Search

Background Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection leads to blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction that does not resolve despite viral suppression on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. In preclinical models, cannabis restores BBB integrity. Methods We studied persons with HIV (PWH) and HIV-negative (HIV−) individuals who had used cannabis recently. We assessed 2 biomarkers of BBB permeability: the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to serum albumin ratio (CSAR) and CSF levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a receptor for uPA, a matrix-degrading proteolytic enzyme that disrupts the BBB. A composite index of the BBB markers was created using principal components analysis. Neural injury was assessed using neurofilament light (NFL) in CSF by immunoassay. Results Participants were 45 PWH and 30 HIV− individuals of similar age and ethnicity. Among PWH, higher CSF suPAR levels correlated with higher CSAR values (r  = 0.47, P  < .001). PWH had higher (more abnormal) BBB index values than HIV− individuals (mean ± SD, 0.361 ± 1.20 vs −0.501 ± 1.11; P  = .0214). HIV serostatus interacted with cannabis use frequency, such that more frequent use of cannabis was associated with lower BBB index values in PWH but not in HIV− individuals. Worse BBB index values were associated with higher NFL in CSF (r  = 0.380, P  = .0169). Conclusions Cannabis may have a beneficial impact on HIV-associated BBB injury. Since BBB disruption may permit increased entry of toxins such as microbial antigens and inflammatory mediators, with consequent CNS injury, these results support a potential therapeutic role of cannabis among PWH and may have important treatment implications for ART effectiveness and toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Three-quarters of cancer deaths occur in resource-limited countries, and delayed presentation contributes to poor outcome. In Botswana, where more than half of cancers arise in HIV-infected individuals, we sought to explore predictors of timely oncology care and evaluate the hypothesis that engagement in longitudinal HIV care improves access. Methods. Consenting patients presenting for oncology care from October 2010 to September 2014 were interviewed and their records were reviewed. Cox and logistic models were used to examine the effect of HIV and other predictors on time to oncology care and presentation with advanced cancer (stage III or IV). Results. Of the 1,146 patients analyzed, 584 (51%) had HIV and 615 (54%) had advanced cancer. The initial clinic visit occurred a mean of 144 days (median 29, interquartile range 0-185) after symptom onset, but subsequent mean time to oncology care was 406 days (median 160, interquartile range 59-653). HIV status was not significantly associated with time to oncology care (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.06). However, patients who reported using traditional medicine/healers engaged in oncology care significantly faster (aHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.40) and those with advanced cancer entered care earlier (aHR 1.48,95% CI 1.30-1.70). Factors significantly associated with advanced cancer included income,<$50 per month (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.75), male sex (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.87), and pain as the presenting symptom (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88). Conclusion. Longitudinal HIV care did not reduce the substantial delay to cancer treatment. Research focused on reducing health system delay through coordination and navigation is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cancer is now the leading cause of mortality for persons living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States, but it is uncertain whether PLWH access cancer screening that could lower this burden. We sought to assess cancer screening for breast, cervical, and colon cancer among PLWH compared with the HIV-uninfected population at a multicenter healthcare system over the past two decades. Methods Data were obtained from a prospective, observational HIV clinical care cohort comprised of PLWH engaged in care in the Partners Healthcare System. Patients eligible for cancer screening between the years 2002 and 2016 were included. Patients were matched in a maximum of 1:4 ratio with HIV-uninfected patients from the Massachusetts General Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network based on age, sex, race, year of study entry, and length of follow-up. The mean proportion of time in which eligible patients were guideline concordant for cervical, breast, and colon cancer screening was assessed. Non-parametric tests were used to compared screening rates between PLWH and HIV-infected and on the basis of multiple clinical and sociodemographic factors. Results During the observation period, a total of 495 PLWH were eligible for breast cancer screening, 1011 for cervical cancer screening, and 1965 for colon cancer screening. For each screening group, the majority of PLWH were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and had relatively high CD4 cell counts (Table 1). Screening rates for PLWH compared with controls were 67.3% vs. 82.8% (P < 0.0001) for breast cancer, 49.0% vs. 73.3% (P < 0.0001) for cervical cancer, and 92.7% vs. 91.2% (P = 0.96) for colon cancer (Figure 1). Among PLWH, factors significantly associated with lower rates of screening guideline concordance were older age, lower CD4 count, HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL, and HIV duration < 5 years for breast cancer, and older age, white race, English language, and lack of ART use for cervical cancer. Conclusion Among patients engaged in longitudinal care, PLWH had significantly lower rates of screening for breast and cervical cancer than HIV-uninfected. Disparity is not explained by racial or primary language differences. Further work to improve access to cancer screening for PLWH is needed. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]