Search

Aneuploidy is characterized by the presence of an abnormal number of chromosomes and is a common hallmark of cancer. However, exposure to aneugenic compounds does not necessarily lead to cancer. Aneugenic compounds are mainly identified using the in vitro micronucleus assay but this assay cannot standardly discriminate between aneugens and clastogens and cannot be used to identify the exact mode-of-action (MOA) of aneugens; tubulin stabilization, tubulin destabilization, or inhibition of mitotic kinases. To improve the classification of aneugenic substances and determine their MOA, we developed and validated the TubulinTracker assay that uses a green fluorescent protein-tagged tubulin reporter cell line to study microtubule stability using flow cytometry. Combining the assay with a DNA stain also enables cell cycle analysis. Substances whose exposure resulted in an accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, combined with increased or decreased tubulin levels, were classified as tubulin poisons. All known tubulin poisons included were classified correctly. Moreover, we correctly classified compounds, including aneugens that did not affect microtubule levels. However, the MOA of aneugens not affecting tubulin stability, such as Aurora kinase inhibitors, could not be identified. Here, we show that the TubulinTracker assay can be used to classify microtubule stabilizing and destabilizing compounds in living cells. This insight into the MOA of aneugenic agents is important, eg, to support a weight-of-evidence approach for risk assessment, and the classification as an aneugen as opposed to a clastogen or mutagen, has a big impact on the assessment.

In vitro (geno)toxicity assessment of electronic vapour products (EVPs), relative to conventional cigarette, currently uses assays, including the micronucleus and Ames tests. Whilst informative on induction of a finite endpoint and relative risk posed by test articles, such assays could benefit from mechanistic supplementation. The ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation analysis can indicate the activation of reporters associated with (geno)toxicity, including DNA damage, oxidative stress, the p53-related stress response and protein damage. Here, we tested for the different effects of a selection of neat e-liquids, EVP aerosols and Kentucky reference 1R6F cigarette smoke samples in the ToxTracker assay. The assay was initially validated to assess whether a mixture of e-liquid base components, propylene glycol (PG) and vegetable glycerine (VG) had interfering effects within the system. This was achieved by spiking three positive controls into the system with neat PG/VG or phosphate-buffered saline bubbled (bPBS) PG/VG aerosol (nicotine and flavour free). PG/VG did not greatly affect responses induced by the compounds. Next, when compared to cigarette smoke samples, neat e-liquids and bPBS aerosols (tobacco flavour; 1.6% freebase nicotine, 1.6% nicotine salt or 0% nicotine) exhibited reduced and less complex responses. Tested up to a 10% concentration, EVP aerosol bPBS did not induce any ToxTracker reporters. Neat e-liquids, tested up to 1%, induced oxidative stress reporters, thought to be due to their effects on osmolarity in vitro. E-liquid nicotine content did not affect responses induced. Additionally, spiking nicotine alone only induced an oxidative stress response at a supraphysiological level. In conclusion, the ToxTracker assay is a quick, informative screen for genotoxic potential and mechanisms of a variety of (compositionally complex) samples, derived from cigarettes and EVPs. This assay has the potential for future application in the assessment battery for next-generation (smoking alternative) products, including EVPs.

Understanding the mode-of-action (MOA) of genotoxic compounds and differentiating between direct DNA interaction and indirect genotoxicity is crucial for their reliable safety assessment. ToxTracker is a stem cell-based reporter assay that detects activation of various cellular responses that are associated with genotoxicity and cancer. ToxTracker consists of 6 different GFP reporter cell lines that can detect the induction of DNA damage, oxidative stress, and protein damage in a single test. The assay can thereby provide insight into the MOA of compounds. Genotoxicity is detected in ToxTracker by activation of 2 independent GFP reporters. Activation of the Bscl2-GFP reporter is associated with induction of DNA adducts and subsequent inhibition of DNA replication and the Rtkn-GFP reporter is activated following the formation of DNA double-strand breaks. Here, we show that the differential activation of these 2 genotoxicity reporters could be used to further differentiate between a DNA reactive and clastogenic or a non-DNA-reactive aneugenic MOA of genotoxic compounds. For further classification of aneugenic and clastogenic compounds, the ToxTracker assay was extended with cell cycle analysis and aneuploidy assessment. The extension was validated using a selection of 16 (genotoxic) compounds with a well-established MOA. Furthermore, indirect genotoxicity related to the production of reactive oxygen species was investigated using the DNA damage and oxidative stress ToxTracker reporters in combination with different reactive oxygen species scavengers. With these new extensions, ToxTracker was able to accurately classify compounds as genotoxic or nongenotoxic and could discriminate between DNA-reactive compounds, aneugens, and indirect genotoxicity caused by oxidative stress.