Search

Aims Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is related to the pathophysiology, mortality, and morbidity of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A novel single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) camera with cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) detectors allows for the quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the potential of CZT-SPECT assessing for CMD has never been evaluated in patients with HFpEF. Methods and results The clinical records of 127 consecutive patients who underwent dynamic CZT-SPECT were retrospectively reviewed. Rest and stress scanning were started simultaneously with 3 and 9 MBq/kg of 99mTc-sestamibi administration, respectively. Dynamic CZT-SPECT imaging data were analysed using a net-retention model with commercially available software. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients. The MFR value was significantly lower in the HFpEF group (mean ± SEM = 2.00 ± 0.097) than that in the non-HFpEF group (mean ± SEM = 2.74 ± 0.14, P = 0.0004). A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that if a cut-off value of 2.525 was applied, MFR could efficiently distinguish HFpEF from non-HFpEF. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction had a consistently low MFR, regardless of the diastolic dysfunction score. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients with MFR values lower than 2.075 had a significantly higher incidence of heart failure exacerbation. Conclusion Myocardial flow reserve assessed by CZT-SPECT was significantly reduced in patients with HFpEF. A lower MFR was associated with a higher hospitalization rate in these patients. Myocardial flow reserve assessed by CZT-SPECT has the potential to predict future adverse events and stratify the severity of disease in patients with HFpEF.

Aims Procedural sedation by non-anaesthesiologists with GABAergic anaesthetics has the potential risk of fatal respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine works its sedative action via α2-adrenergic receptors, and is less associated with respiratory depression. We tested the usability of dexmedetomidine as a procedural sedative during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and results Consecutive patients were randomized to be treated with dexmedetomidine ( n = 43) or thiamylal ( n = 44) as sedatives during AF ablation. Apnoeic and body movement events were monitored using a novel portable respiratory monitor, the SD-101, during the procedure. Although the majority of the patients receiving dexmedetomidine required rescue sedations with thiamylal, the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) defined as the total number of sleep-disordered breathing events divided by the recording time (10.4 ± 5.1 vs. 18.2 ± 8.1 events/h; P < 0.0001) and movement index defined as the number of body movement events per hour (7.6 ± 6.1 vs. 11.0 ± 5.5 events/h; P = 0.0098) were both significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine arm than in the thiamylal arm. A multivariate linear regression analysis including potential factors revealed that dexmedetomidine vs. thiamylal was solely and independently associated with the RDI ( β = −0.62; P = 0.0031). The occurrence of hypotension [9 (21%) vs. 4 (9%); P = 0.14] and bradycardia [4 (9%) vs. 4 (9%); P = 1.0] were similar in the patients with dexmedetomidine and thiamylal. Conclusion Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine may assure safety and patient immobility during AF ablation, and therefore may be a potential alternative for that with GABAergic anaesthetics.