Search

Study Question: What is the behavioral mechanism underlying the response of human spermatozoa to a temperature gradient in thermotaxis?, Summary Answer: Human spermatozoa swim up a temperature gradient by modulating their speed and frequencies of hyperactivation events and turns., What Is Known Already: Capacitated human spermatozoa are capable of thermotactically responding to a temperature gradient with an outcome of swimming up the gradient. This response occurs even when the gradient is very shallow., Study Design, Size, Duration: Human sperm samples were exposed to a fast temperature change. A quantitative analysis of sperm motility parameters, flagellar wave propagation, and directional changes before, during, and after the temperature change was carried out., Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: The swimming behavior of 44 human sperm samples from nine healthy donors was recorded under a phase-contrast microscope at 75 and 2000 frames/s. A temperature shift was achieved by using a thermoregulated microscope stage. The tracks made by the cells were analyzed by a homemade computerized motion analysis system and ImageJ software., Main Results and the Role of Chance: A temperature shift from 31 to 37°C resulted in enhanced speed and a lower frequency of turning events. These were reflected in a 35 ± 1% (mean ± SEM) increase of the straight-line velocity, 33 ± 1% increase of the average path velocity, 11 ± 1% increase of the curvilinear velocity, 20 ± 1% increase of the wobble, and 4 ± 1% increase of the linearity. Qualitatively, the inverse trend was observed in response to a 37-to-31°C shift. In addition, the amplitude of flagellar waves increased close to the sperm head, resulting in higher side-to-side motion of the head and, often, hyperactivation. This increase in the extent of sperm hyperactivation was reflected in an increase in the average (mean ± SEM) fractal dimension from 1.15 ± 0.01 to 1.29 ± 0.01 and in the percentage of hyperactivated spermatozoa from 3 ± 1% to 19 ± 2%. These changes in hyperactivation were observed less often in sperm populations that had not been incubated for capacitation. All these changes partially adapted within 3-10 min, meaning that following the initial change and while being kept at the new temperature, the values of the measured motility parameters slowly and partially returned toward the original values. These results led us to conclude that spermatozoa direct their swimming in a temperature gradient by modulating the frequency of turns (both abrupt turns as in hyperactivation events and subtle turns) and speed in a way that favors swimming in the direction of the gradient., Limitations, Reasons for Caution: The conclusions were made on the basis of results obtained in temporal and steep temperature gradients. The conclusions for spatial, shallow gradients were made by extrapolation., Wider Implications of the Findings: This is the first study that reveals the behavior of human spermatozoa in thermotaxis. This behavior is very similar to that observed during human sperm chemotaxis, suggesting commonality of guidance mechanisms in mammalian spermatozoa. This study further substantiates the function of hyperactivation as a means to direct spermatozoa in guidance mechanisms., Study Funding/competing Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest and no funding to declare., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Capacitated human and rabbit spermatozoa can sense temperature differences as small as those within the oviduct of rabbits and pigs at ovulation, and they respond to them by thermotaxis (i.e., by swimming from the cooler to the warmer temperature). The molecular mechanism of sperm thermotaxis is obscure. To reveal molecular events involved in sperm thermotaxis, we took a pharmacological approach in which we examined the effect of different inhibitors and blockers on the thermotactic response of human spermatozoa. We found that reducing the intracellular, but not extracellular, Ca(2+) concentration caused remarkable inhibition of the thermotactic response. The thermotactic response was also inhibited by each of the following: La(3+), a general blocker of Ca(2+) channels; U73122, an inhibitor of phospholipase C (PLC); and 2-aminoethoxy diphenyl borate, an inhibitor of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP(3)R) and store-operated channels. Inhibitors and blockers of other channels had no effect. Likewise, saturating concentrations of the chemoattractants for the known chemotaxis receptors had no effect on the thermotactic response. The results suggest that the IP(3)R Ca(2+) channel, located on internal Ca(2+) stores, operates in sperm thermotaxis, and that the response is mediated by PLC and requires intracellular Ca(2+). They also suggest that the thermosensors for thermotaxis are not the currently known chemotaxis receptors.

Background: A major question in mammalian sperm chemotaxis is whether the cells sense a chemoattractant gradient by comparing the chemoattractant concentration between time points or between spatial points., Methods: To resolve this question, we exposed human spermatozoa to a temporal chemoattractant gradient under conditions of no spatial gradient by rapidly mixing the cells with progesterone or bourgeonal on a microscope slide and analyzing their swimming with motion analysis software., Results: The cells responded within seconds with an increase in velocity and lateral head displacement, and with a decrease in the linearity of swimming, becoming hyperactivated at the peak of the response. All the responses were transient, lasting for a number of seconds. Essentially similar results were obtained upon intracellular photorelease of cyclic adenosine monophosphate or cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which are thought to be involved in mediating the chemotactic response., Conclusion: These results suggest that human spermatozoa sense and respond to a temporal chemoattractant gradient. On the basis of these observations, we propose a potential model for the chemotactic response of spermatozoa in a spatial chemoattractant gradient.

Background: Human spermatozoa appear to be guided by chemotaxis to the oocyte in the female genital tract. While one of the sources of sperm chemoattractants is the cumulus cells that surround the oocyte, the identity of the chemoattractant secreted from them is unknown. Progesterone, recognized to be secreted from cumulus cells, was demonstrated, at the pM concentration range, to be a chemoattractant for human spermatozoa. Here, we examined whether this steroid is the cumulus-originated chemoattractant for human spermatozoa., Methods: Human cumulus cells were cultured, and the cultured medium was demonstrated to be chemotactically active. Progesterone was then eliminated from the medium by a specific anti-progesterone antibody, and the residual chemotactic activity was assessed., Results: The rate of progesterone secretion from the cells decreased with time. Removal of progesterone from the cumulus-cultured medium resulted in total loss of the chemotactic activity of the medium. Furthermore, the cumulus-cultured medium could substitute for progesterone in stimulating changes in the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration in the spermatozoa, and the changes were very similar to those caused by measured progesterone concentrations in the medium., Conclusions: Taken together, the results suggest that progesterone is the main, if not the sole, chemoattractant secreted by human cumulus cells.

Background: Earlier studies demonstrated that macrophages phagocytize spermatozoa in the female genital tract of mammals. In spite of this phagocytosis, fecundity is not affected, raising questions of how the resulting decrease in the number of spermatozoa does not reduce the fertilization rate and of the role of this phagocytosis. We hypothesized that its role is to rid the female genital tract of spermatozoa past their fertilizing stage (post-capacitated spermatozoa). Here we examined whether, indeed, phagocytosis is restricted to post-capacitated spermatozoa., Methods: Spermatozoa were incubated for 22 h either in a medium that allows them to become capacitated and then post-capacitated, or in a medium that prevents them from acquiring these states. These sperm populations were compared for their susceptibilities to macrophage phagocytosis., Results: Phagocytosis was significantly higher (P << 0.001) in the sperm population containing post-capacitated spermatozoa. Vitality, motility, the acrosomal status and the proportion of capacitated cells did not affect phagocytosis., Conclusion: Post-capacitated spermatozoa are, probably, preferentially phagocytized by macrophages.

Background: Earlier studies demonstrated a small temperature difference between the sperm storage and fertilization sites within the oviducts of rabbits and pigs. Our aim was to reveal the time dependence of this temperature difference relative to ovulation, and to determine how this difference is generated-by temperature elevation at one of these sites or by temperature decrease at the other site., Methods: The temperature at the sperm storage site (at the isthmus near the uterotubal junction) and at the fertilization site (the isthmic-ampullary junction) of rabbit oviducts were measured before, during, and after ovulation by two probes, connected to digital thermometers. Rectal temperature was constantly measured and served as a control for body temperature., Results: The temperature difference between the fertilization site and the storage site was 0.8+/-0.2 degrees C before ovulation. This difference increased at ovulation, reaching 1.6+/-0.1 degrees C after ovulation (P<0.03). This increased difference was mainly due to temperature decrease in the sperm storage site., Conclusion: The temperature-difference increase within the rabbit oviduct is generated at ovulation by a reduced temperature at the sperm storage site. This temperature gradient may play a role in mammalian reproduction via sperm thermotaxis.

