Search

Background Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are the recommended choice of stents for primary PCI. Purpose/Methods The study aimed to determine why interventional cardiologists used non-DESs and how they had influenced the patient prognosis. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the different stents were also compared in treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor. Results Of the PRAGUE 18 study patients, 749 (67.4%) were treated with DESs, 296 (26.6%) with BMS, and 66 (5.9%) with BVS. Cardiogenic shock at presentation and the left main disease, especially as culprit lesion, and right coronary artery stenosis were the reasons for BMS selection. The incidence of the primary net-clinical EP (CV death, nonfatal MI, stroke, major bleeding, or revascularization) at 7 days was 2.6% vs. 6.5%, and 3.0% in the DESs, BMSs, and BVSs, respectively (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.419–5.15, P=0.002 for BMS vs. DES and 1.25 (0.29–5.39) for BVS vs. DES, P=0.76). Patients with BMSs were at higher risk of death at 30 days (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.01–4.76; for BMS vs. DES, P=0.045), and at one year (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.19–3.69; P=0.01); they also had higher composite of cardiac death, re-MI and stroke (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.0–2.74; P=0.047) at one year. BMSs were associated with significantly higher rate of primary EPs either treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Conclusion Patients with the highest risk profile were preferably treated with BMS the contrary to BVS. BMSs were associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular events either treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Charles University Cardiovascular Research Program P-35 and Q-38, Charles University, Czech Republic

Background Time delay is an important prognostic factor and indicator of quality of care for patients with AMI indicated for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose Assessment of total ischaemia time and its relationship to catheterization findings and the incidence of ischaemic events within 1 year in patients treated with primary PCI. Method The analysis included 1230 patients with AIM and primary PCI randomized in the Prague-18 study (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor). We evaluated the total ischaemia time and two the intermediate intervals: A - from the symptom onset to the arrival to the hospital and B - from the entry the hospital to balloon time. We assessed the time delay in relation to patient characteristics, PCI results and ischaemic endpoints (death, reIM, stroke) within 30 days and 1 year. Results Median total ischaemia time was 3.2 hours. Its prolongation resulted in more frequent incidence of TIMI flow 90 min. In 717 (61,6%) patients with increased risk (at least 1 criterion: age >70 years, STEMI anterior wall or LBBB, Killip II-IV, history of MI and CABG, SBP 100 / min), the prolongation of total ischaemia time (≤2 vs. 2.1–4 vs. 4.1–6 vs. >6 hours) resulted in a more frequent incidence of combined ischaemic endpoints within 1 year (p=0.034) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (p=0.028). Conclusion The extension of total ischaemia time in patients treated with primary PCI resulted in a more frequent suboptimal result with TIMI flow Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background Antithrombotic therapy is effective in preventing ischemic and thromboembolic events, however it simultaneously increases the risk of bleeding. The efforts thus focus on balancing the intensity of combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Purpose The study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of single (aspirin/clopidogrel) or dual (aspirin plus clopidogrel) antiplatelet therapy in combination with an oral anticoagulant in non-selected patient population with atrial fibrillation (AFib) and an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods The analysis used data from National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services (NRRHS), which contains data of the entirety of health care paid from the public health insurance (almost 100% of healthcare in the Czech Republic) combined with the database of death records. Occurrence of an ACS, stroke, and bleeding requiring hospitalization within one year was compared in patients discharged on dual and triple antithrombotic therapy. Dual antithrombotic therapy consists of aspirin/clopidogrel plus an oral anticoagulant. Triple antithrombotic therapy was defined as combination of aspirin, clopidogrel and an oral anticoagulant. Results Over a four-year period (2012–2016) 104 000 patients with an ACS were hospitalized in the Czech Republic. AFib (any types) was reported in 12.4% (N=12 891) of them (21.2% in patients 75+ years old). +AFib (vs. −AFib) patients were a higher risk population with respect to the comorbidity (diabetes, hypertension, renal disease, stroke, heart failure) (p We identified 1017 patients discharged on dual and 967 patients on triple antithrombotic therapy. Risk of recurrent ACS within one year with dual therapy was comparable to that with triple therapy (OR (95% CI): 1.219 (0.766; 1.940), p=0.403). The same was also observed for the risk of stroke (1.273 (0.648; 2.501), p=0.483). After six months, persistence on dual antithrombotic therapy (33.4% patients) was higher than on triple therapy (10.3%, p Conclusion Protective effect of dual antithrombotic therapy on the occurence of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular event is comparable to that of the triple antithrombotic therapy in non-selected patients with an acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation. Moreover, long-term persistence on triple therapy is significantly lower due to bleeding risk.

