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Conclusion. Increased innervation of degenerating IVDs by sensory nerve fibers and the neuroplasticity in sensory neurons and spinal cord could contribute to the underlying pathobiology of chronic discogenic LBP. Conclusion. Level of Evidence: N/A

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without clear indications led to a cascade of subsequent diagnostic and invasive services, which occurred within 6 months after imaging. Early MRI was significantly associated with a large and sustained escalation in medical costs, even after grouping by severity and controlling for pain and demographic covariates., Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To compare type, timing, and longitudinal medical costs incurred after adherent versus nonadherent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for work-related low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Guidelines advise against MRI for acute uncomplicated low back pain, but is an option for persistent radicular pain after a trial of conservative care. Yet, MRI has become frequent and often nonadherent. Few studies have documented the nature and impact of medical services (including type and timing) initiated by nonadherent MRI. Methods. A longitudinal, workers' compensation administrative data source was accessed to select low back pain claims filed between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006. Cases were grouped by MRI timing (early, timely, no MRI) and subgrouped by severity (“less severe,” “more severe”) (final cohort = 3022). Health care utilization for each subgroup was evaluated at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-MRI. Multivariate logistic regression models examined risk of receiving subsequent diagnostic studies and/or treatments, adjusting for pain indicators and demographic covariates. Results. The adjusted relative risks for MRI group cases to receive electromyography, nerve conduction testing, advanced imaging, injections, and surgery within 6 months post-MRI risks in the range from 6.5 (95% CI: 2.20–19.09) to 54.9 (95% CI: 22.12–136.21) times the rate for the referent group (no MRI less severe). The timely and early MRI less severe subgroups had similar adjusted relative risks to receive most services. The early MRI more severe subgroup cases had generally higher adjusted relative risks than timely MRI more severe subgroup cases. Medical costs for both early MRI subgroups were highest and increased the most over time. Conclusion. The impact of nonadherent MRI includes a wide variety of expensive and potentially unnecessary services, and occurs relatively soon post-MRI. Study results provide evidence to promote provider and patient conversations to help patients choose care that is based on evidence, free from harm, less costly, and truly necessary. Level of Evidence: N/A

Lumbar foraminal stenosis is known as one of the many causes for low back pain. Patients with foraminal stenosis initially may show variable degrees of leg pain and back pain.1 In general, 5%–10% of the patients with low-back pain are estimated to have radiculopathy. Radiculopathy is a relatively common problem that affects approximately 5 to 22 of every 1,000 people on an annual basis. 2,3 Surgical treatment of radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis has become more prevalent, including lumbar fusion and correction of lumbar spinal alignment with lumbar foraminal decompression. Spivak et al.4 and Kaneko et al.5 reported relationships between the foraminal geometry and radicular pain in their spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis studies, respectively, highlighting the importance of accurate and proper knowledge of the foraminal geometry in order to improve the diagnosis and planning of the treatment in radiculopathy cases. The geometry of the lumbar foramen has been described as an oval, round, or inverted teardrop-shaped “window” in the lateral aspect of the lumbar spine.6 The anatomic boundaries of the foramen consist of the adjacent vertebral pedicles superiorly and inferiorly, the postero-inferior margin of the superior vertebral body, the intervertebral disc, the postero-superior vertebral notch of the inferior vertebral body anteriorly, and the ligamentum flavum and superior and inferior articular facets posteriorly.7 Although foraminal morphology, especially with regard to stenotic changes of the foramen, has been investigated in the literature,8–12 there is no agreement as to what constitutes a normal lumbar foramen, and much less how the foraminal dimensions vary with spinal level, gender or age. One of the reasons for such variability in measurements is inherently tied to the equally large assortment of available methods to determine the foraminal geometry. One way to obtain relatively accurate and repeatable geometric measurements is through the use of cadaver spines. Cadaveric studies allow three dimensional (3D) measurement of the foraminal geometry; however, there are inherent limitations of the cadaveric study such as lack of muscle tone which may affect foraminal geometry by altering the lumbar lordosis and the compression forces acting on the motion segment. To mitigate this lack of obvious physiological experimental conditions, researchers have turned to in vivo measurements using various clinically-available imaging techniques. This approach constitutes a true translational research, although still affected by some limitations. Namely, the attempt to characterize a 3D feature using planar images. Although MRI and CT can visualize the internal aspect of the musculoskeletal system, in everyday clinical setting, radiologists and clinicians only have access to 2D information. Even with reformatted and re-oriented planes, these measurements do not guarantee that the position and orientation of the selected planes are optimal for the measurement of foraminal dimensions. Recent 3D imaging techniques and analysis methods have allowed various anatomical in vivo measurements in true 3D using subject-based 3D image-based models. 13–16, These techniques would be especially beneficial to measure the foraminal geometry due to its complex 3D geometry. Taking advantage of the methodology developed by our laboratory, the purpose of the present study was to measure the lumbar foraminal 3D dimensions in vivo using subject-based 3D CT models.