Search

Introduction The prognostic value and therapeutic implications of ischemia as derived from vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) could differ in men and women, but it has not been stablished. Purpose We assessed the influence of the ischemic burden as derived from CMR on the risk of death and the effect of revascularization across sex. Methods We evaluated 6,237 consecutive patients with known or suspected chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Extensive ischemia was defined as >5 segments with perfusion deficit. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used. Results A total of 2,371 (38.0%) patients were women and 583 (9.3%) underwent CMR-related revascularization. During a median follow-up of 5.13 years, 687 (11.0%) deaths were reported. We found an adjusted differential effect of CMR-derived ischemic burden across sex (p-value for interaction=0.039). Women exhibited an adjusted lower risk of death along most of the continuous ischemic burden but equalled men's risk when extensive ischemia was present. Likewise, CMR-related revascularization was shown to be differentially associated with the risk of mortality across sex (p-value for interaction=0.025). In patients with non-extensive ischemia, revascularization was related to a higher risk of death, with a greater extent in women. At higher ischemic burden, revascularization was associated with a lower risk in men, with more uncertain results in women. Conclusions CMR-derived ischemic burden allows predicting the risk of death and gives insight into the potential effect of revascularization in men and women with CCS. Compared to men, women with nonextensive ischemia displayed a lower risk and a similar risk with a higher ischemic burden. The impact of CMR-related revascularization on mortality risk was also significantly different according to ischemic burden and sex. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III and cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Background Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and heart rate reserve (HRR) during vasodilator stress echocardiography (SE) assess coronary microvascular function and cardiac sympathetic reserve respectively. Both CFVR and HRR can be impaired in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Objectives To evaluate the prognostic value of CFVR and HRR during vasodilator SE in HCM. Methods We enrolled 244 HCM patients (age=51±15 years, 116 men) studied with vasodilator SE from 1999 to 2019 in 5 certified centers. Stress modality was either adenosine (Ado, 0.14 mg/kg/min in 2', n=171) or dipyridamole (Dip, 0.84 mg/kg in 6', n=73). Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was present at rest in 80 patients (33%). We assessed CFVR in left anterior descending coronary artery (by TTE in 225, and TEE in 19 patients) and HRR (peak/rest heart rate). Abnormal values of HRR were based on receiver operating characteristics for Ado and Dip separately calculated. All patients completed the follow-up. Results CFVR was 2.17±0.46 for Dip and 2.13±0.43 for Ado (p=ns); HRR was 1.36±0.19 for Dip and 1.10±0.16 for Ado (p Conclusions A reduced CFVR and blunted HRR during vasodilator SE identify distinct phenotypes and show independent value in predicting outcome in HCM patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier spontaneous event-free survival curves based on HRR and CFVR. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (considering spontaneous events) in patients stratified with the abnormal HRR and/or CFVR. Number of patients at risk per year is shown.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND While current guidelines recommend to perform a noninvasive test to detect coronary artery disease, stress tests are deemed inconclusive in almost a third of cases. The strategy for risk stratification after inconclusive stress testing is not well standardized. PURPOSE To assess the prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters and CMR-based coronary revascularization in patients after inconclusive stress testing. METHODS Between 2008 and 2020, consecutive patients with a first inconclusive stress test referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined by cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. CMR-related coronary revascularization was defined as any revascularisation occurring within 90 days after CMR. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of each parameter. RESULTS Of 1,563 patients who completed the CMR protocol, 1,402 patients (66.7% male, mean age 69.5 ± 11.0 years) completed the follow-up (median[interquartile range], 6.5 [5.6-7.5] years); 197 experienced a MACE (14.1%). Stress CMR was well tolerated without severe adverse events. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio, HR: 2.88 [95%CI, 2.18-3.81]; and HR: 1.46 [95%CI, 1.16-1.89], both p CONCLUSION In patients with a first inconclusive stress test, stress CMR has good prognostic value to predict MACE offering an incremental prognostic value over traditional risk factors.

