Search

Objective: To describe our clinical experience of using combination of fluorescent iodized emulsion, indocyanine green & lipiodol, and hook-wire in pre-operative CT localization of patients with subsolid lung lesions prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)., Methods: A retrospective review between June 2018 and July 2019 of consecutive Chinese patients whom underwent VATS for subsolid lung lesions with pre-operative CT localization done with combination of fluorescent iodized emulsion and hook-wire technique in a tertiary hospital (Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong SAR). The duration and complications related to the localization procedure were recorded The clinical records, operative findings and pathology reports were retrieved from the hospital electronic clinical management system., Results: Combination fluorescent iodized emulsion with hook-wire enabled accurate localization and resection of all subsolid lung lesions in VATS. No major complications were reported., Conclusion: Combination of fluorescent iodized emulsion and hook-wire placement under CT guidance is a simple, safe and cost- effective procedure that enabled accurate localization and resection of subsolid nodule in VATS., Advances in Knowledge: VATS has been the mainstay for indeterminate pulmonary nodules for diagnostic and/or curative purpose. The main problem that surgeons may encounter during operation is the difficulty in locating the target lesion particularly for subsolid lesions. Many pre-operative localization methods have been developed in this regard. With the novel technique that we described, we were able to overcome disadvantages of most described methods.

We report a case of a large right atrial hemangioma masquerading as a clinical presentation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in a 57-year-old man, who was wrongfully treated with nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) prior to surgical consultation. The exact diagnosis was made during the investigation for his cardiac arrhythmia. A large right atrial tumor obstructing the tricuspid valve intermittently was noted on cardiac echocardiography. His symptoms became worse when the patient was lying flat. Tumor excision under cardiopulmonary bypass was carried out, which confirmed the preoperative finding of cardiac hemangioma. The patient underwent uneventful recovery postoperatively and the symptoms of OSAS settled after surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of right atrial tumor masquerading as a clinical presentation of OSAS.

Objective: Studies in other surgical specialties have suggested that pre-emptive wound infiltration using a local anesthetic may reduce post-operative pain. We report the first randomized trial to assess the use of pre-emptive local anesthesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)., Method: Thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing bilateral needlescopic VATS sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis were studied prospectively. Each patient acted as their own control. For each patient, one side was randomized to receive 10ml 0.5% bupivicaine injected to the port sites before incision, and the contralateral control side to receive 10ml saline. Pain severity on a visual analog scale (VAS) was recorded for each chest side at 4h, 1 day and 7 days following surgery. All patients were blinded to the results of randomization throughout the study., Results: Follow up was complete for all patients. At 7 days after surgery, wound pain was significantly reduced by pre-emptive local anesthesia, with 10 (62.5%) of the 16 patients having residual pain reporting less pain on the pre-treated side (p=0.039). There was a trend for reduced pain on the pre-treated side at the other time points. Pain reduction by pre-emptive local anesthesia was not correlated with any demographic or clinical variable. Chest wall paresthesia distinct from localized wound pain was noted by six patients (19.4%), but was not reduced by pre-emptive local anesthesia. Overall, the post-operative discomforts felt by the patients after needlescopic VATS were mild, and did not cause significant functional disturbances., Conclusion: Pre-emptive wound infiltration with a local anesthetic may reduce post-operative wound pain in needlescopic VATS procedures.

