1. Multicenter Investigation of the Micro-Organisms Involved in Penile Prosthesis Infection: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the AUA and EAU Guidelines for Penile Prosthesis Prophylaxis
- Author
-
D.S. Stember, Laurence A. Levine, Run Wang, Sidney Glina, Elizabeth A. Phillips, Martin S. Gross, Nelson E. Bennett, David Ralph, J. Cedeno, William P. Conners, Michael Bickell, M. Rosselló. Barbará, Bruce B. Garber, Rafael Carrion, M. Rosselló Gayá, Ricardo Munarriz, Jason M. Greenfield, Peter J. Stahl, Arthur L. Burnett, A. Thornton, William O. Brant, Odunayo Kalejaiye, Edgardo Becher, Edward Gheiler, Tobias S. Köhler, Pedro Maria, Cigdem Tanrikut, Joseph P. Alukal, Robert Carrasquillo, Stanton C. Honig, J.F. Eid, Gerard D. Henry, Miguel Pineda, and Paul Perito
- Subjects
Male ,Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ,Reoperation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Prosthesis-Related Infections ,medicine.drug_class ,Urology ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Antibiotics ,030232 urology & nephrology ,medicine.disease_cause ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,Humans ,Medicine ,Prosthesis-Related Infection ,Antibiotic prophylaxis ,Retrospective Studies ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Retrospective cohort study ,Penile prosthesis ,Antibiotic Prophylaxis ,Penile prosthesis infection ,Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ,Anti-Bacterial Agents ,Surgery ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Reproductive Medicine ,Implant ,Penile Prosthesis ,business - Abstract
Introduction Penile prosthesis infections remain challenging despite advancements in surgical technique, device improvements, and adoption of antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. Aim To investigate penile prosthesis infection microbiology to consider which changes in practice could decrease infection rates, to evaluate current antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, and to develop a proposed algorithm for penile prosthesis infections. Methods This retrospective institutional review board–exempt multi-institutional study from 25 centers reviewed intraoperative cultures obtained at explantation or Mulcahy salvage of infected three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs). Antibiotic usage was recorded at implantation, admission for infection, and explantation or salvage surgery. Cultures were obtained from purulent material in the implant space and from the biofilm on the device. Main Outcome Measures Intraoperative culture data from infected IPPs. Results Two hundred twenty-seven intraoperative cultures (2002–2016) were obtained at salvage or explantation. No culture growth occurred in 33% of cases and gram-positive and gram-negative organisms were found in 73% and 39% of positive cultures, respectively. Candida species (11.1%), anaerobes (10.5%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (9.2%) constituted nearly one third of 153 positive cultures. Multi-organism infections occurred in 25% of positive cultures. Antibiotic regimens at initial implantation were generally consistent with American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. However, the micro-organisms identified in this study were covered by these guidelines in only 62% to 86% of cases. Antibiotic selection at admissions for infection and salvage or explantation varied widely compared with those at IPP implantation. Conclusion This study documents a high incidence of anaerobic, Candida, and methicillin-resistant S aureus infections. In addition, approximately one third of infected penile prosthesis cases had negative cultures. Micro-organisms identified in this study were not covered by the AUA and EAU antibiotic guidelines in at least 14% to 38% of cases. These findings suggest broadening antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines and creating a management algorithm for IPP infections might lower infection rates and improve salvage success.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF