Search

Background: Preclinical models suggest synergy between anti-angiogenesis therapy, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and histone deacetylase inhibitors to promote anticancer activity., Methods: This phase I study enrolled 47 patients between April 2012 and 2018 and determined safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) when combining bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and valproic acid in patients with advanced cancer., Results: Median age of enrolled patients was 56 years. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 lines of prior therapy. Forty-five patients (95.7%) experienced one or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3 TRAEs were lymphopenia (14.9%), thrombocytopenia (8.5%), and mucositis (6.4%). Grade 4 TRAEs included lymphopenia (2.1%) and CNS cerebrovascular ischemia (2.1%). Six patients developed DLTs across 10 dose levels with grade 3 infection, rash, mucositis, bowel perforation, elevated lipase, and grade 4 cerebrovascular ischemia. The MTD was dose level 9 (bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 1 and 15 intravenously (IV) plus temsirolimus 25 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 IV and valproic acid 5 mg/kg on days 1-7 and 15-21 per orally (PO)). Objective response rate (ORR) was 7.9% with confirmed partial response (PRs) in 3 patients (one each in parotid gland, ovarian, and vaginal cancers). Stable disease (SD) ≥+6 months was seen in 5 patients (13.1%). Clinical benefit state (CBR: PR + SD ≥+6 months) was 21%., Conclusion: Combination therapy with bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and valproic acid was feasible, but there were numerous toxicities, which will require careful management for future clinical development (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552434)., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Detection of methylation patterns in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can offer a novel approach for cancer diagnostics given the unique signature for each tumor type. We developed a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay targeting 32 CpG sites to detect colorectal cancer-specific ctDNA. NGS was performed on bisulfite-converted libraries and status dichotomization was done using median methylation ratios at all targets. We included plasma samples from patients with metastatic colorectal (n = 20) and non-colorectal cancers (n = 8); and healthy volunteers (n = 4). Median methylation ratio was higher in colorectal cancer compared with non-colorectal cancers (P = .001) and normal donors (P = .005). The assay detected ctDNA in 85% of patients with colorectal cancer at a specificity of 92%. Notably, we were able to detect methylated ctDNA in 75% of patients in whom ctDNA was not detected by other methods. Detection of methylated ctDNA was associated with shorter median progression-free survival compared to non-detection (8 weeks versus 54 weeks; P = .027)., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous and complex disease with limited treatment options. Targeting transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and programmed death ligand 1 pathways may enhance antitumor efficacy. Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-β receptor II (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed cell death ligand 1. We report results from an expansion cohort of a phase I study (NCT02517398) in patients with heavily pretreated advanced CRC treated with bintrafusp alfa. As of May 15, 2020, 32 patients with advanced CRC had received bintrafusp alfa for a median duration of 7.1 weeks. The objective response rate was 3.1% and the disease control rate was 6.3% (1 partial response, 1 stable disease); 2 patients were not evaluable. The safety profile was consistent with previously reported data., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors. However, not all MSI-H/dMMR patients will exhibit the same ICB efficacy. Previous studies suggest that concomitant antibiotic use while receiving ICB may result in poorer outcomes. We aimed to evaluate this association in patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Materials and Methods: A single-site, retrospective review of 57 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC that received ICB was completed. Data collected included patient demographics, ICB information, and antibiotic use. Antibiotic exposure was considered from 90 days prior to ICB through 6 weeks after initiation. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR)., Results: The majority of patients received pembrolizumab (27 [47%]) or nivolumab (17 [30%]) monotherapy as their ICB agent. Of the 57 patients, 19 (33.3%) had antibiotic exposure from 90 days prior to ICB initiation through 6 weeks after initiation with most (13 [68%]) having antibiotic use in the 30 days preceding ICB initiation. Similar ORRs were seen in both groups (P-value > .99). No difference was observed in OS (P-value .29) or PFS (P-value .36) between groups., Conclusion: Our data show no association of lower response rates or survival in those MSI-H/dMMR patients with mCRC who receive antibiotics around the initiation of ICB. This information needs to be confirmed in a larger prospective cohort., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: The KRAS p.G12C mutation has recently become an actionable drug target. To further understand KRAS p.G12C disease, we describe clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), KRAS p.G12C mutations (KRAS G12C), and other KRAS mutations (KRAS non-G12C) using a de-identified database., Patients and Methods: Clinical and tumor characteristics, including treatments received, genomic profile, and clinical outcomes were assessed for patients from a US clinical genomic database with mCRC diagnosed between January 1, 2011, and March 31, 2020, with genomic sequencing data available., Results: Of 6477 patients with mCRC (mCRC cohort), 238 (3.7%) had KRAS G12C and 2947 (45.5%) had KRAS non-G12C mutations. Treatment patterns were generally comparable across lines of therapy (LOT) in KRAS G12C versus KRAS non-G12C cohorts. Median (95% CI) OS after the first LOT was 16.1 (13.0-19.0) months for the KRAS G12C cohort versus 18.3 (17.2-19.3) months for the KRAS non-G12C cohort, and 19.2 (18.5-19.8) months for the