Objective: The pain following thoracic surgery and trauma is often refractory to conventional analgesic strategies. However, it shares key characteristics with neuropathic pain which gabapentin, an anticonvulsant, has been proven to effectively treat. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study assessing the use of gabapentin in cardiothoracic surgery patients., Methods: Gabapentin was prescribed to 60 consecutive out-patients with refractory pain persisting at four weeks or more after thoracic surgery or trauma. Follow-up of 45 patients (75%) was performed for a median of 21 months (range: 12-28), and clinical data collected prospectively. The mean age of these patients was 51.6 years (range 22-83). Of these 45 patients, 22 had received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), 8 had received thoracotomy, 3 had received median sternotomy, and 12 were treated for blunt chest trauma., Results: The mean duration of pre-treatment refractory pain was 5.76 months (range 1-62). The mean duration of gabapentin use was 21.9 weeks (range 1-68). No deaths or major complications were encountered. Minor side effects-mostly somnolence and dizziness-occurred in 18 patients (40.0%), causing 3 patients (6.7%) to discontinue gabapentin. Overall, 33 patients (73.3%) noted reduction of pain. Chest wall paresthesia distinguishable from wound pain was relieved in 24 (75.0%) of 32 affected patients. Severe initial pain was significantly correlated with pain relief using gabapentin (p=0.009). No other demographical or clinical variable correlated with benefit or side effects. Satisfaction with gabapentin use was expressed by 40 patients (88.9%). Side effects were not a source of dissatisfaction in any patient., Conclusions: Gabapentin appears safe and well tolerated when used for persistent post-operative and post-traumatic pain in thoracic surgery patients, although minor side effects do occur. Gabapentin may relieve refractory chest wall pain in some of these patients, particularly those with more severe pain. Further studies are warranted to define the role of gabapentin in cardiothoracic surgical practice.

Objective: Chest wall paresthesia is a reported sequela of thoracotomy and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) which is distinct from wound pain. Although needlescopic VATS confers less post-operative pain and better cosmesis, the incidence of paresthesia after needlescopic VATS has not been quantified., Methods: For homogeneity of the patient cohort, we studied 50 patients who received bilateral needlescopic VATS sympathectomy (T2-T4 excision) for palmar hyperhidrosis using 2 or 3 mm instruments during a 36-month period at a single institute. A standard questionnaire was administered by telephone interview, with 34 patents responding (68.0%). The median post-operative observation time was 16.5 months (range: 10-40 months). Collected data were compared with a historical group who received conventional VATS using 10 mm ports., Results: Paresthetic discomfort distinguishable from wound pain was described by 17 patients (50.0%). The most common descriptions were of 'bloating' (41.2%), 'pins and needles' (35.3%), or 'numbness' (23.5%) in the chest wall. The paresthesia resolved in less than two months in 12 patients (70.6%), but was still felt for over 12 months in three patients (17.6%). Post-operative paresthesia and pain did not impact on patient satisfaction with the surgery, whereas compensatory hyperhidrosis in 24 patients (70.6%) did (P=0.001). The rates and characteristics of the paresthesia following needlescopic VATS are similar to those observed after conventional VATS., Conclusions: Chest wall paresthesia affects a significant but previously overlooked proportion of patients following needlescopic VATS, but has minimal impact on post-operative satisfaction. Needlescopic VATS offers no apparent advantage over conventional VATS with regard to paresthesia.

Objective: Thoracic injuries are among the most severe forms of trauma and also a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) has recently provided an alternative method to simultaneously diagnose and manage patients sustaining chest injuries. We analyze our experience with VATS in the setting of thoracic trauma detailing indications for exploration, procedures performed and results of surgery., Methods: A 6-year single institution review of patients undergoing VATS due to injuries sustained from both blunt and penetrating chest trauma at a Level I trauma center and university teaching hospital. Comparisons were made between groups of blunt and penetrating trauma as to Injury Severity Score (ISS), presence of extra-thoracic injuries, initial thoracostomy drainage and length of postoperative stay., Results: VATS was successfully performed in 19 consecutive patients without conversion to thoracotomy. Indications for exploration included acute hemorrhage, retained hemothorax, suspected diaphragmatic injuries (DI), suspected cardiac injury, intra-thoracic foreign body, persistent airleak and chronic empyema. Procedures performed consisted of evacuation of retained hemothorax, hemostasis of intra-thoracic bleeders, repair of DI, wedge lung resections and decortication. Mean postoperative length of stay was 5.86 days. There were no morbidities. One patient with severe intra-abdominal injuries expired on the first postoperative day., Conclusion: In hemodynamically stable patients with thoracic injuries, VATS provides an accurate assessment of intra-thoracic organ injury and can be utilized to definitively and effectively manage injuries sustained as a result of blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma. VATS should be used with caution in patients sustaining severe and life threatening intra-abdominal injuries.