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Several studies have demonstrated the consistently high prognostic value of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). This prognostic value in patients with known myocardial infarction (MI) is poorly described. There remains some skepticism about the capacity of stress CMR in predicting the clinical outcome due to the technical challenge during image analysis causes by myocardial scar. PURPOSE The aim of our study was to assess the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with known MI. METHODS We prospectively included consecutive patients with known MI referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR with dipyridamole. They were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death or recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions for MACE were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR. RESULTS Of 1602 patients with known MI (68 ± 17 years, 78% men), 1556 (97%) completed the CMR protocol, and among those 1401 (90%) completed the follow-up (median follow-up 5.7 (3.9–7.6) years). Reasons for failure to complete CMR included ECG-gating problems (n = 13), intolerance to stress agent (n = 12), renal failure (n = 12), declining participation (n = 4) and claustrophobia (n = 5). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe adverse event. Patients without inducible ischemia experienced a substantially lower annual event rate of MACE (3.1%) than those with 1 or 2 segments of ischemia (4.5%), than those with 3 to 5 segments of ischemia (21.5%), than those with 6 or more segments of ischemia (45.7%, for all p CONCLUSION Stress CMR is technically feasible and has a good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE in patients with known MI. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend performing a non-invasive testing for ischemia to diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD). However, these tests are frequently inconclusive (25%). This population has been poorly studied because of its heterogeneity. In such cases, stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be useful to improve diagnostic certainty. To date, no study has evaluated the prognostic value of stress CMR in these patients presenting with prior inconclusive test. PURPOSE To assess the additional prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with a first inconclusive stress test to detect CAD. METHODS Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with inconclusive stress test prospectively referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR with dipyridamole were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Inconclusive stress test was defined by echocardiography or nuclear stress testing with uncertain conclusion about the diagnosis of CAD. To characterize this population, an unsupervised clustering analysis was performed using 18 variables. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia by stress CMR in each cluster. RESULTS Of 1502 patients with inconclusive stress test (62 ± 12 years, 59% men), 1441 (96%) completed the CMR protocol and 1397(93%) completed the follow-up (median 5.5 ± 2.3 years). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe adverse event. The clustering analysis identified 3 clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 524, 35%) had the highest prevalence of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the highest presence of myocardial scar on CMR, the lowest LVEF(35 ± 7%) and the highest degree of LV dilatation. Cluster 2 (n = 406, 27%) had the highest prevalence of previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), preserved LVEF(54 ± 10%), absence of LV dilatation and rate of male(89%). Cluster 3 (n = 572, 38%) had the lowest rate of previous PCI/CABG and of myocardial scar. This cluster gathered the oldest patients (73 ± 11 years), predominantly female (60%), with the highest rate of atrial fibrillation and body mass index. Survival analysis found significant differences across clusters for the occurrence of MACE (p = 0.02). Moreover, inducible ischemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE in each cluster (cluster 1, HR 2.28; [95%CI: 1.31-3.99]; p = 0.0028; cluster 2, HR 3.37; [95%CI, 1.97-5.75]; p CONCLUSIONS Cluster analysis identified 3 different phenotypes of patients with inconclusive stress test that were associated with distinct clinical and prognostic profiles. Within these clusters, CMR stress has an additional prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier for MACE in each cluster

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Several studies have demonstrated the consistently high diagnostic and prognostic value of stress perfusion imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The feasibility and the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown, because most studies have excluded arrhythmic patients from analysis. PURPOSE The aim of our study was to assess the technical feasibility and the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with AF. METHODS Between 2008 and 2018, we prospectively included consecutive patients with AF referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR with dipyridamole. They were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). The secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. The diagnosis of AF was confirmed on 12-lead ECG before and after CMR, and patients with sinus rhythm during CMR were excluded. In the CMR protocol, to limit AF-related artifacts on cine images, an arrhythmia rejection algorithm, or real-time sequences were used. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions for MACE were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR. RESULTS Of 639 patients with AF and suspected or stable chronic CAD (72 ± 9 years, 77% men), 602 (94%) completed the CMR protocol, and among those 538 (89%) completed the follow-up (median follow-up 5.1 (3.3–7.1) years). Reasons for failure to complete CMR included AF-related ECG-gating problems (n = 17), intolerance to stress agent (n = 7), renal failure (n = 6), declining participation (n = 4) and claustrophobia (n = 3). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe disabling adverse event. Patients without inducible ischemia or LGE experienced a substantially lower annual event rate of MACE (1.2%) than those with ischemia and without LGE (8.9%), or those with both ischemia and LGE (9.8%; p In a multivariable stepwise Cox regression including clinical characteristics and CMR indexes, the presence of inducible ischemia was an independent predictor of a higher incidence of MACE (HR 5.88 ; 95% CI: 3.70 - 10.07; p CONCLUSION Stress CMR is technically feasible and has a good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE and all-cause mortality in patients with AF. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE

Background The prognostic value of both exercise ECG testing (ExECG) and vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance (VS-CMR) is well-known in patients with chest pain of unknown coronary origin. However, it is unknown whether performing both techniques can improve the risk stratification of these patients. Purpose We aim to confirm the additive prognostic value of ExECG and VS-CMR in a real-world cohort of patients with chest pain of unknown coronary origin. Methods We retrospectively included 288 patients in which ExECG and VS-CMR had been subsequently performed within one year. Clinical, ExECG and VS-CMR variables were registered. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to check for the association of variables with the risk of MACE, defined as a combined endpoint of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), admission for heart failure (aHF) or all-cause death. Results During a mean follow-up of 4.2±2.15 years, we registered 27 MACE (15 ACS, 8 aHF and 8 all-cause deaths). The history of hypertension, previous coronary artery disease and/or coronary artery bypass grafting, lower maximal heart rate during ExECG (maxHR) and more extensive ischemic burden (segments with perfusion defects -PD- on stress first-pass perfusion) and myocardial necrosis (number of segments with necrosis at late gadolinium enhancement imaging) associated with the MACE endpoint. However, the only independent predictors of MACE were maxHR during ExECG (HR 0.98 [0.96–0.99], p=0.01) and more extensive segments with PD in the VS-CMR (HR 1.2 [1.07–1.34], p=0.002). We identified the best cut-off using the Youden index derived from receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to predict MACE - it was ≤130bpm for maxHR during ExECG and ≥2 segments with PD on VS-CMR. These cathegories allowed us to stratify the annualized rate of MACE, which was very low (0.97%/year) in patients with normal maxHR and no PD on VS-CMR, intermediate in patients with only abnormal maxHR (1.98%/year) or PD on VS-CMR (3.24%/year) and high in patients with both abnormal maxHR and segments with PD (6.26%/year). Adding maxHR to the multivariable model including stress-induced PD by VS-CMR significantly improved the predictive power of MACE as derived from the continuous reclassification improvement index (0.47 [0.10–0.81], p Conclusions ExECG and VS-CMR can have an additive prognostic value to predict the long-term risk of MACE in patients with chest pain of unknown coronary origin. Patients with maxHR during ExECG ≤130bpm and ≥2 segments with PD on VS-CMR are at the highest risk of MACE. Figure 1. MACE risk stratification. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This study was funded by “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” and “Fondos Europeos de Desarrollo Regional FEDER” (PIE15/00013, PI17/01836, and CIBERCV16/11/00486 grants) and by Generalitat Valenciana (GV/2018/116).

