4 results on '"Nijkeuter, M."'
Search Results
2. Rationale for catheter-based therapies in acute pulmonary embolism
- Author
-
MS Interne Geneeskunde, Team Medisch, Longziekten, de Winter, M A, Vlachojannis, G J, Ruigrok, D, Nijkeuter, M, Kraaijeveld, A O, MS Interne Geneeskunde, Team Medisch, Longziekten, de Winter, M A, Vlachojannis, G J, Ruigrok, D, Nijkeuter, M, and Kraaijeveld, A O
- Published
- 2019
3. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding with extended anticoagulation: the VTE-PREDICT risk score.
- Author
-
de Winter MA, Büller HR, Carrier M, Cohen AT, Hansen JB, Kaasjager KAH, Kakkar AK, Middeldorp S, Raskob GE, Sørensen HT, Visseren FLJ, Wells PS, Dorresteijn JAN, and Nijkeuter M
- Subjects
- Humans, Recurrence, Anticoagulants adverse effects, Hemorrhage chemically induced, Hemorrhage epidemiology, Risk Factors, Venous Thromboembolism drug therapy
- Abstract
Aims: Deciding to stop or continue anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) after initial treatment is challenging, as individual risks of recurrence and bleeding are heterogeneous. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate models for predicting 5-year risks of recurrence and bleeding in patients with VTE without cancer who completed at least 3 months of initial treatment, which can be used to estimate individual absolute benefits and harms of extended anticoagulation., Methods and Results: Competing risk-adjusted models were derived to predict recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding (non-major and major) using 14 readily available patient characteristics. The models were derived from combined individual patient data from the Bleeding Risk Study, Hokusai-VTE, PREFER-VTE, RE-MEDY, and RE-SONATE (n = 15,141, 220 recurrences, 189 bleeding events). External validity was assessed in the Danish VTE cohort, EINSTEIN-CHOICE, GARFIELD-VTE, MEGA, and Tromsø studies (n = 59 257, 2283 recurrences, 3335 bleeding events). Absolute treatment effects were estimated by combining the models with hazard ratios from trials and meta-analyses. External validation in different settings showed agreement between predicted and observed risks up to 5 years, with C-statistics ranging from 0.48-0.71 (recurrence) and 0.61-0.68 (bleeding). In the Danish VTE cohort, 5-year risks ranged from 4% to 19% for recurrent VTE and 1% -19% for bleeding., Conclusion: The VTE-PREDICT risk score can be applied to estimate the effect of extended anticoagulant treatment for individual patients with VTE and to support shared decision-making., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: Marc Carrier reports research funding from BMS, Leo Pharma, and Pfizer, and honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi, BMS, Leo Pharma, Servier and Pfizer. All fees are paid to his institution. Ander Cohen reports grants or contracts, consulting fees and payment or honoraria from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS/Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. All fees were paid to his company. Alfredo Farjat was a full-time employee at Thrombosis Research Institute when he collaborated with this study. Akos Ference Pap is an employee of Bayer AG. Samuel Goldhaber reports grants or contracts from Bayer, Boston Scientific BTG EKOS, NHLBI, BMS, Janssen and Pfizer, consulting fees from Agile, Pfizer, Bayer, speaker fees from Lankenau Grand Rounds in Medicine, Bakken Symposium -University of Minnesota, The Brigham Board Review in Critical Care ‘Virtual Studio/Distance Learning’, New York Cardiovascular Symposium, Latin American Anticoagulation Series Conference, Jeresaty Symposium—Trinity Health of New England, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School Grand Rounds, SBACV Symposium—Brazil Society of Angiology and Vascular Medicine, Brigham-Sheba Collaboration on Thrombosis and Vascular Medicine and Philippine Society of Vascular Medicine Annual Convention. Michael Grosso is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. Ajay Kakkar reports grants from Bayer AG, Sanofi SA, personal fees from Anthos Therapeutics, Bayer AG, Sanofi S.A. Karen Pieper reports consulting fees from Cryolife, J&J Pharmaceuticals, Artivion and Element Science. Gary Raskob reports consultancy fees or honoraria from AMAG Pharma, Anylam, Anthos Therapeutics, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Janssen Global Services LLC, Pfizer, and XaTrek; honoraria from BMS, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo; DSMB or advisory board membership from Anthos Therapetuics, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group of OU Health, stock or stock option ownership for AbbVie, Inc., Gilead Sciences Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, LLC., LLY, MRK, and Pfizer. Sam Schulman reports research grants, paid to his institution, from Octopharma, and consulting fees from Alexion, Bayer, Boehringer–Ingelheim, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo and Octopharma. Minggao Shi is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo. Phillip Wells reports grants and speaker fees from BMS/Pfizer, consulting fees from Anthos and speaker fees and consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare. All fees are paid to his institution. The other authors have nothing to declare., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Rationale for catheter-based therapies in acute pulmonary embolism.
- Author
-
de Winter MA, Vlachojannis GJ, Ruigrok D, Nijkeuter M, and Kraaijeveld AO
- Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. High-risk features of PE are hypotension or shock, and early reperfusion is warranted to unload the strained right ventricle and improve clinical outcomes. Currently, systemic thrombolysis (ST) is the standard of care but is associated with bleeding complications. Catheter-based therapies (CDT) have emerged as a promising alternative having demonstrated to be equally effective while having a lower risk of bleeding. Several CDT are currently available, some combining mechanical properties with low-dose thrombolytics. Recent guidelines suggest that CDT may be considered in patients with high-risk PE who have high bleeding risk, after failed ST, or in patients with rapid haemodynamic deterioration as bail-out before ST can be effective, depending on local availability and expertise. In haemodynamically stable patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (intermediate-risk PE), CDT may be considered if clinical deterioration occurs after starting anticoagulation and relative contraindications for ST due to bleeding risk exist. Decision on treatment modality should follow a risk-benefit analysis on a case by case base, weighing the risk of PE-related complications; i.e. haemodynamic deterioration vs. bleeding. As timely initiation of treatment is warranted to prevent early mortality, bleeding risk factors should be assessed at an early stage in all patients with acute PE and signs of RV dysfunction. To ensure optimal management of complex cases of PE and assess a potential CDT strategy, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. A dedicated Pulmonary Embolism Response Team may optimize this process., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. © The Author(s) 2019.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.