Search

Stimulation of the subiculum/CA1 of the hippocampal formation evokes monosynaptic field potentials in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). High-frequency stimulation of the hippocampus (HPC) can induce long-term potentiation (LTP) in this hippocampo-prefrontal cortical (hippo-PFC) pathway. Previous studies have shown that dopamine and serotonin modulate hippo-PFC LTP. Here, we investigated whether the locus coeruleus (LC) and noradrenaline (NA) can modulate LTP in the rat hippo-PFC pathway. Stimulation of the LC in combination with stimulation of the HPC increased hippo-PFC LTP. Infusion of lidocaine into the LC reduced hippo-PFC LTP. Administration of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, nisoxetine or the alpha2 adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan prior to high-frequency stimulation of the HPC enhanced hippo-LTP. In contrast, administration of clonidine, an alpha2 adrenoceptor agonist, impaired hippo-PFC LTP. Partial noradrenergic (NAergic) lesioning with DSP-4 also impaired hippo-PFC LTP. In conclusion, the LC and NAergic mechanisms modulate hippo-PFC LTP.

The retention constant (R(0)(m)) is determined for 11 selected adrenergic and imidazoline receptor ligands by reverse-phase-thin layer chromatography. It is established that the retention behavior of investigated compounds mostly depends on geometrical, electrostatic, and hydrogen bonding properties. Good correlations among hydrophobic parameters R(0)(m) versus log P for all eleven tested compounds are obtained. The satisfactory correlations are found between R(0)(m) versus apparent partition coefficient octanol-buffer pH 7.4 (log P') or apparent partition coefficient in four liposome systems (log K'(M)) and hypotensive activity (pC(25)) for five imidazolines. The results confirm the suitability of this parameter in quantitative structure-property and structure-activity relationships studies of these drugs.

Although alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are widely used for analgesia, anxiolysis, sedation, sympatholysis and as anaesthetic-adjuncts for many years, their potential use as neuroprotectants has so far been confined to laboratory experiments. Despite the large body of evidence from both in vivo and in vitro studies, their exact neuroprotective mechanisms remain elusive. Herein, we review the available literature pertaining to the neuroprotective effect of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and the possible biochemical and physiological cascades involved in their mechanisms of action. The remarkable safety profile of alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and their high potency of neuroprotection should prompt clinical trials to evaluate their neuroprotective efficacy in humans.

Clonidine (2-[(2,6-dichlorophenyl)amino]-2-imidazoline), an imidazoline alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, is known to exert complex effects on human platelet aggregation distinct from those of the catecholamines, which are non-imidazoline alpha-adrenoceptor agonists. This study has investigated the aggregatory/anti-aggregatory effects of various imidazolines on human platelets. Blood samples were taken from normal volunteers and platelet aggregation was assessed by a turbidimetric method using a Chronolog aggregometer. Noradrenaline (2 microM) and adenosine diphosphate (1 microM) were used as aggregating agents. The results showed that, with the exception of moxonidine, all of the imidazoline agents used (with or without alpha(2)-adrenoceptor activity) were able to inhibit noradrenaline-induced platelet aggregation. Compared with the non-imidazoline alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist, yohimbine, the rank order of potency was: efaroxan (IC50 = 3.07 x 10(-8) M) > idazoxan (IC50 = 1.74 x 10(-7) M) > tolazoline (IC50 = 3.90 x 10(-7) M) > clonidine (IC50 = 1.49 x 10(-6) M) congruent with antazoline (IC50 = 1.77 x 10(-6) M) > yohimbine (IC50 = 3.19 x 10(-6) M) > rilmenidine (IC50 = 1.27 x 10(-5) M) > moxonidine (IC50 > 10(-4) M). Clonidine-displacing substance (CDS), a putative endogenous ligand at imidazoline receptors, was found to inhibit noradrenaline-induced platelet aggregation. Harmane, norharmane and agmatine, putative candidates for the active principle of CDS, had no effect on noradrenaline-induced platelet aggregation. In contrast to noradrenaline-induced aggregation, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was neither potentiated nor inhibited by the imidazoline agents, with the exceptions of clonidine and moxonidine. In conclusion, most imidazoline agents effectively inhibit noradrenaline-induced human platelet aggregation. The lack of effect of moxonidine and the proposed endogenous ligands suggested this effect was mediated by an 'atypical' non-adrenoceptor imidazoline-binding site. The results indicated an anti-aggregatory role of imidazoline compounds on noradrenaline-induced human platelet aggregation. In addition, CDS might be an endogenous modulator that prevented platelet hyper-reactivity to catecholamine stimulation.

