Search

Background: Pooled data from the SMART and START trials were used to compare deferred/intermittent versus immediate/continuous antiretroviral therapy (ART) on disease risk.Methods: Endpoints assessed were AIDS, serious non-AIDS (SNA), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and death. Pooled (stratified by study) hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox models were obtained for deferred/intermittent ART versus immediate/continuous ART; analyses were conducted to assess consistency of HRs across baseline-defined subgroups.Results: Among 10156 participants, there were 124 AIDS, 247 SNA, 117 cancers, 103 CVD, and 120 deaths. Interventions in each trial led to similar differences in CD4 count and viral suppression. Pooled HRs (95% confidence interval) of deferred/intermittent ART versus immediate/continuous ART were for AIDS 3.63 (2.37-5.56); SNA 1.62 (1.25-2.09); CVD 1.59 (1.07-2.37); cancer 1.93 (1.32-2.83); and death 1.80 (1.24-2.61). Underlying risk was greater in SMART than START. Given the similar HRs for each trial, absolute risk differences between treatment groups were greater in SMART than START. Pooled HRs were similar across subgroups.Conclusions: Treatment group differences in CD4 count and viral suppression were similar in SMART and START. Likely as a consequence, relative differences in risk of AIDS and SNA between immediate/continuous ART and deferred/intermittent ART were similar.Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00027352 and NCT00867048. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The optimal penetration of antiretroviral agents into the central nervous system may be a balance between providing adequate drug exposure to inhibit human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication while avoiding concentrations associated with neuronal toxicities. Methods. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure of efavirenz and the metabolites 7-hydroxy (7OH) and 8-hydroxy (8OH) efavirenz were assessed after at least 12 weeks of therapy in HIV-infected subjects randomized to commence antiretroviral regimens containing efavirenz at either 400 mg or 600 mg once daily. Results. Of 28 subjects (14 and 14 on efavirenz 400 mg and 600 mg, respectively), CSF HIV RNA was undetectable in all. Geometric mean CSF efavirenz, 7OH-, and 8OH-efavirenz concentrations (with 90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the 400-mg and 600-mg dosing groups were 16.5 (13-21) and 19.5 (15-25) ng/mL; 0.6 (.4-.9) and 0.6 (.4-1) ng/mL; and 5.1 (4.0-6.4) and 3.1 (2.1-4.4) ng/mL, respectively. Efavirenz concentration in CSF was >0.51 ng/mL (proposed CSF 50% maximal inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus) in all subjects, and 8OH-efavirenz concentration in CSF was >3.3 ng/mL (a proposed toxicity threshold) in 11 of 14 and 7 of 14 subjects randomized to the 400 mg and 600 mg doses of efavirenz, respectively. Whereas CSF efavirenz concentration was significantly associated with plasma concentration (P < .001) and cytochrome P450 2B6 genotype (CSF efavirenz GG to GT/TT geometric mean ratio, 0.56 [90% CI, .42-.74]), CSF 8OH-efavirenz concentration was not (P = .242 for association and CSF 8OH-efavirenz GG to GT/TT geometric mean ratio, 1.52 [90% CI, .97- 2.36]). Conclusions. With both doses of efavirenz studied, CSF concentrations were considered adequate to inhibit HIV replication, although concentrations of 8OH-efavirenz were greater than those reportedly associated with neuronal toxicity. CSF exposure of 8OH-efavirenz was not dependent on plasma exposure and, as we postulate, may be subject to saturable pharmacokinetic effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The optimal individualized selection of antiretroviral drugs in resource-limited settings is challenging because of the limited availability of drugs and genotyping. Here we describe the development of the latest computational models to predict the response to combination antiretroviral therapy without a genotype, for potential use in such settings.Methods: Random forest models were trained to predict the probability of a virological response to therapy (<50 copies HIV RNA/mL) following virological failure using the following data from 22,567 treatment-change episodes including 1090 from southern Africa: baseline viral load and CD4 cell count, treatment history, drugs in the new regimen, time to follow-up and follow-up viral load. The models were assessed during cross-validation and with an independent global test set of 1000 cases including 100 from southern Africa. The models' accuracy [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC)] was evaluated and compared with genotyping using rules-based interpretation systems