Background Recent data suggest that patients with HFrEF (heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) Purpose To assess the safety and the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with HFrEF. Material Between 2008 and 2018, we prospectively included consecutive patients with HFrEF referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR with dipyridamole. HFrEF was defined by a previous history of HF and known LVEF They were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined by cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). The secondary endpoint was a composite outcome of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for acute HF defined by the use of intravenous diuretics. The safety of the stress perfusion CMR was assessed by clinical monitoring for 1 hour after the end of the CMR. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic association of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR. Results Of 1084 patients with HFrEF (65±11 years, median LVEF 34.6±4.9%), 1049 (97%) completed the CMR protocol and among those 952 (91%) completed the follow-up (median 5.6±2.4 years). Reasons for failure to complete CMR included declining participation (n=11), renal failure (n=9), intolerance to stress agent (n=8), claustrophobia (n=4) and poor gating (n=3). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe disabling adverse event. Among patients who underwent CMR, 600 (57%) were diagnosed with MI defined by LGE. Patients without inducible ischemia or LGE experienced a substantially lower annual event rate of MACE (1.8%) than those with ischemia and without LGE (9.4%), or those with both ischemia and LGE (12.0%; p Conclusions Stress CMR is safe and has a good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE in patients with HFrEF. Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background In recent guidelines, non-invasive imaging techniques play a pivotal role in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). The elderly represent a large percentage of our routine CCS population and risk stratification in this scenario is challenging. The potential of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (vs-CMR) for this purpose is unknown. Purpose We explored the prognostic value of the ischemic burden, as derived from vs-CMR, in elderly patients with known or suspected CCS. Methods From the general cohort of 6389 patients with known or suspected CCS submitted to undergo vs-CMR in our health department from 2001 to 2016, we performed a subanalysis of the 1225 patients >70 year-old (mean age 77±5 years, 51% male). Clinical and vs-CMR characteristics were prospectively recorded. The ischemic burden (at stress first-pass perfusion imaging) was computed (using the 17-segment model). The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death and/or non-fatal myocardial infarction (whichever occurred first) was retrospectively revised using the electronic regional health system registry. Results During a median follow-up of 2.7 years, 203 MACEs were registered (17%). Age (77±4 vs. 76±5 years) was not significantly different in patients with and without MACE. Larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes, more depressed LV ejection fraction, more extensive areas with late gadolinium enhancement and ischemic burden were detected in patients with MACE (p8 ischemic segments, p5 segments). Conclusions Vasodilator stress CMR represents a valuable tool to stratify risk in elderly patients with known or suspected CCS and might be helpful to guide decision-making. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background The accuracy and prognostic value of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are well established in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease (CAD). Because myocardial contrast kinetics may be altered in patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), most studies have excluded those patients in whom prognostic data are missing. Purpose To assess the safety and prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion CMR in patients with previous CABG. Material Between 2008 and 2018, we prospectively included consecutive patients with CABG referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR with dipyridamole. They were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined by cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or late coronary revascularization (>90 days after CMR). The safety of the stress perfusion CMR was assessed by clinical monitoring for 1 hour after the end of the CMR. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic association of inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR. Results Of 866 CABG patients (70±9 years, 89% men), 852 (98%) completed the CMR protocol and 771 (89%) completed the follow-up (median 4.2±2.7 years). Reasons for failure to complete CMR included renal failure (n=4), intolerance to stress agent (n=4), claustrophobia (n=2), poor gating (n=2) and declining participation (n=2). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe adverse event. In this cohort, 531 (61%) patients had a myocardial infarction defined by the presence of LGE with ischemic patterns in CMR. Patients without inducible ischemia or LGE experienced a substantially lower annual event rate of MACE (12.8%) than those with ischemia and without LGE (27.6%), or those with both ischemia and LGE (28.2%; p Conclusions Stress CMR is feasible, safe and has a good discriminative prognostic value to predict the occurrence of MACE and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CABG. Kaplan-Meier: MACE (A) – CV Mortality (B) Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

OnBehalf Stress Echo 2020 study group of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Background ABCDE-stress echocardiography (SE) may explore different aspects in the heterogeneous entity of known or suspected heart failure (HF). Aim To assess ABCDE-vasodilator SE in non-ischemic HF Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we recruited 428 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries: 148 patients with HF and preserved (>50%) ejection fraction (HFpEF, Group 1); 100 with HF and mid-range (40-50%) ejection fraction (HFmrEF, Group 2); 180 with HF and reduced ( Results All positivity criteria, except A, were more prevalent (p Conclusions ABCDE-vasodilator SE can help to identify the profound pathophysiological heterogeneity underlying a similar clinical presentation in patients with known or suspected HF with angiographically normal coronary arteries. These patients rarely show stress-induced regional wall motion abnormalities (A), but may exhibit pulmonary congestion (B), reduced myocardial functional reserve (C), altered coronary microcirculation (D) and cardiac autonomic dysfunction (E). Abstract 1675 Figure. The positivity rate of ABCDE criteria

