Search

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: Physiological assessment with pressure wire pullback can characterize coronary artery disease (CAD) with a focal or diffuse pattern. However, the clinical relevance of this distinction is unknown. We use data from the ORBITA trial (Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation With Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina) to test if the pattern of CAD predicts the placebo-controlled efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on stress echocardiography ischemia and symptom end points. Methods: One hundred sixty-four patients in ORBITA underwent blinded instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) pullback assessment before randomization. Focal disease was defined as a ≥0.03 iFR unit drop within 15 mm, rather than over a longer distance. Analyses were performed using regression modeling. Results: In the PCI arm (n=85), 48 were focal and 37 were diffuse. In the placebo arm (n=79), 35 were focal and 44 were diffuse. Focal stenoses were associated with significantly lower fractional flow reserve (FFR) and iFR values than diffusely diseased vessels (mean FFR and iFR, focal 0.60±0.15 and 0.65±0.24, diffuse 0.78±0.10 and 0.88±0.08, respectively, P

Introduction: Atrial arrhythmia (AA) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) frequently co-exist, which loom as burgeoning public health problems. It is difficult to determine whether a tachycardia is the indicator or consequence of LVSD in patients with tachycardia and LVSD. Tachycardia mediated cardiomyopathy (TCM) raises a “chicken or egg” question. Regardless of the etiology, the patients with severe LVSD are considered as the candidate for the implantation of cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention. It is well known that the LVSD improves after the successful treatment of AA in TCM population. However, enlarged left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDd) is considered as a parameter of irreversible LVSD. Hypothesis: Enlarged LVDd could not be a predictor for irreversible LVSD in patients with AA. Methods: We assessed patients with persistent AA and heart failure (Ejection Fraction (EF) Results: Twenty-five patients with persistent AA and LVSD (23 men; mean age 63.8±9.3 years) were enrolled in this study. After restored and maintained SR, EF and left ventricular end-systolic volume (ESV) and BNP were improved in all patients respectively (EF 30.7±10.7 to 54.0±7.3%, ESV; 82.1±32.4 to 50.6±24.1ml, BNP; 379.2±237.9 to 48.0±29.7pg/ml P60mm were observed in 5 patients (25%) before the treatment. EF was normalized in patients with severe LVSD (EF Conclusions: The unnecessary device implantation could be avoided in patients with AA and severe LVSD with aggressive rhythm control therapy. Even in the patients with severe LVSD and enlarged LVDd, LVSD is reversible when AA exists.

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) disagree on the hemodynamic significance of a coronary lesion in ≈20% of cases. It is unknown whether the physiological pattern of disease is an influencing factor for this. This study assessed whether the physiological pattern of coronary artery disease influences discordance between FFR and iFR measurement. Methods and Results: Three-hundred and sixty intermediate coronary lesions (345 patients; mean age, 64.4±10.3 years; 76% men) with combined FFR, iFR, and iFR pressure-wire pullback were included for analysis from an international multicenter registry. Cut points for hemodynamic significance were FFR ≤0.80 and iFR ≤0.89, respectively. Lesions were classified into FFR+/iFR+ (n=154; 42.7%), FFR−/iFR+ (n=38; 10.6%), FFR+/iFR− (n=41; 11.4%), and FFR−/iFR− (n=127; 35.3%) groups. The physiological pattern of disease was classified according to the iFR pullback recordings as predominantly physiologically focal (n=171; 47.5%) or predominantly physiologically diffuse (n=189; 52.5%). Median FFR and iFR were 0.80 (interquartile range, 0.75–0.85) and 0.89 (interquartile range, 0.86–0.92), respectively. FFR disagreed with iFR in 22% (79 of 360). The physiological pattern of disease was the only influencing factor relating to FFR/iFR discordance: predominantly physiologically focal was significantly associated with FFR+/iFR− (58.5% [24 of 41]), and predominantly physiologically diffuse was significantly associated with FFR−/iFR+ (81.6% [31 of 38]; P Conclusions: The physiological pattern of coronary artery disease was an important influencing factor for FFR/iFR discordance.

Background: This study assesses clinical outcomes after drug-eluting balloon treatment for recurrent in-stent restenosis lesions based on the number of metallic layers. Methods and Results: We enrolled 304 consecutive patients (333 lesions) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis lesions between March 2014 and June 2015. Per the number of stent layers previously implanted to the lesion, the patients were categorized into 3 groups, 1 stent layer (1L), 166 patients; 2 stent layers (2L), 87 patients; and ≥3 stent layers (≥3L), 51 patients. The end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis. No significant differences were observed in patients’ baseline characteristics among the groups. The 1-year MACE and target lesion revascularization rates were significantly higher in the ≥3L group than those in the 1L and 2L groups (MACE: 1L, 16.9%; 2L, 16.1%; and ≥3L, 43.1%, P P P P =0.02]) were independent predictors for MACE. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of cardiac death among the groups ( P =0.34). Conclusions: Seemingly, drug-eluting balloon is less effective for ≥3L in-stent restenosis lesions. Hemodialysis and in-stent restenosis with the number of metallic layers are independent predictors for MACE.