Search

Differences in male and female phenotypes are often the results of sexual selection. Over the years, a vast number of studies investigated how and why the 2 sexes differ in their physical appearance, reaching the conclusion that peculiar visual traits, signals, or ornaments usually evolve under the pressure of sexual selection to mediate intrasexual competition and mate choice. In social contexts, however, males and females can hold different roles and social interactions may depend on the individual gender. The female-dominated hymenopteran societies represent a fascinating scenario to investigate recognition and communication among individuals of different genders outside a common sexual selection framework because sterile female workers typically do not mate and are not attracted to males. Here, we used laboratory bioassays (lure presentation experiments) to evaluate the ability of Polistes dominula workers to discriminate between individuals of the 2 genders, investigating the relevance of the chemical and visual cues potentially involved in such process. Our results showed that P. dominula workers are able to discriminate between the sexes and visual cues rather than chemical ones are responsible for such discrimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Males are under different selective pressures than females, which results in differences in the physiology of the two sexes to maximize their fitness. In terms of immunity, males are typically considered as the 'sicker sex', where immunocompetence is reduced to favour increased reproductive output. However, male social Hymenoptera are also haploid and therefore lack allelic variation at the individual level, which can also lead to reduced immunocompetence. Over the last decade, several studies have provided evidence for a higher susceptibility to disease in males of social Hymenoptera, without clarifying whether this susceptibility was a direct consequence of their haploid condition or the result of a 'live hard, die young' overall evolutionary strategy. In the present study, we used an experimental approach of bacterial challenge to test the immune response of males and females in two species of social Hymenoptera (honey bees, Apis mellifera; paper wasps, Polistes dominula), where males show very different life-history traits. Drones benefit from colony protection for most of their life, whereas P. dominula males leave their colonies and have to survive for weeks at leks. If the haploid condition is responsible for a higher susceptibility in males, we should expect a lower immune response in males of both species compared to females. Conversely, if the immunocompetence depends on the life-history traits of males, an opposite trend is expected in males of the two species. Our results do not support the 'haploid susceptibility hypothesis' but are in accordance with the different life history of males from the two species. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 114, 274-278. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]