Search

Background Despite population antiretroviral treatment (ART) utilization exceeding UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets, Kaposi sarcoma (KS) remains one of the most prevalent malignancies in Botswana. We sought to examine the characteristics and outcomes of KS in the context of high ART utilization. Methods Consenting patients at one of four oncology centers for KS treatment were enrolled prospectively (October 2010 to March 2019) and followed quarterly for 5 years. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier estimator and predictors assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results A total of 408 KS patients were enrolled and of those, 396 (97%) were HIV-positive and included in analyses. Median age at diagnosis was 40 years (IQR: 34.1, 46.7) and 247 patients (62%) were male. The median CD4 cell count at the time of KS diagnosis was 253 cells/mL (IQR: 134, 364) and 279 (73%) were receiving ART at the time of KS diagnosis. Among those on ART, the median duration of ART prior to KS diagnosis was 11.9 months (IQR: 2.7, 46.7). The proportion receiving ART prior to KS increased during the surveillance period from 58% to 80% (P < 0.001). Of the 248 (62.6%) patients with recent measurement, 91% had HIV-1 RNA < 1000 copies/mL. Five-year overall survival was 73% (95% CI 68–78%). In multivariable analysis, Female sex and higher income were associated with improved survival, but not age or CD4 cell count. The duration of ART was significantly associated with survival (P = 0.02), with improved survival for individuals on ART < 6 months compared with longer ART (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.29–0.98). The incidence of KS cases declined by nearly 50%, but has remained relatively stable since 2015. Conclusion Survival rates in this cohort were comparable to other KS cohorts. While KS treatment initially declined with ART expansion, KS remains a significant disease burden in Botswana with 80% of cases occurring among individuals receiving ART. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cancer is now the leading cause of mortality for persons living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States, but it is uncertain whether PLWH access cancer screening that could lower this burden. We sought to assess cancer screening for breast, cervical, and colon cancer among PLWH compared with the HIV-uninfected population at a multicenter healthcare system over the past two decades. Methods Data were obtained from a prospective, observational HIV clinical care cohort comprised of PLWH engaged in care in the Partners Healthcare System. Patients eligible for cancer screening between the years 2002 and 2016 were included. Patients were matched in a maximum of 1:4 ratio with HIV-uninfected patients from the Massachusetts General Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network based on age, sex, race, year of study entry, and length of follow-up. The mean proportion of time in which eligible patients were guideline concordant for cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening was assessed. Non-parametric tests were used to compared screening rates between PLWH and HIV-infected and on the basis of multiple clinical and sociodemographic factors. Results During the observation period, a total of 495 PLWH were eligible for breast cancer screening, 1011 for cervical cancer screening, and 1965 for colon cancer screening. For each screening group, the majority of PLWH were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and had relatively high CD4 cell counts (Table 1). Screening rates for PLWH compared with controls were 67.3% vs. 82.8% (P < 0.0001) for breast cancer, 49.0% vs. 73.3% (P < 0.0001) for cervical cancer, and 92.7% vs. 91.2% (P = 0.96) for colon cancer (Figure 1). Among PLWH, factors significantly associated with lower rates of screening guideline concordance were older age, lower CD4 count, HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL, and HIV duration < 5 years for breast cancer, and older age, white race, English language, and lack of ART use for cervical cancer. Conclusion Among patients engaged in longitudinal care, PLWH had significantly lower rates of screening for breast and cervical cancer than HIV-uninfected. Disparity is not explained by racial or primary language differences. Further work to improve access to cancer screening for PLWH is needed. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]