Search

Background: Fumaric acid esters (FAE) are safe and effective in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis but have a slow onset of action. A short-term combination with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) may substantially accelerate the therapeutic response in the induction phase of treatment., Objectives: To assess the synergistic effect of a 6-week course of NB-UVB phototherapy in addition to FAE in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: In this randomized, assessor-masked trial, patients with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of ≥ 10 and a body surface area affected of ≥ 10 were randomized either to monotherapy with FAE (n = 16) or a combination of FAE with NB-UVB (n = 14). The primary outcome parameter of the study was the mean PASI reduction after 6 weeks of treatment. In addition, the PASI 75 response (≥ 75% improvement from baseline PASI), the Psoriasis Log-based Area and Severity Index (PLASI) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed as secondary outcome measures., Results: In total, 30 patients (19 men, 11 women; median age 52 years, interquartile range 36-56) were analysed. The mean reduction in PASI after 6 weeks was significantly greater with the combination treatment than with FAE monotherapy (P = 0·016). This was paralleled by a much faster improvement in the DLQI in the combination group than in the FAE-monotherapy group., Conclusions: Adding a 6-week course of NB-UVB to FAE both accelerates and augments the therapeutic response during the early phase of treatment and increases quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., (© 2017 British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Ultraviolet (UV) A1 and psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) are effective treatment options for severe atopic dermatitis (AD); however, their relative efficacy has not yet been determined in a head-to-head study., Objectives: To compare UVA1 and oral 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP) plus UVA with respect to efficacy, tolerability and duration of response in patients with severe generalized AD., Methods: Forty patients were included in this randomized observer-blinded crossover trial. The patients received either 15 exposures to medium-dose UVA1 as the first treatment and, in cases of relapse, another 15 exposures to 5-MOP plus UVA as the second treatment, or vice versa. All patients were followed until 12 months after discontinuation of the last treatment. The SCORAD score was determined by a blinded investigator at baseline, after 10 and 15 treatments each and during the follow-up period. In addition, all adverse events were recorded during the whole study period., Results: Twenty-three patients completed the crossover treatment. Both phototherapies resulted in clinical improvement; however, PUVA reduced the baseline SCORAD score to a significantly greater extent than UVA1 (mean +/- SD 54.3 +/- 25.7% vs. 37.7 +/- 22.8%; P = 0.041). The median length of remission was 4 weeks (interquartile range 4-12) after UVA1 and 12 weeks (interquartile range 4-26) after PUVA therapy (P = 0.012)., Conclusions: PUVA provides a better short- and long-term response than medium-dose UVA1 in patients with severe AD.

Shiitake (Lentinus edodes) is a mushroom that is very popular in Asian cuisine. After ingestion of the raw fungus, dermatitis may occur in rare cases, and is commonly assumed to be a toxic reaction. We report a 52-year-old man who developed a generalized pruritic papulovesicular eruption 2 weeks after daily consumption of uncooked shiitake mushrooms. Prick-to-prick and scratch tests with uncooked mushrooms resulted in an eczematous reaction at 24 h that peaked at 72 h and persisted for 1 week. In contrast, no cutaneous reactions could be elicited in 20 healthy people. We conclude that our patient had systemic allergic contact dermatitis due to consumption of raw shiitake mushroom.

Background: Previous studies have shown elevated titres of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in 2.9-19% of patients with polymorphic light eruption (PLE). A diagnosis of lupus erythematosus (LE) was finally established in some of these ANA-positive patients., Objectives: To investigate whether the presence of ANA in patients with PLE merely represents an epiphenomenon or is associated with an increased risk of eventual progression to LE., Methods: We identified 472 patients with PLE who had received prophylactic photo(chemo)therapy between 1986 and 2003 and were routinely tested for the presence of ANA. All ANA-positive (ANA titre of>or=1:80) patients were asked to attend for a follow-up examination comprising a medical history, complete skin inspection and a detailed laboratory analysis including ANA and antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens., Results: Of all the patients, 55 (11.7%) were found to be ANA positive on one or several occasions, and three (0.6%) also had antibodies to SS-A/Ro. Thirty-nine (71%) of all ANA-positive patients including all Ro+ subjects were available for follow-up after a median follow-up period of 8 years (interquartile range 5-11.5). Twenty-five patients showed persistence of ANA positivity with a median titre of 1:160 (range 1:80-1:640), whereas in 14 patients ANA titres had returned to normal levels. None of the patients revealed additional clinical, histopathological or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of LE., Conclusions: After a median follow-up period of 8 years none of the ANA-positive patients developed LE. Our findings indicate that PLE is a benign disease without tendency to progress to LE.