The beta 3-adrenergic receptor is the predominant subtype of beta-adrenergic receptor expressed in adipose tissue. Recently, a naturally occurring mutation in the human beta 3-receptor gene has been described which results in substitution of the tryptophan residue at position 64 in the first intracellular loop with an arginine residue. The polymorphism, which is prevalent in the human population, has been associated with increases in some parameters of obesity and Type II diabetes. In order to characterize the pharmacological effects of this amino acid substitution, the W64R mutation was made in the human beta 3 receptor gene and the resulting mutant receptor expressed in CHO cells. Activation by various agonists showed no significant differences (t-test, P > 0.05) between the wild type and mutant receptors. These studies show that, when expressed in a heterologous system, the W64R mutant receptor is pharmacologically and functionally indistinguishable from the wild type beta 3-adrenergic receptor.

Molecular dynamics simulations of the hamster alpha 1B-adrenergic and the rat m3-muscarinic seven-helix bundle receptor models have been carried out. The free, agonist-bound and antagonist-bound forms have been considered. Moreover, three mutant forms of the m3-muscarinic receptor (N507-->A, N507-->D and N507-->S) have also been simulated; among these, the N507-->S mutant shows a constitutive activity. A comparative structural/dynamics analysis has been performed to elucidate (i) the perturbations induced by the functionally different ligands upon binding to their target receptor, (ii) the features of the three single-point mutants with respect to the receptor wild type and (iii) the properties shared by the agonist-bound forms of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor and the m3-muscarinic receptor and by the constitutively active mutant N507-->S. The consistency obtained between the structural rearrangement of the transmembrane seven-helix bundle models considered, and the experimental pharmacological efficacies of the ligands and of the mutants, constitute an important validation of the 3-D models obtained and allow the inference of the mechanism of ligand- or mutation-induced receptor activation at the molecular level.

