Search

Ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has improved organ preservation and viability assessment among heart, liver, and lung transplantation. However, literature regarding the application of NMP in human clinical kidney transplantation remains limited. Numerous kidneys, especially from donors with stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI), are not utilized concerning the high rate of delayed graft function (DGF) and primary nonfunction. The present study investigated the impact of NMP (135-150 min) on short-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from deceased donors with AKI.Graft outcomes of NMP kidneys were compared with contralateral kidneys stored in static cold storage (SCS) from the same donor with AKI during December 2019-June 2021. The study's primary aim is to assess the safety and feasibility of NMP in deceased donors with AKI. The primary outcome was DGF. Secondary outcomes were duration of DGF, biopsy-proven rejection, postoperative intrarenal resistive index, postoperative infections, hospital stay duration, primary nonfunction, and kidney function estimated glomerular filtrate rate at discharge, 3 mo, and 1 y.Five pairs of AKI kidneys (NMP versus SCS) were included in the final analysis. The results show no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between NMP versus SCS kidneys; however, NMP kidneys demonstrated slightly improved estimated glomerular filtrate rate at 3 mo (59.8 ± 5.93 [59] versus 75.20 ± 14.94 [74]) mL/min/1.73 mNMPs of AKI donor kidneys are safe and feasible. A larger cohort is required to explore the reconditioning effect of NMP on AKI kidneys.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) converted a retroperitoneal (RP) procedure into a transperitoneal (TP) operation with reports of bowel and solid organ injuries leading to mortality in occasional cases. Laparoscopic RP donor nephrectomy can reduce these risks but never became popular because of the muscle cutting approach. Lumbotomy incision can be used to approach retroperitoneum by incising fascial planes, eliminating disadvantages of the RP approach. This report compares the outcomes of the standard multiport TP LDN with translumbar laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN).Between January 2016 and June 2017, 50 voluntary kidney donors out of 267 donors were randomized to undergo LESS-DN vs LDN. Donors with body mass index ≥30 kg/mThe RP group experienced lesser pain (VAS score 0.3 ± 0.3 vs 1.1 ± 0.0, p = 0.000), lesser analgesic requirement (186 ± 51.07 mg vs 254 ± 62.7 mg, p = 0.000), and faster convalescence (7.0 ± 3.0 days vs 10.7 ± 3.3 days, p = 0.00) related to smaller cumulative incision (7.8 ± 0.8 cm vs12.4 ± 2.0 cm, p = 0.00), and had reduced operative time (142 ± 26.2 minutes vs 170.8 ± 34.75 minutes, p = 0.001) and blood loss. Other recorded parameters were similar in both the groups.The single port RP approach significantly reduced postoperative pain and hastened recovery when compared with the TP approach. Converting to a RP approach presents an opportunity for surgeons to further reduce morbidity associated with the donor nephrectomy.