Search

Background Early reports on the pandemic nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) directed the nephrology community to develop infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance. We aimed to make an inventory of strategies that dialysis centres followed to prevent infection with COVID-19 in the first pandemic wave. Methods We analyzed IPC measures taken by hemodialysis centres treating patients presenting with COVID-19 between 1 March 2020 and 31 July 2020 and that completed the European Renal Association COVID-19 Database centre questionnaire. Additionally, we made an inventory of guidelines published in European countries to prevent spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in dialysis centres. Results Data from 73 dialysis units located in and bordering Europe were analyzed. All participating centres implemented IPC measures to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave. Measures mentioned most often included triage with questions before entering the dialysis ward, measuring body temperature, hand disinfection, masking for all patients and staff, and personal protective equipment for staff members. These measures were also recommended in most of the 14 guidelines that were identified in the inventory of national guidelines and were also scored as being among the most important measures by the authors of this paper. Heterogeneity existed between centres and national guidelines regarding the minimal distance between dialysis chairs and recommendations regarding isolation and cohorting. Conclusions Although variation existed, measures to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were relatively similar across centres and national guidelines. Further research is needed to assess causal relationships between measures taken and spread of SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare genetic disorder characterised by hepatic oxalate overproduction that leads to progressive kidney disease. As kidney function declines, oxalate elimination is compromised and plasma oxalate (POx) increases, leading to systemic oxalosis. In chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3b–5, elevated POx is directly related to the pathophysiology of oxalosis, and reduction of POx is a relevant clinical trial endpoint. Lumasiran, an RNA interference therapeutic designed to reduce hepatic oxalate production, is indicated for the treatment of PH1 in all age groups. Data from the ILLUMINATE-C trial (EudraCT: 2019–0 013 346-17) demonstrated substantial reductions in POx and acceptable safety in patients with PH1 with impaired kidney function, including patients on haemodialysis (HD), who received lumasiran for 6 months. In Cohorts A (no HD) and B (on HD), respectively, lumasiran led to 33.33% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): −15.16 to 81.82] and 42.43% (95% CI: 34.15–50.71) least-squares (LS) mean reductions in POx from baseline to Month 6 (the primary endpoint). Here, we present METHOD ILLUMINATE-C is an ongoing Phase 3, single-arm study with two cohorts, Cohort A (N = 6; no HD at study start) and Cohort B (N = 15; on HD). The 6-month primary analysis period is followed by an extension period (EP) of up to 54 months. Key inclusion criteria include genetically confirmed PH1, eGFR ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and POx ≥ 20 μmol/L. Patients received weight-based dosing of subcutaneous lumasiran. Outcomes of interest for the current analysis included assessments of cardiac oxalosis using echocardiography, medullary nephrocalcinosis by kidney ultrasound, kidney stone events and burdensome symptoms of PH1. RESULTS All 21 patients [43% female; 76% white; median age 8 (range 0–59) years] completed the 6-month primary analysis period. Among patients with abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; abnormal defined as LVEF CONCLUSION Lumasiran treatment resulted in substantial reductions in POx in patients of all ages with PH1 and advanced kidney disease. The observations regarding cardiac measures that reflect systemic oxalosis, together with the kidney stone event and nephrocalcinosis results, are consistent with mobilisation of oxalate from systemic stores. Data on these long-term outcomes will continue to be collected and further evaluated in the EP. These results, along with previous reports from ILLUMINATE-A and ILLUMINATE-B, provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of lumasiran across the full spectrum of patients affected by PH1.

Cinacalcet and, more recently, etelcalcetide revolutionized the treatment of chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder (CKD–MBD). Kidney transplant (KT) usually improves CKD–MBD. However, a significant proportion of KT recipients have high serum calcium levels, not requiring any treatment. We report two patients previously treated with etelcalcetide who developed severe (>3.3 mmol/L) hypercalcaemia in the early post-KT course, requiring parathyroidectomy. Pathological studies showed parathyroid adenomas and hyperplasia. One patient had a graft biopsy showing numerous intratubular calcium phosphate crystals. These observations should prompt pharmacovigilance studies and careful follow-up of KT recipients previously treated with etelcalcetide.

Acquittal in international criminal law has long been disregarded by the governing bodies of international criminal courts. However, the acquittal exposes constitutive (and constituent) components of this very body of law. The authors draw conclusions from semi-directive interviews with (acquitted and condemned) people tried by the ad hoc tribunals. Their approach creates an opportunity to highlight and comprehend — from the perspective of the acquitted individual — the failures of the functioning of international criminal justice, which is focused on the idea of guilt. Moreover, this research shows how the position of tried individuals affects their perception and acceptance of international criminal law.