Rilmenidine is an oxazoline derivative with antihypertensive activity which was developed to enhance the dissociation between the hypotensive and adverse effect profile of centrally acting agents. Experimental studies have indicated that rilmenidine is selective for both alpha 2-adrenoceptors (v alpha 1) and newly discovered nonadrenergic imidazoline receptors in the brain and in the periphery. In experimental studies, rilmenidine differs from clonidine in that it is more selective for imidazoline receptors than for alpha 2-adrenoceptors; at equihypotensive doses, rilmenidine causes less bradycardia and reduction in cardiac output, less sedation, and little or no antinociceptive action compared to clonidine. The hypotensive effects of rilmenidine are antagonised by idazoxan and yohimbine, but idazoxan (imidazoline structure) is six times more potent than yohimbine (a selective alpha 2-antagonist). In isolated renal proximal tubule cells, where imidazoline binding has also been shown, rilmenidine inhibits reabsorption of sodium. Clinical studies comparing 1 mg rilmenidine with placebo demonstrated significant reductions in blood pressure (BP) (61% rilmenidine v 23% placebo normalized to 160/90 mm Hg). The reduction in BP was not associated with classical alpha 2 side effects such as dry mouth or daytime drowsiness. Compared with clonidine (0.15 to 0.3 mg), equihypotensive doses of rilmenidine (1 to 2 mg) induced two to three times less dry mouth, daytime drowsiness, and constipation; no orthostatic hypotension was reported. Methyldopa (0.5 to 1 mg) v rilmenidine (1 to 2 mg) indicated a comparable reduction of BP with significantly less weakness, drowsiness, orthostatic dizziness, and dry mouth on rilmenidine; there was no evidence of the "clonidine withdrawal syndrome" on drug withdrawal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rilmenidine (RIL) is a novel antihypertensive drug selectively acting at the sites of imidazoline receptors. Compared with diuretics, beta-blockers, Ca2+ antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, the four major groups recommended by the US Joint National Committee as first-line antihypertensive drugs, RIL appears to meet the same criteria of efficacy, safety, and acceptability. Rilmenidine dose-dependently decreases blood pressure (BP), acting as a vasodilator by decreasing vascular resistance through inhibition of the adrenergic nervous system, even while the BP changes due to standing and exercise. In comparison with placebo, RIL significantly decreased BP. In double-blind comparative trials versus first-line diuretics and beta-blockers, RIL normalized BP in approximately 60% patients, showing a similar efficacy to other drugs. In contrast with hydrochlorothiazide, RIL decreased total cholesterol and did not change plasma potassium levels. No tachyphylaxis was observed during long-term treatment. Central side effects, which have contributed to the limitation of the use of alpha 2-agonists as second- or third-line therapy for hypertension, were significantly less frequent with RIL than with clonidine or methyldopa. Indeed, the incidence of dry mouth and drowsiness during double-blind comparative trials versus clonidine and methyldopa was significantly lower with RIL. This absence of central side-effects was confirmed in double-blind comparative trials versus hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol. In contrast with clonidine, no sodium retention or weight gain were observed during chronic treatment with RIL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The binding of [3H]rilmenidine to membranes of rat cerebral cortex was studied in order to ascertain which receptor populations this novel antihypertensive interacts with in the cortex. A catecholamine-sensitive, alpha 2-adrenoceptor binding site was identified which represented up to 50% of specific, 2 nmol/L [3H]rilmenidine binding and was displaceable by the catecholamines in the rank order epinephrine----norepinephrine----dopamine----isoproterenol. Some imidazolines such as clonidine, naphazoline, and idazoxan and the guanidino compound guanabenz completely and potently inhibited [3H]rilmenidine binding from both catecholamine-sensitive and -insensitive sites. The substituted imidazole and guanidine, cimetidine, and amiloride, respectively, showed no affinity for [3H]rilmenidine binding. The pharmacologic profile of the catecholamine-insensitive [3H]rilmenidine site in rat cerebral cortex suggests it may be novel, as it has the features of an imidazoline-guanidino-oxazoline binding site. However, its identity requires further characterization.

The impact of photoperiodic manipulations and testosterone treatments on the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenergic (alpha 2-AR), beta-adrenergic (beta-AR), and A1-adenosine (A1-R) responsiveness, was explored in male Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Moreover, binding studies were performed with appropriate alpha 2-AR, beta-AR, and A1-R radioligands to study receptor changes. Animals were kept for 12 weeks in long day photoperiod (LD: 16 h light (L)-8 h dark (D)), in short day photoperiod (SD: 6L-18D), or in short photoperiod with testosterone treatments (1 mg/animal/day sc) 10 days before sacrifice (SD+T). The antilipolytic effect of the full alpha 2-AR agonist UK14304 and the specific binding of the alpha 2-AR radioligands [3H] RX821002 (antagonist) and [3H]UK14304 were significantly reduced in SD hamsters compared with LD hamsters. The alpha 2-site number and alpha 2-AR responsiveness were completely restored in SD+T hamsters. Whatever the experimental conditions the adipocyte beta-AR receptivity (lipolytic response of isoproterenol and [125I]cyanopindolol binding), and the A1-R receptivity (antilipolytic response initiated by (-)phenylisopropyladenosine and [3H]dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine and [3H]phenylisopropyladenosine binding) remained unchanged. Moreover, the kidney and brain alpha 2-AR densities identified with [3H]RX821002 were not significantly different in LD, SD or SD+T hamsters. These results were obtained without any modification of animal weight, white adipose tissue weight, or white fat cell size. We conclude that, in the Syrian hamster, the expression of the adipocyte alpha 2-AR is under the control of the photoperiod by a testosterone-dependent mechanism probably mediated through the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, without any alteration of the animal fat stores.

