Search

Aims: The predictive role of local impedance (LI) drop in lesion formation using a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter was recently described. The purpose of our current study was to assess the temporal characteristics of LI drop during ablation and its correlation with acute lesion efficacy., Methods and Results: Point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation was performed. The efficacy of applications was determined by pacing along the circular ablation line and assessing loss of capture. Local impedance, contact force, and catheter position data with high resolution were analysed and compared in successful and unsuccessful applications. Five hundred and fifty-nine successful and 84 unsuccessful applications were analysed. The successful applications showed higher baseline LI (P < 0.001) and larger LI drop during ablation (P < 0.001, for all). In case of unsuccessful applications, after a moderate but significant drop from baseline to the 2 s time point (153 vs. 145 Ω, P < 0.001), LI did not change further (P = 0.99). Contradictorily, in case of successful applications, the LI significantly decreased further (baseline-2 s-10 s: 161-150-141 Ω, P < 0.001 for all). The optimal cut-point for the LI drop indicating unsuccessful application was <9 Ω at the 4-s time point [AUC = 0.73 (0.67-0.76), P < 0.001]. Failing to reach this cut-point predicted unsuccessful applications [OR 3.82 (2.34-6.25); P < 0.001]., Conclusion: A rapid and enduring drop of the LI may predict effective lesion formation, while slightly changing or unchanged LI is associated with unsuccessful applications. A moderate LI drop during the first 4 s of radiofrequency application predicts ineffective radiofrequency delivery., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: N.S. and L.G. report consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Abbott, and Boston Scientific, not related to the present study. V.K.N. reports lecture fees and honoraria from Abbott and Boston Scientific, not related to the present study. N.P. is employed by Boston Scientific International B.V., Kerkrade, The Netherlands. I.S. received fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Orchestra Biomed. Z.S. reports consultation fees from Abbott and Johnson & Johnson, not related to the present study. The other authors report no conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Recommendations on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) are based on less robust evidence than those in sinus rhythm (SR). We aimed to assess the efficacy of CRT upgrade in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial population by their baseline rhythm., Methods and Results: Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and previously implanted pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and ≥20% right ventricular (RV) pacing burden were randomized to CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145). Primary [HF hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality, or <15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume] and secondary outcomes were investigated. At enrolment, 131 (36%) patients had AF, who had an increased risk for HFH as compared with those with SR [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-7.13; P = 0.013]. The effect of CRT-D upgrade was similar in patients with AF as in those with SR [AF adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.06; 95% CI 0.02-0.17; P < 0.001; SR aOR 0.13; 95% CI 0.07-0.27; P < 0.001; interaction P = 0.29] during the mean follow-up time of 12.4 months. Also, it decreased the risk of HFH or all-cause mortality (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.70; P = 0.003; interaction P = 0.17) and improved the echocardiographic response (left ventricular end-diastolic volume difference -49.21 mL; 95% CI -69.10 to -29.32; P < 0.001; interaction P = 0.21)., Conclusion: In HFrEF patients with AF and PM/ICD with high RV pacing burden, CRT-D upgrade decreased the risk of HFH and improved reverse remodelling when compared with ICD, similar to that seen in patients in SR., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B.M. reports grants from Boston Scientific, NRDIF Hungary, and National Heart Program during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Biotronik, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and grants from Medtronic outside the submitted work. I.O. reports lecture and advisory fees from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Vitatron and travel grants from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Attila K. reports grants from Bolyai Research Scholarship and FK ‘OTKA’ Research Grant from NKFIH outside the submitted work, stock from CardioSight, Inc. and stock option from Argus Cognitive, Inc. outside the submitted work, and personal fees from Argus Cognitive, Inc. and CardioSight Hungary LLC outside the submitted work. G.D. reports research grants to institution from Medtronic and Biotronik and lecture and advisory fees from Medtronic, Biotronik, and Abbott. C.F. reports support from the Semmelweis University, grants from Medtronic, consulting fees from Medtronic and Biotronik Hungary, and payment or honoraria for lectureures from Johnson and Johnson Co., Abbott Laboratories and Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH and Co. L.G. reports support for the present manuscript from Vitatron Medical, Boston Scientific, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Hungary, and Biotronik Hungary; consulting fees from Medtronic Hungary and Abbott Hungary; honoraria; travel grants; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board; and role in other board and committee (FESC, FEHRA, President of the Scientific Committee of the Hungarian Society of Cardiology, Past President of the Working Group on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Pacing, and EHRA Scientific Programme Board). Annamária K. reports grants from Bolyai Research Scholarship outside the submitted work; consulting fees from Medtronic; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotronik, and Novartis; payment for expert testimony from Boehringer Ingelheim and Boston Scientific; travel grants from AstraZeneca and Novartis; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim and Boston Scientific; and role in other board and committee (committee member of Hungarian Society of Cardiology and secretary of the Working Group on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Pacing, Hungarian Society of Cardiology). S.D.S. reports grants to institution from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH/NHLBI, NeuroTronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI and consulting fees outside the scope of the current work from Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProthera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, AnaCardio, Akros, and Valo. R.H. reports institutional grants from Abbott, Biotronik, and Slovak Research and Development Agency; honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic; and travel grants from the European Society of Cardiology and Pfizer. He is also the president of the Slovak Heart Rhythm Association. E.M. reports grants from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Biotronik Hungary. V.K. reports grants from Boston Scientific, ZOLL, Biotronik, Spire Inc., and NIH, consulting fees from Biotronik and Zoll, and payment or honoraria for lectures from Abbott Medical and Medtronic. The other authors declare no conflict of interest for this contribution., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Cerebral thrombo-embolism is a dreaded complication of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation; its surrogate, silent cerebral embolism (SCE) can be detected by diffusion-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI). Initial investigations have raised a concern that very high-power, short-duration (vHPSD; 90 W/4 s) temperature-controlled PVI with the QDOT Micro catheter may be associated with a higher incidence of SCE compared with low-power long-duration ablation. We aimed to assess the incidence of procedural complications of vHPSD PVI with an emphasis on cerebral safety., Methods and Results: We enrolled 328 consecutive patients undergoing their PVI procedure using vHPSD. A subgroup of 61 consecutive patients underwent diffusion-weighted bMRI within 24 h of the procedure, and incidence and predictors of SCE were studied. The mean procedure time and left atrial dwell time for the overall cohort were 69.6 ± 24.1 and 46.5 ± 21.5 min, respectively. First-pass isolation was achieved in 82%. No stroke or transient ischaemic attack occurred. Silent cerebral embolism was identified in 5 of 61 patients (8.2%). Silent cerebral embolism following procedures was significantly associated with lower baseline generator impedance (105.8 vs. 112.6 Ω, P < 0.0001) and with intermittent loss of catheter-tissue contact during ablation (14.1% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Very high-power, short-duration PVI is a safe technique with an excellent acute success rate. Silent cerebral embolism incidence in our cohort was below the previously reported range, with no clinically overt cerebral complications. Lower baseline generator impedance and loss of contact during ablation may contribute to a higher risk of SCEs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: N.S. and L.G. report consulting fees from Biosense Webster, Abbott, and Boston Scientific, not related to the present study. Z.S. and K.V.N. report consulting fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific, unrelated to the present study. For all other authors, there are no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background and Aims: De novo implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block, heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, among HFrEF patients with right ventricular pacing (RVP), the efficacy of CRT-D upgrade is uncertain., Methods: In this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial, 360 symptomatic (New York Heart Association Classes II-IVa) HFrEF patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), high RVP burden ≥ 20%, and a wide paced QRS complex duration ≥ 150 ms were randomly assigned to receive CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145) in a 3:2 ratio. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or <15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization., Results: Over a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the primary outcome occurred in 58/179 (32.4%) in the CRT-D arm vs. 101/128 (78.9%) in the ICD arm (odds ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.19; P < .001). All-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 22/215 (10%) in the CRT-D arm vs. 46/145 (32%) in the ICD arm (hazard ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.47; P < .001). The incidence of procedure- or device-related complications was similar between the two arms [CRT-D group 25/211 (12.3%) vs. ICD group 11/142 (7.8%)]., Conclusions: In pacemaker or ICD patients with significant RVP burden and reduced ejection fraction, upgrade to CRT-D compared with ICD therapy reduced the combined risk of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or absence of reverse remodelling., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Controversial results have been published regarding the influence of pulmonary vein (PV) anatomical variations on outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, no data are available on the impact of PV orientation on the long-term success rates of point-by-point PVI. We sought to determine the impact of PV anatomy and orientation on atrial fibrillation (AF)-free survival in patients undergoing PVI using the radiofrequency point-by-point technique., Methods and Results: We retrospectively included 448 patients who underwent initial point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for AF at our department. Left atrial computed tomography angiography was performed before each procedure. PV anatomical variations, ostial parameters (area, effective diameter, and eccentricity), orientation, and their associations with 24-month AF-free survival were analysed. PV anatomical variations and ostial parameters were not predictive for AF-free survival (all P > 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that female sex (P = 0.025) was associated with higher rates of AF recurrence, ventral-caudal (P = 0.002), dorsal-cranial (P = 0.034), and dorsal-caudal (P = 0.042) orientation of the right superior PV (RSPV), on the other hand, showed an association with lower rates of AF recurrence, when compared with the reference ventral-cranial orientation. On multivariate analysis, both female sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.15-2.93, P = 0.011] and ventral-caudal RSPV orientation, compared with ventral-cranial orientation, proved to be independent predictors of 24-month AF recurrence (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.71, P = 0.003)., Conclusion: Female sex and ventral-caudal RSPV orientation have an impact on long-term arrhythmia-free survival. Assessment of PV orientation may be a useful tool in predicting AF-free survival and may contribute to a more personalized management of AF., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: Patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator are often considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, limited comprehensive data are available regarding their long-term outcomes., Methods and Results: Our retrospective registry included 2524 patients [1977 (78%) de novo, 547 (22%) upgrade patients] with mild to severe symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS ≥ 130ms. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation (HTX), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation; secondary endpoints were death from any cause and post-procedural complications. In our cohort, upgrade patients were older [71 (65-77) vs. 67 (59-73) years; P < 0.001], were less frequently females (20% vs. 27%; P = 0.002) and had more comorbidities than de novo patients. During the median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 1091 (55%) de novo and 342 (63%) upgrade patients reached the primary endpoint. In univariable analysis, upgrade patients exhibited a higher risk of mortality/HTX/LVAD than the de novo group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.61; P < 0.001]. However, this difference disappeared after adjusting for covariates (adjusted HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86-1.48; P = 0.402), or propensity score matching (propensity score-matched HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.95-1.29; P = 0.215). From device-related complications, lead dysfunction (3.1% vs. 1%; P < 0.001) and pocket infections (3.7% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.014) were more frequent in the upgrade group compared to de novo patients., Conclusion: In our retrospective analysis, upgrade patients had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than de novo patients, which might be attributable to their more significant comorbidity burden. The occurrence of lead dysfunction and pocket infections was more frequent in the upgrade group., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Unlike in atrial fibrillation ablation, there is a lack of appropriately sized and properly designed studies regarding outflow tract (OT) premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation outcomes with contact force sensing (CFS) catheters. We aimed to compare the acute success-, complication-, and long-term recurrence rates of manual CFS catheters with traditional irrigated catheters (T) in OT PVC ablation., Methods and Results: Single-centre, propensity-matched data of 75-75 patients ablated for right-sided OT (RVOT) or left-sided OT (LVOT) PVCs in 2015-17 with CFS or T catheters were compared. Acute success rate, peri-procedural complications, post-procedural daily PVC burden, and long-term recurrence rates were compared on intention-to-treat basis. Acute success rate equalled 80% in both groups, with no difference in force values in the CFS group comparing successful or failed cases [12.0 (8.75-17.0) vs. 16.0 (10.25-22.25) g, P = 0.21]. There were three cases of pseudo-aneurysm and one cardiac tamponade. PVC burden fell significantly from baseline 22 (15-30)% to 2 (0-10)% (P < 0.0001), with no difference between catheter types [CFS: 1 (0-7)% vs. T: 4 (1-12) %; P = 0.21]. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival of CFS and T catheters (58 vs. 59%, P = 0.29) during 12 months of follow-up, respectively. Recurrence in the CFS group did not differ either by the force exerted below or above the median value of 12 g (P = 0.66)., Conclusion: Both types of catheters can effectively reduce OT PVC burden with minimal serious complication rates. Ablation with CFS or T catheters gives similar acute- and long-term results., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: The aim of our study was to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation (TELVLI)., Methods and Results: Transseptal endocardial left ventricular lead implantation was performed in 54 patients (44 men, median age 69, New York Heart Association III-IV stage) between 2007 and 2017 in a single centre. In 36 cases, the transseptal puncture (TP) was performed via the femoral vein, and in 18 cases, the TP and also the left ventricular (LV) lead placement were performed via the subclavian vein. An electrophysiological deflectable catheter was used to reach the LV wall through the dilated TP hole. The LV lead implantation was successful in all patients. A total of 54 patients were followed up for a median of 29 months [interquartile range (IQR) 8-40 months], the maximum follow-up time was 94 months. Significant improvement in the LV ejection fraction was observed at the 3-month visit, from the median of 27% (IQR 25-34%) to 33% (IQR 32-44%), P < 0.05. Early lead dislocation was observed in three cases (5%), reposition was performed using the original puncture site in all. The patients were maintained on anticoagulation therapy with a