OnBehalf Stress Echo 2020 study group of the Italian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Background A blunted heart rate reserve (HRR) during exercise or vasodilator stress echo (SE) has been associated with a poor outcome in retrospective studies. Aim. To assess the prognostic value of HRR in patients undergoing SE in prospective study. Methods We prospectively recruited a sample of 1825 patients (none with pacemakers or atrial fibrillation; mean age 63 ± 11 years; 1099 male, 60%; 1125, 62% on beta-blockers at the time of testing). All underwent SE with either exercise (n= 631, 543 with semi-supine bicycle and 88 with post-treadmill) or vasodilator (n = 1194, 1184 with accelerated high dose dipyridamole and 10 with adenosine) SE for evaluation of known or suspected coronary artery disease and/or heart failure in 7 accredited laboratories of 5 countries. HRR was calculated by ECG as the peak/rest HR ratio. All patients were followed-up. Results During a median follow-up time of 480 days, 211 events occurred: 20 deaths, 22 non-fatal myocardial infarctions, 58 hospital admissions for acute decompensated heart failure and 111 late (> 3 months from SE) myocardial revascularizations. Positivity cutoff for HRR identified by ROC analysis was ≤1.67 (sensitivity 51.0, specificity 63.4) in the exercise group and ≤1.32 (sensitivity 65.0, specificity 48.9) in the vasodilator group. The separation was present both in the exercise (left panel) and the vasodilator (right panel) subsets : see figure. At multivariable analysis, blunted HRR was an independent predictor of event-free survival in the overall group (Hazard Ratio 1.422, 95 % Confidence Intervals: 1.055-1.917, p=.021), independent of beta-blocker therapy. Conclusion A blunted HRR is a useful non-imaging predictor of adverse events during both vasodilator and exercise SE, independent of inducible ischemia and beta-blocker therapy. Abstract P1793 Figure. HRR and event-free survival curves

Background The World's ageing population with a life expectancy that is steadily increasing raises the question of the benefit of screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) in very old patients with high risk of CAD. Current guidelines discourage the performance of stress testing in asymptomatic elderly. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of vasodilator stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in elderly patients aged >75 years without previous known CAD. Material Consecutive elderly patients >75 years without known CAD referred for vasodilator stress perfusion CMR were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions for MACE were performed to determine the prognostic association of inducible ischemia or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) by CMR beyond traditional clinical risk indexes. Results Of 754 elderly high risk patients (82.0±3.9 years, 48.4% men), 747 (99%) completed the CMR protocol, and among those 659 (88.2%) completed the follow-up (median follow-up 5.7±2.5 years). Reasons for failure to complete CMR included claustrophobia (n=3), declining participation (n=2) and intolerance to stress agent (n=2). Stress CMR was well tolerated without occurrence of death or severe disabling adverse event. Patients without inducible ischemia or LGE experienced a substantially lower annual rate of MACE (5.5% vs. 9.9% for those with ischemia and vs. 6.9% for those with ischemia and/or LGE). In a multivariable stepwise Cox regression including clinical characteristics and CMR indexes, the absence of inducible ischemia was an independent predictor of a lower incidence of MACE at follow-up (hazard ratio 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 0.62; p When patients with early coronary revascularization (within 30 days of CMR) were censored on the day of revascularization, both presence of inducible ischemia and ischemia extent per segment maintained a strong association with MACE. Using Kaplan-Meier analyses, the presence of myocardial ischemia identified the occurrence of future CV events (p Conclusion Stress CMR is safe and has discriminative prognostic value in very elderly patients, with a very low negative event rate in patients without ischemia or infarction. Among elderly patients without known CAD, the presence of myocardial ischemia on vasodilator stress CMR was predictive of future CV event or death.