Background Balancing the intensity and duration of antiplatelet therapy according to thrombotic risk is a fundamental need in order to optimize therapy effectiveness and safety. Incorporation of new predictors in thrombotic risk stratification is therefore of a crucial importance for antiplatelet therapy net clinical benefit. Purpose The present analysis aimed to evaluate the relation of miR-126-3p and miR-223-3p, new markers of platelet activation, in order to facilitate prediction of recurrent thrombotic events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Method The analysis included 598 patients (age median 62 years, men 77.8%) randomized in the Prague-18 study (ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in AIM treated with primary PCI). During the study follow up, 40.6% of patients switched to clopidogrel. Determination of miR was evaluated 24 hours after admission; miR-126-3p and miR-223-3p were normalized by miR-423-3p and miR-150-5p. Quantitative determination of selected miRNAs was performed with a novel microRNA immunoassay method. Selected miRNAs were compared with key efficacy endpoints (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI and stroke), stent thrombosis and all hemorrhagic events, and analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Results Increased values of miR-223-3p were significantly related to the occurrence of combined ischemic endpoint within 30 days [OR (95% CI) 15.739 (2.066; 119.932) p=0.008] and within one year [3.175 (1.40; 7.186) p=0.006]. Decreased ratio of miR-126-3P/miR-223-3p was significantly related to the occurrence of combined ischemic endpoint within 30 days [0.137 (0.031; 0.609) p=0.009] and one year [0.372 (0.169; 0.819) p=0.014]. MiRNAs were identified as independent predictors even after adjustment for confounding clinical predictors (Study arm, Switch to Clopidogrel, Age, Men, BMI, Smoking, History of Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, DM, MI, PCI, CABG, Chronic heart failure, Chronic renal failure, Peripheral arterial disease, LBBB, RBBB, TIMI 1, Stem disease, Suboptimal of failure of PCI, Time to hospital). Adjusted ORs (95% CI) are 11.828 (1.472; 98.011), p=0.022 and 2.394 (1.021; 5.610), p=0.045 for increased value of miR-223-3p and the occurrence of combined ischemic endpoint within 30 days and one year respectively; 0.151 (0.030; 0.757), p=0.022 and 0.407 (0.179; 0.925), p=0.032 for decreased ratio of miR-126–3P/miR-223-3p and the occurrence of combined ischemic endpoint within 30 days and one year respectively. No association between miRNA and bleeding complications was identified. Conclusion The miR-223-3p and miR-126-3p to miR-223-3p ratio are strong independent predictors of thrombotic ischemic events and can be used to stratify patients post AMI.

Experimental data on myocardial regeneration with the use of bone marrow stem cells in recent years promoted first pilot clinical trials. Currently used methodology in these pilot clinical trials is based on the aspiration of autologous bone blood, separation of cell fraction thought to contain multipotent stem cells and reinjection of this autologous cellular blood material to the patient's coronary artery during balloon occlusion of this artery. Our experience obtained during almost 3 years led us to stop prematurely one trial and to continue under strict rules another one. This new promising method could bring a true revolution in future prevention or treatment of ischaemic heart failure. However, it is today unclear, whether this is a fascinating new hope for heart failure patients or a dead end route.