It is questioned whether alterations of the sympathetic nervous system can explain the specific increment of the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor observed during white adipose tissue (WAT) enlargement and fat cell size increment. The impact of a 6-hydroxydopamine-induced sympathectomy, validated by determination of the WAT norepinephrine content, was tested on isolated white fat cell alpha 2-adrenoceptor function and binding [( 3H]RX 821002 and [3H]UK 14304 binding). Chemical sympathectomy of standard adult hamsters, neither alters the alpha 2-adrenergic-dependent antilipolysis nor the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenergic binding. A slight hypersensitivity of the beta 1-adrenergic lipolytic response was observed, without modification in beta-adrenergic binding [( 125I]cyanopindolol binding). Compared with controls, caloric restriction (10 days) of adult hamsters induced a large decrease in adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor (P less than 0.001) with a parallel decrement in the mean fat cell size (P less than 0.001) and alpha 2-adrenergic responsiveness while there was no significant variation of the WAT norepinephrine content (on a per pad basis). 6-Hydroxydopamine treatment of the restricted animals (from day 6 to day 9) induced a higher preservation of adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor density (P less than 0.001), no change in alpha 2-adrenergic responsiveness, and higher preservation of mean fat cell size (P less than 0.05) than in the restricted only animals. No significant modification in the beta-adrenergic binding was observed whatever the conditions. It was concluded that the specific increment in the adipocyte alpha 2-adrenoceptor during fat mass enlargement was not directly dependent on sympathetic nervous system alterations. Nevertheless, the sympathetic-dependent mobilization of the fat stores, after induction of caloric restriction, can indirectly modulate the alpha 2-adrenoceptor density in the adipocyte by promoting changes in white fat cell size.

It has recently been shown that imidazoline alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, such as clonidine and UK 14,304, selectively bind to both alpha 2- and imidazoline receptors in basolateral membranes from rabbit renal proximal tubule. In order to define the relative affinity of three antihypertensive alpha 2-agonists for the two classes of receptors, we performed competition studies of imidazoline alpha 2-antagonist 3H-RX 781094 and nonimidazoline antagonist 3H-rauwolscine binding to basolateral membranes from rabbit proximal tubule. The order of potency for inhibition of radioligand binding to basolateral membranes was rilmenidine greater than clonidine greater than guanfacine and clonidine greater than guanfacine greater than rilmenidine for 3H-RX 781094 and 3H-rauwolscine binding, respectively. These data show that not only clonidine, but also rilmenidine and guanfacine, drugs usually used as specific alpha 2-agonists, bind to both alpha 2- and imidazoline receptors. The higher affinity of these molecules for one or the other class of receptors could explain their different capacity to induce hypotension and side effects.

To characterize the agonist profile of alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists (imidazoline-like drugs, azoloazepine derivatives, beta-phenethylamines-like drugs) on human platelets, the characteristics of alpha 2-adrenoceptors (KD, Bmax) have been evaluated and the affinity constants measured by displacement technique and computer-assisted analysis of the curves. Furthermore, since alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists interact with the post-synaptic receptors in a calcium-operated channel, whether the effect of calcium-entry inhibitors (verapamil, nifedipine, diltiazem) is related to a competition with alpha 2-receptors has also been examined. By Scatchard analysis, it was calculated that in human platelets alpha 2-adrenoceptors have KD = 3.45 nM and Bmax = 247 fmol (mg protein)-1. As far as the potency is concerned, imidazoline-like drugs were the most potent agonists in human platelet alpha 2-adrenoceptors (guanabenz IC50 = 8.6 +/- 0.8 X 10(-8), B-HT 920 IC50 = 2.9 +/- 0.3 X 10(-7), (-)-adrenaline IC50 = 3.4 +/- 0.5 X 10(-7)). Among the calcium-entry inhibitors only verapamil antagonized [3H]rauwolscine binding: the effect was stereospecific, (-)-D 600 being more potent than (+)-D 600. Nifedipine and diltiazem did not affect alpha 2-receptor binding. It is concluded that human platelets alpha 2-receptors share the agonist potency profile of other tissues containing alpha 2-receptors (brain, pre-synaptic junction), and that among calcium-entry blockers only verapamil can antagonize alpha 2-agonists. Nifedipine and diltiazem do not appear to interact stereospecifically with alpha 2-adrenoceptors.