1. Invasive- versus computed tomography-angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease among elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- Author
-
Israel M. Barbash, Victor Guetta, Yafim Brodov, Elad Maor, Orly Goitein, A Finkelstein, Arie Steinvil, A Segev, Galit Aviram, Amir Halkin, Anat Berkovitch, Shmuel Banai, and Paul Fefer
- Subjects
Coronary artery disease ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Transcatheter aortic ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Medicine ,Radiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,medicine.disease ,Computed tomography angiography - Abstract
Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Current guidelines recommend that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of >70% proximal coronary lesions prior to TAVI. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two approaches to CAD diagnosis pre-TAVI. Methods We investigated 2,027 patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis at two large centers with different pre-procedural CAD assessment: pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography (CTA) with selective invasive angiography according to CTA results (N=831) or mandatory invasive angiography (IA) (N=1,196). Peri-procedural complications were documented according to the VARC-2 criteria. Mortality rates were prospectively documented. Results Mean age of the study population was 86±4, of whom 55% were female. Patients in the IA group had significantly higher rates of pre-TAVI PCI compared to the CTA group (32% vs. 17%, p Conclusions In elderly patients, CTA driven approach for CAD evaluation pre-TAVI is a valid strategy with similar outcome as compared to invasive approach. CTA strategy significantly reduces invasive procedures rates without compromising patient's outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
- Published
- 2020