Search

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) children are frequent travellers to countries where yellow fever (YF) is endemic, but there are no data regarding the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in such children treated with hydroxyurea (HU). The main objective of this study was to compare the tolerance and immune response to YF vaccination in SCD children treated or not with HU., Method: SCD children < 18 years attending the international travel clinics of three large paediatric centres and requiring a first YF vaccination were included in a prospective study. Adverse events were collected 2 weeks after vaccination. YF vaccine antibody titres were measured ~6 months after vaccination., Results: Among the 52 SCD children vaccinated against YF, 17 (33%) were treated with HU. Only mild adverse events, mainly fever and local reaction, were observed in the HU group with a similar frequency in the non-HU group (57 and 35%, respectively, P = 0.30). YF antibody titres were measured in 15/17 patients in the HU group and 23/35 patients in the non-HU group after a median of 6.0 months (3.5-8.5) following vaccination. The geometric mean of YF antibody titre was similar in both groups. A protective antibody level was observed in 85% of the children in the HU group vs 100% in the non-HU group (P = 0.14), suggesting a lower effectiveness of the vaccine in patients on HU similarly to what has been described in patients on immune suppressive therapy for other vaccines., Conclusion: YF vaccination seems to be safe and efficient in SCD children treated with HU. Considering the potential risk of severe complications in cases of YF while travelling in Africa for those patients, the benefit-to-risk ratio argues for YF vaccination in all SCD children. Control of a protective antibody titre may also be useful to ascertain an adequate response in those treated with HU., (© International Society of Travel Medicine 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

We investigated the knowledge of female genital mutilation (FGM) among 60 general and 52 specialized travel medicine practitioners. Less than 50% of these practitioners had adequate knowledge of FGM. Only 42.9% declared having encountered FGM. FGM is likely underestimated in health facilities. Medical education and supporting information should be developed to better address and prevent FGM., (© International Society of Travel Medicine, 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Context: Growth hormone (GH) therapy may improve statural growth outcomes in patients with severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)., Objectives: To evaluate the effect of GH treatment on adult height and to identify determinants of growth outcomes in JIA., Design and Patients: Data from 58 patients with JIA, including 53 receiving GH, enrolled in three prospective clinical trials between 1997 and 2002 were analyzed., Intervention: GH (0.056 mg/kg/d [interquartile range (IQR), 0.050 to 0.062]) for a median duration of 6.5 years (IQR, 4.7 to 7.9 years)., Main Outcome Measures: Factors associated with a favorable growth outcome (adult height - target height ≤ -1.5 standard deviations) were identified by multivariate logistic regression., Results: Adult height was available for 48 patients 8.6 years after GH initiation (IQR, 6.0 to 10.2 years). Height standard deviation score (SDS) increased from -2.9 (IQR, -4.4 to -1.6) at baseline to -1.7 (IQR, -3.9 to -0.1) in adulthood (P < 0.001). Median adult height was below target height [SDS, -0.2 (IQR, -1.4 to 0.4); P < 0.001]. Corrected adult height SDS was -1.3 (IQR, -3.0 to -0.2). Growth outcome was favorable in 24 (52.2%) patients. Significant independent determinants of growth outcome were age at GH initiation [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.68 per additional year; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47 to 0.99], height at GH initiation (aOR, 2.6 per additional SDS; 95% CI, 1.15 to 5.9), and mean C-reactive protein levels during follow up (aOR, 0.51 per additional 10 mg/L; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.92)., Conclusion: Long-term GH treatment significantly increased growth in patients with JIA but did not fully restore the genetic growth potential. The response showed marked interindividual variability and was weaker in patients with severe inflammation., (Copyright © 2017 Endocrine Society)