Search

Competing Interests: None declared.

Background: We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis., Methods: A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy., Results: Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93-1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018)., Conclusions: Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01898338., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) have been reported in clinical trials. However, real-life data are scarce. This study presents data on the use, efficacy and safety of SO in real clinical practice., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentre study, without any influence on the prescription decisions, that included 220 patients from 11 Spanish centres. Demographic, treatment, analytical and nutritional parameters and adherence, side effects and dropout rates were collected during 6 months., Results: SO was initiated due to inadequate control of serum phosphate (P) in 70% of participants and in 24.5% to reduce the number of tablets. Monotherapy with SO increased from 44% to 74.1%, with a reduction in the average daily number of sachets/tablets from six to two. Serum P decreased by 20% (4.6 ± 1.2 versus 5.8 ± 1.3 mg/dL; P < 0.001), with a significant reduction in intact parathyroid hormone levels (P < 0.01). The percentage of patients with adequate serum P control at threshold levels of 5 and 4.5 mg/dL increased by 45.4% and 35.9%, respectively. Serum ferritin was not modified, while the transferrin saturation index increased significantly (P = 0.04). Serum albumin and normalized protein catabolic rate, when normalized by serum P, increased, averaging 37% and 39%, respectively (P < 0.001). Adherent patients increased from 28.2% to 52.7%. Adverse effects were reported by 14.1% of participants, with abandonment of treatment in 9.5%., Conclusions: The use of SO in real-life results in better control of serum P, a reduction in the number of tablets and an improvement in therapeutic adherence. In addition, it may be beneficial with regards to secondary hyperparathyroidism and nutritional status., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.)

Background: In dialysis patients, non-adherence to oral cinacalcet adds complexity to the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism. The present study aims to evaluate the use of intravenous calcimimetic, etelcalcetide, in the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients adherent and non-adherent to oral calcimimetics., Method: The Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire was used to identify non-adherence. Almost half of the patients were non-adherent to the treatment with cinacalcet. Twenty-five patients (15 non-adherent) were switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide and were followed-up monthly for 8 months., Results: Cinacalcet was discontinued for 1 week before the initiation of etelcalcetide. After this period, the serum PTH levels increased by2-fold in adherent patients, whereas it did not change in non-adherent patients suggesting that they were not taking the medication. Etelcalcetide progressively reduced serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) (mean ± standard deviation) from 818 ± 395 to 367 ± 289 pg/mL (P   <   0.001) in non-adherents, and from 496 ± 172 to 228 ± 111 pg/mL (P   <   0.01) in adherent patients with a mean dose of 7.0 ± 2.3 and 5.1 ± 1.2 mg in non-adherent and in adherent patients, respectively. Etelcalcetide increased the percentage of patients with PTH on target from 28% to 58%. Patients with serum calcium <8.4 mg/dL increased from 8% to 40%, although they remained asymptomatic. The percent of patients with serum phosphate on target increased from 40% to 65%., Conclusion: The lack of adherence to cinacalcet is a possible cause of the apparent lack of response to oral calcimimetic. The use of etelcalcetide ensures compliance and control of secondary hyperparathyroidism in both non-adherent and adherent patients., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.)

Context: Cinacalcet induces immediate changes in serum PTH levels, but the pharmacodynamic effect throughout the daily dosing interval in controlled patients is unknown. Also, in patients with reduced PTH, it is unknown what happens in the first 24 hours after withdrawal., Objective: Our aim was to describe the effect over 48 hours of cinacalcet in hemodialysis patients with controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism., Design: This was a phase 4, open-label, single-arm, single-dose, single-center clinical trial., Setting: The study was conducted at a public hospital (Hospital Perpetuo Socorro, Alicante, Spain)., Patients: We included 10 patients on cinacalcet for 6 months or longer with intact PTH (iPTH) levels 100-400 pg/mL [8 men, mean age of 66 years (range 39-82 years)], chronically treated with 30 mg (n = 6), 60 mg (n = 3), or 90 mg (n = 1) of cinacalcet., Intervention: A single dose (30-90 mg) was administered at baseline., Main Outcome Measures: iPTH (Duo Kit Scantibodies and Elecsys Roche), PTH 1-84, ionized calcium, phosphorus (P), and calcitonin were determined at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours., Results: There was a significant reduction in iPTH between 1 and 6 hours, and values returned to baseline at 24 hours [maximum mean (95% confidence interval) percent change from baseline: -50%(-34; -66) at 3 hours]. A transient increase in calcitonin and a decrease in P were also observed, with no changes in calcium. At 48 hours, there was a significant increase in iPTH [+51% (26; 76)] and P. Changes in PTH were similar with the 3 determination methods., Conclusions: In hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism controlled by cinacalcet, a transient (1-6 hours) reduction in PTH and P and an increase in calcitonin are observed after each daily dose, with return to baseline at 24 hours. After calcimimetics discontinuation, PTH was significantly increased at 48 hours. The assay used to measure PTH does not influence relative changes induced by cinacalcet.