Tobacco smoking is a frequent problem affecting many kidney transplant (KT) candidates and recipients. The negative impact of active smoking on KT outcomes has been demonstrated. Consequently, most guidelines strongly recommend quitting smoking before considering kidney transplantation. However, nicotine addiction is a complex multifactorial disease and only 3–5% of the patients who try to quit by themselves achieve prolonged abstinence. Smoking cessation programmes (SCPs) have proven their efficacy in the general population to increase the rate of quitting and should therefore be proposed to all smoking KT candidates and recipients. Nevertheless, SCPs have not been evaluated in the KT field and not all KT centres have easy access to these programmes. In this work, we aim to review the current knowledge on the subject and provide an overview of the available interventions to help smoking patients quit. We detail non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical approaches and discuss their use in KT candidates and recipients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is particularly life threatening in patients with kidney failure under dialysis, with mortality rate at 28 days of 21.2% in the ERA-EDTA registry and 25% in the ERACODA (European Renal Association COVID-19 Database) database. [...]

Background. Patients on kidney replacement therapy comprise a vulnerable population and may be at increased risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Currently, only limited data are available on outcomes in this patient population. Methods. We set up the ERACODA (European Renal Association COVID-19 Database) database, which is specifically designed to prospectively collect detailed data on kidney transplant and dialysis patients with COVID-19. For this analysis, patients were included who presented between 1 February and 1 May 2020 and had complete information available on the primary outcome parameter, 28-day mortality. Results. Of the 1073 patients enrolled, 305 (28%) were kidney transplant and 768 (72%) dialysis patients with a mean age of 60 ± 13 and 67 ± 14 years, respectively. The 28-day probability of death was 21.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 14.3–30.2%] in kidney transplant and 25.0% (95% CI 20.2–30.0%) in dialysis patients. Mortality was primarily associated with advanced age in kidney transplant patients, and with age and frailty in dialysis patients. After adjusting for sex, age and frailty, in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between transplant and dialysis patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.59–1.10, P = 0.18]. In the subset of dialysis patients who were a candidate for transplantation (n = 148), 8 patients died within 28 days, as compared with 7 deaths in 23 patients who underwent a kidney transplantation Conclusions. The 28-day case-fatality rate is high in patients on kidney replacement therapy with COVID-19 and is primarily driven by the risk factors age and frailty. Furthermore, in the first year after kidney transplantation, patients may be at increased risk of COVID-19-related mortality as compared with dialysis patients on the waiting list for transplantation. This information is important in guiding clinical decision-making, and for informing the public and healthcare authorities on the COVID-19-related mortality risk in kidney transplant and dialysis patients.

Background and Aims IgG4 disease is a systemic fibroinflammatory disorder that may affect virtually any organ. IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD) is a major manifestation, occurring in almost one third of patient. The present study addresses the diagnosis, management and outcome of French patients with IgG4-RKD. Method We conducted a retrospective observational study including patients with renal impairment due to IgG4-RKD from 32 centers. Clinical, biological, and imaging data, as well as management modalities and outcome, were retrieved from medical records. Results 74 patients, 64 males and 10 females, were diagnosed with IgG4-RKD between 1997 and 2019 and were included in the present study. The mean age at diagnosis was 65.2 ± 15-year-old. Renal involvement was present at diagnosis in 63% of cases. Nine (12%) patients had isolated renal involvement, whereas extra-renal involvement included retroperitoneal fibrosis (20%), auto-immune pancreatitis (49%), cholangitis (27%), and lung disease (22%). Renal imaging lesions were observed in 48 (64%) patients, and included renal hypertrophy, patchy lesions and pseudo-tumor solitary renal lesion. PET-CT scan was performed in 47 (65%) patients and showed hypermetabolic renal lesion(s) in 36% of cases. The presence of extra-renal hypermetabolic lesions was observed in 35 cases (74%). 43 %, 25% and 14% of patients presented with AKI, AKI-on-CKD, and isolated CKD, respectively. The mean serum creatinine level at diagnosis was 244 ± 140 µmol/L, corresponding to an eGFR of 69 ± 22ml/min/1.73m. Urinary sediment was most often bland. Mean urine protein-to-creatinine ratio was 1.27 g/g. of note, 26% of patients had more than 1 g/g. 82% of patients underwent a kidney biopsy showing tubulointerstitial involvement in all cases, 12 (16%) had additional glomerular involvement, mainly membranous nephropathy. The major additional laboratory abnormalities included polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, and increased serum IgG4 increase in 83% and 86%, respectively. Complement levels were decreased in 27 (37%) patients. Two patients were lost for follow-up and 69 patients were treated with corticosteroid therapy in 66 (89%) patients and 10 received Rituximab as first line therapy. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.8 ± 30 months. During follow-up, 22 (30%) patients relapsed, while 45 (62%) patients had persistent CKD at last follow-up, with a mean eGFR of 47±27 ml/min/1.73m. Seven (9%) patients progressed to ESRD and 7 died. A significant response was achieved in 46 (62%) patients. Patients who received steroids higher than 0.5mg/kg/day had lower serum IgG4 levels (1.8 g/l versus 5.7 g/l, p=0.007) at last follow up but there was no significant difference observed in terms of renal function between the two groups (45.5 vs 48.8 ml/min/1.73m, p= 0.72). By univariate analysis, predictors of relapse were low C3 or C4 serum level (p=0.01), ANCA positivity (p= 0.02), renal radiological lesions (p=0.05). At last follow-up the eGFR was worse in patients with a serum creatinine diagnosis greater than 300 µmol/L (30.25 vs 57 ml/min/1.73m p=0.0001) and more progressed to ESRD (p=0.03). Conclusion IgG4-RKD has been recently described and may affect middle-aged males. The disease presents as tubulointerstitial nephritis with glomerular involvement in 16% of cases. Disease response to corticosteroid therapy is favorable but is characterized by a high rate of relapses and a significant risk of persistent CKD in the majority of patient. Risk of ESRD and death in almost 20% of patients.

Background Diarrhoea is one of the most frequent complications after kidney transplantation (KT). Non-infectious diarrhoea has been associated with reduced graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. However, the risk factors for renal allograft loss following diarrhoea remain largely unknown. Methods Between January 2010 and August 2011, 195 consecutive KT recipients who underwent standardized microbiological workups for diarrhoea at a single centre were enrolled in this retrospective study. Results An enteric pathogen was readily identified in 91 patients (47%), while extensive microbiological investigations failed to find any pathogen in the other 104. Norovirus was the leading cause of diarrhoea in these patients, accounting for 30% of the total diarrhoea episodes. The baseline characteristics were remarkably similar between non-infectious and infectious diarrhoea patients, with the exception that the non-infectious group had significantly lower graft function before diarrhoea (P = 0.039). Infectious diarrhoea was associated with a longer duration of symptoms (P = 0.001) and higher rates of acute kidney injury (P = 0.029) and hospitalization (P Conclusion Our study shows that pre-existing conditions (re-transplantation, chronic graft dysfunction and late occurrence) determine the primary functional long-term consequences of post-transplant diarrhoea.

The past decade has seen unprecedented preparation for a human influenza pandemic. Until the 2009 outbreak of human cases of (swine) influenza A (H1N1), the avian influenza H5N1 virus was considered a potential cause of a human influenza pandemic. The H5N1 virus remains a considerable threat to human health, and it is important that pandemic preparedness planning for an outbreak continues. Moreover, vaccine development strategies for a potential H5N1 pandemic can guide development of vaccines to combat the 2009/10 H1N1 pandemic and other future potential influenza pandemics. Development of an influenza vaccine that induces a cross-reactive immune response is a key component of a pandemic preparedness strategy. Such a vaccine is likely to prime the immune system to mount a rapid response to vaccination with a drifted strain and/or to infection and may be used before the onset of a pandemic or in its early stages. Even partial cross-protection may have a considerable impact on infection rates during early pandemic stages [1, 2]. The vaccine must provide a high and long-lasting immune response at a relatively low antigen dose, because the need for a high dose would exhaust the limited global production capacity for influenza antigen. Formulation of pandemic vaccines using adjuvants to stimulate a robust immune response is an important approach to reducing the antigen dose and eliciting a cross-reactive response [3]. An H5N1 pandemic vaccine based on the A/Vietnam/1194/2004 clade 1 strain is licensed to be used in the event of an imminent H5N1 pandemic. The vaccine is adjuvanted with AS03A, a novel tocopherol oil-in-water emulsion-based adjuvant system (11.86 mg of tocopherol). It is licensed to be delivered via a schedule of 2 injections administered 3 weeks apart [4]. In a study in adults aged 18-60 years, the lowest dose investigated (3.75 μg hemagglutinin [HA]) elicited immune responses against the vaccine strain that met all US Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and European Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) immunologic licensure criteria [5]. Much higher doses were needed to induce a moderate immune response with a nonadjuvanted H5N1 split-virus vaccine [6], indicating that adjuvantation with AS03A allows successful dose sparing. In addition, the vaccine has been shown to induce a cross-reactive immune response (hemagglutination inhibition [HI]) and neutralizing antibodies and CD4 T cell–mediated immune response) against drifted clade 2 H5N1 strains [5, 7–10] An acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile has been demonstrated [5, 8, 11]. Studies with seasonal influenza vaccines suggest that the reduced immune response to vaccination in elderly populations is due – at least in part – to immunosenescence [12]. It is possible that elderly people may therefore need additional or higher doses. This study aimed to assess the immune response in an elderly population to 2 single or 2 double doses of the AS03A-adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic vaccine, administered 21 days apart, compared with the same dosage and schedule without the adjuvant system.