for those cases with genotypes available.Results: The models achieved AUCs of 0.79-0.84 (mean 0.82) during cross-validation, 0.80 with the global test set and 0.78 with the southern African subset. The AUCs were significantly lower (0.56-0.57) for genotyping.Conclusions: The models predicted virological response to HIV therapy without a genotype as accurately as previous models that included a genotype. They were accurate for cases from southern Africa and significantly more accurate than genotyping. These models will be accessible via the online treatment support tool HIV-TRePS and have the potential to help optimize antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings where genotyping is not generally available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with intestinal permeability and microbial translocation that contributes to systemic immune activation, which is an independent predictor of HIV disease progression. The association of microbial translocation with clinical outcome remains unknown.Methods. This nested case-control study included 74 subjects who died, 120 of whom developed cardiovascular disease and 81 of whom developed AIDS during the Strategies for Management of Anti-Retroviral Therapy (SMART) study with matched control subjects. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), soluble CD14 (sCD14), endotoxin core antibody (EndoCAb), and 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) were measured in baseline plasma samples.Results. Subjects with the highest quartile of sCD14 levels had a 6-fold higher risk of death than did those in the lowest quartile (95% confidence interval, 2.2–16.1; P<.001), with minimal change after adjustment for inflammatory markers, CD4+ T cell count, and HIV RNA level. No other marker was significantly associated with clinical outcomes. I-FABP, LPS, and sCD14 were increased and EndoCAb was decreased in study subjects, compared with healthy volunteers. sCD14 level correlated with levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A and D-dimer.Conclusions. sCD14, a marker of monocyte response to LPS, is an independent predictor of mortality in HIV infection. Therapeutic attenuation of innate immune activation may improve survival in patients with HIV infection. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: Data suggest that some licensed antiretroviral doses could be reduced. We assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir at doses of 400/100, 200/150 and 200/50 mg twice daily in HIV-negative volunteers (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00985543).Methods: Male and female volunteers were administered lopinavir/ritonavir at doses of 400/100 mg (two lopinavir/ritonavir Meltrex 200/50 mg tablets, Regimen 1), 200/150 mg (one Meltrex tablet, one 100 mg ritonavir capsule, Regimen 2) and 200/50 mg (one Meltrex tablet, Regimen 3). Each dose was given twice daily for 7 days sequentially, separated by a 7 day wash-out period. Lopinavir/ritonavir steady-state pharmacokinetics was assessed over 12 h at the end of each phase (days 7, 21 and 35). Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using the 400/100 mg twice daily dose as reference, by determining geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals.Results: Twenty-two subjects (eight females) completed the study. Lopinavir AUC(0-12) (ng h/mL), C(max) (ng/mL) and the minimum concentration (C(trough)) (ng/mL) for the 400/100, 200/150 and 200/50 mg twice daily doses, respectively, were as follows: 99,599, 73,603 and 45,146; 11,965, 8939 and 6404; and 5776, 4293 and 1749. Lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly lower for Regimens 2 and 3: GMR (90% CI) AUC(0-12), 0.74 (0.65-0.84) and 0.45 (0.40-0.51); C(max), 0.75 (0.66-0.85) and 0.54 (0.40-0.60); and C(trough), 0.74 (0.62-0.89) and 0.30 (0.25-0.36), respectively. All subjects taking the 400/100 and 200/150 mg twice daily doses, and 19 (86%) subjects taking 200/50 mg twice daily had lopinavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 1000 ng/mL.Conclusions: These pharmacokinetic data show that therapeutic plasma concentrations of lopinavir can be achieved with 200/150 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (one Meltrex tablet and one 100 mg ritonavir capsule twice daily). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few randomized trials comparing antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens have been conducted in resource-limited settings.Methods: In the Republic of South Africa, antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals >14 years old with a CD4 cell count <200 cells/μL or a prior AIDS diagnosis were randomized to receive efavirenz (EFV) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) with either zidovudine (ZDV) plus didanosine (ddI) or stavudine (d4T) plus lamivudine (3TC) in an open-label, 2-by-2 factorial study and followed up for the primary outcome of AIDS or death and prespecified secondary outcomes, including CD4 cell count and viral load changes, treatment discontinuation, and grade 4 events.Results: In total, 1771 persons were randomized and followed up for a median of 24.7 months. AIDS or death occurred in (1) 163 participants assigned EFV and 157 assigned LPV/r (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.84-1.30]) and in (2) 170 participants assigned ZDV+ddI and 150 assigned d4T+3TC (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.93-1.44]). HIV RNA levels were lower (P < .001) and CD4 cell counts were greater (P < .01) over follow-up for d4T+3TC versus ZDV+ddI. Rates of potentially life-threatening adverse events and overall treatment discontinuation were similar for d4T+3TC and ZDV+ddI; however, more participants discontinued d4T because of toxicity (12.6%) than other treatments (<5%).Conclusion: EFV and LPV/r are effective components of first-line ART. The poorer viral and immune responses with ZDV+ddI and the greater toxicity-associated discontinuation rate with d4T+3TC suggest that these treatments be used cautiously as initial therapy.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00342355. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Antiretroviral therapy is complicated by drug interactions and contraindications. Novel regimens are needed. Methods. This open label study randomly assigned treatment-naive, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- infected subjects to receive tenofovir-emtricitabine with efavirenz (Arm I), with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (Arm II), or with zidovudine/abacavir (Arm III). Pair-wise comparisons of differences in time-weighted mean change from baseline plasma HIV-RNA to week 48 formed the primary analysis. Treatment arms were noninferior if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was <0.5 log10 copies/mL. Secondary objectives included virologic, immunologic and safety end points. Results. The intention-to-treat population comprised 322 patients (Arm I, n = 114; Arm II, n = 105; and Arm III, n = 103). Noninferiority for the primary end point was established. Analysis for superiority showed that Arm III was significantly less potent than Arm I (-0.20 log10 copies/mL; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.01 log10 copies/ mL; P=.038). The proportions of patients on each of Arm I (95%) and Arm II (96%) with <200 copies/mL were not different (P=.75), but the percentage of patients in Arm III with <200 copies/mL (82%) was significantly lower (P=.005). CD4+ cell counts did not differ. Serious adverse events were more frequent in Arm III (n = 30) than in Arm I or Arm II (n = 15 for each; P =.062). Conclusions. A novel quadruple nucleo(t)side combination demonstrated significantly less suppression of HIV replication, compared with the suppression demonstrated by standard antiretroviral therapy regimens, although it did meet the predetermined formal definition of noninferiority. Secondary analyses indicated statistically inferior virologic and safety performance. Efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir arms were equivalent in viral suppression and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare lipid profiles in HIV-infected adults receiving atazanavir-based regimens. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir with a comparator and evaluated lipids at 48 weeks. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, Current Controlled Trials, National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, trials at AIDSinfo and HIV conference proceedings to May 2009. Standardized mean difference (SMD) between study arms in change from baseline to week 48 in lipid parameters was determined weighted by study size and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: Nine eligible RCTs were identified (n=3346). SMDs (mmol/L) in four RCTs comparing atazanavir/ritonavir with a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor were: total cholesterol, -0.62 (95% CI -0.72, -0.51); low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, -0.31 (95% CI -0.44, -0.17); high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, -0.16 (95% CI -0.27, -0.06); non-HDL cholesterol, -0.58 (95% CI-0.69, -0.48); and triglycerides, -0.46 (95% CI -0.58, -0.34). Atazanavir compared with non-atazanavir (three RCTs) found lower total, LDL and non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides [SMD -0.87 mmol/L (95% CI -0.99, -0.76); -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI -0.67, -0.45); -0.88 mmol/L (95% CI -0.99, -0.76); and -0.56 mmol/L (95% CI -0.75, -0.36), respectively], but HDL cholesterol did not differ [-0.16 mmol/L (95% CI -0.49, 0.16)]. In the atazanavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir comparison (two RCTs), total [SMD 0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23, 0.65)] and non-HDL cholesterol [SMD 0.44 mmol/L (95% CI 0.23, 0.65)] were higher, but HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were not different. Conclusions: At 48 weeks, plasma lipid concentrations were lower with atazanavir/ritonavir than with other ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens. Total and non-HDL cholesterol were higher with atazanavir/ritonavir than atazanavir alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Neurocognitive impairment remains prevalent, despite combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Differences between changes in cerebral function and alternative cARTs have not been prospectively assessed. Methods. Treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected individuals randomly allocated to commence cART (tenofoviremtricitabine plus either efavirenz [arm 1], atazanavir-ritonavir [arm 2], or zidovudine-abacavir [arm 3]) were eligible. Cerebral function tests included neurocognitive testing and assessment of cerebral metabolites using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in several anatomical voxels, including right frontal white matter and right basal ganglia, at baseline and after 48 weeks. N-acetylaspartate-to-creatine (NAA/Cr) ratios were calculated. Both the differences between changes in neurocognitive function and NAA/Cr ratios over 48 weeks and the study arms (arm 1 vs arm 2; arm 1 vs arm 3) were assessed. Results. Thirty subjects completed study procedures (9, 9, and 12 subjects in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Mean CD4+ cell counts (± standard deviation) were 218±87 cells/mL at baseline and 342±145 cells/μL at week 48. The mean plasma HIV-1 RNA level was <50 copies/μL for 28 of the 30 subjects at week 48. Over 48 weeks, greater improvements in identification reaction time (P=.04) and executive function (P=.02) were observed in arm 3, compared with arm 1 (0.03, -0.30, -0.50 log10 ms change in identification reaction time, in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Increases in the NAA/Cr ratio were observed in all voxels (maximum 38% in right basal ganglia), with greater increases observed in arm 1 than in arm 2 (P=.03) in frontal white matter (30%, -7%, and 0% change in the NAA/Cr ratio, in arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to prospectively describe different changes in cerebral function testing parameters between different cARTs. Greater improvements in neuronal recovery (NAA/Cr ratio) were observed for recipients of tenofovir-emtricitabine plus efavirenz (arm 1), and greater improvements in neurocognitive function testing were observed for recipients of tenofovir-emtricitabine plus zidovudine-abacavir (arm 3). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. There are 2 once-daily, fixed-dose-combination, dual-nucleoside analogue tablets: tenofovir 300 mg-emtricitabine 200 mg (TDF-FTC) and abacavir 600 mg-lamivudine 300 mg (ABC-3TC). Which fixed-dosecombination tablet is more effective and safe is uncertain. Methods. We compared TDF-FTC and ABC-3TC in a randomized, open-label, 96-week trial in which either fixed-dose-combination was substituted for current nucleoside treatments in human leukocyte antigen-B*5701- negative adults with human immunodeficiency virus loads !50 copies/mL. The primary end point was virological failure (consecutive viral load measurements 1400 copies/mL, by intention-to-treat). Secondary end points included death, AIDS, adverse events, serious non-AIDS events, metabolic parameters, and body composition. We used exact statistics for differences in proportions, T tests to compare means, and Cox regression for hazard ratios. Results. Of 441 patients who were screened, 357 were treated; 98% were men, the mean age was 45 years, 30% were receiving TDF, 20% were receiving ABC, and 24% were receiving a protease inhibitor. Virological failure was uncommon (5.6% for ABC-3TC and 3.9% for TDF-FTC; difference, 1.