Background In patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) the effect of revascularization on all-cause death (the most verifiable clinical event) is unknown. Objectives We explored the potential of the ischemic burden as derived from vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to guide decision-making in this scenario. Methods In a large prospective multicenter registry, we recruited 6389 patients (mean age 65±11 years, 38% female) submitted to undergo vasodilator stress CMR for known or suspected SIHD. Baseline and CMR characteristics were prospectively recorded. The ischemic burden (at vasodilator stress first-pass perfusion imaging) and necrosis extent (at late enhancement imaging) were computed (17-segment model). The effect of CMR-related revascularization (within the following three months) on all-cause death (revised using the unified regional electronic health system registry) was explored. Results During a 5.75-year median follow-up, 717 (11.2%) all-cause deaths were documented. In multivariable analyses, more extensive ischemic burden (per 1-segment increase) independently related to all-cause death (1.05 [1.03–1.07], p5 segments (9.3% vs. 16.3%, HR 0.56 [0.32–0.98], p=0.02) but it independently increased risk in 604 patients with ischemic burden ≤5 segments (16.2% vs. 11.3%, HR 1.59 [1.03–2.45], p=0.037). Figure 1. CMR-related revascularization Conclusions In patients with known or suspected stable ischemic heart disease the ischemic burden as derived from vasodilator stress CMR can be helpful to predict the effect of revascularization on long-term all-cause death. Acknowledgement/Funding Funded by “Instituto de Salud Carlos III”/FEDER (PIE15/00013, PI17/01836, and CIBERCV16/11/00486 grants) and Generalitat Valenciana (GV/2018/116).

Background Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) of left anterior descending artery is useful for risk stratification during stress echocardiography (SE) as an add-on to regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), but the age-and sex-dependence of prognostic cutoff values remains unclear. Purpose To provide sex and age-specific prognostic cut-off values which may be needed to account for the physiologic decline of CFVR with age, and sex-related differences in resting flow. Methods In an observational, prospective, multicenter, registry study design, we enrolled from August 2003 to August 2017 in 4 Italian cardiology referral centers with accredited, quality-controlled stress echo laboratory a consecutive sample of 5,577 patients (of them, 2,284 women and 110 aged ≥85 years) referred to the SE lab for known or suspected coronary artery disease, after exclusion of patients with inadequate acoustic window (n=295), premature test interruption (n=105), and lost to follow-up (n=173).All underwent dual imaging (RWMA and CFVR) dipyridamole SE (0.84 mg/kg over 6') and were followed-up. All-cause death and non-fatal myocardial infarction were the main outcome measures. Median follow-up of 20 months (1st quartile 8, 3rd quartile 43 months), Results There were 649 hard events (236 deaths and 413 non-fatal myocardial infarctions), 288 of which occurred in women and 38 in patients ≥85 years. With a ROC analysis, the best prognostic cut-off value for CFVR was almost the same for men (2.03) and women (2.02) and consistent across all age strata (85 years) who showed an optimal value of 1.90. Independent prognostic indicators were RWMA (HR=5.42, 95% CI=2.42–12.15; p85 years. Best prognostic cut-off value of CFVR Conclusion A sex-independent cut-off value of CFVR ≤2.0 provides the optimal risk stratification across all age groups, except those >85 years in whom a lower cut-off

The presence of transient ischemic dilatation (TID) and positive vasodilator stress electrocardiographic (ECG) changes on SPECT is often associated with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. PET allows for evaluation of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve both of which have incremental diagnostic and prognostic perspective. We are reporting a case with significant vasodilator stress ECG abnormalities and TID with normal myocardial blood flow and flow reserve that had normal coronary arteries on invasive angiography. This case suggests that normal myocardial blood flow and flow reserve in conjunction with normal perfusion can rule out significant CAD regardless of vasodilator-induced ECG changes and TID.

We thank the authors for the opportunity to discuss in further detail the rationale behind the task force's decision to give exercise perfusion imaging a Class I indication as the initial diagnostic test in assessment of patients with angina and left bundle branch block (LBBB). As pointed out, there are data that suggest superior diagnostic accuracy of vasodilator stress (but not dobutamine stress)1 compared with exercise stress scintigraphy in …

Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is advocated for the assessment of myocardial perfusion in addition to wall motion during stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.1,2 We therefore read with interest the article by Bhattacharyya et al. 3 on behalf of the British Society of Echocardiography detailing the current status and performance of stress echocardiography in the UK. In particular, we note the limited performance of MCE with only a small number of units (10.5%) using this technique, and a corresponding ‘under-utilization’ of vasodilator stress. Given the emerging literature,4–6 the observed uptake …