1. Lung Transplantation as a Therapeutic Option in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Author
-
Sae Hoon Choi, Sang-Bum Hong, Tae Sun Shim, Hyung Ryul Kim, In-Cheol Choi, Seung-Il Park, Sang-Oh Lee, Kyung-Hyun Do, Dong Kwan Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, and Youjin Chang
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,ARDS ,Time Factors ,Waiting Lists ,Seoul ,Health Status ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Clinical Decision-Making ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Severity of Illness Index ,03 medical and health sciences ,Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Interquartile range ,Internal medicine ,Severity of illness ,medicine ,Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ,Humans ,Lung transplantation ,Intensive care medicine ,Survival rate ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Mechanical ventilation ,Respiratory Distress Syndrome ,Transplantation ,business.industry ,Patient Selection ,Retrospective cohort study ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Respiration, Artificial ,Treatment Outcome ,030228 respiratory system ,Female ,business ,Lung Transplantation - Abstract
Background Lung transplantation (LTPL) is considered as a salvage therapeutic option in patients with end-stage lung disease. However, there is a lack of sufficient data on the use of LTPL in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although there are few case reports on lung transplant for ARDS, no case series exists up to date. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with ARDS in accordance with the LTPL status. Methods Patients who had severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 100 mm Hg with positive end-expiratory pressure ≥ 5 cm H2O) and were listed for LTPL with no underlying end-stage lung disease were included in this single-center retrospective study. Demographic and clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed. Results Fourteen patients were listed for LTPL due to severe ARDS. All patients received mechanical ventilation, and 12 (86%) patients underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of the 9 patients who underwent LTPL, 8 (89%) survived, whereas only 1 (20%) patient out of those who did not receive LTPL survived. The median survival time of the patients who underwent LTPL was 1996 days (interquartile range [IQR], 872-2239), compared with 49 days (IQR, 872-2239) in patients who did not undergo LTPL. The median survival time after LTPL was 64 months (IQR, 28-72). The 3-year survival rate of the recipients was 78%. Conclusions LTPL may be considered as a therapeutic option in a select group of patients with severe ARDS. However, the irreversibility of the patient's lung status should be considered.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF