Search

Study design Diagnostic study. Objective To assess the construct validity of the flip test as a sign of nerve root tension. Summary of background data The flip test is commonly performed in patients with sciatica to confirm or otherwise nerve root tension evidenced by a restricted supine straight leg raise (SLR). Passive extension of the knee with the patient in the erect position and the hip flexed is reported to cause a sudden falling or flipping back of the trunk. Although widely known there are no research articles validating this test. Methods Sixty-seven patients with sciatica and magnetic resonance imaging scans confirming disc protrusion and nerve root compression underwent the flip test. The response of the patient was recorded, compared with the supine SLR, and subjected to statistical analysis. Results Thirty-three percent of patients felt no pain, 39% felt pain on full extension of the knee, and 28% resisted full extension of the knee due to pain. Only one-third of patients demonstrated a "flip." The response was related to the supine SLR, such that patients with high SLRs tended not to show a painful reaction whereas all patients with a supine SLR below 45 degrees showed a painful response. Conclusion We consider that the flip test has been substantially misinterpreted in the past. However, it remains a useful check of nerve root tension but only for patients with supine SLRs below 45 degrees . The most reliable response was not a flip but the demonstration of pain on extension of the knee. We would recommend the term "sitting SLR test," as a more accurate and less misleading name.

Study design A 2-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model of an intervertebral segment was used to investigate the stress patterns in the adjacent vertebrae of fused spinal segment incorporating 4 common cage designs. The same was used to study the effect of maturation of bone graft on stress distribution pattern. Objectives To study and compare the stress distribution patterns in a normal spinal segment and in the adjacent vertebrae of a fused spinal segment. The effect of bone graft incorporation around the mesh cage was also investigated. Summary of background data Lumbar fusion surgery is thought to relieve discogenic low back pain by eliminating the abnormal intersegmental movement at the level of disc degeneration. Successful spinal fusion does not guarantee symptomatic pain relief. Discogenic pain is also known to be associated with an abnormal load transmission pattern across the degenerate disc. We hypothesized that the lumbar interbody fusion results in relief of discogenic pain by normalizing the load distribution pattern. Methods We used a 2-dimensional axisymmetric finite element model of an intervertebral segment to investigate the stress patterns in the vertebrae adjacent to a fused spinal segment incorporating 4 common cage designs: (1) anterior lumbar interbody fusion, (2) posterior lumbar interbody fusion rectangular, (3) posterior lumbar interbody fusion threaded, and (4) mesh cage. Results High stress concentrations and abnormal overall stress patterns were noted for all the cage designs studied. The anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with its larger contact area showed the least abnormal stress magnitude in comparison with the other cages. Incorporation of bone in and around the mesh cage increased the area of contact and decreased the abnormal high stresses. The spine fusion model representing final bony healing showed restoration of near physiologic stress pattern. Conclusions Interbody fusion cages with larger area of contact between cage and vertebral endplate produces a lower stress distribution pattern. A successful bony fusion restores near physiologic stress distribution pattern. Restoration of near normal load distribution pattern may become an important aim of surgery for discogenic low back pain.