Search

Motivation More than half of the human proteome contains the proline-rich motif, PxxP. This motif has a high propensity for adopting a left-handed polyproline II (PPII) helix and can potentially bind SH3 domains. SH3 domains are generally grouped into two classes, based on whether the PPII binds in a positive (N-to-C terminal) or negative (C-to-N terminal) orientation. Since the discovery of this structural motif, over six decades ago, a systematic understanding of its binding remains poor and the consensus amino acid sequence that binds SH3 domains is still ill defined. Results Here, we show that the PPII interaction with SH3 domains is governed by the helix backbone and its prolines, and their rotation angle around the PPII helical axis. Based on a geometric analysis of 131 experimentally solved SH3 domains in complex with PPIIs, we observed a rotary translation along the helical screw axis, and separated them by 120° into three categories we name α (0–120°), β (120–240°) and γ (240–360°). Furthermore, we found that PPII helices are distinguished by a shifting PxxP motif preceded by positively charged residues which act as a structural reading frame and dictates the organization of SH3 domains; however, there is no one single consensus motif for all classified PPIIs. Our results demonstrate a remarkable apparatus of a lock with a rotating and translating key with no known equivalent machinery in molecular biology. We anticipate our model to be a starting point for deciphering the PPII code, which can unlock an exponential growth in our understanding of the relationship between protein structure and function. Availability and implementation We have implemented the proposed methods in the R software environment and in an R package freely available at https://github.com/Grantlab/bio3d. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

In addition to TCR signaling, the activation and proliferation of naive T cells require CD28-mediated co-stimulation. Once engaged, CD28 is phosphorylated and can then activate signaling pathways by recruiting molecules to its YMNM motif and two PxxP motifs. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between tyrosine phosphorylation and the co-stimulatory function of CD28 in murine primary CD4+ T cells. Tyrosine phosphorylation is decreased in CD28 where the N-terminal PxxP motif is mutated (nPA). In cells expressing nPA, activation of Akt and functional co-stimulation were decreased. In contrast, where the C-terminal PxxP motif is mutated, tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of the ERK, Akt and NF-κB were intact, but proliferation and IL-2 production were decreased. Using the Y189 to F mutant, we also demonstrated that in naive CD4+ T cells, tyrosine at position 189 in the YMNM motif is critical for both tyrosine phosphorylation and the functional co-stimulatory effects of CD28. This mutation did not affect unfractionated T-cell populations. Overall, our data suggest that CD28 signaling uses tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent and phosphorylation-independent pathways.

The guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) RalGPS1a activates small GTPase Ral proteins such as RalA and RalB by stimulating the exchange of Ral bound GDP to GTP, thus regulating various downstream cellular processes. RalGPS1a is composed of an Nterminal Cdc25-like catalytic domain, followed by a PXXP motif and a C-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. The Cdc25 domain of RalGPS1a, which shares about 30% sequence identity with other Cdc25-domain proteins, is thought to be directly engaged in binding and activating the substrate Ral protein. Here we report the crystal structure of the Cdc25 domain of RalGPS1a. The bowl shaped structure is homologous to the Cdc25 domains of SOS and RasGRF1. The most remarkable difference between these three Cdc25 domains lies in their active sites, referred to as the helical hairpin region. Consistent with previous enzymological studies, the helical hairpin of RalGPS1a adopts a conformation favorable for substrate binding. A modeled RalGPS1a-RalA complex structure reveals an extensive binding surface similar to that of the SOS-Ras complex. However, analysis of the electrostatic surface potential suggests an interaction mode between the RalGPS1a active site helical hairpin and the switch 1 region of substrate RalA distinct from that of the SOS-Ras complex.

Motivation: Much research has been devoted to the characterization of interaction interfaces found in complexes with known structure. In this context, the interactions of non-homologous domains at equivalent binding sites are of particular interest, as they can reveal convergently evolved interface motifs. Such motifs are an important source of information to formulate rules for interaction specificity and to design ligands based on the common features shared among diverse partners. Results: We develop a novel method to identify non-homologous structural domains which bind at equivalent sites when interacting with a common partner. We systematically apply this method to all pairs of interactions with known structure and derive a comprehensive database for these interactions. Of all non-homologous domains, which bind with a common interaction partner, 4.2% use the same interface of the common interaction partner (excluding immunoglobulins and proteases). This rises to 16% if immunoglobulin and proteases are included. We demonstrate two applications of our database: first, the systematic screening for viral protein interfaces, which can mimic native interfaces and thus interfere; and second, structural motifs in enzymes and its inhibitors. We highlight several cases of virus protein mimicry: viral M3 protein interferes with a chemokine dimer interface. The virus has evolved the motif SVSPLP, which mimics the native SSDTTP motif. A second example is the regulatory factor Nef in HIV which can mimic a kinase when interacting with SH3. Among others the virus has evolved the kinase’s PxxP motif. Further, we elucidate motif resemblances in Baculovirus p35 and HIV capsid proteins. Finally, chymotrypsin is subject to scrutiny wrt. its structural similarity to subtilisin and wrt. its inhibitor’s similar recognition sites. Contact: ah@biotec.tu-dresden.de Supplementary informaton: A database is online at