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8% to 6.1%; P=.62). No participant developed AIDS, whereas 18 (5%) participants developed a serious non- AIDS event (rate, 2.79 events per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 1.76-4.43), of which 4 were fatal. TDF-FTC was associated with significantly fewer serious non-AIDS events than ABC-3TC (1.2 vs 4.8 events per 100 patient years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73; Pp.012), influenced mostly by a lower rate of cardiovascular events (0.3 vs 2.2 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.98; Pp.048). TDF-FTC resulted in significantly lower bone mineral density (mean difference in hip t score, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.23; P < .001) but not in more fractures. Conclusions. In this population, TDF-FTC and ABC-3TC had similar virological efficacy, but ABC-3TC was associated with more serious non-AIDS events, particularly cardiovascular events. Clinical trials registration. NCT00192634. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 with thymidine-analogue nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (tNRTIs) causes lipoatrophy, mitochondrial toxicity, and lower adipose tissue expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ [PPARG gene]) . Rosiglitazone (RSG), a PPARγ agonist, improves congenital lipoatrophy but not HIV lipoatrophy. Methods. Serial fat biopsies were taken from HIV-infected, lipoatrophic men randomized to receive RSG or placebo for 48 weeks. Adipose tissue mitochondrial and nuclear gene expression and mitochondrial DNA content were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Nonparametric analyses were applied. Results. Subjects receiving tNRTI-containing antiretroviral therapy had lower baseline mitochondrial RNA expression and DNA content. In subjects receiving tNRTIs, exposure to RSG did not affect PPARG expression at either week 2 or 48. At week 2, RSG increased PPARG expression only in subjects not treated with tNRTIs, whereas at week 48, increased PPARG expression was observed in subjects not treated with tNRTIs, regardless of RSG use. Similar findings were observed for the PPARG-responsive gene fatty acid- binding protein 4. Changes in PPARG expression were associated with increases in limb fat mass. Conclusions. These data suggest that in HIV-infected, lipoatrophic men, adipose PPARG expression and function are dependent on intact mitochondrial function. These data support a direct link between mitochondrial toxicity and adipose tissue PPARG expression and help explain the poor clinical response to RSG observed in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The SMART study randomized 5,472 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with CD4+ cell counts >350 cells/microL to intermittent antiretroviral therapy (ART; the drug conservation [DC] group) versus continuous ART (the viral suppression [VS] group). In the DC group, participants started ART when the CD4+ cell count was <250 cells/microL. Clinical outcomes in participants not receiving ART at entry inform the early use of ART.Methods: Patients who were either ART naive (n=249) or who had not been receiving ART for >or= 6 months (n=228) were analyzed. The following clinical outcomes were assessed: (i) opportunistic disease (OD) or death from any cause (OD/death); (ii) OD (fatal or nonfatal); (iii) serious non-AIDS events (cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disease plus non-AIDS-defining cancers) and non-OD deaths; and (iv) the composite of outcomes (ii) and (iii).Results: A total of 477 participants (228 in the DC group and 249 in the VS group) were followed (mean, 18 months). For outcome (iv), 21 and 6 events occurred in the DC (7 in ART-naive participants and 14 in those who had not received ART for >or= 6 months) and VS (2 in ART-naive participants and 4 in those who had not received ART for 6 months) groups, respectively. Hazard ratios for DC vs. VS by outcome category were as follows: outcome (i), 3.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-9.56; p=.02); outcome (ii), 3.26 (95% CI, 1.04-10.25; p=.04); outcome (iii), 7.02 (95% CI, 1.57-31.38; p=.01); and outcome (iv), 4.19 (95% CI, 1.69-10.39; p=.002 ).Conclusions: Initiation of ART at CD4+ cell counts >350 cells/microL compared with <250 cells/microL may reduce both OD and serious non-AIDS events. These findings require validation in a large, randomized clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Methods: The SMART study compared 2 strategies for using antiretroviral therapy-drug conservation (DC) and viral suppression (VS)-in 5,472 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with CD4+ cell counts >350 cells/microL. Rates and predictors of opportunistic disease or death (OD/death) and the relative risk (RR) in DC versus VS groups according to the latest CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA level are reported.Results: During a mean of 16 months of follow-up, DC patients spent more time with a latest CD4+ cell count <350 cells/microL (for DC vs. VS, 31% vs. 8%) and with a latest HIV RNA level >400 copies/mL (71% vs. 28%) and had a higher rate of OD/death (3.4 vs. 1.3/100 