Search

Background The risk of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression is significant despite treatment with renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blocking agents. Current clinical tools cannot predict whether or not patients will respond to treatment with RAS inhibitors (RASi). We aimed to investigate whether proteome analysis could identify urinary peptides as biomarkers that could predict the response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin-receptor blockers treatment to avoid DKD progression. Furthermore, we investigated the comparability of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated using four different GFR equations, for DKD progression. Methods We evaluated urine samples from a discovery cohort of 199 diabetic patients treated with RASi. DKD progression was defined based on eGFR percentage slope results between visits (∼1 year) and for the entire period (∼3 years) based on the eGFR values of each GFR equation. Urine samples were analysed using capillary electrophoresis–coupled mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis was performed between the uncontrolled (patients who did not respond to RASi treatment) and controlled kidney function groups (patients who responded to the RASi treatment). Peptides were combined in a support vector machine-based model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the risk prediction models in two independent validation cohorts treated with RASi. Results The classification of patients into uncontrolled and controlled kidney function varies depending on the GFR equation used, despite the same sample set. We identified 227 peptides showing nominal significant difference and consistent fold changes between uncontrolled and controlled patients in at least three methods of eGFR calculation. These included fragments of collagens, alpha-1-antitrypsin, antithrombin-III, CD99 antigen and uromodulin. A model based on 189 of 227 peptides (DKDp189) showed a significant prediction of non-response to the treatment/DKD progression in two independent cohorts. Conclusions The DKDp189 model demonstrates potential as a predictive tool for guiding treatment with RASi in diabetic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This observational cohort study compared the likelihood of maintained (stabilized/up-titrated) renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy at 6 months following hyperkalaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or heart failure (HF) from the USA, Japan and Spain who received sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) for at least 120 days, relative to those with no prescription for a potassium (K+) binder. Methods Using health registers and hospital medical records, patients with CKD and/or HF receiving RAASi therapy who experienced a hyperkalaemia episode were identified. Propensity score (PS) matching (1:4) was applied to balance the SZC cohort to the no K+ binder cohort on baseline characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the odds of maintained RAASi therapy at 6 months in the SZC versus no K+ binder cohorts. Results The PS-matched SZC cohort included 565 (USA), 776 (Japan) and 56 (Spain) patients; the no K+ binder cohort included 2068, 2629 and 203 patients, respectively. At 6 months, 68.9% (USA), 79.9% (Japan) and 69.6% (Spain) in the SZC cohorts versus 53.1% (USA), 56.0% (Japan) and 48.3% (Spain) in the no K+ binder cohorts had maintained RAASi therapy. Meta-analysed across countries, the odds ratio of maintained RAASi therapy in the SZC cohort versus no K+ binder cohort was 2.56 (95% confidence interval 1.92–3.41; P  < .0001). Conclusions In routine clinical practice across three countries, patients treated with SZC were substantially more likely to maintain guideline-concordant RAASi therapy at 6 months following hyperkalaemia relative to patients with no K+ binder treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Prevention of human hypertension is an important challenge and has been achieved in experimental models. Brief treatment with renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors permanently reduces the genetic hypertension of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). The kidney is involved in this fascinating phenomenon, but relevant changes in gene expression are unknown. Methods and results In SHR, we studied the effect of treatment between 10 and 14 weeks of age with the angiotensin receptor blocker, losartan, or the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, perindopril [with controls for non-specific effects of lowering blood pressure (BP)], on differential RNA expression, DNA methylation, and renin immunolabelling in the kidney at 20 weeks of age. RNA sequencing revealed a six-fold increase in renin gene (Ren) expression during losartan treatment (P < 0.0001). Six weeks after losartan, arterial pressure remained lower (P = 0.006), yet kidney Ren showed reduced expression by 23% after losartan (P = 0.03) and by 43% after perindopril (P = 1.4 × 10−6) associated with increased DNA methylation (P = 0.04). Immunolabelling confirmed reduced cortical renin after earlier RAS blockade (P = 0.002). RNA sequencing identified differential expression of mRNAs, miRNAs, and lncRNAs with evidence of networking and co-regulation. These included 13 candidate genes (Grhl1 , Ammecr1l , Hs6st1 , Nfil3 , Fam221a , Lmo4 , Adamts1 , Cish , Hif3a , Bcl6 , Rad54l2 , Adap1 , Dok4), the miRNA miR-145-3p, and the lncRNA AC115371. Gene ontogeny analyses revealed that these networks were enriched with genes relevant to BP, RAS, and the kidneys. Conclusion Early RAS inhibition in SHR resets genetic pathways and networks resulting in a legacy of reduced Ren expression and BP persisting for a minimum of 6 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Natural products (NPs) have played a significant role in modern drug discovery, serving as a source of inspiration and ideas for drug design. NPs have led to advancements in the treatment of various diseases, including infectious, cardiovascular, cancer, and multiple sclerosis. Pharmaceutical companies are shifting towards biotechnological methods to develop medicines for complex diseases. NPs offer a wider chemical space compared to synthetic compounds, with unique structural features and a diverse range of bioactive compounds. In the context of kidney disease treatment, both NPs and synthetic drugs have made significant contributions to pharmacotherapy. NPs have the potential to provide unique structural motifs for future drug development. [Extracted from the article]

Renin-Angiotensin-System (RAS) inhibitors remained the only effective nephro-protective treatments until recent landmark trials showed that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and non-steroid mineral receptor antagonists added-on RAS inhibitor therapy dramatically slowed renal disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, despite this impressive advancement, a substantial proportion of patients remains at high risk of renal and cardiovascular events. Thus, we are still far from achieving the therapeutic ceiling in CKD. However, we are entering a new era in the management of patients with CKD with innovative methodological approaches to test disease-modifying medications in the context of personalized medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in prevalence worldwide, posing major implications for public health such as kidney failure requiring dialysis, and increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Diabetic and hypertensive kidney disease represent the two most common causes of CKD. Until a few years ago, lifestyle modifications, blood pressure, glycaemic and lipid control, along with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker monotherapy were the only measures for retarding these two diseases and were the cornerstone of treatment for CKD of any aetiology. Effective application of all these measures could reduce the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in proteinuric CKD roughly from 10–12 to 5–6 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, hence leaving a large unmet need in CKD treatment. In recent years, major kidney outcome trials showed that the addition of sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with CKD with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D) and of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with CKD with T2D can largely improve kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. Elegant analyses of these trials shed further light on these effects, showing that SGLT2i or finerenone use on top of standard-of-care treatment in patients with albuminuric CKD can further reduce chronic eGFR annual loss to 2–2.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, while SGLT2is in normoalbuminuric CKD can reduce this loss <0.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, i.e. well below the aging-related GFR loss. Therefore, current evidence suggests that available treatments, if properly implemented, can help us reach the therapeutic ceiling in the majority of CKD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the potential benefits of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in preventing hypertension. Hypertension is a global health problem that increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases. The RAS plays a crucial role in the development of hypertension, and pharmacological inhibition of the RAS can lower blood pressure. However, long-term treatment with RAS inhibitors can lead to side effects and poor compliance. The article explores the epigenetic mechanisms behind the long-term effects of RAS inhibition and identifies potential gene targets for future treatments. While animal studies have shown promising results, clinical trials have not yet confirmed the same effects in humans. Further research is needed to fully understand and utilize the potential of RAS inhibition in preventing hypertension. [Extracted from the article]

Background: There is a clinical need for treatments that can slow or prevent the growth of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, not only to reduce the need for surgery, but to provide a means to treat those who cannot undergo surgery. Methods: Analysis of the UK Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS) prospective cohort was conducted to test for an association between cardiometabolic medications and the growth of an abdominal aortic aneurysm above 30 mm in diameter, using linear mixed-effect models. Results: A total of 3670 male participants with data available on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth, smoking status, co-morbidities, and medication history were included. The mean age at recruitment was 69.5 years, the median number of surveillance scans was 6, and the mean(s.e.) unadjusted abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate was 1.75(0.03) mm/year. In a multivariate linear mixed-effect model, smoking (mean(s.e.) +0.305(0.07) mm/year, P = 0.00003) and antiplatelet use (mean(s.e.) +0.235(0.06) mm/year, P = 0.00018) were found to be associated with more rapid abdominal aortic aneurysm growth, whilst metformin was strongly associated with slower abdominal aortic aneurysm growth (mean(s.e.) −0.38(0.1) mm/year, P = 0.00019), as were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (mean(s.e.) −0.243(0.07) mm/year, P = 0.0004), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (mean(s.e.) −0.253(0.08) mm/year, P = 0.00255), and thiazides/related diuretics (mean(s.e.) −0.307(0.09) mm/year, P = 0.00078). Conclusion: The strong association of metformin with slower abdominal aortic aneurysm growth highlights the importance of the ongoing clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of metformin with regard to the prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth and/or rupture. The association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, and diuretics with slower abdominal aortic aneurysm growth points to the possibility that optimization of cardiovascular risk management as part of abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance may have the secondary benefit of also reducing abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rates. Abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rates were compared with smoking status, co-morbidities, and medication history in the UK Aneurysm Growth Study (UKAGS) prospective cohort. It was found that: smoking and antiplatelet use were associated with a more rapid abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate; the drug metformin was strongly associated with a slower abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate; and drugs in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and thiazide/related diuretic classes were also associated with a slower abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate. These results suggest that common cardiometabolic medications may be useful therapeutic options to slow abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, with a potentially serious prognosis. At present, management of IgAN is primarily based on therapeutic lifestyle changes, and excellent blood pressure control and maximized supportive treatment with the combination of inhibition of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system with either inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin II receptor blockers and inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2, and possibly in the future also with endothelin antagonists. Supportive care currently represents the cornerstone of treatment of IgAN. Targeted-release formulation of budesonide should replace systemic corticosteroids in patients with higher proteinuria and active histological lesions. New treatment options are aimed at immunopathogenesis of IgAN including depletion or modulation of Galactose-deficient-Immunoglobulin A1–producing B cells, plasma cells, and the alternate and/or lectin pathway of complement. The exact place of monoclonal antibodies and complement inhibitors will need to be determined. This article reviews potential supportive therapies currently available for patients with IgAN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension is very common and remains often poorly controlled in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is the essential first step in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Dietary sodium restriction is often overlooked, but can improve BP control, especially among patients treated with an agent to block the renin–angiotensin system. In the presence of very high albuminuria, international guidelines consistently and strongly recommend the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker as the antihypertensive agent of first choice. Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and diuretics are reasonable second- and third-line therapeutic options. For patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, guidelines recommend the addition of spironolactone to the baseline antihypertensive regimen. However, the associated risk of hyperkalemia restricts the broad utilization of spironolactone in patients with moderate-to-advanced CKD. Evidence from the CLICK (Chlorthalidone in Chronic Kidney Disease) trial indicates that the thiazide-like diuretic chlorthalidone is effective and serves as an alternative therapeutic opportunity for patients with stage 4 CKD and uncontrolled hypertension, including those with treatment-resistant hypertension. Chlorthalidone can also mitigate the risk of hyperkalemia to enable the concomitant use of spironolactone, but this combination requires careful monitoring of BP and kidney function for the prevention of adverse events. Emerging agents, such as the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist ocedurenone, dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan and the aldosterone synthase inhibitor baxdrostat offer novel targets and strategies to control BP better. Larger and longer term clinical trials are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of these novel therapies in the future. In this article, we review the current standards of treatment and discuss novel developments in pathophysiology, diagnosis, outcome prediction and management of hypertension in patients with CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue affecting an estimated 850 million people globally. The leading causes of CKD is diabetes and hypertension, which together account for >50% of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Progressive CKD leads to the requirement for kidney replacement therapy with transplantation or dialysis. In addition, CKD, is a risk factor for premature cardiovascular disease, particularly from structural heart disease and heart failure (HF). Until 2015, the mainstay of treatment to slow progression of both diabetic and many non-diabetic kidney diseases was blood pressure control and renin-angiotensin system inhibition; however, neither angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) nor angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) reduced cardiovascular events and mortality in major trials in CKD. The emergence of cardiovascular and renal benefits observed with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) from clinical trials of their use as anti-hyperglycaemic agents has led to a revolution in cardiorenal protection for patients with diabetes. Subsequent clinical trials, notably DAPA-HF, EMPEROR, CREDENCE, DAPA-CKD and EMPA-KIDNEY have demonstrated their benefits in reducing risk of HF and progression to kidney failure in patients with HF and/or CKD. The cardiorenal benefits—on a relative scale—appear similar in patients with or without diabetes. Specialty societies' guidelines are continually adapting as trial data emerges to support increasingly wide use of SGLT2i. This consensus paper from EURECA-m and ERBP highlights the latest evidence and summarizes the guidelines for use of SGLT2i for cardiorenal protection focusing on benefits observed relevant to people with CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives Dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade involves dual therapy with a combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), direct renin inhibitors (DRIs), or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). It is hypothesized that dual RAAS blockade would result in a more complete inhibition of the RAAS cascade. However, large clinical trials on dual RAAS inhibition have shown increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia without additional benefit on mortality, cardiovascular events, or chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression compared to RAAS inhibitor monotherapy in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The development of newer, more selective non-steroidal MRAs as cardiorenal protective therapies has created a new opportunity for dual RAAS inhibition. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risks of AKI and hyperkalemia with dual RAAS blockade in patients with DKD. Design, setting, participants, and measurements This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCT) published from 1 January 2006 to 30 May 2022. The study population included adult patients with DKD receiving dual RAAS blockade. A total of 31 RCTs and 33   048 patients were included in the systematic review. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects. Results There were 208 AKI events in 2690 patients on ACEi + ARB versus 170 in 4264 patients with ACEi or ARB monotherapy (pooled RR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.23–1.39). There were 304 hyperkalemia events in 2818 patients on ACEi + ARB versus 208 in 4396 patients with ACEi or ARB monotherapy (pooled RR 1.97, 95% CI: 1.32–2.94). A non-steroidal MRA + ACEi or ARB showed no increase in the risk of AKI (pooled RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.81–1.16) compared to ACEi or ARB monotherapy but had a 2-fold higher risk of hyperkalemia with 953 events in 7837 patients in dual therapy versus 454 events in 6895 patients in monotherapy (pooled RR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.84–2.28). A steroidal MRA + ACEi or ARB had a 5-fold higher risk of hyperkalemia with 28 events in 245 at risk in dual therapy versus five events in 248 at risk in monotherapy (pooled RR 5.42 95% CI: 2.15–13.67). Conclusion Dual therapy with RAASi is associated with an increased risk of AKI and hyperkalemia compared to RAASi monotherapy. Conversely, dual therapy with RAAS inhibitors and non-steroidal MRAs have no additional risk of AKI but a similar risk of hyperkalemia, which is lower than dual therapy with RAAS inhibitors and steroidal MRAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte abnormality with characteristic electrocardiogram changes. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) increase the risk of developing hyperkalemia. This case highlights a rare life-threatening episode of hyperkalemia in an individual whose only risk factor was an ARB. A 58-year-old female presented with sudden-onset chest pressure, light-headedness, and diaphoresis. Her initial electrocardiogram showed a nearly sinusoidal rhythm with a widened ventricular depolarization (QRS) and prolonged QT-interval (QTc). Life-threatening hyperkalemia of 9.1 mmol/L was confirmed with a rapid point-of-care electrolyte panel. She was rapidly treated with calcium, potassium-shifting and eliminating medications, and emergent hemodialysis. After stabilization, a thorough workup found that the patient's only risk factor for hyperkalemia was her use of an ARB. While both ARBs and ACEIs are commonly associated with mild hyperkalemia, life-threatening hyperkalemia is rare, particularly in patients without concomitant renal failure, diabetes mellitus, adrenal disease, or potassium-sparing diuretic use. However, this case illustrates that life-threatening hyperkalemia is possible in patients solely taking an ARB without prior significant risk factors. Despite normal renal function in an individual without heart failure or diabetes, this patient developed life-threatening hyperkalemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The metabolic failure of macrophages to adequately process lipid is central to the aetiology of atherosclerosis. Here, we examine the role of macrophage angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in a mouse model of PCSK9-induced atherosclerosis. Methods and results Atherosclerosis in mice was induced with AAV-PCSK9 and a high-fat diet. Animals with increased macrophage ACE (ACE 10/10 mice) have a marked reduction in atherosclerosis vs. WT mice. Macrophages from both the aorta and peritoneum of ACE 10/10 express increased PPARα and have a profoundly altered phenotype to process lipids characterized by higher levels of the surface scavenger receptor CD36, increased uptake of lipid, increased capacity to transport long chain fatty acids into mitochondria, higher oxidative metabolism and lipid β-oxidation as determined using 13C isotope tracing, increased cell ATP, increased capacity for efferocytosis, increased concentrations of the lipid transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1, and increased cholesterol efflux. These effects are mostly independent of angiotensin II. Human THP-1 cells, when modified to express more ACE, increase expression of PPARα, increase cell ATP and acetyl-CoA, and increase cell efferocytosis. Conclusion Increased macrophage ACE expression enhances macrophage lipid metabolism, cholesterol efflux, efferocytosis, and it reduces atherosclerosis. This has implications for the treatment of cardiovascular disease with angiotensin II receptor antagonists vs. ACE inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most antihypertensives can induce dermal photosensitivity, which may increase melanoma risk. However, corroborating evidence is limited. We examined the associations between use of antihypertensives and melanoma risk.Methods: A nationwide nested case-control study was conducted using data from the Cancer Registry of Norway, the National Registry and the Norwegian Prescription Database in 2004-15. Ten controls were randomly selected for each melanoma case, matched on sex and birth year. The study included 12 048 cases and 117 895 controls. We estimated rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All analyses were adjusted for ambient ultraviolet radiation (UVR). We additionally performed active comparator analyses, and sensitivity analyses by only including new users, distinguishing between exclusive and mixed users, allowing for different latency periods, and subgroup analyses by melanoma subtype and clinical stage.Results: Compared with non-use, we observed a slightly increased melanoma risk in users of diuretics (RR 1.08, CI 1.01-1.15), calcium-channel blockers (RR 1.10, CI 1.04-1.18) and drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin system (RR 1.10, CI 1.04-1.16), but not for beta blockers (RR 0.97, CI 0.92-1.03). We found no heterogeneity of associations by melanoma subtype or clinical stage and no dose-response relationship between the cumulative defined daily doses (DDDs) and melanoma. No interaction was found between cumulative DDDs and ambient UVR.Conclusions: Weak associations, with lack of a dose-response relationship and lack of interactions with ambient UVR, in the DDD analysis in this nationwide study do not support a causal relationship between antihypertensives and melanoma risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Klotho is a transmembrane anti-ageing protein that exists in three forms, i.e. α-Klotho, β-Klotho and γ-Klotho, with distinct organ-specific expression and functions in the body. Here we focus on α-Klotho (hereafter Klotho), abundantly expressed by the distal and proximal convoluted tubules of the kidney. A significant decline in systemic and renal Klotho levels is a new hallmark for kidney disease progression. Emerging research portrays Klotho as a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target for diabetic and non-diabetic kidney disease. Even so, the underlying mechanisms of Klotho regulation and the strategies to restore its systemic and renal levels are still lacking. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers are the current standard of care for kidney diseases, but the molecular mechanisms for their nephroprotective action are still ambiguous. Moreover, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress also plays a crucial role in kidney disease progression. Few studies have claimed that the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) has a direct relation with ER stress generation and vice versa in kidney disease. Interestingly, RAAS and ER stress modulation are associated with Klotho regulation in kidney disease. Here we focus on how the RAAS and ER stress connect with Klotho regulation in kidney disease. We also discuss Klotho and ER stress in an alliance with the concept of haemodynamic and metabolic overload in kidney disease. In addition, we highlight novel approaches to implement Klotho as a therapeutic target via RAAS and ER stress modulation for the treatment of diabetic and non-diabetic kidney diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Concerns have been raised that angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might facilitate transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 leading to more severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disease and an increased risk of mortality. We aimed to investigate the association between ACE-I/ARB treatment and risk of death amongst people with COVID-19 in the first 6 months of the pandemic. Methods We identified a cohort of adults diagnosed with either confirmed or probable COVID-19 (from 1 January to 21 June 2020) using computerized medical records from the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) primary care database. This comprised 465 general practices in England, United Kingdom with a nationally representative population of 3.7 million people. We constructed mixed-effects logistic regression models to quantify the association between ACE-I/ARBs and all-cause mortality among people with COVID-19, adjusted for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, concurrent medication, smoking status, practice clustering, and household number. Results There were 9,586 COVID-19 cases in the sample and 1,463 (15.3%) died during the study period between 1 January 2020 and 21 June 2020. In adjusted analysis ACE-I and ARBs were not associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85–1.21 and OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67–1.07, respectively). Conclusion Use of ACE-I/ARB, which are commonly used drugs, did not alter the odds of all-cause mortality amongst people diagnosed with COVID-19. Our findings should inform patient and prescriber decisions concerning continued use of these medications during the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended by guidelines as first-line antihypertensive therapies in the general population or in patients with earlier stages of kidney disease. However, the cardioprotective benefit of these agents among patients on dialysis remains uncertain. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases from inception through February 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of ACEIs/ARBs relative to placebo or no add-on treatment in patients receiving dialysis. RCTs were eligible if they assessed fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events as a primary efficacy endpoint. Results We identified five RCTs involving 1582 dialysis patients. Compared with placebo or no add-on treatment, the use of ACEIs/ARBs was not associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events {risk ratio [RR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–1.11]}. Furthermore, there was no benefit in cardiovascular mortality [RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.59–1.14)] and all-cause mortality [RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.64–1.15)]. These results were consistent when the included RCTs were stratified by subgroups, including hypertension, ethnicity, sample size, duration of follow-up and quality. Conclusion The present meta-analysis showed that among patients on dialysis, the use of ACEIs/ARBs is not associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality as compared with placebo or no add-on treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background While it is well known that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) increase the risk of acute renal failure, the role of neprilysin inhibition (NEPi) is unclear and some physicians are reluctant to prescribe sacubitril/valsartan because of safety concerns. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the risk for renal events, progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or progression to dialysis on combined NEPi and ACEi/ARBs compared with ACEi or ARBs. Methods We performed a systematic meta-analysis including 17 randomized controlled trials (study drug sacubitril/valsartan or omapatrilat), involving a total of 23 569 patients, after searching PubMed, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.org and Embase for eligible studies. From the included trials, all renal endpoints, including long- and short-term outcomes and hyperkalemia, were extracted. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird method. The study was registered at PROSPERO. Results Overall, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or omapatrilat showed a slightly lower risk of any renal event [OR 0.82 (0.7–0.97)] compared with treatment with an ACEi or ARB alone. Also, there was a decreased risk of severe acute renal events [OR 0.8 (0.69–0.93)] and a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate decline [mean difference −0.58 mL/min (−0.83 to −0.33 mL/min)]. There was no difference in chronic renal events [OR 0.92 (0.8–1.05)] or hyperkalemia [OR 1.02 (0.84–1.23)]. Conclusion NEPi + ACEi/ARBs are safe in terms of renal adverse events. Longer trials focusing on CKD are needed to evaluate the effect of NEPi on decreasing progression of CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Proteinuria is a well-known risk factor for progressive kidney impairment. Recently, C-terminal cubilin (CUBN) variants have been associated with isolated proteinuria without progression of kidney disease. Methods Genetic testing of 347 families with proteinuria of suspected monogenic cause was performed by next-generation sequencing of a custom-designed kidney disease gene panel. Families with CUBN biallelic proteinuria-causing variants were studied at the clinical, genetic, laboratory and pathologic levels. Results Twelve families (15 patients) bearing homozygous or compound heterozygous proteinuria-causing variants in the C-terminal CUBN gene were identified, representing 3.5% of the total cohort. We identified 14 different sequence variants, five of which were novel. The median age at diagnosis of proteinuria was 4 years (range 9 months to 44 years), and in most cases proteinuria was detected incidentally. Thirteen patients had moderate to severe proteinuria at diagnosis without nephrotic syndrome. These patients showed lack of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment, normal kidney biopsy and preservation of normal kidney function over time. The two remaining patients presented a more severe phenotype, likely caused by associated comorbidities. Conclusions Identification of C-terminal pathogenic CUBN variants is diagnostic of an entity characterized by glomerular proteinuria, normal kidney histology and lack of response to ACEi/ARB treatment. This study adds evidence and increases awareness about albuminuria caused by C-terminal variants in the CUBN gene, which is a benign condition usually diagnosed in childhood with preserved renal function until adulthood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To evaluate the prescribing pattern of antihypertensive drugs and its compliance to the recommendations of Joint National Committee 8 (JNC 8) guidelines and assess the impact of pharmacist led patient counselling on hypertension management. Methods A prospective study was carried out for a period of one year (September 2020–October 2021) among 150 hypertensive patients of various departments in a tertiary care hospital, Kerala, India. All the cases were prospectively analysed to study the pattern of antihypertensive use and patients were counselled with a patient information leaflet. Key findings Out of 150 patients, 53% were women and 47% were men. Majority of patients were aged 60 years and above (66.0%). Diabetes mellitus (26%) was the most common co-morbidity associated with hypertension. About half of the patients had received dual therapy (49%) followed by monotherapy (31.3%), triple therapy (18%) and quadruple therapy (2%). Calcium channel blockers (59.8%) were the most frequently prescribed drug class followed by angiotensin II receptor blockers (30.5%) either alone or in combination for effective control of blood pressure. Cilnidipine (8.7%) was the most commonly used antihypertensive drug followed by telmisartan (8%). It was observed that 80% of prescriptions were adherent to JNC 8 hypertension treatment recommendations. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the knowledge-awareness scores before (18%) and after (52%) patient counselling. Conclusion The study represents the utilisation pattern of antihypertensive drugs. The adherence of antihypertensive medication use to JNC 8 guidelines was high level at the study site but needs to improve further. The study concludes that pharmacist-led counselling plays a vital role in improving patients' knowledge and awareness towards hypertension management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertension is a key risk factor for ischemic heart disease and atherosclerosis. Most patients require a combination of antihypertensive medications to accomplish their therapeutic goals. Antihypertensive medicines such as calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers are indicated for patients whose high blood pressure cannot be controlled with monotherapy. The combination of amlodipine besylate (AML) with irbesartan (IRB) is an example of this synergistic activity in lowering blood pressure. Objective: In this regard, the goal of the research is to develop sensitive spectrophotometric methods for the simultaneous determination of amlodipine besylate and irbesartan. Methods: Three simple ratio spectra-manipulating spectrophotometric methods namely, ratio difference, mean centering of ratio spectra, and derivative ratio, were developed for the simultaneous assay of the cited mixture. Results: Linear correlations were attained over the concentration range of 1-35 lg/mL and 2-35lg/mL for amlodipine besylate and irbesartan, respectively. The methods were validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines with good results. Conclusion: The methods developed were successfully applied for the assay of the cited drugs in their marketed formulation. They could be efficiently used for routine analysis of the mentioned drugs in QC laboratories. Highlights: The proposed approaches do not require expensive solvents or complex instruments. They could be used in routine laboratory tests where time and cost are crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) conferred a high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related mortality early in the pandemic. We evaluate the presentation, treatment and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients on KRT over time during the pandemic. Methods This registry-based study involved 6080 dialysis and kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19, representing roughly 10% of total Spanish KRT patients. Epidemiology, comorbidity, infection, vaccine status and treatment data were recorded, and predictors of hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality were evaluated. Results Vaccine introduction decreased the number of COVID-19 cases from 1747 to 280 per wave. Of 3856 (64%) COVID-19 KRT patients admitted to the hospital, 1481/3856 (38%) were admitted during the first of six waves. Independent predictors for admission included KT and the first wave. During follow-up, 1207 patients (21%) died, 500/1207 (41%) during the first wave. Among vaccinated patients, mortality was 19%, mostly affecting KT recipients. Overall, independent predictors for mortality were older age, disease severity (lymphopaenia, pneumonia) and ICU rejection. Among patient factors, older age, male sex, diabetes, KT and no angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were independent predictors of death. In KT recipients, individual immunosuppressants were independent predictors of death. Over time, patient characteristics evolved and in later pandemic waves, COVID-19 was mainly diagnosed in vaccinated KT recipients; in the few unvaccinated dialysis patients, ICU admissions increased and mortality decreased (28% for the first wave and 16–22% thereafter). Conclusions The clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID-19 during the first wave no longer represent COVID-19 in KRT patients, as the pandemic has become centred around vaccinated KT recipients. Vaccines lowered the incidence of diagnosed COVID-19 and mortality. However, mortality remains high despite increased access to ICU care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Inflammatory process and apoptosis are involved in the pathogenesis of cardiac injury and oxidative damage caused by diabetes mellitus. The cardioprotective effects of standardized aqueous ethanolic olive leaf extract (OLE), metformin (as a cardiovascular protective agent) and valsartan (as an angiotensin receptor blocker) in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were evaluated. Methods Wistar rats divided into control, diabetic, OLE-treated (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg), metformin (300 mg/kg)-treated, valsartan (30 mg/kg)-treated and metformin/valsartan-treated diabetic groups. Biochemical parameters, including malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activates, and the total contents of thiol were measured, and histopathological and gene expression studies were done on cardiac tissues. Fasting blood sugar (FBS) and cardiac injury markers were examined in serum. Key findings FBS; the serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase-muscle/brain (CK-MB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST); and heart tissue MDA levels due to diabetes were significantly alleviated by OLE treatment (effect size; ηp2 = 0.934, 0.888, 0.848, 0.888 and 0.879, respectively), and SOD and CAT activity and the thiol content in heart tissue were significantly increased (effect size; ηp2 = 0.770, 0.749 and 0.753, respectively). Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and the number of infiltrating inflammatory cells were reduced in cardiac tissues of OLE-treated groups compared with the diabetic rats (effect size; ηp2 = 0.969 and 0.949, respectively). OLE up-regulated BCL2 gene expression and down-regulated BAX gene expression in cardiac tissue (effect size; ηp2= 0.490 and 0.522, respectively). Conclusion OLE in a dose-dependent manner ameliorates cardiac damage in diabetic cardiomyopathy, perhaps through attenuating inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study was designed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of combination therapy with sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and renin–angiotensin system blockers such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to May 2020. Two authors independently performed study selection, risk-of-bias assessment and data extraction. The quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Statistical heterogeneity was determined by the I 2 statistics. Results Seven studies including 1757 patients were analysed. Compared with ACEI/ARB alone, combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors and ACEIs/ARBs produced a reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) −3.84 mmHg], diastolic blood pressure (DBP; WMD −1.06 mmHg), 24 h ambulatory SBP (WMD −4.59 mmHg), 24-h ambulatory DBP (WMD −2.08 mmHg), urine albumin:creatinine ratio (WMD −29.70%), evaluated glomerular filtration rate (WMD −3.46 mL/min/1.73 m2), haemoglobin A1c [standardized mean difference (SMD) −0.48], fasting plasma glucose (SMD −0.28), uric acid (SMD −0.35) and body weight (SMD −0.29). The risk of hypoglycaemia with combination therapy was higher than in the control group (risk ratio 1.37). As for the risks of total adverse events, genital infection and urinary tract infection, no significant difference was revealed. Conclusion Compared with ACEI/ARB alone, the combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors and ACEIs/ARBs in T2DM was effective and well-tolerated and could achieve additional effects including better control of blood pressure, improvement of renal outcomes, alleviation of long-term renal function and a decrease in blood glucose and body weight. The combination therapy showed an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are closely linked pathological processes. Combating high blood pressure (BP) is an essential part of preventing CKD progression and reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. Data from recent randomized controlled trials on patients at high CV risk showed the beneficial effects of intensive action to meet BP targets on mortality related to CV disease. The impact of meeting such targets on renal function is still unclear, however, particularly for patients with CKD. This issue has been the object of several post hoc analyses because lowering BP definitely has a nephroprotective role, but the early decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) associated with antihypertensive therapies and strict BP targets is still a concern in nephrology clinical practice. The present review discusses the results of studies on this topic, focusing specifically on the clinical significance of early GFR decline in response to treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, or to different BP targets, in terms of renal and CV outcomes, and how this tips the balance towards continuing or discontinuing antihypertensive therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The effect of renin–angiotensin system (RAS) blockade either by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) susceptibility, mortality and severity is inadequately described. We examined the association between RAS blockade and COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis in a large population-based cohort of patients with hypertension (HTN). Methods This is a cohort study using regional health records. We identified all individuals aged 18–95 years from 87 healthcare reference areas of the main health provider in Catalonia (Spain), with a history of HTN from primary care records. Data were linked to COVID-19 test results, hospital, pharmacy and mortality records from 1 March 2020 to 14 August 2020. We defined exposure to RAS blockers as the dispensation of ACEi/ARBs during the 3 months before COVID-19 diagnosis or 1 March 2020. Primary outcomes were: COVID-19 infection and severe progression in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (the composite of need for invasive respiratory support or death). For both outcomes and for each exposure of interest (RAS blockade, ACEi or ARB) we estimated associations in age-, sex-, healthcare area- and propensity score-matched samples. Results From a cohort of 1 365 215 inhabitants we identified 305 972 patients with HTN history. Recent use of ACEi/ARBs in patients with HTN was associated with a lower 6-month cumulative incidence of COVID-19 diagnosis {3.78% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.69–3.86%] versus 4.53% (95% CI 4.40–4.65%); P < 0.001}. In the 12 344 patients with COVID-19 infection, the use of ACEi/ARBs was not associated with a higher risk of hospitalization with need for invasive respiratory support or death [OR = 0.91 (0.71–1.15); P = 0.426]. Conclusions RAS blockade in patients with HTN is not associated with higher risk of COVID-19 infection or with a worse progression of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Our aim is to explain the relationship between Ang II and Scl in osteoporotic (OP) rats and the contribution of Scl in the antiosteoporotic effect mechanism of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Methods This study consists of two sub-studies conducted on 4th and 12th weeks after ovariectomy. In study 1, treatment was started immediately after bilateral ovariectomy (OVX), while, in study 2, treatment was started 2 months after OVX. Two different doses of telmisartan (5 and 10 mg/kg) were administered with the aid of gavage for 30 days in both sub-study groups. Results Serum and tissue Scl, osteocalcin, osteopontin and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase mRNA expressions were higher and bone mineral densities (BMD) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) mRNA expressions were found to be lower in the OVX groups compared with the sham group. In OVX groups where two different doses of telmisartan were administered, BMD and BALP mRNA expressions increased and serum and tissue Scl decreased. Conclusion There may be a close relationship between angiotensin II and sclerostin in the development of osteoporosis. In this study, telmisartan administration showed an antiosteoporotic effect and significantly decreased the level of sclerostin. These results strongly support this relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It has been established that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a membrane-bound regulatory peptide, for host cell entry. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors have been reported to increase ACE2 in type 2 pneumocyte pulmonary tissue. Controversy exists for the continuation of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the current pandemic. ACE2 serves as a regulatory enzyme in maintaining homeostasis between proinflammatory angiotensin II and anti-inflammatory angiotensin 1,7 peptides. Derangements in these peptides are associated with cardiovascular disease and are implicated in the progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Augmentation of the ACE2/Ang 1,7 axis represents a critical target in the supportive management of coronavirus disease 2019–associated lung disease. Observational data describing the use of RAAS inhibitors in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 have not borne signals of harm to date. However, equipoise persists, requiring an analysis of novel agents including recombinant human-ACE2 and existing RAAS inhibitors while balancing ongoing controversies associated with increased coronavirus infectivity and virulence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) lower blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria and reduce renal disease progression in many—but not all—patients. Reduction of dietary sodium intake improves these effects of ARBs. Dietary potassium intake affects BP and proteinuria. We set out to address the effect of potassium intake on BP and proteinuria response to losartan in non-diabetic proteinuric chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of a placebo-controlled interventional cross-over study in 33 non-diabetic proteinuric patients (baseline mean arterial pressure and proteinuria: 105 mmHg and 3.8 g/day, respectively). Patients were treated for 6 weeks with placebo, losartan and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCT), combined with a habitual (∼200 mmol/day) and low-sodium (LS) diet (<100 mmol/day), in randomized order. To analyse the effects of potassium intake, we categorized patients based on median split of 24-h urinary potassium excretion, reflecting potassium intake. Results Mean potassium intake was stable during all six treatment periods. Losartan and losartan/HCT lowered BP and proteinuria in all treatment groups. Patients with high potassium intake showed no difference in the BP effects compared with patients with low potassium intake. The antiproteinuric response to losartan monotherapy and losartan combined with HCT during the habitual sodium diet was significantly diminished in patients with high potassium intake (20% versus 41%, P   =   0.011; and 48% versus 64%, P   =   0.036). These differences in antiproteinuric response abolished when shifting to the LS diet. Conclusions In proteinuric CKD patients, the proteinuria, but not BP-lowering response to losartan during a habitual high-sodium diet was hampered during high potassium intake. Differences disappeared after sodium status change by LS diet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Users of guideline-recommended renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may experience disruptions to their treatment, e.g. due to hyperkalaemia, hypotension or acute kidney injury. The risks associated with treatment disruption have not been comprehensively assessed; therefore, we evaluated the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in RAAS inhibitor users experiencing treatment disruptions in a large population-wide database. Methods This exploratory, retrospective analysis utilized data from the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics and the Office for National Statistics databases. Adults (≥18 years) with first RAAS inhibitor use (defined as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 were eligible for inclusion. Time to the first occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes [all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, cardiac arrhythmia, heart failure hospitalization, cardiac arrest, advancement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage and acute kidney injury] was compared between RAAS inhibitor users with and without interruptions or cessations to treatment during follow-up. Associations between baseline characteristics and adverse clinical outcomes were also assessed. Results Among 434 027 RAAS inhibitor users, the risk of the first occurrence of all clinical outcomes, except advancement in CKD stage, was 8–75% lower in patients without interruptions or cessations versus patients with interruptions/cessations. Baseline characteristics independently associated with increased risk of clinical outcomes included increasing age, smoking, CKD, diabetes and heart failure. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for effective management of factors associated with RAAS inhibitor interruptions or cessations in patients for whom guideline-recommended RAAS inhibitor treatment is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The potential long-term safety and efficacy of aliskiren in nondiabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) are unknown. We sought to investigate the renoprotective effect of aliskiren on nondiabetic CKD patients. Methods In this open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial, nondiabetic CKD Stages 3–4 patients were randomized to receive aliskiren added to an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) at the maximal tolerated dose, or ARB alone. Primary outcome was the rate of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Secondary endpoints included rate of change in urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR), cardiovascular events and hyperkalemia. Composite renal outcomes of doubling of baseline serum creatinine or a 40% reduction in eGFR or incident end-stage renal disease or death were analyzed as post hoc analysis. Results Seventy-six patients were randomized: 37 to aliskiren (mean age 55.1 ± 11.1 years) and 39 to control (mean age 55.0 ± 9.4 years). Their baseline demographics were comparable to eGFR (31.9 ± 9.0 versus 27.7 ± 9.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, P  =  0.05) and UPCR (30.7 ± 12.6 versus 47.8 ± 2.8 mg/mmol, P  =  0.33) for treatment versus control subjects. After 144 weeks of follow-up, there was no difference in the rate of eGFR change between groups. Six patients in the aliskiren group and seven in the control group reached the renal composite endpoint (16.2% versus 17.9%, P  =  0.84). The cardiovascular event rate was 10.8% versus 2.6% (P  =  0.217). The hyperkalemia rate was 18.9% versus 5.1% with an adjusted hazard ratio of 7.71 (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 52.3, P  =  0.04) for the aliskiren arm. Conclusion Aliskiren neither conferred additional renoprotective benefit nor increased adverse events, except for more hyperkalemia in nondiabetic CKD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

However, dialysis patients have usually been excluded from trials of HF therapies, including trials of treatments targeting the natriuretic peptide system. Twenty-six (65%) patients received SV 100 mg BD, 6 (15%) received SV 100 mg OD and 8 (20%) received SV 50 mg BD [[9]]. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of progression to kidney failure and cardiovascular events [[1]]. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Hypertension is a critical health problem; it is a prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Many treatments to combat hypertension are available, however many patients are resistant to the standard therapeutic approaches. The association of two or more substances in a fixed-dose combination is effective and tolerated as a substitute for the standard therapeutic approach. Objective: The new ultra performance liquide chromatography method was developed and validated to assay a combination of eight antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic: hydrochlorothiazide, dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker: Amlodipine and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (sartans): valsartan, candesartan, eprosartan, olmesartan, losartan, and irbesartan in the pharmaceutical matrix. Methods: Chromatographic separation was performed on an AcquityVR UPLC C18 1.7 mm 2.1·100mm column, with a gradient of buffer solution and acetonitrile, in the proportion of (80:20 v/v). Results: Good resolution was obtained, and an optimal analysis time of less than 5min was achieved. The method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines following the classical approach and accuracy profile, and it is shown to be suitable for intended applications. The method was successfully used for quality control laboratories and the determination of these drugs combinations in pharmaceutical dosage forms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hypertension, defined as a blood pressure (BP) ≥ 130/80 mmHg and/or use of BP lowering medications, affects 47% of the U.S. population and is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. Prevalence of BP control appears to be decreasing in the U.S. and currently only 1 in 4 adults with hypertension have controlled BP. Erectile dysfunction (ED), an early marker of subclinical CVD, often accompanies hypertension. Most BP lowering medications have been shown to not affect sexual function, but the drug class of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have generally been found to have favorable effects on erectile function through their inhibition of angiotensin II. Therefore, exploring the relationship between hypertension management and ED is advantageous for the ultimate control and treatment of these two common and highly prevalent diseases. Objective: Assess the demographics of hypertensive men with and without ED and examine associations of ED with hypertension management and BP control outcomes Methods: All men presenting for an initial visit for hypertension (ICD-10 codes I10, I11.0, and I11.9) between January 2017-December 2022 at an academic medical center were included for analysis. The electronic health record was queried for patient demographics, the diagnosis of ED, cardiovascular comorbidities, major drug classes of antihypertensives, and major PDE5-inhibitors. Descriptive statistics was used to describe patient characteristics by ED status. Chi-squared, t-test, and Mann-Whitney U tests was used to compare characteristics of patients by presence of ED. Results: Of 24,723 hypertensive men in our health