Background: In a recent pilot study a novel, patented fatty acid-based 1% coal tar preparation (Exorex) has been found to be similar in efficacy to calcipotriol in the treatment of psoriasis., Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy, safety and cosmetic acceptability of the new 1% coal tar preparation in comparison with calcipotriol cream in a larger patient cohort., Patients and Methods: Forty patients with chronic plaque type psoriasis were included in this randomized, observer-blind, intrapatient comparison trial. In each patient two comparable target plaques were treated twice daily with 1% coal tar preparation or calcipotriol cream. At the onset of therapy and at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, the response to treatment was determined by the psoriasis severity index (PSI) that assesses the degree of erythema, infiltration and scaling of the psoriatic lesions on a five-point scale. In addition, all treatment-related side-effects were recorded and cosmetic acceptability of both treatments was rated every second week by the patients. After complete or near complete clearing the patients were followed up until relapse or for a maximum period of 18 months., Results: Thirty-eight patients completed the study. At termination of the trial the mean +/- SD baseline PSI score of 9.2 +/- 1.5 was reduced to 3.0 +/- 2.9 by 1% coal tar preparation and to 2.8 +/- 2.7 by calcipotriol. The mean PSI reduction between baseline and final assessment did not differ significantly between 1% coal tar preparation and calcipotriol (P = 0.77). The mean intraindividual difference in reduction of PSI score between 1% coal tar preparation and calcipotriol was 0.1 score points (95% confidence interval - 0.84 to + 0.63). No difference between either preparation was observed with regard to time until relapse. Itching was caused by 1% coal tar preparation in four patients and by calcipotriol in one patient. Unpleasant odour or staining of the 1% coal tar preparation was reported by six patients, whereas one patient complained about the smell of the calcipotriol cream., Conclusions: The novel 1% coal tar preparation was found to be comparably as effective as calcipotriol in treating psoriasis. Tolerability and cosmetic acceptability was better for calcipotriol. Taking into consideration that the coal tar preparation is considerably less expensive than calcipotriol this new product appears as a very useful topical medication for chronic plaque type psoriasis.

Background: Numerous studies have shown that the additional administration of topical or systemic antipsoriatic agents might serve as an effective means to increase the efficacy of photochemotherapy [psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA)] for psoriasis., Objectives: To compare the therapeutic response to tacalcitol plus PUVA, tazarotene plus PUVA and PUVA monotherapy in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis. In addition, we also assessed the duration of remission induced by each regimen and the tolerability of the two combination treatments., Methods: Thirty-one patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis were included in this observer-blinded, intrapatient comparison trial. PUVA treatment was given four times weekly. Additionally, tacalcitol ointment and 0.1% tazarotene gel were applied separately on two target areas once daily in the evening. At the onset of therapy and every 2 weeks thereafter the response to treatment was determined by the Psoriasis Severity Index score, which assesses the degree of erythema, infiltration and scaling of the psoriatic lesions. After complete or near complete clearing patients were followed-up until relapse., Results: Twenty-four patients completed the study. The treatment requirements to induce complete or near complete clearing were significantly lower for both combination treatments than for PUVA monotherapy (P < 0.01). The median cumulative UVA dose and number of exposures were 30.6 J cm-2 (95% confidence interval, CI 22.5-71.2) and 14 (95% CI 11-16) for tacalcitol plus PUVA, 32.3 J cm-2 (95% CI 22.5-73.8) and 14 (95% CI 11-19) for tazarotene plus PUVA, and 37.0 J cm-2 (95% CI 29.5-83.9) and 16 (95% CI 14-22) for PUVA monotherapy. No difference between the three regimens was observed with regard to duration of remission. Adverse reactions occurred more often with 0.1% tazarotene than with tacalcitol but were in general mild and completely reversible upon using a lower concentration of 0.05% tazarotene., Conclusions: Tacalcitol ointment and tazarotene gel are both comparably effective in improving the therapeutic result of PUVA therapy in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Besides accelerating the treatment response, both agents, by virtue of their UVA dose-sparing effect, might also help to reduce possible long-term hazards of PUVA treatment.