mCRC overall cohort; median (95% CI) rwPFS was 7.4 (6.3-9.5), 9.0 (8.2-9.7), and 9.2 (8.6-9.7) months, respectively. The different KRAS non-G12C mutations examined did not affect clinical outcomes. Median OS and rwPFS for all cohorts declined with each subsequent LOT., Conclusions: Patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutant mCRC have poor treatment outcomes, and outcomes appear numerically worse than for those without this mutation, indicating potential prognostic implications for KRAS p.G12C mutations and an unmet medical need in this population., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Cetuximab 500 mg/m2 biweekly (Q2W) plus chemotherapy is commonly used and recommended by NCCN guidelines. This meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety between Q2W versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab dosing., Methods: A systematic literature review was performed on Pubmed and RightFind (2007-2017) for patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who received Q2W or Q1W cetuximab and other treatments. Observational studies and case reports were excluded. Randomized trials comparing Q2W and Q1W dosing, and single-arm trials with only Q2W schedule were included. CRYSTAL, a phase 3 randomized study with Q1W cetuximab dosing was paired with each single-arm study with a Q2W schedule and reweighted to achieve similar demographic/baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with hazard ratios (HR), overall response rate (ORR) with odds ratios, and risk difference of adverse events of special interest (AESI) between Q2W versus Q1W cetuximab were analyzed., Results: Five phase 2 studies with cetuximab Q2W/Q1W dosing schedules were identified: CECOG (phase 2; Q2W, n = 77; Q1W, n = 75), NORDIC 7.5 (phase 2; Q2W, n = 152) and NORDIC 7 (arm C of phase 3; Q1W, n = 109), CELINE (n = 60), OPTIMIX (n = 99), and APEC (n = 289) all phase 2, Q2W, single-arm studies paired with CRYSTAL Q1W dosing (n = 303). Efficacy was similar between Q2W versus Q1W administration; OS HR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.89, 1.04]; PFS HR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.87, 1.05]; ORR odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI [0.96, 1.41]. Mean differences (Q2W-Q1W) across AESI rates were not clinically meaningful with no obvious directionality., Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in efficacy and safety between Q2W versus Q1W cetuximab administration in mCRC patients., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Motivation: DNA methylation is a key epigenetic factor regulating gene expression. While promoter methylation has been well studied, recent publications have revealed that functionally important methylation also occurs in intergenic and distal regions, and varies across genes and tissue types. Given the growing importance of inter-platform integrative genomic analyses, there is an urgent need to develop methods to discover and characterize gene-level relationships between methylation and expression., Results: We introduce a novel sequential penalized regression approach to identify methylation-expression quantitative trait loci (methyl-eQTLs), a term that we have coined to represent, for each gene and tissue type, a sparse set of CpG loci best explaining gene expression and accompanying weights indicating direction and strength of association. Using TCGA and MD Anderson colorectal cohorts to build and validate our models, we demonstrate our strategy better explains expression variability than current commonly used gene-level methylation summaries. The methyl-eQTLs identified by our approach can be used to construct gene-level methylation summaries that are maximally correlated with gene expression for use in integrative models, and produce a tissue-specific summary of which genes appear to be strongly regulated by methylation. Our results introduce an important resource to the biomedical community for integrative genomics analyses involving DNA methylation., Availability and Implementation: We produce an R Shiny app (https://rstudio-prd-c1.pmacs.upenn.edu/methyl-eQTL/) that interactively presents methyl-eQTL results for colorectal, breast and pancreatic cancer. The source R code for this work is provided in the Supplementary Material., Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) demonstrates high clinical activity that appears durable, but the impact of CPI on pathological tumor response is unknown. In this retrospective analysis, our objective was to assess pathological response and clinical outcomes in dMMR mCRC patients treated with CPI prior to surgical resection of primary and/or metastatic tumor. Among 121 advanced dMMR mCRC patients treated with CPI at 2 institutions between November 2016 and December 2018, 14 underwent surgery. Pathologic complete response was noted in the resected specimens of 13 patients despite the presence of residual tumor on preoperative imaging in 12 of those patients. With median follow-up of 9 months, no patients have had disease relapse or progression. For this small retrospective study, the data suggest that residual radiographic tumor may not require systematic resection following response to anti-PD1-based therapy. However, larger prospective studies are warranted., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Proportionate female representation in health research is necessary for scientific rigor and health equity. We aimed to assess the representation of women in clinical trials leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cancer drug approvals., Materials and Methods: Trials supporting FDA cancer drug approvals between July 2008 and June 2018 were sourced from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. The ratio of female to male trial enrollment was compared with cancer incidence and mortality in the U.S. using International Agency for Research on Cancer data. Reproductive tract and breast cancers were excluded. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing trial enrollment with population incidence and mortality were calculated., Results: A total of 186 trials leading to 170 FDA cancer drug approvals showed slight female underrepresentation compared with overall cancer incidence in the U.S. (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98, p < .0001). Female enrollment for drugs approved between 2008-2013 and 2014-2018 was unchanged (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.05, p = .25). There was slight female underrepresentation in hematological trials (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.998; p = .040 for leukemia; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.997; p = .040 for lymphoma) and significant female underrepresentation in colorectal (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.76; p < .0001), pancreas (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p = .0004), lung (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.75-0.80; p < .0001), kidney (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67; p < .0001), and thyroid cancer trials (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.23-0.28; p < .0001) compared with U.S. incidence., Conclusion: Female underrepresentation has persisted within solid organ tumor trials but is less notable in hematologic trials. Additional work is required to identify drivers of such disparity., Implications for Practice: Adequate gender representation in clinical trials is a matter of health equity. This study demonstrates that women remain underrepresented in trials across hematological and solid organ trials compared with cancer incidence and mortality in women, with the disparity worse in a number of solid organ tumor types. There are thus still significant improvements to be made regarding adequate representation of women in trials. Studies exploring the reasons for ongoing disparity in gender representation are warranted to help clinicians to rectify this., (© AlphaMed Press 2020.)

Background: The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) collaboration aimed to evaluate whether 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy are noninferior to 6 months. Our study objectives were to characterize medical oncologists' perspectives toward the results of the IDEA collaboration and to evaluate how IDEA impacted prescribing patterns of adjuvant FOLFOX and CAPOX in colon cancer., Materials and Methods: A list of questions developed by four medical oncologists regarding IDEA results were formulated and distributed online to gastrointestinal medical oncologists globally. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to summarize information., Results: Of 174 responses, 145 were complete and analyzed. Responses were obtained globally from South America (53%); the U.S. and Canada (28%); Europe, Australia, and New Zealand (12%); and Asia (7%). Most clinicians (98%) were aware of the IDEA study. Prior to IDEA, clinicians preferred FOLFOX over CAPOX (81% vs. 19%). Subsequent to IDEA, 55% of clinicians preferred CAPOX over FOLFOX (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.0-8.5; p < .01 compared with pre-IDEA). Two thirds (68%) of responders tailored duration of adjuvant therapy based on risk stratification. Most oncologists (76%) were more willing to discontinue oxaliplatin early if toxicities develop after the results of IDEA. Half of responders (50%) found that IDEA increased their confidence in decision making for adjuvant treatment; 36% were unchanged, and 15% indicated decreased confidence. Less than half (48%) were comfortable communicating the study results and the concept of a noninferiority trial with patients., Conclusion: IDEA appears to have shifted clinician preference from FOLFOX to CAPOX for adjuvant therapy, and most clinicians now use a risk-stratified approach in determining duration of adjuvant therapy. Patient education resources may facilitate better communication of IDEA results to patients., Implications for Practice: This global survey illustrates that most gastrointestinal medical oncologists now use a risk-stratified approach for determining the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. Clinicians are five times more likely to choose CAPOX over FOLFOX after the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) collaboration results., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Background: Current guidelines include the use of adjuvant oxaliplatin in clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma. However, its efficacy is supported by a single phase II trial. We aimed to examine whether oxaliplatin confers survival benefit in this patient population., Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2006-2013) we identified 6,868 individuals with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. We used multivariate Cox regression to evaluate survival differences according to treatment intensity and change from clinical to pathological stage., Results: We demonstrated an association with improved overall survival with the use of doublet adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological stage III rectal adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.92). This association was confirmed in patients with clinical stage III and subsequent pathological stage III disease (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and was not observed in patients who progressed from clinical stage II to pathological stage III disease. Doublet adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in patients with pathological stage 0 or I disease, regardless of their clinical stage., Conclusion: Adjuvant oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma was confirmed in patients with clinical stage III and subsequent pathological stage III disease. Omission of oxaliplatin can be considered in pathological complete response or pathological stage I disease., Implications for Practice: Current guidelines include the use of oxaliplatin as part of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with clinical stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC). However, its efficacy is supported only by a single phase II trial. This study found an association with improved overall survival with the use of doublet AC in patients diagnosed with clinical stage III and subsequent pathological stage III, and not in patients with pathological stage 0 or I, regardless of their clinical stage. Therefore, omission of oxaliplatin can be considered in patients with either pathological complete response or pathological stage I RAC, thereby avoiding oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (© AlphaMed Press 2019.)