person-years) than VS patients. For periods of follow- up with a CD4+ cell count <350 cells/microL, rates of OD/death were increased but similar in the 2 groups (5.7 vs. 4.6/100 person-years), whereas the rates were higher in DC versus VS patients (2.3 vs. 1.0/100 person-years; RR, 2.3 [95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4]) for periods with the latest CD4+ cell count >or= 350 cells/microL-an increase explained by the higher HIV RNA levels in the DC group.Conclusions: The higher risk of OD/death in DC patients was associated with (1) spending more follow-up time with relative immunodeficiency and (2) living longer with uncontrolled HIV replication even at higher CD4+ cell counts. Ongoing HIV replication at a given CD4+ cell count places patients at an excess risk of OD/death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Toxicities observed with current combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) warrant a search for novel options, such as class-sparing regimens. Ritonavir-boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI)-only regimens are such an option but are prone to pharmacokinetic interactions. Methods. This 48-week randomized study examined the safety and efficacy of a switch in CART to a oncedaily regimen of saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV), and atazanavir (ATV) that did not include nucleoside reversetranscriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The study also assessed the pharmacokinetic profile of a change in the SQV formulation, from 200 mg to 500 mg, in 2 regimens (SQV-RTV twice per day plus NRTIs [arm 1] and SQV-RTVATVo nce per day without NRTIs [arm 2]) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects (plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA level, <50 copies/mL). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), which are used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and have been associated with lipoatrophy. The effects of this mitochondrial dysfunction on lipid metabolism, at a molecular level in vivo, have not been described. Methods. We examined early changes (by 2 weeks after initiation of therapy) in expression of mitochondrial and nuclear genes in adipose tissue from 20 HIV-negative subjects randomized to receive dual-NRTI therapy (zidovudine/lamivudine or stavudine/lamivudine) for 6 weeks. Results. We observed decreased transcription of mitochondrial (mt) RNA without significant depletion of mtDNA. Decreases in mtRNA coincided with simultaneous up-regulation of nuclear genes involved in transcriptional regulation of mtRNA (NRF1 and TFAM) and oxidation of fatty acids (PPARA and LPL), whereas PPARG, which is important for differentiation of adipose tissue, was down-regulated. Many nuclear changes correlated with changes in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 (PGC1), suggesting a central role for PGC1 in nuclear responses to mitochondrial dysfunction. Expression of peripheral blood monocyte mtRNA also decreased, suggesting that monocytes may be surrogates for NRTI-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in other tissues. Conclusions. Independent of HIV, NRTIs decrease transcription of mtRNA in vivo. The absence of depletion of mtDNA suggests that NRTIs cause mitochondrial dysfunction by means other than through inhibition of DNA polymerase-γ, whereas disruption of expression of lipid metabolism genes offers an explanation for NRTI-induced lipoatrophy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. In advance of a large clinical end point trial evaluating the effectiveness of subcutaneous interleukin 2 (scIL-2) for treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, 3 identically designed Vanguard trials were conducted in Buenos Aires, Argentina; Bangkok, Thailand; and Houston, Texas. To more precisely quantitate the effect on CD4 cell response of 3 different doses of scIL-2 that were administered twice daily for 5 days every 8 weeks, the results of these 3 trials were pooled in a meta-analysis. Methods. Two hundred eighteen HIV-1-infected subjects who were receiving antiretroviral therapy and who had a baseline CD4 cell count of &ges;350 cells/mm³ were consecutively randomized to receive scIL-2 at a dose of 1.5 mIU (n = 36) or a control regimen (n = 36); or scIL-2 at a dose of 4.5 mIU (n = 36) or a control regimen (n = 36); or scIL-2 at a dose of 7.5 mIU (n = 37) or a control regimen (n = 37). After completion of 3 cycles of therapy, the subjects were enrolled in an extension phase (months 6-12). Subjects were encouraged to receive additional cycles of scIL-2 to maintain a CD4 cell count of more than twice the baseline count or >1000 cells/mm³. Results. After completion of 3 cycles of scIL-2, the mean CD4 cell count changes from baseline (calculated as changes from baseline in a scIL-2 group minus changes from baseline in its contemporaneous control group) were 67 (P = .14), 339 (P< .0001), and 605 cells/mm³ (P< .0001) for the 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 mIU dose groups, respectively (P< .0001 for differences among dose groups). Between months 6 and 12, a total of 78%, 39%, and 32% of subjects assigned to the 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 mIU dose groups, respectively, needed at least 1 additional cycle to achieve the CD4 cell count goal. At 12 months, the differences in the mean change in CD4 cell count from baseline between each scIL-2 dose group and its contemporaneous control group were 184, 369, and 432 cells/ mm³, respectively (P = .01 for differences among dose groups). Conclusions. Although CD4 cell count increases were seen in all 3 dose groups, higher scIL-2 doses resulted in greater CD4 cell count changes after 6 months, compared with control groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a randomized, controlled phase II trial comparing escalating doses of subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus antiretrovirals versus antiretroviral alone in HIV-infected patients with CD4[sup +] cell counts of 350 per cubic millimeter. Effects of the T cell-derived cytokine IL-2 on the immune system; Efficacy of the treatment groups; Side effects of subcutaneous IL-2 administration.

The safety and activity of outpatient-based continuous intravenous interleukin-2 (CIV IL-2) or a slow-release, polyethylene glycol (PEG)—modified IL-2 were studied in human immunodeficiency virus (HlV)—infected persons with CD4 cell counts between 200 and 500/mm3. One hundred fifteen patients were randomized to antiretroviral therapy plus cyclical CIV IL-2 (n = 27), subcutaneous PEG IL-2 (n = 58), or no IL-2 (n = 30). Toxicity withdrawal rates were low (4% for CIV IL-2 and 7% for PEG IL-2). There were median CD4 cell count increases of 359 and 44 cells/mm3 and a decline of 46 cells/mm3 in the 3 groups, respectively, over 1 year (P < .0001 for each intergroup comparison). CD4 cell count increases were greatest in those with lower HIV RNA load. Delayedtype hypersensitivity scores increased and HLA-DR expression on CD8 cells decreased significantly with IL-2 therapy. HIV RNA levels were unaffected. IL-2 therapy may expand the existing immune repertoire but not immediately reconstitute lost immune function. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background The Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) trial demonstrated that immediate (at CD4+ >500 cells/µL) vs deferred (to CD4+ <350 cells/µL or AIDS) antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation reduced risk for AIDS and serious non-AIDS (SNA). We investigated associations of inflammation, coagulation, and vascular injury biomarkers with AIDS, SNA or death, and the effect of immediate ART initiation. Methods Biomarkers were measured from stored plasma prior to randomization and at month 8. Associations of baseline biomarkers with event risk were estimated with Cox regression, pooled across groups, adjusted for age, gender, and treatment group, and stratified by region. Mean changes over 8 months were estimated and compared between the immediate and deferred ART arms using analysis of covariance models, adjusted for levels at entry. Results Baseline biomarker levels were available for 4299 START participants (92%). Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. Higher levels of IL-6 and D-dimer were the only biomarkers associated with risk for AIDS, SNA or death, as well as the individual components of SNA and AIDS events (HRs ranged 1.37–1.41 per 2-fold higher level), even after adjustment for baseline CD4+ count, HIV RNA level, and other biomarkers. At month 8, biomarker levels were lower in the immediate arm by 12%–21%. Conclusions These data, combined with evidence from prior biomarker studies, demonstrate that IL-6 and D-dimer consistently predict clinical risk across a broad spectrum of CD4 counts for those both ART-naïve and treated. Research is needed to identify disease-modifying treatments that target inflammation beyond the effects of ART. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to studies on treatment interruption in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

Focuses on the survival of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease progression. Basis on the statistical analysis of HIV disease progression; Examination of interleukin as a potent simulator of T cell proliferation and maturation; Success on combining antiretroval therapy and antimicrobial prophylaxis in treating HIV-infection.