Search

The extent of medical student unwellness is well documented. Learner distress may impact patient care, workforce adequacy, and learners' performance and personal health. The authors describe the philosophy, structure, and content of the novel REACH (Recognize, Empathize, Allow, Care, Hold each other up) curriculum and provide a preliminary evaluation.The REACH curriculum is a mandatory, longitudinal well-being curriculum for first- and second-year medical students at the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) designed to prepare them for the emotional life of being a physician. The curriculum uses a framework, core concepts, and skills from the field of trauma stewardship. It builds on effective medical student well-being interventions (e.g., mindfulness-based training) and the sharing of personal stories by instructors during didactic and small-group sessions that are integrated into the regular MCW curriculum. During the first 2 years of implementation (2018-2019 and 2019-2020), the curriculum was evaluated using mid- and postcurriculum student surveys.Over 700 students have completed the REACH curriculum as of March 2022. Overall, most students who responded to the surveys in 2018-2020 reported that they felt the REACH curriculum material was important, that the curriculum met their expectations for a quality medical school course, and that they would recommend other schools incorporate a similar curriculum. Respondents to the 2019-2020 postcurriculum survey indicated the REACH curriculum helped them develop self-care (84% [85/101]), mindfulness (76% [76/101]), and help-seeking (71% [72/101]) skills.The initial outcomes show that integrating a mandatory well-being curriculum is feasible and acceptable to medical students. The authors plan to examine the relationships between student-reported well-being metrics, academic and clinical performance data, and professional identity formation. They are also prototyping electronic dashboards that will allow students to interact with their well-being data to promote timely help-seeking and behavior change.

To prepare to develop a medical school curriculum on substance abuse disorders (SADs), the authors conducted a review of the quality of the sparse published literature.The authors searched MEDLINE (1950 through December 2008) using OVID, PsycINFO, and PubMed to identify all studies of SAD interventions targeted toward undergraduate medical students. Of the 1,084 studies identified initially, 31 reported sufficient data to allow the authors to evaluate quality using Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) scores. The authors also determined the impact of the studies by considering three-year citation rate and journal impact factor. A detailed review of the literature provided data on contact hours and intervention content.The three-rater intraclass correlation coefficient for total MERSQI score was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.90). The mean MERSQI score was 10.42 of a possible 18 (SD 2.59; range: 6.33-14.83). MERSQI scores were higher for more recently published studies and correlated with three-year citation rate but not impact factor. The mean contact time for 26 studies was 29.25 hours (range: 0.83-200 hours).The literature provides a variety of educational methods to train medical students in SAD detection and intervention skills. This literature is of variable quality and provides limited guidance for development of curricula and medical education policy. Better methods of curriculum evaluation and publication guidelines would help ensure that this literature has a positive impact on educational practice and public health.

Researchers lack the rich evidence base and benchmark patient outcomes needed to evaluate the effectiveness of medical education practice and guide policy. The authors offer a framework for medical education research that focuses on physician-influenced patient outcomes that are potentially sensitive to medical education. Adapting the concept of ambulatory care sensitive conditions, which provided traction to health services research by defining benchmark patient outcomes to measure health system performance, the authors introduce the concept and propose the adoption of educationally sensitive patient outcomes and suggest two measures: patient activation and clinical microsystem activation. They assert that the ultimate goal of medical education is to ensure that measurement of future physicians' competence and skills is based not only on biomedical knowledge and critical clinical skills but also on the ability to translate these competencies into effective patient- and systems-level outcomes. The authors consider methodological approaches and challenges to measuring such outcomes and argue for large, multiinstitutional, prospective cohort studies and the development of a national Database for Research in Education in Academic Medicine to provide the needed infrastructure. They advocate taking the next steps to establish an educational evidence base to guide the academic medical centers of the 21st century in aligning medical education practice with health care delivery that meets the needs of individuals and populations.

Gastroenterology (GI) training programs must develop the teaching skills of their faculty and provide feedback to their fellows. Many faculty feel uncomfortable offering feedback or identifying specific areas for improvement to the fellows. We developed an Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) to assess fellows' skills and provided faculty with specific criteria to rate the fellows' performance. We propose that OSCEs can serve as tools for faculty development in delivering effective feedback.Faculty completed a Web-based training module and received written guidelines on giving feedback. Four OSCE stations were completed by each fellow with faculty using standardized checklists to assess the fellows' skills. Afterwards, faculty rated each program component and assessed their comfort level with feedback.Eight faculty members and 10 fellows from 5 GI training programs in NYC participated. 100% of the faculty agreed that feedback is an important learning tool, should include the learner's self-assessment, and that feedback skills could improve with practice. Compared to faculty skills prior to the program, 87.5% of the faculty agreed that they focused more on specific behaviors and 75% agreed that giving negative feedback was now easier.OSCEs can serve as practicums for faculty development in giving constructive feedback.

There has been much debate in the medical education literature regarding the extent to which feature-driven and nonanalytic (similarity-based) reasoning strategies define expertise, but the relative value of teaching these strategies, together or in isolation, remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy achieved upon receiving instruction to use each strategy in isolation to that of a combined approach.In 2003-04, 48 undergraduate psychology students from McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, were taught to diagnose ten cardiac disorders (including normal) via electrocardiogram (ECG) presentation. Twelve students were instructed to carefully identify all features present before assigning a diagnosis (feature first). Twelve were given the same instruction with notice that some test ECGs had been seen during training (implicit combined). Twelve were simply instructed to trust familiarity and diagnose based on this impression (similarity-based). Finally, 12 students were given feature first and similarity-based instructions in combination (explicit combined).No difference in diagnostic accuracy was observed between the groups given the feature first (42%) and first impression (41%) instructions (p.4), but the groups instructed to use both strategies (explicitly or implicitly) performed significantly better (56% and 53%, respectively; p.01).The results support an additive model of clinical reasoning in which instructions to be feature oriented and to trust similarity improve performance in novice diagnosticians.