Background: Despite growing therapeutic relevance of ERBB2 amplifications in colorectal cancer (CRC), little is known about ERBB2/ERBB3 mutations. We aimed to characterize these subsets of CRC., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 419 CRC patients from MD Anderson (MDACC) and 619 patients from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS)/Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) with tissue sequencing, clinicopathologic, mutational, and consensus molecular subtype (CMS) profiles of ERBB2/ERBB3 mutant patients. A third cohort of 1623 CRC patients with ctDNA assays characterized the ctDNA profile of ERBB2 mutants. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: ERBB2 mutations occurred in 4.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4% to 6.4%), 5.8% (95% CI = 4.1% to 8.0%), and 5.1% (95% CI = 4.0% to 6.2%) of MDACC, NHS/HPFS, and ctDNA patients, respectively. ERBB3 mutations occurred in 5.7% (95% CI = 3.7% to 8.4%, 95% CI = 4.0% to 7.8%) of patients in both tissue cohorts. Age, stage, and tumor location were not associated with either mutation. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was associated with ERBB2 (odds ratio [OR] = 5.98, 95% CI = 2.47 to 14.49, P < .001; OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 2.38 to 11.05, P < .001) and ERBB3 mutations (OR = 3.48, 95% CI = 1.51 to 8.02, P = .002; OR = 3.40, 95% CI = 1.05 to 10.96, P = .03) in both tissue cohorts. Neither gene was associated with TP53, APC, KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations in tissue. However, PIK3CA mutations were strongly associated with ERBB2 mutations in all three cohorts (OR = 3.68, 95% CI = 1.83 to 7.41, P = .001; OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.11 to 4.58, P = .02; OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.25 to 3.58, P = .004) and ERBB3 mutations in the MDACC cohort (OR = 13.26, 95% CI = 5.27 to 33.33, P < .001). ERBB2 (P = 0.08) and ERBB3 (P = .008) mutations were associated with CMS1 subtype. ERBB2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.23 to 4.03, P = .009), but not ERBB3 (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.73, P = .73), mutations were associated with worse overall survival., Conclusions: MSI and PIK3CA mutations are associated with ERBB2/ERBB3 mutations. Co-occurring PIK3CA mutations may represent a second hit to oncogenic signaling that needs consideration when targeting ERBB2/ERBB3.

Background: Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy can cause hepatic sinusoidal injury (HSI), portal hypertension, and splenic sequestration of platelets. Evidence suggests that bevacizumab may protect against HSI., Methods: Two cohorts of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) were analyzed: a nonrandomized exploratory cohort of 184 patients treated at a single institution from 2003 to 2010 and a confirmatory cohort of 200 patients from a multi-institutional randomized trial (NO16966). All patients were treated with frontline fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab. Changes in splenic volumes and platelet counts were compared by treatment, two-sided log-rank test., Results: In the exploratory cohort, the bevacizumab-treated patients (n = 138) compared with the nonbevacizumab-treated patients (n = 46) demonstrated a longer median time to splenic enlargement (≥30%, P = .02) and reduced rate of thrombocytopenia (<150 000/mm3, P = .04). In the confirmatory cohort (106 bevacizumab arm and 94 placebo arm), the median time to a spleen enlargement of 30% or more was 7.6 vs 5.4 (P = .01), and six-month cumulative incidence of thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 000/mm3) was 19% vs 51% (P < .001) for bevacizumab compared with placebo. The development of an increasing spleen size was associated with the risk of either grade 1 or grade 2 thrombocytopenia (P < .001). The cumulative rate of grade 1 or grade 2 thrombocytopenia was statistically less in the bevacizumab arm, with six-month grade 2 thrombocytopenia rates of 4% vs 23% (P < .001). Patients with a large spleen prior to chemotherapy initiation appeared to be at highest risk of this toxicity., Conclusion: In metastatic CRC, the addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy reduces the frequency of splenic enlargement and the rate of thrombocytopenia.