Background: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the impact of cinacalcet administration on the attainment of Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative of the National Kidney Foundation (NFK-K/DOQI) targets, in a group of dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism that were not controlled with vitamin D metabolites due to inadequate elevations in serum calcium and/or phosphorus., Methods: Twenty-eight patients undergoing haemodialysis that presented secondary hyperparathyroidism (PTH > 300 pg/ml) with difficulty to use vitamin D either because of hypercalcaemia (>10.2 mg/dl) and/or hyperphosphoraemia (>5.5 mg/dl) were included in this study. The follow-up period was 9 months before and after the introduction of cinacalcet. We started by adding 30 mg of cinacalcet orally once daily to their previous vitamin D metabolite treatment. The following variables were calculated and recorded: the mean of all measurements of serum Ca, P and parathyroid hormones (PTH), and Ca x P in each patient; calcium in dialysate (mEq/l); doses of vitamin D administered; doses of cinacalcet used, and the average prescription of calcium-based phosphate binders, sevelamer hydrochloride and aluminum binders, corresponding to two periods according to the introduction of cinacalcet. The proportions of patients with different serum Ca levels as well as serum P levels; serum PTH levels and CaxP at the beginning and at the end of the nine month period of treatment with cinacalcet were calculated., Results: Serum PTH (826.9 +/- 325 vs 248.1 +/- 77.3, P < 0.001), serum calcium (9.9 +/- 0.6 vs 8.6 +/- 0.4, P < 0.001) and the Ca x P product (94.7 +/- 7.3 vs 43.6 +/- 8.5; P < 0.001) diminished significantly whereas serum phosphorus remained unchanged (4.8 +/- 1.5 vs 4.3 +/- 1.1; P = NS). Before cinacalcet, 23 patients had severe hyperparathyroidism (serum PTH > 500) and 15 patients hypercalcaemia (serum calcium >10.2 mg/dl). After 9 months of treatment, all 28 patients showed serum PTH < 500 pg/ml and serum calcium <10.2 mg/dl; 64.7% of the patients achieved Ca, P, Ca x P and PTH objectives simultaneously. While the mean dose of cinacalcet increased along the 9 months of treatment (P < 0.001), there were no significant changes in vitamin D metabolites (P = 0.5), neither in the mean doses of calcium-containing agents, nor in the mean prescribed doses of sevelamer (P < 0.01), and aluminium-containing agents diminished significantly (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: In summary, the combination of cinacalcet and low doses of vitamin D improved significantly the control of PTH and Ca x P in patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism on chronic haemodialysis, without adverse effects and with lower doses of phosphate binders.

Background: The K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone Metabolism and Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease was published in October 2003. The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of the application of those guidelines on clinical practices and on the achievement of bone disease targets and quality standards., Methods: We included in the study 342 patients dialysed in our three HD units during 2003 and 2004. Starting October 2003, the K-DOQI recommendations were introduced into practice. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was measured every 3 months and the serum Ca and P levels, monthly. In patients whose medications were modified, PTH was measured monthly and Ca and P levels, weekly or biweekly., Results: The following are the main findings for 2004 (post-K/DOQI): an increased use of dialysates with a Ca concentration of 2.5 mEq/l (27.2-50.9%, P<0.001) and a reduced use of a dialysate calcium of 3.0 mEq/l (44.6-39.6%, P: NS) and 3.5 mEq/l (28-9.4%, P<0.001); a reduced use of calcium-based phosphate binders (891.9-565.5 mg Ca/day, P<0.001) and increased use of sevelamer hydrochloride (800 mg) (from 4.86 to 7.51 mg, tablets/day, P<0.001) lower serum Ca levels (9.7-9.4 mg/dl, P<0.01), and higher intact PTH levels (201.4-311.8 pg/ml, P<0.001), without changes in serum P levels; an increased proportion of patients with serum Ca levels within the K/DOQI target range (38.7-46.6%, P<0.01), resulting mainly from the reduced percentage of patients with hypercalcaemia (55-44.4%, P<0.01); a decreased proportion of patients with PTH<150 pg/ml (53.8-31.4%, P<0.001) but an increased proportion of patients with PTH>300 pg/ml, with no change in the proportion of patients with PTHs within the K/DOQI target range. Phosphorus levels and targets did not show significant differences between 2003 and 2004 (56.9-56.2%, P: NS)., Conclusions: The only way to ensure that K/DOQI guidelines actually improve medical outcomes is to emphasize implementation strategies and also the scientific evaluation of their effectiveness in clinical settings. In spite of the application of the K-DOQI recommendations, a large proportion of our patients stayed outside the proposed targets, which points to the need for more effective therapeutic options.

Background: This study intended to investigate the degree of compliance with hand hygiene and use of gloves by health workers in haemodialysis (HD) units, and the factors that influenced adherence to hand hygiene protocols., Methods: During the month of November 2003, one person observed the health care staff in each of nine different dialysis units, during 495 randomly distributed 30 min observation periods that covered all steps of a haemodialysis session (connection, dialysis and disconnection). The observers noted the number of potential opportunities to implement standard precautions and the number of occasions on which the precautions were actually taken. Adherence to standard precautions was evaluated, analysing the influence of the following variables: the patient-to-nurse ratio, the number of HD shifts scheduled per day, acute HD units vs chronic, whether or not infectious patients were isolated and in-house vs contract cleaning personnel., Results: There were a total of 977 opportunities to wear gloves for, and to wash the hands following, a patient-oriented activity, and 1902 opportunities to wash hands before such an activity. Gloves were actually used on 92.9% of these occasions. Hands were washed only 35.6% of the time after patient contact, and only 13.8% of the time before patient contact. Poor adherence to hand washing was associated with the number of shifts per HD unit per day and with higher patient-to-nurse ratios. In the acute HD units, there was greater adherence to standard precautions than in the chronic units, although there too it was substandard. The personnel's knowledge of patients' infectious status did not modify their adherence to hand hygiene practices. A higher patient-to-nurse ratio independently influenced hand washing both before and after patient contact., Conclusions: The overall adherence of health care workers to recommended hand washing practices is low. Whether or not programmes promoting higher hand hygiene standards and the potential use of alcohol-based hand cleansers will improve hand hygiene practices in HD units requires further investigation.