Background: Human sperm chemotaxis to pre-ovulatory follicular fluid is well established in vitro. However, it is not known whether the female's oocyte-cumulus complex secretes sperm chemoattractants subsequent to ovulation (for enabling sperm chemotaxis within the Fallopian tube) and, if so, which of these cell types--the oocyte or the cumulus oophorus--is the physiological origin of the secreted chemoattractant., Methods: By employing a directionality-based chemotaxis assay, we examined whether media conditioned with either individual, mature (metaphase II) human oocytes or the surrounding cumulus cells attract human sperm by chemotaxis., Results: We observed sperm chemotaxis to each of these media, suggesting that both the oocyte and the cumulus cells secrete sperm chemoattractants., Conclusions: These observations suggest that sperm chemoattractants are secreted not only prior to ovulation within the follicle, as earlier studies have demonstrated, but also after oocyte maturation outside the follicle, and that there are two chemoattractant origins: the mature oocyte and the surrounding cumulus cells.

Precontact communication between gametes is established by chemotaxis. Sperm chemotaxis toward factor(s) in follicular fluid (FF) has been demonstrated in humans and mice. In humans, the chemotactic responsiveness is restricted to capacitated spermatozoa. Here, we investigated whether sperm chemotaxis to factor(s) present in FF also occurs in rabbits and, if so, whether only capacitated spermatozoa are chemotactically responsive. Chemotaxis assays were performed by videomicroscopy in a Zigmond chamber. We measured chemotactic responsiveness as a function of FF dilution by means of a novel directionality-based method that considers the ratio between the distances traveled by the spermatozoa both parallel to the chemoattractant gradient and perpendicular to it. A peak of maximal response was observed at 10(-4) dilution of FF, resulting in a typical chemotactic concentration-dependent curve in which 23% of the spermatozoa were chemotactically responsive. In contrast, the percentage of cells exhibiting FF-dependent enhanced speed of swimming increased with the FF concentration, whereas the percentage of cells maintaining linear motility decreased with the FF concentration. The percentages of chemotactically responsive cells were very similar to those of capacitated spermatozoa. Depletion of the latter by stimulation of the acrosome reaction resulted in a total loss of the chemotactic response, whereas the reappearance of capacitated cells resulted in a recovery of chemotactic responsiveness. We conclude that rabbit spermatozoa, like human spermatozoa, are chemotactically responsive to FF factor(s) and acquire this responsiveness as part of the capacitation process.

Follicular fluid (FF) induces sperm chemotaxis in human spermatozoa. Progesterone also causes sperm accumulation. However, sperm accumulation can be caused by chemotaxis, chemokinesis, and trapping of various kinds. It has been suggested that progesterone also induces chemotaxis in human spermatozoa. In view of the physiological significance of sperm chemotaxis in human fertilization and its potential clinical implications, it is important to determine unequivocally whether chemotaxis is induced by progesterone and, if so, whether progesterone in FF is the chemoattractant. To resolve these questions we looked for characteristic changes in the direction of sperm swimming toward pure progesterone as well as toward FF before and after progesterone removal. Progesterone caused sperm accumulation and hyperactivation-like motility, but it caused very few changes in the direction of sperm swimming that are characteristic of chemotaxis. Removal of progesterone (and other steroids) from FF by charcoal treatment abolished the sperm hyperactivation-like motility but not sperm chemotaxis. These results suggest that while progesterone might be a weak chemoattractant, it is not the major chemoattractant in FF. Progesterone probably causes human sperm accumulation mainly by inducing hyperactivation-like motility and, as a consequence, sperm trapping.

Recent studies have indicated that human spermatozoa respond to follicular fluid by attraction to chemotactic factor(s) in the fluid, accompanied by enhancement of motility and ultimately hyperactivation. In this study, we quantified the sperm response. We exposed spermatozoa to a gradient of a chemotactically active fraction of follicular fluid (denoted as "the attractant") and separated the spermatozoa that accumulated in the attractant and those that did not. We thus obtained two subpopulations: one enriched with chemotactically responsive spermatozoa, and one deficient in such spermatozoa. The fraction of the responsive spermatozoa out of the total sperm population was 2-12% at any measured time point. With time, the responsive spermatozoa lost their ability to be attracted, while such activity was gradually acquired by the subpopulation originally deficient in responsive spermatozoa. These results indicate that the identity of responsive spermatozoa is continuously changing. If the in vitro results are representative of the physiological conditions in vivo, they imply that the role of sperm chemotaxis combined with enhanced motility may be to select capacitated spermatozoa and bring them to the egg. Such a mechanism may, over an extended period of time, increase the prospect that an egg will meet capacitated spermatozoa as soon as it ovulates.