Search

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a debilitating disease caused by Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi and B. timori parasitic worms and transmitted by Culex, Anopheles, Aedes and Mansonia mosquitoes. Mass drug administration (MDA) to reduce the infection levels in the human population is the key component of LF elimination programs. However, the potential of the use of vector control is gaining recognition as a tool that can complement MDA. The method of monitoring the parasites in mosquito vectors is known as xenomonitoring. Monitoring of vectors for filarial larvae is an important assessment tool for LF elimination programs. Xenomonitoring has the advantage of giving a real-time estimate of disease, because the pre-patent period may take months after infection in humans. It is a non-invasive sensitive tool for assessing the presence of LF in endemic areas. The aim of this review is to discuss the prospects, challenges and needs of xenomonitoring as a public health tool, in the post-MDA evaluation activities of national LF elimination programs., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Hydrocele and elephantiasis are 2 clinically very diverse and often mutually exclusive chronic manifestations of human bancroftian filariasis. Plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a major angiogenic factor, and tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFRs) that regulate host inflammation have been associated with development of chronic filariasis, although their genetic basis are not known., Methods: We studied polymorphisms of ET-1 (Ala288Ser) and TNFR-II (Met196Arg) genes by means of the polymerase chain reaction confronting 2 pairs primers method and restriction fragment length polymorphism, respectively. Plasma ET-1 level was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay., Results: Met196Arg genotype frequency of TNFR-II polymorphism was significantly greater in hydrocele patients, compared with elephantiasis patients (OR, 4.34 [95% CI, 2.04-9.20]). Conversely, a significantly high prevalence of the Ala288Ser mutation of ET-1 was observed in elephantiasis patients, compared with hydrocele cases (OR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.13-4.10]). Decreased plasma ET-1 levels associated significantly with Ala288Ser mutation in the study population. A combined analysis indicated a 23-fold higher risk for developing elephantiasis in individuals with TNFR-II (Met196Met) and ET-1 mutants (Ala288Ser + Ser288Ser)., Conclusions: ET-1 (Ala288Ser) and TNFR-II (Met196Arg) polymorphisms are associated with development of one or the other form of chronic disease in bancroftian filariasis.

Background: It is increasingly recognized that host genetic factors may play an important role in determining the outcome of filarial infections. To test this hypothesis in bancroftian lymphatic filariasis, pedigree data were collected twice during an 18-year period from an isolated Polynesian population living on a Pacific island where lymphatic filariasis is endemic., Methods: Using variance-component analysis, we examined the contribution of shared genetic and environmental effects on host clinical and immune responses to filarial infection, along with potential confounding determinants., Results: Sex was found to have a negligible influence on heritability estimates, but shared-household effects accounted for up to 32% of host variability. After accounting for these shared-household effects, heritability estimates suggested that levels of microfilariae and circulating adult worm antigen, as well as host eosinophil and immunoglobulin G antibody responses to larval and adult worm antigens, were highly heritable (range of heritability estimates, 0.15-0.84)., Conclusions: These data provide evidence of a key role for genetic factors in determining the host response to filarial infections in humans and emphasize the complexity of the relationships among the host, parasite, and environment.