Search

Aims: As transcatheter mitral valve (MV) interventions are expanding and more device types and sizes become available, a tool supporting operators in pre-procedural planning and the clinical decision-making process is highly desirable. We sought to develop a finite element computational simulation model to predict the results of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) interventions., Methods and Results: We prospectively enrolled patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) referred for a clinically indicated TEER. The 3D trans-oesophageal echocardiograms performed at the beginning of the procedure were used to perform the simulation. On the 3D dynamic model of the MV that was first obtained, we simulated the clip implantation using the same clip type, size, number, and implantation location that was used during the intervention. The 3D model of the MV obtained after the simulation of the clip implantation was compared with the clinical results obtained at the end of the intervention. We analysed the degree and location of residual MR and the shape and area of the diastolic MV area. We performed computational simulation on five patients. Overall, the simulated models predicted well the degree and location of the residual regurgitant orifice(s) but tended to underestimate the diastolic mitral orifice area., Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study, we present preliminary results on our algorithm simulating clip implantation in five patients with functional MR. We show promising results regarding the feasibility and accuracy in terms of predicting residual MR and the need to improve the estimation of the diastolic MV area., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: D.M.-Z. is a consultant for PrediSurge and receives research grants from Edwards Lifesciences. J.M., M.P., and F.C. are PrediSurge employees. J.D. received speaker and proctoring fees from Abbott. M.N. is a proctor for Abbott vascular, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic and received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott vascular, Medtronic, and Robocath. D.A. is a proctor for Abbott and also received speaker fees. M.K. received speaker and proctoring fees from Abbott and GEHC. S.G. is a proctor for Medtronic and Abbott. R.P. is a proctor for Abbott. M.H. received consultant fees from Abbott. J.-N.A. is the chairman of PrediSurge. A.E., F.L., Y.L.d. R.H., I.G.B., A.D., D.N., M.L., V.C., and T.M. none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background and Aims: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease predominantly affecting elderly patients that carries significant morbidity and mortality without aortic valve replacement, the only proven treatment. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of AS screening using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a geriatric population from the perspective of the publicly funded healthcare system in Canada., Methods: Markov models estimating the cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for AS screening with a one-time TTE were developed. The model included diagnosed and undiagnosed AS health states, hospitalizations, TAVR and post-TAVR health states. Primary analysis included screening at 70 and 80 years of age with intervention at symptom onset, with scenario analysis included for early intervention at the time of severe asymptomatic AS diagnosis. Monte Carlo simulation of 5000 replications was completed with a lifetime horizon and 1.5% discount for costs and outcomes., Results: Screening for AS at the age of 70 years was associated with an ICER of $156,722 and screening at 80 years of age was associated with an ICER of $28,005, suggesting that screening at 80 years of age is cost-effective when willingness-to-pay per QALY is $50,000. Scenario analysis with early intervention was not cost-effective with an ICER of $142,157 at 70 years, and $124,651 at 80 years., Conclusion: Screening for AS at 80 years of age with a one-time TTE, in a Canadian population, improves quality of life and is cost-effective in a publicly funded healthcare system providing TAVR is reserved for symptomatic patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is the next epidemic in the cardiovascular field, affecting millions of people worldwide and having a major impact on health care systems. With aging of the population, the incidence and prevalence of VHD will continue to increase. However, VHD has not received the attention it deserves from both the public and policymakers. Despite important advances in the pathophysiology, natural history, management, and treatment of VHD including the development of transcatheter therapies, VHD remains underdiagnosed, identified late, and often undertreated with inequality in access to care and treatment options, and there is no medication that can prevent disease progression. The present review article discusses these gaps in the management of VHD and potential actions to undertake to improve the outcome of patients with VHD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest D.M.-Z. has received research grant from Edwards Lifesciences. H.B. received honoraria and travel support from Edwards Lifesciences and Actelion. M.E.-S. received consulting fees from Edwards LLC, Highlife, Artivon, and ChemImage. I.G.B. declares that there is no conflict of interest. A.V. declares that there is no conflict of interest. J.B. has received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. P.P. has received funding from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Pi-Cardia, for echocardiography core laboratory analyses and research studies in the field of transcatheter valve therapies, for which he received no personal compensation. P.P. has received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. V.C. declares that there is no conflict of interest. M.L. received clinical institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards, and Medtronic. T.M. declares that there is no conflict of interest. B.I. declares that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has profoundly changed the management of patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). Large unbiased nationwide data regarding TAVR implementation, impact on SAVR and their respective outcomes are scarce., Methods and Results: Based on a French administrative hospital-discharge database, we collected data on all consecutive aortic valve replacements (AVRs) performed in France for AS between 2007 and 2019 [106 253 isolated SAVR (49%), 46 514 combined SAVR (21%), and 65 651 TAVR (30%)]. The number of AVR linearly increased between 2007 and 2019 (from 10 892 to 23 109, P for trend < 0.0001) due to a marked increase in TAVR (from 253 to 13 030, P for trend < 0.0001), while SAVR increased up to 2013 and then declined (10 892 in 2007, 12 699 in 2013, and 10 079 in 2019). The Charlson index decreased linearly