Search

Your search keyword '"Andrew M M Reeves"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Andrew M M Reeves" Publisher oxford univ press
2 results on '"Andrew M M Reeves"'

1. The GOGREEN and GCLASS surveys: first data release

Author

Jeffrey C. C. Chan, Melinda Townsend, Heath Shipley, Laura C. Parker, Allison Noble, Kevin C. Cooke, Pascale Jablonka, Caelan Golledge, Julie Nantais, Grayson C. Petter, Michael L. Balogh, Gabriella De Lucia, P. Cerulo, Kristi Webb, Dennis Zaritsky, Callum Bellhouse, C. Valotto, M. Victoria Alonso, Sean L. McGee, Alexis Finoguenov, Kevin Boak, Ricardo Demarco, Ben Forrest, Benedetta Vulcani, Lyndsay Old, Michael C. Cooper, Irene Pintos-Castro, Stephen Gwyn, Diego Lambas Garcia, Sean P. Fillingham, Gregory Rudnick, Bianca M. Poggianti, Nicole E. Drakos, David G. Gilbank, Gillian Wilson, Hernán Muriel, Tracy Webb, Howard K. C. Yee, Andrea Biviano, Karen McNab, Remco F. J. van der Burg, Chris Lidman, Jasleen Matharu, Adam Muzzin, Anna Davidson, Andrew M. M. Reeves, and Department of Physics

Subjects
galaxies: clusters, Stellar mass, galaxy redshift survey, geec2 spectroscopic survey, FOS: Physical sciences, quiescent galaxies, Astrophysics, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, Spectral line, similar-to 1, Photometry (optics), 0103 physical sciences, red-sequence, Astrophysics::Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, Spectroscopy, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics, Physics, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Star formation, formation history, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 115 Astronomy, Space science, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Galaxy, Redshift, velocity dispersions, Space and Planetary Science, star-formation rates, Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA), distant cluster survey, Halo, stellar mass, galaxies: evolution
Abstract

We present the first public data release of the GOGREEN and GCLASS surveys of galaxies in dense environments, spanning a redshift range $0.8, Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS Sept 28, 2020

2. The GOGREEN survey: the environmental dependence of the star-forming galaxy main sequence at 1.0 < z < 1.5

Author

Allison Noble, Lyndsay Old, Gillian Wilson, Ben Forrest, David G. Gilbank, Michael C. Cooper, Irene Pintos-Castro, Howard K. C. Yee, Ricardo Demarco, Bianca M. Poggianti, Michael L. Balogh, Gabriella De Lucia, Sean L. McGee, Benedetta Vulcani, Andrew M. M. Reeves, Julie Nantais, Chris Lidman, Heath Shipley, Adam Muzzin, Pascale Jablonka, Ian G. McCarthy, Andrea Biviano, Kristi Webb, Remco F. J. van der Burg, Egidijus Kukstas, P. Cerulo, Dennis Zaritsky, Jeffrey C. C. Chan, Gregory Rudnick, ITA, USA, and GBR

Subjects
redshift survey, Stellar mass, density environments, Population, quiescent galaxies, Astrophysics, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, similar-to 1, quenching time-scales, 0103 physical sciences, Cluster (physics), spherical systems, education, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Galaxy cluster, QC, Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics, QB, Physics, education.field_of_study, Field galaxy, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Star formation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, formation histories, Redshift, Galaxy, velocity dispersions, Space and Planetary Science, galaxies: clusters: general, digital sky survey, galaxies: evolution, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, spectroscopic confirmation
Abstract

We present results on the environmental dependence of the star-forming galaxy main sequence in 11 galaxy cluster fields at $1.0 < z < 1.5$ from the Gemini Observations of Galaxies in Rich Early Environments Survey (GOGREEN) survey. We use a homogeneously selected sample of field and cluster galaxies whose membership is derived from dynamical analysis. Using [OII]-derived star formation rates (SFRs), we find that cluster galaxies have suppressed SFRs at fixed stellar mass in comparison to their field counterparts by a factor of 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1 ($\sim3.3\sigma$) across the stellar mass range: $9.0 < \log(M_{*} /M_{\odot}) < 11.2$. We also find that this modest suppression in the cluster galaxy star-forming main sequence is mass and redshift dependent: the difference between cluster and field increases towards lower stellar masses and lower redshift. When comparing the distribution of cluster and field galaxy SFRs to the star-forming main sequence, we find an overall shift towards lower SFRs in the cluster population, and note the absence of a tail of high SFR galaxies as seen in the field. Given this observed suppression in the cluster galaxy star-forming main sequence, we explore the implications for several scenarios such as formation time differences between cluster and field galaxies, and environmentally-induced star formation quenching and associated timescales., Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS on February 25 2020, appended erratum accepted in MNRAS on September 17 2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results