1. Breast Implant Prevalence in the Dutch Female Population Assessed by Chest Radiographs.
- Author
-
de Boer M, van Middelkoop M, Hauptmann M, van der Bijl N, Bosmans JAW, Hendriks-Brouwer N, Schop SJ, de Boer JP, Hijmering NJ, Overbeek LIH, Lobbes MBI, Klazen CAH, de Jong D, Rakhorst HA, van der Hulst RRWJ, and van Leeuwen FE
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Netherlands epidemiology, Prevalence, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Young Adult, Breast Implants statistics & numerical data, Mammography methods
- Abstract
Background: Breast implant-related health problems are a subject of fierce debate. Reliable population-based estimates of implant prevalence rates are not available, however, due to a lack of historical registries and incomplete sales data, precluding absolute risk assessments., Objectives: This study aimed to describe the methodology of a novel procedure to determine Dutch breast implant prevalence based on the evaluation of routine chest radiographs., Methods: The validity of the new method was first examined in a separate study. Eight reviewers examined a series of 180 chest radiographs with (n = 60) or without (n = 120) a breast implant confirmed by a computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan. After a consensus meeting with best-performing expert reviewers, we reviewed 3000 chest radiographs of women aged 20 to 70 years in 2 large regional hospitals in the Netherlands in 2015. To calculate the national breast implant prevalence, regional prevalence variations were corrected utilizing the National Breast Cancer Screening Program., Results: Eight reviewers scored with a median sensitivity of 71.7% (range, 41.7%-85.0%) and a median specificity of 94.6% (range, 73.4%-97.5%). After a consensus meeting and a reevaluation by best-performing expert reviewers, sensitivity was 79.9% and specificity was 99.2%. The estimated national prevalence of breast implants among women between 20 and 70 years was 3.0%, ranging from 1.7% at 21 to 30 years to 3.9% between 51 and 60 years., Conclusions: The novel method in this study was validated with a high sensitivity and specificity, resulting in accurate prevalence estimates and providing the opportunity to conduct absolute risk assessment studies on the health consequences of breast implants., (© 2019 The Aesthetic Society. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF