1. Culture and other direct detection methods to diagnose human granulocytic anaplasmosis.
- Author
-
Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Zentmaier L, Liveris D, Visintainer P, Schwartz I, Dumler JS, and Wormser GP
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, HL-60 Cells, Adult, Anaplasmosis diagnosis, Anaplasmosis microbiology, Ehrlichiosis diagnosis, Ehrlichiosis microbiology, Ehrlichiosis blood, Aged, 80 and over, Granulocytes pathology, Anaplasma phagocytophilum isolation & purification, Anaplasma phagocytophilum genetics, Polymerase Chain Reaction methods
- Abstract
Objectives: We sought to assess the performance of 3 laboratory tests on blood specimens for direct detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the cause of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), in patients tested at a single medical institution in New York State., Methods: Direct tests included microscopic blood smear examination for intragranulocytic inclusions, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and culture using the HL-60 cell line. The HGA cases testing positive by only 1 direct test were not included, unless HGA was confirmed by acute or convalescent serology using an indirect immunofluorescent assay., Results: From 1997 to 2009, 71 patients with HGA were diagnosed by at least 1 of the 3 direct test methods. For the subgroup of 55 patients who were tested using all 3 methods, culture was positive for 90.9% (50/55) vs 81.8% (45/55) for PCR vs 63.6% (35/55) for blood smear (P =.002). Most cultures (79.3%) were detected as positive within 1 week of incubation., Conclusions: Although using culture to detect A phagocytophilum is likely not amenable for implementation in most hospital laboratories, in our experience, culture had the highest yield among the direct tests evaluated., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF