1. The Effects of Oral Energy-Dense Supplements on Nutritional Status in Nondiabetic Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
- Author
-
Yan Huang, Yanhuan He, Huiqin Tao, Yaozhong Kong, Xianhui Qin, Min Liang, Qijun Wan, Aiqun Liu, Qi Wang, Yaya Yang, Junzhi Chen, Youbao Li, Zihan Lei, and Zizhen Lin
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Transplantation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,030109 nutrition & dietetics ,Epidemiology ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Nutritional status ,Maintenance hemodialysis ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Confidence interval ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Quality of life ,Nephrology ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Hemodialysis ,Adverse effect ,business ,Dialysis - Abstract
Background and objectives Fat-based energy-dense nutritional supplements may offer benefits over protein- or carbohydrate-dense supplements for patients receiving dialysis because of the adverse metabolic consequences of the latter. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of the short-term use of a fat-based nutritional supplement on various measures of nutritional status in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who have low dietary energy intake. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We enrolled nondiabetic patients receiving hemodialysis for >3 months who had inadequate dietary energy intake ( Results The average age of the total population was 47 (SD: 12) years, and 55% were men. The median of dialysis vintage was 43.4 (22.5–76.3) months; 240 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=120) or control group (n=120). In total, 228 (95%) participants completed the trial. The change in phase angle did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups (estimate, 0.0; 95% confidence interval, −0.1 to 0.1 versus estimate, 0.0; 95% confidence interval, −0.1 to 0.1; estimated difference, 0.0; 95% confidence interval −0.2 to 0.2; P=0.99). None of the 19 domains of quality of life differed between the groups. Adverse events were reported in 23 (19%) participants in the control group and 40 (33%) participants in the intervention group. Conclusions In nondiabetic patients on maintenance hemodialysis, short-term administration of fat-based energy-dense nutritional supplement has no clinically significant effect on nutritional status as measured by phase angle. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_08_03_CJN16821020.mp3
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF