Search

Ovarian volume measurements have been recently shown to be predictive of response to ovarian stimulation. Women with small ovarian volumes, i.e. <3 cm(3), have a higher incidence of cycle cancellation, together with a lower peak oestradiol concentration, lower number of retrieved oocytes, and lower pregnancy rates, compared with women with larger ovarian volumes. We prospectively investigated whether a higher dose, microdose flare gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol, can improve IVF outcome in women with a small ovarian volume. Only the first IVF cycle was reviewed. In total, 109 women aged <40 years undergoing 109 cycles were prospectively evaluated. Women with an ovarian volume of < or =3 cm(3) noted on the day of luteal GnRH agonist administration had their stimulation regimen changed to a more aggressive microdose flare GnRH agonist protocol. In all, 30 women (27.5%) with an ovarian volume of <3 cm(3), and 79 women (72.5%) with an ovarian volume of >3 cm(3) were compared. Women with an ovarian volume of <3 cm(3) had a significantly higher incidence of unexplained infertility as their presenting aetiology, compared with women with a larger ovarian volume (33 and 8.6%, P = 0.0036). There was a significant negative correlation between age and ovarian volume, and between day 3 FSH concentration and ovarian volume. We also report a significant positive correlation between body mass index and ovarian volume. There was also a significant positive correlation between ovarian volume and the number of oocytes retrieved. Despite a trend towards higher day 3 FSH concentrations, a significantly longer duration of stimulation, higher gonadotrophin requirements, and lower oocyte yield, the implantation and pregnancy rates were comparable between the two groups. Women with a small ovarian volume noted at baseline ultrasound can have comparable implantation and pregnancy rates to those with larger ovarian volumes with the use of a higher dose gonadotrophin, microdose GnRH agonist stimulation.

The role of luteal oestradiol for successful implantation in humans seems to be permissive rather than obligatory. Few studies have attempted to clarify the role of early luteal oestradiol in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome, whether peri-implantation oestradiol is predictive of successful IVF outcome. We retrospectively analysed 106 women undergoing 106 IVF/embryo transfer cycles. Only the first treatment cycle per patient was analysed. Peak oestradiol denoted the concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Mid-luteal oestradiol was obtained 3 days after embryo transfer (8 days after HCG administration). A total of 44 pregnancies were noted (41.51%). There were no differences in age, cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), peak oestradiol, number of retrieved oocytes, number of embryo transfers, and mid-luteal oestradiol between pregnant and non-pregnant women. However, the ratio of day of HCG oestradiol to mid-luteal oestradiol was highly predictive of successful outcome: the ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate (sacs with fetal heart beat/embryo transfer) were 15.8 and 5.7% respectively if the above ratio exceeded 5.0 (n = 19), compared to 42.1 and 16.3%, and 53.3 and 26. 5% if the ratio was between 0.4 and 2.5 (n = 57), and between 2.5 and 5.0 (n = 30) respectively. Our study suggests that the magnitude of decline in oestradiol concentrations after oocyte retrieval may be important in predicting IVF success. We postulate that endometrial integrity may become compromised when a dramatic drop in oestradiol occurs by the mid-luteal period. Whether these women benefit from oestradiol supplementation after oocyte retrieval remains to be investigated.

The measurement of ovarian volume has been recently shown to predict follicular response in in-vitro fertilization (IVF), specifically a lower number of retrieved oocytes with decreasing ovarian volume. This test appears to be better than basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as a prognostic measure of ovarian reserve. However, the effect of pituitary desensitization on ovarian volume has not been previously investigated. We prospectively evaluated 38 women undergoing IVF using a long luteal leuprolide acetate (LA) protocol. All women had their ovarian volume measurements performed on day 21, the day of LA start, and again on the day of gonadotrophin start. The mean age was 30.6 +/- 3.9 years (range 23-37). Basal FSH was 5.4 +/- 1.9 IU/l (range 1.2-10.2). The mean preLA ovarian volume was 7.0 +/- 3.6 cm3 (left ovary 6.8 +/- 3.9, right ovary 7.1 +/- 3.8), compared to 6.3 +/- 4.2 cm3 postLA (left ovary 6.0 +/- 4.9, right ovary 6.5 +/- 4.8) (not significant). The mean number of small antral follicles noted in both ovaries was also unchanged after pituitary desensitization. Pituitary desensitization using LA had no effect on overall ovarian volume measurements. The total number of retrieved oocytes decreased with increasing age and decreasing ovarian volume.

The impact of hydrosalpinx (HSPX) on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome has recently been the subject of intense debate. Most, but not all, studies have reported decreased implantation and pregnancy rates and increased early pregnancy loss in HSPX patients. This has led to prophylactic salpingectomies prior to IVF in HSPX patients despite the lack of any prospective studies to suggest that any improvement will occur. Women with HSPX constitute a heterogeneous population because some conceive easily with IVF while others do not until after surgical correction. HSPX also increases in size with ovarian stimulation, and can cause implantation failure by fluid reflux into the uterine cavity. Careful assessment of the endometrial lining is mandatory in HSPX to rule out fluid reflux from the HSPX. We present two case reports of patients whose HSPX enlarged with ovarian stimulation, causing fluid reflux into the uterine cavity which was only noted after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration.