Search

Background Bictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is guideline-recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We evaluated whether people receiving dolutegravir (DTG) plus F/TAF or F/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) with viral suppression can switch to B/F/TAF without compromising safety or efficacy, regardless of preexisting nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, we enrolled adults who were virologically suppressed for ≥6 months before screening (with documented/suspected NRTI resistance) or ≥3 months before screening (with no documented/suspected NRTI resistance) on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to switch to B/F/TAF or DTG + F/TAF once daily for 48 weeks, each with matching placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (snapshot algorithm); the prespecified noninferiority margin was 4%. Results Five hundred sixty-seven adults were randomized; 565 were treated (284 B/F/TAF, 281 DTG + F/TAF). At week 48, B/F/TAF was noninferior to DTG + F/TAF, as 0.4% (1/284) vs 1.1% (3/281) had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (difference, −0.7% [95.001% confidence interval {CI}, −2.8% to 1.0%]). There were no significant differences in efficacy among participants with suspected or confirmed prior NRTI resistance (n = 138). No participant had treatment-emergent drug resistance. Median weight change from baseline at week 48 was +1.3 kg (B/F/TAF) vs +1.1 kg (DTG + F/TAF) (P =.46). Weight change differed by baseline NRTIs (+2.2 kg [F/TDF] and +0.6 kg [F/TAF], P <.001), with no differences between B/F/TAF and DTG + F/TAF. Conclusions The single-tablet regimen B/F/TAF is a safe, effective option for people virologically suppressed on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF, including in individuals with preexisting resistance to NRTIs. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03110380. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) often leads to weight gain. While some of this weight gain may be an appropriate return-to-health effect, excessive increases in weight may lead to obesity. We sought to explore factors associated with weight gain in several randomized comparative clinical trials of ART initiation. Methods We performed a pooled analysis of weight gain in 8 randomized controlled clinical trials of treatment-naive people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) initiating ART between 2003 and 2015, comprising >5000 participants and 10 000 person-years of follow-up. We used multivariate modeling to explore relationships between demographic factors, HIV disease characteristics, and ART components and weight change following ART initiation. Results Weight gain was greater in more recent trials and with the use of newer ART regimens. Pooled analysis revealed baseline demographic factors associated with weight gain including lower CD4 cell count, higher HIV type 1 RNA, no injection drug use, female sex, and black race. Integrase strand transfer inhibitor use was associated with more weight gain than were protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), with dolutegravir and bictegravir associated with more weight gain than elvitegravir/cobicistat. Among the NNRTIs, rilpivirine was associated with more weight gain than efavirenz. Among nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, tenofovir alafenamide was associated with more weight gain than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, abacavir, or zidovudine. Conclusions Weight gain is ubiquitous in clinical trials of ART initiation and is multifactorial in nature, with demographic factors, HIV-related factors, and the composition of ART regimens as contributors. The mechanisms by which certain ART agents differentially contribute to weight gain are unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Current guidelines for the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections provide varying recommendations for the optimal treatment of acute HCV infections. There are limited data from small cohort studies to provide guidance on the best approach to treatment of this important patient population. Methods Sofosbuvir-Containing Regimens Without Interferon for Treatment of Acute HCV in HIV-1 Infected Individuals is an open-label, 2-cohort, Phase 1 clinical trial in which the second cohort assessed the safety and efficacy of 8 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of acute HCV infections in participants with chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infections. This final analysis of the second cohort had a planned accrual of 27 participants, based on non-inferiority criteria, compared to the study-defined, historical, sustained virologic response (SVR) of 60% with pegylated-interferon/ribavirin. Results We enrolled 27 men (9 Hispanic; 11 White, non-Hispanic; 5 Black, non-Hispanic; 2 Asian or Pacific Islander; median age 46 years). Most (96%) had HCV genotype-1 infection and 59% had the favorable interleukin 28B CC genotype. The median baseline HCV RNA load was 6.17 log10 IU/mL (interquartile range 4.51 – 6.55). All participants (100%) achieved the primary outcome of a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the date of the last dose of study treatment (90% confidence interval 90–100%), achieving non-inferiority versus the 60% historic benchmark. No treatment discontinuations occurred. Conclusions This multicenter clinical trial, investigating 8 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for acute HCV infections in men with HIV infections, reports a 100% SVR. This study provides the rationale for larger studies of shortened courses of direct-acting antiviral therapies in persons with HIV infections, including those with high baseline HCV RNA loads. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02128217. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) exhibits great genetic diversity and is classified into 7 genotypes (GTs), with varied geographic prevalence. Until the recent development of pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral regimens, the determination of HCV GT was necessary to inform optimal treatment.Methods: Plasma samples with unresolved GT using standard commercial genotyping methods were subjected to HCV full-genome sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis was performed to assign GT.Results: Four patients, previously classified as GT5 by LiPA or Abbott RealTime polymerase chain reaction assays, were identified as infected with a novel HCV GT. This novel HCV GT, GT8, is genetically distinct from previously identified HCV GT1-7 with >30% nucleotide sequence divergence to the established HCV subtypes. All 4 patients were originally from Punjab, India, but now reside in Canada and are epidemiologically unlinked. Despite presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions within the GT8 virus of all 4 patients (NS3: V36L, Q80K/R; NS5A: Q30S, Y93S), all patients achieved a sustained virologic response; 2 treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir for 8 weeks, 1 with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks and 1 with sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir for 12 weeks.Conclusions: The discovery of a novel HCV GT8 confirms the circulation of this newly identified lineage in the human population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Combining antiviral regimens in the hepatitis C virus (HCV)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–coinfected population can be complex as they share overlapping mechanisms for elimination that may result in drug interactions. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) with multiple antiretroviral (ARV) regimens were evaluated. Methods Healthy volunteers were enrolled into 2 phase 1, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, cross-over studies. SOF/VEL and ARV regimens were administered alone and in combination; ARVs (and pharmacokinetic enhancers) included atazanavir (ATV), cobicistat (COBI), darunavir (DRV), dolutegravir (DTG), efavirenz (EFV), elvitegravir (EVG), emtricitabine (FTC), lopinavir (LPV), raltegravir (RAL), rilpivirine (RPV), ritonavir (RTV), tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Geometric least squares means ratios (coadministration:alone) and 90% confidence intervals were constructed for area under the plasma concentration–time curve over the dosing interval, maximum concentration, and trough, for all analytes. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Results In total, 237 participants were enrolled. No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of SOF, SOF metabolite GS-331007, or VEL were observed other than an approximate 50% decrease in VEL exposure when administered with EFV/FTC/TDF. No clinically relevant differences in the PK of ARVs were observed when administered with SOF/VEL. Study treatments were well tolerated, including no observed creatinine clearance changes during evaluation of TDF-containing regimens. Conclusions SOF/VEL and ARV regimens including ATV, COBI, DRV, DTG, EVG, FTC, LPV, RAL, RPV, RTV, TAF, or TDF may be coadministered without dose adjustment. Use of SOF/VEL with EFV-containing regimens is not recommended due to an approximate 50% reduction in VEL exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The nucleotide analogues tenofovir and sofosbuvir are considered to have low potential for drug interactions.Objectives: To determine the effect of sofosbuvir-based HCV treatment on plasma concentrations of tenofovir and cellular concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate.Methods: HIV-infected participants with acute HCV were treated for 12 weeks with sofosbuvir + ribavirin in Cohort 1 or 8 weeks with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in Cohort 2 of AIDS Clinical Trials Group study 5327. Only participants taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were included in this analysis. Tenofovir in plasma, tenofovir diphosphate in dried blood spots and tenofovir diphosphate in PBMCs were measured pre-HCV therapy and longitudinally during the study using validated LC/MS-MS.Results: Fifteen and 22 men completed Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In Cohort 1, tenofovir diphosphate was 4.3-fold higher (95% CI geometric mean ratio 2.46-7.67; P = 0.0001) in dried blood spots and 2.3-fold higher (95% CI 1.09-4.92; P = 0.03) in PBMCs following 12 weeks of sofosbuvir + ribavirin versus study entry. Tenofovir in the plasma was unchanged. In Cohort 2, tenofovir diphosphate was 17.8-fold higher (95% CI 12.77-24.86; P < 0.0001) in dried blood spots after 8 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir versus study entry. Tenofovir plasma concentrations were 2.1-fold higher (95% CI 1.44-2.91; P = 0.0005). Despite the increase in cellular tenofovir diphosphate concentrations, only a small decline in CLCR (6%-7%) was observed in both cohorts between study entry and end of treatment.Conclusions: These data indicate an unexpected drug interaction with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and sofosbuvir at the cellular level. Additional studies are needed to determine the mechanism and clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. A safe, simple, effective, and pan-genotypic regimen to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) remains a medical need. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir for HCV in patients coinfected with HIV-1. Methods. This phase 3, open-label, single-arm study at 17 sites in the United States enrolled patients with HCV of any genotype and HIV-1 coinfection, including those with compensated cirrhosis. All patients received sofosbuvir-velpatasvir once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Efficacy and safety were assessed in all patients receiving at least 1 dose of treatment. Results. Of 106 patients, 91 (86%) were men, 48 (45%) were black, and 19 (18%) had cirrhosis. SVR12 was achieved by 101 of 106 (95% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 89%-99%]) patients: 74 of 78 (95% [95% CI, 87%-99%]) with genotype 1; all 11 (100% [95% CI, 72%-100%]) with genotype 2; 11 of 12 (92% [95% CI, 62%-100%]) with genotype 3; and all 5 (100% [95% CI, 48%-100%]) with genotype 4. All 19 patients with cirrhosis had SVR12. Two patients relapsed, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 1 withdrew consent. Two discontinued treatment due to adverse events and 2 had serious adverse events. The most common adverse events were fatigue (25%), headache (13%), upper respiratory tract infection (8%), and arthralgia (8%). Conclusions. Sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks was safe and provided high rates of SVR12 in patients coinfected with HCV and HIV-1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Patients chronically infected with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) have faster disease progression and are less responsive to current direct-acting antiviral regimens than patients infected with other genotypes. We conducted an open-label trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 3 HCV infection. Methods. We enrolled treatment-naive patients with and without compensated cirrhosis at 15 sites in Canada. All patients were treated with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90 mg and 400 mg) plus weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of baseline and treatment-emergent drug resistance. Results. Of the 111 patients enrolled, 105 (95%) had subtype 3a HCV and 39 (35%) had compensated cirrhosis. SVR12 was achieved by 99 of 111 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-94%). Of the 39 patients with cirrhosis, 31 (79%) achieved SVR12, compared with 68 of 72 (94%) patients without cirrhosis. No treatment-emergent resistance mutations occurred in those who failed treatment. One patient discontinued treatment due to liver cancer and died 22 days after treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse events were fatigue (51%), headache (36%), and nausea (23%). Conclusions. In this multicenter trial involving treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 HCV, 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir provided a high level of SVR in those without cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Historically, acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was treated with shorter durations of interferon-containing therapies. In the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), it is unclear whether the efficacy of treatment achieved in chronic infection can be maintained with abbreviated courses of therapy during the acute phase. Methods. The sofosbuvir-containing regimens without interferon for treatment of acute HCV in HIV-1 infected individuals (SWIFT-C) is an open-label, 2-cohort clinical trial in which the first cohort assessed for the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for the treatment of acute HCV infection in participants with chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. This is a preplanned analysis of the first cohort, which had a planned accrual of 17 participants. Results. Seventeen men (11 Hispanic, 6 white, median age 45 years) were enrolled. Most (88%) had HCV genotype-1 infection and few (24%) had the favorable IL28B CC genotype. Median baseline HCV RNA was 2 280 000 IU/mL (interquartile range, 272 000-4 230 000). Ten participants (59%) achieved the primary outcome of SVR12 (90% confidence interval, 36%-78%), failing to establish noninferiority. All treatment failures were due to viral relapse (41%). There were no premature treatment discontinuations. The only factor that differed between participants who achieved SVR vs those who relapsed was ribavirin concentration at the end of treatment. Conclusion. Sofosbuvir-ribavirin for 12 weeks for the treatment of acute HCV genotype-1 infection in HIV-1-infected persons results in a high relapse rate. Preliminary studies of DAA combination therapies suggest improved response rates, although the adequate duration of therapy remains unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The development of direct-acting antivirals in recent years has dramatically enhanced rates of viral eradication to >90% in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. To determine true treatment efficacy and define the most appropriate retreatment, it is important to distinguish virologic relapse from reinfection when patients in whom HCV is eradicated during treatment become infected with a new HCV strain after treatment. Methods. We investigated the prevalence of late recurrent viremia (patients with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment but detectable HCV RNA at follow-up week 24) and used refined phylogenetic analysis of multiple HCV genes to distinguish virologic relapse from reinfection. Results. Across 11 phase 3 clinical trials of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (SOF) and SOF, only 12 of 3004 patients had detectable HCV RNA following sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Of these 12 patients with late recurrent viremia, 11 had the same HCV genotype/subtype at baseline and at recurrence. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that 58% (7 of 12) of these patients were successfully treated with the SOF-based regimen, with HCV eradication achieved, but became reinfected with a different HCV strain after treatment. The remaining 5 patients with late recurrent viremia had virologic relapse in which the HCV present at baseline persisted in the liver or another compartment and reemerged in the blood 24 weeks after treatment. Conclusions. The incidence of late recurrent viremia was low. Distinguishing reinfection from virologic relapse has implications for determining true treatment efficiency and selecting optimal retreatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy is safe and effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but treatment uptake remains low. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of OST and drug use during therapy on completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin. Methods. The phase 3 ION studies evaluated a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin administered for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1. People with clinically significant drug use ( prior 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening by urine drug tests (not explained by prescriptions) were ineligible. Stored samples were available from ION-1 for retrospective testing for illicit drugs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. Among 1952 patients enrolled in the ION studies, 4% (n = 70) were receiving OST. Among those receiving (n = 70) and not receiving OST (n = 1882), there was no difference in treatment completion (97% vs 98%; P = .40), ⩾80% adherence (93% vs 92%; P = 1.00), SVR12 (94% vs 97%; P = .28), and serious adverse events (4% vs 3%; P = .43), respectively. Among participants in the ION-1 trial, 23% (n = 196) used illicit drugs during therapy (15% cannabinoids alone; 8% other illicit drugs ± cannabinoids). There was no difference in treatment completion, ⩾80% adherence, SVR12, or serious AEs in those with no drug use during treatment compared with those who used cannabinoids and/or other illicit drugs. No cases of HCV reinfection were observed in the 24 weeks following treatment. Conclusions. OST and drug use during HCV therapy did not impact treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, or safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sofosbuvir (SOF) exhibits a high barrier to resistance, with no S282T NS5B substitution or phenotypic resistance detected in phase 3 registration studies.Methods: Here, emergence of the NS5B variants L159F and V321A and possible association with resistance was evaluated in 8 studies of SOF (NEUTRINO, FISSION, POSITRON, FUSION, VALENCE, PHOTON-1, PHOTON-2, and P7977-2025) and 5 studies of combination ledipasvir (LDV) and SOF (LDV/SOF; LONESTAR, ELECTRON [LDV/SOF arms], ION1, ION2, and ION3), using deep sequencing.Results: Deep sequencing detected L159F in 15% (53 of 353) and V321A in 5% (17 of 353) of patients with virologic failure in the SOF studies. Intensification of SOF treatment with LDV reduced the emergence of L159F or V321A to 2% (1 of 50 each) at virologic failure. L159F and V321A did not influence the outcome of retreatment with SOF, ribavirin, and pegylated interferon. At baseline, L159F was detected only in genotype 1-infected patients (1%) and was only associated with increased virologic failure in patients treated for short durations with SOF and ribavirin.Conclusions: Deep-sequencing analysis confirmed that NS5B variants L159F and V321A emerged in a subset of patients treated with SOF at virologic failure. These variants had no impact on retreatment outcome with SOF, ribavirin, and pegylated interferon. Baseline L159F in genotype 1 did not affect the treatment outcome with LDV/SOF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with sickle cell disease are at high risk for chronic hepatitis C infection. Prior treatment has been limited due to the use of ribavirin causing hemolytic anemia and interferon causing cytopenias. We demonstrate the safety and efficacy of fixed-dose combination ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this analysis of the ASTRAL trials (non-opioid substitution therapy [OST], n = 984; OST, n = 51) evaluating the once-daily, pan-genotypic regimen of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for hepatitis C virus infection, OST did not impact completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), or safety. SVR12 was 96% (95% confidence interval, 87%, >99%) in those receiving OST. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T cell responses were characterized in a blinded study involving infected individuals and their seronegative exposed uninfected (EU) partners from Lusaka, Zambia. HIV-1-specific T cell responses were detected ex vivo in all infected individuals and amplified, on average, 27-fold following in vitro expansion. In contrast, no HIV-1-specific T cell responses were detected in any of the EU partners ex vivo or following in vitro expansion. These data demonstrate that the detection of HIV-1-specific T cell immunity in EU individuals is not universal and that alternative mechanisms may account for protection in these individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T cell responses were characterized in a blinded study involving infected individuals and their seronegative exposed uninfected (EU) partners from Lusaka, Zambia. HIV-1-specific T cell responses were detected ex vivo in all infected individuals and amplified, on average, 27-fold following in vitro expansion. In contrast, no HIV-1-specific T cell responses were detected in any of the EU partners ex vivo or following in vitro expansion. These data demonstrate that the detection of HIV-1-specific T cell immunity in EU individuals is not universal and that alternative mechanisms may account for protection in these individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Postmarketing cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during hepatitis C treatment have been reported. We analyzed serum samples from patients in a clinical trial of ledipasvirsofosbuvir in Taiwan and Korea. Of the 173 patients enrolled, 103 (60%) had been previously infected with HBV. None showed evidence of HBV reactivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background People of color are underrepresented in clinical trials. TAF has shown improved renal and bone safety vs. TDF. We pooled 7 studies to evaluate efficacy/safety of TAF vs. TDF for ART initiation/switch in Hispanic/Latinx and Black participants. Methods Data from Hispanic/Latinx and Black adults who initiated/switched to TAF or TDF in 7 randomized trials (2 treatment-naïve, 5 suppressed switch) were analyzed. TAF-based regimens (elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine [FTC]/TAF, rilpivirine/FTC/TAF, FTC/TAF, or bictegravir/FTC/TAF) were compared with TDF-based regimens. Virologic suppression (VS; HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL, FDA snapshot) and % change in bone mineral density (BMD) and renal tubular biomarkers urine β-2-microglobulin (B2M):creatinine (Cr) ratio and retinol binding protein (RBP):Cr ratio are reported at W96. Results The pooled population (N = 5,825) included 1138 Hispanic/Latinx and 1324 Black participants. Treatment-naïve participants (n = 1,733) were 15% female, 25% Black, 19% Hispanic/Latino, with median age 34 years, HIV-1 RNA 4.6 log10 c/mL, CD4 405 cells/mm3. Switch participants (n = 4,092) were 13% female, 22% Black, 20% Hispanic/Latino, median age 45 years, CD4 653 cells/mm3. There was no difference in VS rate with TAF vs. TDF in any group. VS rate (TAF vs. TDF) in naïve participants: 88% vs. 84% (Hispanic/Latinx); 78 vs. 79% (Black); 87% vs. 85% (overall). VS (TAF vs. TDF) was well maintained in switch participants: 91% both arms (Hispanic/Latinx); 86% vs. 87% (Black); 90% vs. 88% (overall). TAF and TDF were well tolerated with few discontinuations due to adverse events (0.6–2%) in all groups. At W96 there was less impact on renal biomarkers in all groups initiating TAF (P < 0.001; table), and decreases in BMD were smaller (P < 0.005; table) vs. TDF. All groups switching from TDF to TAF experienced decreases in tubular proteinuria and improvements in BMD (both P < 0.001; table) at W96. Conclusion Hispanic/Latinx and Black participants who initiated/switched to TAF had significantly improved bone and renal parameters vs. TDF, with similar VS rates at W96. Efficacy and biomarkers were similar to the overall study population. These data in >2,400 Hispanic/Latinx and Black PLH demonstrate noninferior efficacy and safety advantages with TAF vs. TDF. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In the DISCOVER PrEP trial, emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) was noninferior to emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) for HIV prevention. Here we report the bone safety outcomes of F/TAF and F/TDF. Methods Men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) at risk of HIV were randomized 1:1 to receive blinded F/TDF or F/TAF, taken once daily. Those on PrEP with F/TDF were eligible to enroll. Bone densitometry (DXA) of the hip and spine were performed in a subset of participants (BMD subset). Fracture events were compared in all study participants. Week 48 data are presented. Results 5387 participants were enrolled in the main study, with 383 included in the BMD subset. In the BMD subset, the median age was 37 (IQR 29, 46); 0.8% were TGW, 9.4% were black, and 20.6% were Hispanic or Latinx. Fifty-three BMD subset participants were on baseline F/TDF PrEP at enrollment, 26 of whom were randomized to F/TAF. F/TAF was associated with more favorable changes in hip and spine BMD compared with F/TDF (Table 1); these differences were similar when participants on baseline PrEP were excluded. Participants age <35 on F/TAF gained BMD, whereas those on F/TDF lost BMD (Table 1). BMD decreases of ≥3% were less frequent in the F/TAF group than the F/TDF group at the hip (3.8% vs. 18.4%, P < 0.001) and spine (10.1% vs. 26.9%, P < 0.001). Osteopenia was more frequently diagnosed in the spine in participants on F/TDF compared with F/TAF (Figure 1, P = 0.007); but not in the hip. Fracture event frequency was the same (53 [2.0%] per group, P = 1.00). One pathological fracture was reported in the F/TAF group compared with two in the F/TDF group (P = 0.57). In participants on baseline F/TDF PrEP, those randomized to F/TAF had significantly improved hip BMD compared with baseline (median percent change 1.13 [IQR −0.86, 3.47], P = 0.027), while spine BMD was unchanged. Conclusion Through 48 weeks, DXA subset participants taking F/TAF for PrEP had significantly less change in BMD than those taking F/TDF, and were less likely to develop spine osteopenia. The incidence of fracture was similar, and pathological fractures were rare. F/TAF for PrEP is effective and has a superior bone safety profile compared with F/TDF. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In the DISCOVER PrEP trial, emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) was noninferior to emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) for HIV prevention. Here, we report on the renal outcomes of F/TAF and F/TDF among all DISCOVER participants and in those on baseline F/TDF PrEP who were randomized to F/TAF. Methods In total, 5387 men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) at risk for HIV were randomized 1:1 to receive blinded F/TDF or F/TAF taken once daily (full cohort). Of these, 905 were on F/TDF PrEP at enrollment; of whom, 465 were randomized to F/TAF. Renal function and safety assessments included urinalysis (UA), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRCG), urine protein:creatinine (Cr) ratio (UPCR), markers of proximal tubular function (β2-microglobulin:Cr ratio [β2M:Cr] and retinol-binding protein:Cr ratio [RBP:Cr]) and investigator-reported renal adverse events (AEs). Week 48 data are presented. Results In the full cohort, F/TAF was associated with more favorable changes in eGFRCG, β2M:Cr, and RBP:Cr compared with F/TDF (Table 1). Treatment-emergent proteinuria by UA was more common with F/TDF than F/TAF (24.3% vs. 21.3% P = 0.009), as were treatment-emergent elevations in UPCR >200 mg/g (35 [1.5%] vs. 16 [0.7%], P = 0.005). Compared with F/TDF, participants taking F/TAF had numerically fewer study drug-related renal AEs, severe study drug-related renal AEs, and discontinuations due to renal AEs (Table 2). Proximal renal tubulopathy (Fanconi syndrome) was reported in one participant in the F/TDF arm and none in the F/TAF arm. In participants on F/TDF PrEP at enrollment who were randomized to F/TAF, statistically significant increases in eGFRCG were apparent as early as week 4 (Table 1 and Figure 1), as were decreases in tubular proteinuria (Table 1). Renal biomarker changes in PrEP-naïve participants mirrored those in the full cohort. Conclusion Through 48 weeks, MSM and TGW taking F/TAF for PrEP had significantly better measures of renal function and fewer study-drug-related renal AEs compared with those taking F/TDF; switching from F/TDF to F/TAF was associated with improvements in eGFRCG and tubular function biomarkers. F/TAF for PrEP is effective and has a superior renal safety profile compared with F/TDF. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background HIV treatment for individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) has previously required complex dose-adjusted regimens. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-tablet, once-daily elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) in people living with HIV (PLH) and ESRD on chronic HD. Methods Virologically suppressed adult PLH with ESRD on chronic HD for ≥ 6 months were switched to open-label E/C/F/TAF 150/150/200/10 mg once daily for 96 weeks. Efficacy was assessed as the proportion of participants who maintained virologic suppression (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) using the snapshot algorithm. Safety and participant satisfaction were assessed throughout the study. Results We enrolled 55 participants with median age 51 years (range 23–64) with median time on HD 6 years (range 1–17). In the per protocol analysis set, virologic suppression was maintained in 30 of 31 participants (96.8%, 95% CI [83.3%, 99.9%]) at week 96. In the full analysis set, virologic suppression was maintained in 30 of 55 participants (54.5%; 95% CI [40.6%, 68.0%]); one discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy, and W96 data were unavailable for 24. Of the 24 participants lacking W96 data, 17 discontinued study drug early and 7 had missing data while on study drug; all had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL at the last pre-week 96 check. Treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 53 (96.4%) participants, and study-drug-related AEs occurred in 7 (12.7%). Treatment-emergent AEs leading to premature study drug discontinuation occurred in 4 (7.3%) participants; two were considered study-drug-related (allergic pruritus and peripheral neuropathy in one participant each). No study-drug-related serious AEs were observed. 85.7% (30/35) of responding participants reported they were 'much more satisfied' with their regimen. Conclusion Single-tablet, once-daily E/C/F/TAF was effective in maintaining virologic suppression in PLH on chronic HD over 96 weeks of follow-up. E/C/F/TAF was well tolerated and was associated with improved participant satisfaction. These data demonstrate that E/C/F/TAF is a safe and effective alternative to more complicated regimens in PLH on chronic HD, with the potential to improve patient satisfaction and quality of life. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]