Search

Study design Matched case-control study. Objective To identify factors other than a multilevel procedure that increase the risk of symptomatic postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH). Summary of background data Postoperative SEH is a potentially devastating complication of spinal surgery. Previous studies that reported risk factors for postoperative SEH all identified a multilevel procedure as a risk factor, but the other risk factors remain unclear. Methods Patients who developed postoperative SEH requiring surgical evacuation were identified from database. Each patient was matched with 3 controls who underwent spinal decompression at the same number of levels in the same part of the spine by the same surgeon during the preceding or following year. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for postoperative SEH to obtain adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Clinical outcomes after evacuation were investigated separately divided with or without severe paralysis or time until the second surgery. Results Postoperative SEH evacuation was performed after 32 of 8250 (0.39%) spinal decompression procedures. The incidence was significantly higher after thoracic procedures (2.41%) than after cervical (0.21%) or lumbar (0.39%) procedures. Multivariate analysis identified a 50 mm Hg or greater increase in systolic blood pressure after extubation (adjusted odds ratio: 3.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-8.51) and higher body mass index (adjusted odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.31) as risk factors. Among 14 patients with severe paralysis due to postoperative SEH, those who underwent evacuation within 24 hours of the onset had a significantly better improvement in clinical outcome and Frankel grade than did those after 24 hours. Conclusion A 50 mm Hg or greater increase in systolic blood pressure after extubation and high body mass index were identified as risk factors for SEH. Appropriate blood pressure control especially at the end of surgery is important for the prevention of postoperative SEH, particularly in obese patients. Level of evidence 3.

Study design A retrospective, age- and sex-matched radiographic study. Objectives To investigate the spinopelvic alignment in patients with osteoarthosis of the hip (HOA) and those with low back pain (LBP) and to determine the characteristics and differences in both groups. Summary of background data Hip-spine syndrome, first described by Offierski and MacNab, is quite an important pathology when treating patients with pain in their low back and lower extremities. However, despite it being a well-known entity, few papers have adequately investigated and assessed the spinopelvic alignment in patients with hip-spine syndrome. Methods Sagittal and coronal spinopelvic alignments were investigated in 150 patients with HOA and 150 with LBP using radiographs of the whole spine in both anteroposterior and lateral views. Parameters measured in this study were lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the shift of the sagittal C7 plumb line, pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT) on the lateral radiographs. On the anteroposterior (AP) films, lumbar scoliosis, pelvic obliquity, leg length discrepancy, the shift of the coronal C7 plumb line, and Sharp angle were measured. These parameters were compared between the two groups. In patients with HOA, the relationships between Sharp angle and other parameters were also analyzed to clarify the possible influence of sagittal and coronal spinopelvic alignments on HOA without acetabular dysplasia. Results LL, SS, PI, and PO were found to be less in patients with LBP compared with those with HOA, and there was no significant difference in LS between the two groups. PI was significantly greater in HOA patients and strongly correlated to PT, SS, and LL (i.e., as the PI increased so did the PT, SS, and LL). Sharp angles were also significantly greater in HOA patients and strongly correlated to age, LL and SS (i.e., as Sharp angles increased so did LL and SS); however, age decreased in the hip patients. Conclusions These findings suggest that higher PI in the younger individual may contribute to the development of HOA in later life without both lumbar kyphosis and acetabular dysplasia because of the anterior uncovering of the acetabulum. More investigation will be expected to analyze the spinopelvic alignment in patients with hip spine syndrome.

Although the cervical pedicle screw system is considered the most effective instrumentation for posterior cervical spine surgery, reports on clinical application are limited because of the unresolved and inherent risk of neurovascular complications. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of placement and clinical effectiveness of the cervical pedicle screw. The cases of 26 patients were investigated. The average followup was 20 months. All but one patient had simultaneous decompression and fusion of various extent. In these cases, screw placement, alignment of the fused segment, fusion rate, neurologic improvement, and complications were assessed. Using an image intensifier, 134 screws were inserted. Five screws (3.7%) completely perforated and 10 (7.4%) partially perforated. The complete perforations occurred in the first 10 patients. Except for two patients with metastasis, bony union was obtained in all patients without loss of correction. Neurologic impairment also was improved in all patients, and no complications associated with the cervical pedicle screw were seen. Clinical results of the cervical pedicle screw system were excellent with few complications. However, there is the possibility of screw perforation, which could cause neurovascular complications. Increased accuracy of screw insertion is needed to make this instrumentation safer.