for TAVR, but in two steps for SAVR (2011 and 2017). In-hospital mortality rates of both SAVR and TAVR declined (both P for trend < 0.0001) and were similar or lower for TAVR than for isolated SAVR in patients 75 years or above in the last 3 years (2017-19). Complication rates of TAVR also declined but permanent pacemaker rates remained high and length of stay substantial (16.7% and median 6 days, respectively, in 2017-19)., Conclusion: The number of AVR has doubled in a decade and TAVR has become the dominant form of AVR in 2018. The improvement in patient profiles seems to have anticipated the demonstrated benefit of TAVR in intermediate and low-risk patients. In patients 75 years or older, TAVR should be considered as the first option. We also highlight two important areas for improvement, the high permanent pacemaker rates, and the long length of stay even in the contemporary era. Our results may have major implications for clinical practice and policymakers., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has profoundly changed the management of patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). Large unbiased nationwide data regarding TAVR implementation, impact on SAVR and their respective outcomes are scarce., Methods and Results: Based on a French administrative hospital-discharge database, we collected data on all consecutive aortic valve replacements (AVRs) performed in France for AS between 2007 and 2019 [106 253 isolated SAVR (49%), 46 514 combined SAVR (21%), and 65 651 TAVR (30%)]. The number of AVR linearly increased between 2007 and 2019 (from 10 892 to 23 109, P for trend < 0.0001) due to a marked increase in TAVR (from 253 to 13 030, P for trend < 0.0001), while SAVR increased up to 2013 and then declined (10 892 in 2007, 12 699 in 2013, and 10 079 in 2019). The Charlson index decreased linearly for TAVR, but in two steps for SAVR (2011 and 2017). In-hospital mortality rates of both SAVR and TAVR declined (both P for trend < 0.0001) and were similar or lower for TAVR than for isolated SAVR in patients 75 years or above in the last 3 years (2017-19). Complication rates of TAVR also declined but permanent pacemaker rates remained high and length of stay substantial (16.7% and median 6 days, respectively, in 2017-19)., Conclusion: The number of AVR has doubled in a decade and TAVR has become the dominant form of AVR in 2018. The improvement in patient profiles seems to have anticipated the demonstrated benefit of TAVR in intermediate and low-risk patients. In patients 75 years or older, TAVR should be considered as the first option. We also highlight two important areas for improvement, the high permanent pacemaker rates, and the long length of stay even in the contemporary era. Our results may have major implications for clinical practice and policymakers., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm2 or an AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) <0.6 cm/m2, despite little evidence supporting the latter approach and important intrinsic limitations of BSA indexation. We hypothesized that AVA indexed to height (H) might be more applicable to a wide range of populations and body morphologies and might provide a better predictive accuracy., Methods and Results: In 1298 patients with degenerative AS and preserved ejection fraction from three different countries and continents (derivation cohort), we aimed to establish an AVA/H threshold that would be equivalent to 1.0 cm2 for defining severe AS. In a distinct prospective validation cohort of 395 patients, we compared the predictive accuracy of AVA/BSA and AVA/H. Correlations between AVA and AVA/BSA or AVA/H were excellent (all R2 > 0.79) but greater with AVA/H. Regressions lines were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients with AVA/BSA (P < 0.0001) but almost identical with AVA/H (P = 0.16). AVA/BSA values that corresponded to an AVA of 1.0 cm2 were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients (0.48 and 0.59 cm2/m2) but not with AVA/H (0.61 cm2/m for both). Agreement for the diagnosis of severe AS (AVA < 1 cm2) was significantly higher with AVA/H than with AVA/BSA (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed across the three countries. An AVA/H cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m [HR = 8.2(5.6-12.1)] provided the best predictive value for the occurrence of AS-related events [absolute AVA of 1 cm2: HR = 7.3(5.0-10.7); AVA/BSA of 0.6 cm2/m2 HR = 6.7(4.4-10.0)]., Conclusion: In a large multinational/multiracial cohort, AVA/H was better correlated with AVA than AVA/BSA and a cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m provided a better diagnostic and prognostic value than 0.6 cm2/m2. Our results suggest that severe AS should be defined as an AVA < 1 cm2 or an AVA/H < 0.6 cm2/m rather than a BSA-indexed value of 0.6 cm2/m2., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: There is ongoing controversy about the need for routine transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, the debate was reignited by the publication of a large series of patients showing a prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) on TOE of 4.4%. We sought to assess the prevalence of LAAT on TOE before AF ablation at our institution., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation at our institution between January 2009 and December 2016 were included. All patients were on oral anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks prior to TOE. Transoesophageal echocardiographies were performed 3-5 days prior to scheduled AF ablation. Data were collected utilizing a prospective database. In all, 668 patients and 943 AF ablation procedures were included. Mean age was 64 ± 11 years, 72% were male, average CHADS2 score was 1.0 ± 1.0, and 72% of the patients had paroxysmal AF. At the time of ablation, 496 (53%) were on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and 447 (47%) were on Warfarin. There were three cases with LAAT (3/943, 0.3%), all of whom had persistent AF and were on Warfarin. Two patients underwent surgical ablation and the third patient did not undergo ablation., Conclusion: In our experience, the prevalence of LAAT in patients on anticoagulation therapy undergoing TOE before catheter ablation of AF is 0.3%, which was much lower than recently reported. None of the patients with paroxysmal AF or on NOACs were found to have LAAT. Rather than routine use of TOE prior to AF ablation, a risk-based approach should be considered.

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) has been considered a risk factor for thrombo-embolic disease. Superimposed thrombus formation on MAC has not been well described as a possible underlying mechanism for this association. We report three patients with mobile left ventricular (LV) thrombus arising from the LV aspect of severe calcified mitral annulus in the setting of normal LV function, mitral valve function, and sinus rhythm.