Search

Objective: To evaluate the combination of tumor volume and sound speed as a potential imaging marker for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response. Methods: This study was carried out under an IRB-approved protocol (written consent required). Fourteen patients undergoing NAC for invasive breast cancer were examined with ultrasound tomography (UST) throughout their treatment. The volume (V) and the volume-averaged sound speed (VASS) of the tumors and their changes were measured for each patient. Time-dependent response curves of V and VASS were constructed individually for each patient and then as averages for the complete versus partial response groups in order to characterize differences between the two groups. Differences in group means were assessed for statistical significance using t-tests. Differences in shapes of group curves were evaluated with Kolmogorov-Smirnoff tests. Results: On average, tumor volume and sound speed in the partial response group showed a gradual decline in the first 60 days of treatment, while the complete response group showed a much steeper decline (P < 0.05). The shapes of the response curves of the two groups, corresponding to the entire treatment period, were also found to be significantly different (P < 0.05). Furthermore, large simultaneous drops in volume and sound speed in the first 3 weeks of treatment were characteristic only of the complete responders (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using UST to monitor NAC response, warranting future studies to better define the potential of UST for noninvasive, rapid identification of partial versus complete responders in women undergoing NAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the feasibility of using tissue sound speed as a quantitative marker of breast density. Methods: This study was carried out under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol (written consent required). Imaging data were selected retrospectively based on the availability of US tomography (UST) exams, screening mammograms with volumetric breast density data, patient age of 18 to 80 years, and weight less than 300 lbs. Sound speed images from the UST exams were used to measure the volume of dense tissue, the volume averaged sound speed (VASS), and the percent of high sound speed tissue (PHSST). The mammographic breast density and volume of dense tissue were estimated with three-dimensional (3D) software. Differences in volumes were assessed with paired t-tests. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the strength of the correlations between the mammographic and UST assessments of breast density. Results: A total of 100 UST and 3D mammographic data sets met the selection criteria. The resulting measurements showed that UST measured a more than 2-fold larger volume of dense tissue compared to mammography. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). A strong correlation of rS = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90) between 3D mammographic breast density (BD) and the VASS was noted. This correlation is significantly stronger than those reported in previous two-dimensional studies (rS = 0.85 vs rS = 0.71). A similar correlation was found for PHSST and mammographic BD with rS = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90). Conclusion: The strong correlations between UST parameters and 3D mammographic BD suggest that breast sound speed should be further studied as a potential new marker for inclusion in clinical risk models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast density, as assessed by mammography, reflects breast tissue composition. Breast epithelium and stroma attenuate x-rays more than fat and thus appear light on mammograms while fat appears dark. In this review, we provide an overview of selected areas of current knowledge about the relationship between breast density and susceptibility to breast cancer. We review the evidence that breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer, the histological and other risk factors that are associated with variations in breast density, and the biological plausibility of the associations with risk of breast cancer. We also discuss the potential for improved risk prediction that might be achieved by using alternative breast imaging methods, such as magnetic resonance or ultrasound. After adjustment for other risk factors, breast density is consistently associated with breast cancer risk, more strongly than most other risk factors for this disease, and extensive breast density may account for a substantial fraction of breast cancer. Breast density is associated with risk of all of the proliferative lesions that are thought to be precursors of breast cancer. Studies of twins have shown that breast density is a highly heritable quantitative trait. Associations between breast density and variations in breast histology, risk of proliferative breast lesions, and risk of breast cancer may be the result of exposures of breast tissue to both mitogens and mutagens. Characterization of breast density by mammography has several limitations, and the uses of breast density in risk prediction and breast cancer prevention may be improved by other methods of imaging, such as magnetic resonance or ultrasound tomography. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer, by Colin and Schott.