Search

Background Recently, comparative trials among biologics in ulcerative colitis (UC) provided conflicting results on their reciprocal superiority or equivalence. Therefore, in patients naive to biologics, the first-choice biological drug is uncertain. Methods In a retrospective, real-life, multicentre inception cohort study involving 11 Italian IBD tertiary centres, all consecutive patients, naive to biologics, treated with adalimumab (ADA), infliximab biosimilar (CTP-13), golimumab (GOL) or vedolizumab (VDZ) after their postmarketing approval (2014–2018) for moderate–severe active UC, were followed up for 1 year or until relapse. All drugs were compared with each other and to naive patients treated with IFX-originator (IFX-O, Remicade) in 2013–2014 as a reference group. A propensity score analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the 1 year relapse-free, optimisation-free, steroid-free remission, defined as Mayo score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, no relapse after first clinical remission and no optimisation with dose intensification or steroids courses. Multiple further secondary endpoints were analysed (Table 1). Results Two hundred ninety-six naive patients (ADA = 56, CTP-13 = 73, GOL = 60, VDZ = 34, IFX-O = 73) were included. The primary end-point was achieved in similar percentages in all groups, irrespective of optimisation. IFX-O and ADA had similar rates of clinical remission achieved once during the follow-up but higher rates than GOL and VDZ. The 1-year relapse rate, however, was lower with VDZ than ADA, GOL and IFX-O. Treatment failure for primary/secondary no response was higher with GOL than IFX-O and ADA. Treatment failures for intolerance were similar among all drugs. CTP-13 performed differently than the originator for some secondary end-points. Conclusion Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year in patients naive to these drugs. IFX originator and ADA appear more effective in the induction phase, while patients responders to VDZ had more prolonged clinical remission. Some differences on secondary questionable outcomes between IFX biosimilar and originator have been observed.

Background Until 2014, infliximab originator (Remicade, IFX-O) was the only biological treatment approved in Italy for ulcerative colitis (UC), followed by the sequential approval of adalimumab (ADA), infliximab biosimilar (CTP-13), golimumab (GOL) and vedolizumab (VDZ). Recently, comparative trials among these drugs provided conflicting results on their reciprocal superiority or equivalence. Methods In a retrospective, real-life, multicenter inception cohort study involving 11 Italian IBD tertiary centres, all consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe active UC, treated with ADA, CTP-13, GOL or VDZ after their post-marketing approval (2014–2018) were followed-up for 1 year or until relapse. All drugs were compared with each other and to patients treated with Remicade in 2013–2014 (reference group). The 80% power calculation of the study required at least 75 patients in each arm. A propensity score analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the 1 year relapse-free, optimisation-free, steroid-free remission, defined as Mayo partial score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, no relapse after first clinical remission and no optimisation with dose intensification or steroids courses. Multiple further secondary endpoints were analysed (Table 1). Results 492 patients (ADA=90, CTP-13=105, GOL=79, VDZ=142, IFX-O=76) were included. Overall, 65% achieved clinical remission once during the follow-up, with IFX-O performing better than GOL and VDZ. The relapse rate was 24%, with the lowest rates with VDZ. The primary end-point was achieved in similar percentages in all groups, except for lower rates with GOL than IFX-O. IFX-O performed better than each other drug for other clinical outcomes (Table 1). Discontinuation for intolerance was similar among the drugs, but CTP-13 had more frequent adverse events (mainly infusion reactions) than ADA, VDZ and IFX-O. Conclusion Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year, except for GOL vs. IFX originator. IFX-O appears more effective in multiple questionable clinical outcomes. IFX biosimilar had more adverse events than the other drugs. IFX originator should be used as the reference drug in head to head, controlled, comparison trials for current and future biologics in UC.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety of treatment interruption (Tl) guided by CD4+ count in HIV-infected patients followed-up prospectively. Methods: Patients on HAART with a CD4+ cell count >500 cells/mm 3 discontinued therapy with instructions to start therapy again before their CD4+ count dropped below 200 cells/mm 3 . Results: We report data on 112 HIV-infected patients. The median follow-up after starting the first Tl was 34.7 months (IQR: 23.1-43.8). The median duration of the first Tl was 12 months (IQR: 5.2-25). In the multivariate analysis the factor which most strongly correlated with the duration of the first Tl was the CD4+ cell count at the end of the Tl. Among the 34 patients who had completed a second Tl, the duration of the two periods of interruption was similar if the treatment was recommenced at the end of the first Tl at a CD4+ count higher than the nadir count. Conclusions: The strategy of Tl is safe if the criteria for restarting therapy are applied correctly. The factor with the greatest influence on the duration of the first Tl is the number of CD4+ cells at the end of the Tl.

Objectives: Patients with organic growth hormone deficiency (GHD) or with structural hypothalamic–pituitary abnormalities may have additional anterior pituitary hormone deficits, and are at risk of developing complete or partial corticotropin (ACTH) deficiency. Evaluation of the integrity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA) is essential in these patients because, although clinically asymptomatic, their HPA cannot appropriately react to stressful stimuli with potentially life-threatening consequences. Design and methods: In this study we evaluated the integrity of the HPA in 24 patients (age 4.2–31 years at the time of the study) with an established diagnosis of GHD and compared the reliability of the insulin tolerance test (ITT), short synacthen test (SST), low-dose SST (LDSST), and corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) test in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. Results: At a cortisol cut-off for a normal response of 550 nmol/l (20 μg/dl), the response to ITT was subnormal in 11 subjects, 6 with congenital and 5 with acquired GHD. Four patients had overt adrenal insufficiency, with morning cortisol concentrations ranging between 66.2–135.2 nmol/l (2.4–4.9 μg/dl) and typical clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. In all these patients, a subnormal cortisol response to ITT was confirmed by LDSST and by CRH tests. SST failed to identify one of the patients as adrenal insufficient. In the seven asymptomatic patients with a subnormal cortisol response to ITT, the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency was confirmed in one by LDSST, in none by SST, and in five by CRH tests. The five patients with a normal cortisol response to ITT exhibited a normal response also after LDSST and SST. Only two of them had a normal response after a CRH test. In the seven patients with asymptomatic adrenal insufficiency mean morning cortisol concentration was significantly higher than in the patients with overt adrenal insufficiency. ITT was contraindicated in eight patients, and none of them had clinical symptoms of overt adrenal insufficiency. One of these patients had a subnormal cortisol response to LDSST, SST, and CRH, and three exhibited a subnormal response to CRH but normal responses to LDSST and to SST. Conclusion: We conclude that none of these tests can be considered completely reliable for establishing or excluding the presence of secondary or tertiary adrenal insufficiency. Consequently, clinical judgment remains one of the most important issues for deciding which patients need assessment or re–assessment of adrenal function.

We compared 2 rules-based genotype interpretation systems and real or virtual phenotype through a retrospective analysis of a prospective trial. Genotypes were determined with VircoGEN II (VIRCO) and were interpreted with either RetroGram 1.4 or TRUGENE HIV-1 (guidelines 3.0) or original virtual phenotype (Virtual Phenotype; VIRCO), as available in the year 2000. Among 188 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 isolates, overall concordance (kappa agreement) was observed for the 2 rules-based systems, whereas striking discordances were noted between them and real and virtual phenotype interpretations for stavudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, abacavir, and amprenavir (kappa

Alzheimer disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia in elderly people, can be definitively diagnosed both by clinical findings and by pathological postmortem on brain tissues. Typical AD neuropathological lesions include perikaryal neurofibrillary tangles, which consist of paired helical filaments. The major component of these filaments is the microtubule-associated protein τ, a normal protein that occurs in a modified, hyperphosphorylated form in AD. Given the lack of biological markers for the in vivo diagnosis of AD, the recent reports of increased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein τ concentrations have raised expectations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Sensitive immunoassays have been developed to detect this protein in CSF samples (1)(2). We retrospectively studied paired serum and CSF samples from 31 patients (12 men, 19 women, mean age 68.8 ± 9.1 years) with probable AD (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria); 39 patients with other neurological diseases (OND) (multiinfarct dementia, 11; multiple sclerosis, 18; neurodegenerative diseases, 6; viral …