system during the study period, only 1,119 men (4.5%) were noted to have ED (Table 1). Hypertensive men with ED were younger (56 ± 11), than those without ED (61±15). There was no statistically significant difference in the use of ARBs amongst hypertensive men with and without ED. Initial systolic and diastolic BP was significantly higher amongst men with ED. After pooling all outpatient clinic visits prior to and after the diagnosis of ED, BP control did improve mildly over the study period, but this was coupled with a decrease in BP medication use across all drug classes. Finally, there was a significant increase in hypertensive males who were on a either sildenafil or tadalafil after their ED diagnosis (Table 2). Conclusions: This study elucidates several key points in conceptualizing the ED and hypertension problem and lays a foundation for the next phase in addressing critical gaps in care. This research further validates the underdiagnoses and thus undertreatment of ED overall, with a significantly lower than expected number of men with ED. Despite the well-established benefits of ARBs in hypertensive men with ED, we observed a trend of underutilization of this beneficial BP medication option. Improvements in BP control over time for hypertensive men with ED emphasize the role ED could play in hypertension management. Leveraging ARBs and education on the interplay of ED and hypertension could lead to improved rates and control of both diseases. Disclosure: Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo Pharmaceuticals, ForHims. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There is growing concern about the potential harmful effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between recent exposure to ACEIs/ARBs and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods We used data from a nationwide cohort of patients with COVID-19 from the health insurance claims data of South Korea, which were released for research purposes for public health by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of South Korea. Patients with COVID-19 were identified using the relevant diagnostic code. Propensity score matching (1:1) was carried out among patients with CVD according to the type of medication (ACEIs/ARBs vs other), and the risk of death was assessed. Results A total of 4936 patients with COVID-19 were analyzed, of whom 1048 (21.2%) had CVD. Of the 1048 patients with CVD, 864 (82.4%) received at least 1 antihypertensive medication before the diagnosis of COVID-19, including 359 (41.6%) who received ACEIs/ARBs and 505 (58.4%) who received drugs other than ACEIs/ARBs. Using the propensity scores for ACEI/ARB use, we matched 305 pairs of patients receiving ACEIs/ARBs and patients receiving other drugs. Recent use of ACEIs/ARBs was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in unadjusted analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.33–1.14) or propensity score matching analysis (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.46–2.16). Conclusions In patients with COVID-19 and underlying CVDs, the recent use of ACEIs/ARBs was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings do not support stopping or modifying ACEIs/ARBs in patients during the current COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Evidence concerning the potential repurposing of antihypertensives for Alzheimer's disease prevention is inconclusive. We used Mendelian randomization, which can be more robust to confounding by indication and patient characteristics, to investigate the effects of lowering systolic blood pressure, via the protein targets of different antihypertensive drug classes, on Alzheimer's disease.Methods: We used summary statistics from genome-wide association studies of systolic blood pressure and Alzheimer's disease in a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. We identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that mimic the action of antihypertensive protein targets and estimated the effect of lowering systolic blood pressure on Alzheimer's disease in three ways: (i) combining the protein targets of antihypertensive drug classes, (ii) combining all protein targets and (iii) without consideration of the protein targets.Results: There was limited evidence that lowering systolic blood pressure, via the protein targets of antihypertensive drug classes, affected Alzheimer's disease risk. For example, the protein targets of calcium channel blockers had an odds ratio (OR) per 10 mmHg lower systolic blood pressure of 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94 to 2.49; p = 0.09; SNPs = 17]. We also found limited evidence for an effect when combining all protein targets (OR per 10 mmHg lower systolic blood pressure: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.56; p = 0.41; SNPs = 59) and without consideration of the protein targets (OR per 10 mmHg lower systolic blood pressure: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.13; p = 0.45; SNPs = 153).Conclusions: Mendelian randomization suggests that lowering systolic blood pressure via the protein targets of antihypertensive drugs is unlikely to affect the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. Consequently, if specific antihypertensive drug classes do affect the risk of Alzheimer's disease, they may not do so via systolic blood pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) directly binds to ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) to facilitate cellular entry. Compared with the lung or respiratory tract, the human heart exhibits greater ACE2 expression. However, little substantial damage was found in the heart tissue, and no viral particles were observed in the cardiac myocytes. This study aims to analyse ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein proteases at the single-cell level, to explore the cardiac involvement in COVID-19 and improve our understanding of the potential cardiovascular implications of COVID-19. Methods and Results With meta-analysis, the prevalence of cardiac injury in COVID-19 patients varies from 2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0–5%, I 2 = 0%] in non-ICU patients to 59% (95% CI 48–71%, I2 = 85%) in non-survivors. With public single-cell sequence data analysis, ACE2 expression in the adult human heart is higher than that in the lung (adjusted P < 0.0001). Inversely, the most important S protein cleavage protease TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease serine protease-2) in the heart exhibits an extremely lower expression than that in the lung (adjusted P < 0.0001), which may restrict entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cardiac cells. Furthermore, we discovered that other S protein proteases, CTSL (cathepsin L) and FURIN (furin, paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme), were expressed in the adult heart at a similar level to that in the lung, which may compensate for TMPRSS2, mediating cardiac involvement in COVID-19. Conclusion Compared with the lung, ACE2 is relatively more highly expressed in the human heart, while the key S protein priming protease, TMPRSS2, is rarely expressed. The low percentage of ACE2+/TMPRSS2+ cells reduced heart vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 to some degree. CTSL and FURIN may compensate for S protein priming to mediate SARS-CoV-2 infection of the heart. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although both hospitalization and mortality due to heart failure (HF) have been widely studied, less is known about the impact of HF on disability and quality of life.Aim: To assess the degree of disability and quality of life in HF patients attended at family medicine centres.Design and Setting: Cross-sectional study of a cohort of HF patients attended at family medicine centres.Methods: Disability was assessed with the WHODAS 2 questionnaire, which provides a global and six domain scores that is understanding and communication, getting around, self-care, getting along with people, life activities and participation in society. Quality of life was assessed with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, which furnishes a global and two domain scores, physical and emotional.Results: A breakdown of the results showed that 28% of patients had moderate disability and 16.7% had severe disability, with the most important areas affected being: life activities, 8.9% extreme disability and 30.3% severe disability; getting around, 34.6% severe disability and 2% extreme disability; and participation in society, 53.3% moderate-severe disability. Quality of life was mildly affected. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification and sex were the major determinants of disability and quality of life. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists were associated with better scores in the "getting around" and "life activity" domains.Conclusion: HF patients in primary care show an important degree of disability and an acceptable quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients even without known cardiovascular (CV) disease have high mortality rates. Whether neurohormonal blockade treatments improve outcomes in this population remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs), β-blockers or both in all-cause mortality rates in incident ESRD patients without known CV disease starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 2009 and 2015 in the nationwide Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie registry. Methods Patients with known CV disease and those who started emergency RRT, stopped RRT or died within 6 months were excluded. Propensity score matching models were used. The main outcome was all-cause mortality. Results A total of 13 741 patients were included in this analysis. The median follow-up time was 24 months. When compared with matched controls without antihypertensive treatment, treatment with ACEi/ARBs, β-blockers and ACEi/ARBs + β-blockers was associated with an event-rate reduction per 100 person-years: ACEi/ARBs 7.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1–8.2] versus matched controls 9.5 (8.8–10.1) [HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.69–0.84)], β-blocker 7.1 (6.6–7.7) versus matched controls 9.5 (8.5–10.2) [HR 0.72 (0.65–0.80)] and ACEi/ARBs + β-blockers 5.8 (5.4–6.4) versus matched controls 7.8 (7.2–8.4) [HR 0.68 (0.61–0.77)]. Conclusions Neurohormonal blocking therapies were associated with death rate reduction in incident ESRD without CV disease. Whether these relationships are causal will require randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims LCZ696, a first-generation dual angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), is effective in treating heart failure patients. However, the role of ARNis in treating diabetic cardiomyopathy is poorly understood. This study evaluates the efficacy of a novel combination of telmisartan [angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)] and thiorphan [neprilysin inhibitor (NEPi)] in ameliorating diabetic cardiomyopathy while, at the same time, exploring the relevant underlying molecular mechanism(s). Methods and results Diabetes was induced by administration of streptozotocin (55 mg/kg, i.p.) in male Wistar rats. After 4 weeks, diabetic rats were subjected to either thiorphan (0.1 mg/kg/day, p.o.) or telmisartan (10 mg/kg/day, p.o.) monotherapy, or their combination, for a period of 4 weeks. Metabolic and morphometric alterations, failing ventricular functions, and diminished baroreflex indicated development of diabetic cardiac complications. Apart from morphometric alterations, all pathological consequences were prevented by telmisartan and thiorphan combination therapy. Diabetic rats exhibited significant modulation of the natriuretic peptide system, a key haemodynamic regulator; this was normalized by combination therapy. Histopathological studies showed augmented myocardial fibrosis, demonstrated by increased % PSR-positive area, with combination therapy giving the best improvement in these indices. More importantly, the combination of thiorphan and telmisartan was superior in attenuating inflammatory (NF-κB/MCP-1), profibrotic (TGF-β/Smad7) and apoptotic (PARP/Caspase-3) cascades compared to respective monotherapies when treating rats with diabetic cardiomyopathy. In addition, diabetic heart chromatin was in a state of active transcription, indicated by increased histone acetylation (H2AK5Ac, H2BK5Ac, H3K9Ac, and H4K8Ac) and histone acetyltransferase (PCAF and Ac-CBP) levels. Interestingly, combination treatment was sufficiently potent to normalize these alterations. Conclusion The protective effect of novel ARB and NEPi combination against diabetic cardiomyopathy can be attributed to inhibition of inflammatory, profibrotic, and apoptotic cascades. Moreover, reversal of histone acetylation assists its protective effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a large Israeli dataset of 14 520 individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2, angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers were not found to be associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 infection after adjusting for major confounders. Patients on these medications should not stop their medication prophylactically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) are common disorders in aging men and cause lower urinary tract symptoms. Hypertension induces atherosclerosis in the blood vessels of the lower urinary tract, subsequently following by the development of BPH and BPE. Clinical study demonstrated that anti-hypertensive drug angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) treatment improved storage and voiding scores in male patients with hypertension, whereas other antihypertensive drugs were not effective. ARB could improve prostatic hyperplasia independent of reducing blood pressure. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) are widely used as genetically hypertensive model. SHRs also demonstrate decreased prostatic blood flow and develop glandular epithelial hyperplasia and morphological abnormalities in the ventral prostate. We examined the effects of an ARB, losartan on glandular epithelial prostatic hyperplasia in SHRs. Thirty-six-weeks old male SHRs were orally treated with losartan (3 or 10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle once daily for 18 weeks. Wistar Kyoto rats (WKYs) were treated with vehicle were used as controls (n = 8). After the oral treatment, effects of losartan were evaluated by measuring prostate weight, blood pressure, and prostatic blood flow. The tissue levels of malondialdehyde (oxidative stress marker; MDA), interleukin-6 (inflammatory cytokine; IL-6), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) levels in ventral prostate were measured by colorimetric assay and ELISA assay. Histological analysis for the ventral prostate was performed by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay. The glandular epithelial area was determined by HE staining. TUNEL assay was performed to quantify the degree of apoptosis. The statistical differences were determined using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey-Kramer test. Histological data were analyzed using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparison. Body weight did not significantly differ among the groups. The vehicle treated SHRs had significantly higher prostate weight, prostate weight/body weight ratio (PBR), blood pressure, glandular epithelial area, and tissue MDA, IL-6, and bFGF levels in the ventral prostate and lower prostatic blood flow compared to the vehicle treated WKYs. Treatment with losartan significantly decreased PBR and improved prostatic blood flow and glandular epithelial area as well as tissue MDA, IL-6, and bFGF levels in the SHR ventral prostate without affecting blood pressure. High-dose losartan significantly decreased blood pressure and increased TUNEL-positive cells in the ventral prostate in SHRs. Chronic losartan treatment could improve glandular epithelial prostatic hyperplasia via recovery of reduced prostatic blood flow and induction of apoptosis in the ventral prostate in SHRs. Losartan might improve not only hypertension but also prostatic hyperplasia in humans. Work supported by industry: no. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Finerenone reduces risk of incident heart failure in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: analyses from the FIGARO-DKD trial. Keywords: Finerenone; Type 2 diabetes; Chronic kidney disease; Heart failure; FIGARO-DKD EN Finerenone Type 2 diabetes Chronic kidney disease Heart failure FIGARO-DKD e36 e37 2 05/20/22 20220401 NES 220401 Diabetes is the main cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a risk factor for their progression to end-stage renal disease. Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with finerenone in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the FIDELITY pooled analysis. [Extracted from the article]

Background. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1Rabs) have been associated with significantly reduced graft survival. Earlier graft loss has been observed in patients who had pretransplant AT1Rabs and posttransplant donorspecific antibodies (DSA). Methods. The main goal of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between AT1Rabs and the time period to detection of de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DSA) posttransplantation in living donor kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The analysis included 141 KTRs. Pretransplant frozen serum samples were tested for AT1Rabs by ELISA and HLA-DSA by SAB (Luminex) at both the preand post-KT time points. Results. The median AT1Rab level was 9.13 U (interquartile range 5.22-14.33). After a mean follow-up period of 3.55 years, 48 patients were found to harbour de novo HLA-DSAs. The presence of AT1Rabs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.01, P = 0.010], male-to-male transplantation (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.42-4.67, P = 0.002) and antecedent borderline changes or acute cellular rejection (ACR) (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.29-4.75, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with de novo DSA detection. A dose-dependent association between AT1Rab levels (<10 U, 10.1-16.9 U, 17-29.9 U and >30 U) and de novo DSA detection was observed (logrank P = 0.0031). After multivariate analysis of AT1Rab levels (continuous variable), AT1Rabs >30 U, male-to-male transplantation, donor age, higher class I percentage of Panel Reactive Antibody and antecedent borderline changes or ACR remained as independent significant risk factors for the detection of de novo DSAs. Conclusions. The findings suggest that higher levels of pretransplant circulating antibodies against AT1R (>30 U) in kidney graft recipients constitute an independent risk factor for earlier de novo HLA-DSA detection during the posttransplant period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide [[1]] and in Europe [[2]]. For patients with early chronic kidney disease (CKD), the risk of dying from CV disease is greater than that of reaching the dialysis stage [[5]]. We recently reported the results of two studies comparing the risk of mortality and CV events [[8]] and the level of arterial stiffness [[9]] between non-transplanted CKD patients and KTRs, matched on several CV risk parameters including glomerular filtration rate (GFR). [Extracted from the article]