Rapidly improving understanding of molecular oncology, emerging novel therapeutics, and increasingly available and affordable next-generation sequencing have created an opportunity for delivering genomically informed personalized cancer therapy. However, to implement genomically informed therapy requires that a clinician interpret the patient's molecular profile, including molecular characterization of the tumor and the patient's germline DNA. In this Commentary, we review existing data and tools for precision oncology and present a framework for reviewing the available biomedical literature on therapeutic implications of genomic alterations. Genomic alterations, including mutations, insertions/deletions, fusions, and copy number changes, need to be curated in terms of the likelihood that they alter the function of a "cancer gene" at the level of a specific variant in order to discriminate so-called "drivers" from "passengers." Alterations that are targetable either directly or indirectly with approved or investigational therapies are potentially "actionable." At this time, evidence linking predictive biomarkers to therapies is strong for only a few genomic markers in the context of specific cancer types. For these genomic alterations in other diseases and for other genomic alterations, the clinical data are either absent or insufficient to support routine clinical implementation of biomarker-based therapy. However, there is great interest in optimally matching patients to early-phase clinical trials. Thus, we need accessible, comprehensive, and frequently updated knowledge bases that describe genomic changes and their clinical implications, as well as continued education of clinicians and patients., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Further advances of targeted cancer therapy require comprehensive in-depth profiling of somatic mutations that are present in subpopulations of tumor cells in a clinical tumor sample. However, it is unclear to what extent such intratumor heterogeneity is present and whether it may affect clinical decision-making. To study this question, we established a deep targeted sequencing platform to identify potentially actionable DNA alterations in tumor samples., Methods: We assayed 515 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples and matched germline DNA (475 patients) from 11 disease sites by capturing and sequencing all the exons in 201 cancer-related genes. Mutations, indels, and copy number data were reported., Results: We obtained a 1000-fold mean sequencing depth and identified 4794 nonsynonymous mutations in the samples analyzed, of which 15.2% were present at <10% allele frequency. Most of these low level mutations occurred at known oncogenic hotspots and are likely functional. Identifying low level mutations improved identification of mutations in actionable genes in 118 (24.84%) patients, among which 47 (9.8%) otherwise would have been unactionable. In addition, acquiring ultrahigh depth also ensured a low false discovery rate (<2.2%) from FFPE samples., Conclusions: Our results were as accurate as a commercially available CLIA-compliant hotspot panel but allowed the detection of a higher number of mutations in actionable genes. Our study reveals the critical importance of acquiring and utilizing high sequencing depth in profiling clinical tumor samples and presents a very useful platform for implementing routine sequencing in a cancer care institution., (© 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.)

Background: Approximately 20% of patients with stage II colorectal cancer will experience a relapse. Current clinical-pathologic stratification factors do not allow clear identification of these high-risk patients. ColoPrint (Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, http://www.agendia.com) is a gene expression classifier that distinguishes patients with low or high risk of disease relapse., Methods: ColoPrint was developed using whole-genome expression data and validated in several independent validation cohorts. Stage II patients from these studies were pooled (n = 416), and ColoPrint was compared with clinical risk factors described in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2013 Guidelines for Colon Cancer. Median follow-up was 81 months. Most patients (70%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Risk of relapse (ROR) was defined as survival until first event of recurrence or death from cancer., Results: In the pooled stage II data set, ColoPrint identified 63% of patients as low risk with a 5-year ROR of 10%, whereas high-risk patients (37%) had a 5-year ROR of 21%, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.16 (p = .004). This remained significant in a multivariate model that included number of lymph nodes retrieved and microsatellite instability. In the T3 microsatellite-stable subgroup (n = 301), ColoPrint classified 59% of patients as low risk with a 5-year ROR of 9.9%. High-risk patients (31%) had a 22.4% ROR (HR: 2.41; p = .005). In contrast, the NCCN clinical high-risk factors were unable to distinguish high- and low-risk patients (15% vs. 13% ROR; p = .55)., Conclusion: ColoPrint significantly improved prognostic accuracy independent of microsatellite status or clinical variables, facilitating the identification of patients at higher risk who might be considered for additional treatment., (©AlphaMed Press.)