Search

To achieve faster and equitable improvements in maternal and child health outcomes, the government of India launched the National Rural Health Mission in 2005. This paper describes the equity-enhancing role of the public sector in increasing use of institutional delivery care services in India between 2004 and 2014. Information on 24 661 births from nationally representative survey data for 2004 and 2014 is analysed. Concentration index is computed to describe socioeconomic-rank-related relative inequalities in institutional delivery and decomposition is used to assess the contributions of public and private sectors in overall socioeconomic inequality. Multilevel logistic regression is applied to examine the changes in socioeconomic gradient between 2004 and 2014. The analysis finds that utilization of institutional delivery care in India increased from 43% in 2004 to 83% in 2014. The bulk of the increase was in public sector use (21% in 2004 to 53% in 2014) with a modest increase in private sector use (22% in 2004 to 30% in 2014). The shift from a pro-rich to pro-poor distribution of public sector use is confirmed. Decomposition analysis indicates that 51% of these reductions in socioeconomic inequality are associated with improved pro-poor distribution of public sector births. Multilevel logistic regressions confirm the disappearance of a wealth-based gradient in public sector births between 2004 and 2014. We conclude that public health investments in India have significantly contributed towards an equitable increase in the coverage of institutional delivery care. Sustained policy efforts are necessary, however, with an emphasis on education, sociocultural and geographical factors to ensure universal coverage of institutional delivery care services in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For decades, US taxpayers have been lamenting the high cost of health care. Since the mid-1980s, Americans have had double-digit spending on health care. Despite this investment, Americans are less healthy than their European and Scandinavian counterparts across an array of health measures. Aim: We sought to explore how inadequate attention to the social, behavioral and environmental determinants of health may contribute to the American health care paradox of high health care spending and poor health outcomes. Design: Mixed methods. Methods: We report previous findings related from a 10-year analysis of national-level health and social service spending and health outcome data from the Organization of Economic and Cooperation and Development (OECD). We also put forth case studies representing different socioeconomic strata to illustrate the relationship between health care and social service spending and health. Results: Although the US spending more of its GDP on health care than any other country, it is not a high spender when one sums spending on both health care and social services. The U.S. however has the lowest ratio of our social service spending to health care spending in the OECD, and countries with lower ratios on average have worse health outcomes. Cases from diverse socioeconomic strata demonstrate how limited attention to the social determinants of health can result in extremely high health care costs and poor health outcomes. Conclusions: Greater investment in addressing the social, behavioral and environmental determinants of health may foster better health without accelerating health care costs in America. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Health Policy & Planning is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The main aim of the Gezondheid en Levens Omstandigheden Bevolking Eindhoven en omstreken (GLOBE) study (the letters of whose name represent the first letters of the Dutch acronym for Health and Living Conditions of the Population of Eindhoven and surroundings) is to quantitatively assess mechanisms and factors explaining socio-economic inequalities in health in the Netherlands. Baseline data for the study were collected by postal survey in 1991 among 18 973 respondents ranging in age from 15–75 years from the city of Eindhoven and its surrounding municipalities. Subsamples (total N = 5667) were interviewed and/or surveyed in 1991, 1997, 2004 (also including a new sample), and most recently in 2011. Information was asked on indicators of socio-economic position, a range of potential explanatory factors (material, behavioural, psychosocial, and environmental) and health outcomes. From 2004 onwards, special emphasis was given to the identification of physical, social, and cultural environmental factors in the explanation of socio-economic inequalities in health behaviours. Information from the baseline postal survey onwards can and has been linked to several registries of causes of death, hospital admissions, and cancer. Researchers are cordially invited to contact the project leader (f.vanlenthe@erasmusmc.nl) to propose research based on the data. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background. Late diagnosis of cancer may partly be explained by the fact that some patients do not seek health care promptly when experiencing an alarm symptom. Socioeconomic and demographic differences exist concerning knowledge and awareness of cancer alarm symptoms in the general population and socioeconomic differences are found in cancer incidence and survival. We therefore hypothesise that socioeconomic and demographic differences in health care-seeking behaviour are present among people with alarm symptoms. Objectives. To analyse associations between health care seeking and socioeconomic and demographic factors among people reporting cancer alarm symptoms. Methods. A questionnaire survey comprising 20000 people aged >20 from the Danish population. The questionnaire concerned alarm symptoms of common cancers and subsequent health care seeking. Data on socioeconomic factors were obtained from Statistics Denmark. Main outcomes: health care seeking and patient interval. Results. A total of 26.1% of all subjects reported that they did not seek health care when having experienced an alarm symptom. Women—subjects aged >40, subjects living with a partner and subjects having a cancer diagnosis—were more likely to seek health care, whereas medium educational level was negatively associated with health care seeking. Further, women were more likely to seek health care within 1 month, whereas subjects out of the workforce were less likely to do so. Conclusions. Approximately three out of four subjects sought health care when having experienced an alarm symptom but 50% waited for at least 1 month. Some demographic factors were found to be associated with health care-seeking behaviour and the patient interval, whereas no consistent associations were found with regard to socioeconomics. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]