Search

Objectives: Improvement of clinical results in heart transplantation (HTx) has favoured the expansion of indication criteria towards aged population. The impact of increasing recipient age is controversial and, owing to donor shortage, the debate still remains whether HTx is justified for older patients. We analysed age as a prognostic factor at long-term after HTx and if it should be a determinant in organ allocation., Methods: Data of 364 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac transplantation between 1999 and 2014 at the University Hospital of Udine were analysed. Patients were divided into three groups according to age (Group 1: 18-40, Group 2: 41-59, Group 3: ≥ 60 years) and survival and major complications were evaluated at long-term (mean follow-up 6.7 ± 4.5 years, range 1-15.7 years)., Results: Preoperatively, renal failure (2.9, 16.1, 39.5%, P < 0.01) and cardiovascular factors such as diabetes (1.2, 17.1, 36.4%, P < 0.01), systemic hypertension (5.9, 31.5, 40.8%, P < 0.01) and dyslipidaemia (5.9, 40.3, 42.9%, P < 0.01) were more common in older patients (Group 3), as well as ischaemic cardiopathy (0, 42.6, 49.7%, P < 0.01). Donor age was lower in younger recipients (Group 1) (33 ± 15, 39 ± 14, 45 ± 14 years, P < 0.01). Older patients showed a worse long-term survival (hazard ratio 1.7; 1.1-2.5), also after adjusting for major cardiovascular risk factors, renal failure and donor age. In fact, 15-year survival was 100% in Group 1, while at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years survival was 88, 78, 69 and 56% in Group 2, and 87, 68, 49 and 43% in Group 3, respectively. Even major long-term complications were less frequent in younger patients in terms of neoplasms (P < 0.01), rehospitalizations (P < 0.01) and a tendency to higher freedom from other complications such as cytomegalovirus infections, renal failure and dialysis., Conclusions: Our results showed a significantly different outcome according to recipient age, even when adjusted for major risk factors. Notably, patients younger than 40 years showed 100% long-term survival, and apparent lower rate of complications due to immunosuppression. Since 15-year survival in patients ≤40 years is twice that of patients ≥60 years, recipient age should be taken into account in organ allocation., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Since patient compliance following organ transplantation is considered a limiting factor for long-term outcome, psychosocial assessment is commonly employed to evaluate suitability for organ transplantation. We analysed the impact of psychosocial characteristics on long-term outcome after heart transplantation in our institution., Methods: The outcomes of 345 patients (82% male, mean age: 56 ± 11 years) who had undergone a heart transplant since 1999 were evaluated taking into consideration major clinical and psychosocial findings. The impact on survival of the psychological habitus, substance abuse, economic status, education level, presence of caregivers and distance from the hospital (Area 1: <100 km, Area 2: ≥100 and <500 km, Area 3: ≥500 km) were considered in an univariate and multivariate analysis., Results: Univariate analysis showed that only retired patients had an increased risk of mortality. In fact, survival at 1, 5 and 10 years in unemployed versus retired versus employed people was 94 ± 3% vs 91 ± 2% vs 88 ± 3%; 86 ± 5% vs 75 ± 3% vs 80 ± 5%; 72 ± 8% vs 57 ± 5% vs 76 ± 5%, respectively (P = 0.05). Unemployed and employed patients were younger than retired patients. In multivariate analysis, after correction of clinical data, no psychosocial characteristics were found to be risk factors for long-term mortality: psychological problems [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87; 0.56-1.33]; smoking (HR = 0.96; 0.61-1.54); alcohol abuse (HR = 1.62; 0.73-3.61); absence of caregivers (HR = 0.9; 0.44-1.83); critical economical condition (HR = 1.12; 0.65-1.93); lower school degree (HR = 0.95; 0.60-1.51); unemployment (HR = 1.00; 0.58-1.73) and distance from hospital (HR = 1.12; 0.76-1.98). At the same time, no psychosocial factors were identified as risk factors for coronary allograft vasculopathy, acute rejection and infection., Conclusions: The psychosocial factors analysed in our study seem to have no impact on patient outcome, and should not preclude candidates from listing for heart transplantation; on the other hand psychosocial assessment should be utilized to identify patients requiring more specific surveillance to obtain the best outcome., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

The results of heart transplantation in a consecutive series of 19 end-stage valvular disease patients (15 male, aged 48 +/- 8 years) were analysed retrospectively. The indication for heart transplantation was heart failure due to left and/or right ventricular dysfunction; 16 patients had undergone previous valve surgery, but prosthetic dysfunction was present in only one patient. All patients were in NYHA class IV, 15 were on oral anticoagulants and 5 on i.v. catecholamine support. There were four in-hospital deaths (21%) and one late death (5%), resulting in a 1-year mortality rate slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of patients transplanted for other indications (16%). Mean follow-up of the survivors was 48 +/- 33 months (range 9-95); 5-year actuarial survival was similar to that observed among the other heart transplantation patients (74 +/- 10% vs 77 +/- 3%, P = NS). The incidence of acute rejection and infection was also similar in valvular disease and non-valvular disease patients. Kidney and liver function at 1 year post-heart transplantation was preserved in all cases; cardiac catheterization revealed normal graft function in all patients and the absence of coronary lesions in all but two. In conclusion, in our limited experience morbidity and mortality in patients transplanted for end-stage valvular disease seem to be similar to those of patients undergoing heart transplantation for other etiologies.