target international normalized ratio between 2.5 and 3.5. Four thromboembolic events were noticed during follow-up. A total of 27 patients died, with a median survival of 15 months (IQR 6-40)., Conclusion: The TELVLI is an effective approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) however it is associated with a substantial thromboembolic risk (7%)., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has made huge progress with respect to innovation, efficacy, and safety, however, complications are still present. Recent studies examined various predictors of complications. However, limited data exist regarding the role of a repeat procedure. Our aim was the prospective evaluation of the incidence and predictors of complications related to AF ablation procedures in consecutive patients, including repeat procedures., Methods and Results: All ablation procedures for AF between January 2013 and December 2015 were analysed in our electrophysiology laboratory. During the study period 1243 procedures were analysed [394 female, median age 62 (55-69)]. Overall complication rate was 6.84%, major complication rate was 2.82%. Major complications were the following: 18 pericardial tamponades; 5 pseudoaneurysms; 1 arteriovenous fistula; 6 thromboembolic cerebrovascular events; 3 pulmonary vein stenosis; and 2 atrioventricular blocks. No atrio-oesophageal fistula or procedure related death occurred. Univariate analysis for overall complications showed that age ≥ 65 years (P = 0.0231), female gender (P = 0.0438), hypertension (P = 0.0488), CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 (P = 0.0156), and previous AF ablation procedure (P < 0.0001) is associated with higher risk for adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed that the only independent predictor of overall complications was previous AF ablation procedure (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the only predictor of major complications was previous AF ablation procedure (P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Incidence of complications associated with AF ablation in our high volume electrophysiology laboratory is similar to other cohorts. The only independent predictor of complications was previous AF ablation procedure in our series., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aim: Failure rate to implant left ventricular (LV) lead transvenously is 4-8% in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. Epicardial lead placement is an alternative method and if not applicable case reports and small series showed the feasibility of endocardial LV lead implantation. Electroanatomical mapping might be a useful tool to guide this procedure., Methods and Results: Four patients had undergone endocardial LV lead implantation after unsuccessful transvenous implantation or epicardial LV lead dysfunction using the transseptal approach. Electroanatomical mapping was used to mark the location of the transseptal puncture. This location point guided the mapping catheter from the subclavian access and facilitated positioning of the LV lead at the adjacent latest activation area of the left ventricle detected by activation mapping. Endocardial active fixation LV leads were successfully implanted in all patients with stable electrical parameters immediately after implantation and over a mean follow-up of 18.3 months (lead impedance 520 ± 177 vs. 439 ± 119 Ω and pacing threshold 0.8 ± 0.2 V, 0.5 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 V, 0.5 ms, respectively). Patients were maintained on anticoagulation therapy with a target international normalized ratio of 3.5-4.5 and did not show any thromboembolic, haemorrhagic events, or infection. Echocardiography showed significant improvement of LV systolic function with marked improvement of the functional status., Conclusions: Electroanatomical mapping is a useful technical tool to guide endocardial LV lead implantation. It helps to identify the location of the transseptal puncture and the use of activation mapping might facilitate location of the optimal lead positions during CRT.

Aims: Arrhythmias occurring late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) are common. Due to the risk of sudden cardiac death, attention is focused towards ventricular tachycardias (VT). The aims of this study were to determine the clinical profile of patients with known benign and malignant arrhythmias and to assess patients with palpitations without documented arrhythmias., Methods and Results: Fifty-two patients with prior ToF repair were included in this study (mean follow-up: 18+/-7.3 years). Echocardiographic measurements such as left ventricular ejection fraction, left and right atrial (LA and RA) diameters, left and right ventricular diameters (LVEDD and RVEDD), pulmonary and tricuspid regurgitation (TI and PI) and electrocardiographic parameters such as QRS duration, P-wave duration, P-wave dispersion were obtained and compared in patients with and without a history of palpitations. The same comparisons were performed between patients with documented supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) and VT. Twenty-seven of 52 patients had a clinical history of palpitations. The remaining 25 patients served as controls. Eleven patients had documented SVT and 6 patients had documented VT. In patients with documented SVT, the RA size and the QRS durations were significantly higher than in the controls (RA: 55.3+/-5.6 vs. 47.4+/-4.8 mm, P=0.03, QRS: 160.0+/-25.9 vs. 131.8+/-26.1 ms, P=0.01). In patients with VT, the LVEDD, LA, and QRS durations showed significantly higher values compared with the control patients (LVEDD: 53.5+/-4.7 vs. 45.6+/-6.8 mm; LA: 56.0+/-3.4 vs. 48.5+/-4.8 mm, P=0.01; QRS: 169.5+/-29.7 ms vs. 131.8+/-26.1 ms; P=0.001). The only significant differences between patients with and without palpitations were the RA size (58.2+/-3.9 vs. 50.5+/-5.2 mm, P=0.02) and the P-wave dispersion (26.8+/-15.2 vs. 16.6+/-4.3 ms, P=0.04)., Conclusion: Our present data suggest that undocumented arrhythmias are most likely SVTs and are associated with increased RA size.