Search

Objective The Emotional Verbal Learning Test-Spanish (EVLT-S) is a novel list learning test similar in structure to traditional verbal memory tests but contains words from 4 discrete emotional categories. Influence of acculturation on emotional learning was examined on EVLT-S learning trials 1 to 5. Participants and Method Participants included 50 bilingual healthy individuals in the Spanish-dominant group (Age M = 20.3years; 72% female) and 27 in the English-dominant group (Age M = 23.4years, 51.9% female). They were administered a battery of tests including the EVLT, a non-emotional verbal list learning test (LLT), Vocabulary (VC), Digit Span (DS), and The Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH) in their dominant language. To examine learning curves a mixed model ANOVA was conducted with test (EVLT-S/EVLT, LLT-S/LLT) and trial as within-subjects variables and group (Spanish, English) as a between-subjects variable. Results There were significant main effects (p <.005) for test, trial, and group. The Spanish-dominant group had the lowest overall performance on the EVLT-S (main effect for group). Post hoc comparisons of the Spanish-dominant group's LLT-S and EVLT-S performance indicated significant differences at each trail (p <.01), with the EVLT-S scores being lower than the LLT-S scores. The ANOVA was repeated with VC, DS, and SASH included as covariates. When controlling for these variables, the main effect for group was no longer significant. A significant trial by acculturation interaction effect emerged (p<.05), with the English-dominant group generally performing better than the Spanish-dominant group. Conclusions Results suggest that Spanish and English language group differences were largely accounted for by word knowledge (VC), working memory (DS), and acculturation differences (SASH) between the groups. The role of these variables is discussed further in the context of acculturation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The EVLT-S is the Spanish translation of a novel measure of emotional verbal learning and memory. The current study aimed to preliminarily examine the factorial validity of the EVLT-S to determine if its latent structure was similar to that identified for the EVLT by Strauss and Allen (2013) in a sample of 329 English speakers. Participants and Method Two principal component analyses (PCAs) were conducted to examine the latent structure of the EVLT-S. The first PCA examined EVLT/EVLT-S performance in a combined sample of English language-dominant participants (n = 52; Age M = 23.1 years; Education M = 13.4 years; 32.7% White non-Hispanic, 36.5% Hispanic, and 30.8 % other; 55.8% female) and Spanish language-dominant participants (n = 50; Age M = 20.3 years; Education M = 12.8 years; 98% Hispanic and 2% other; 72% female). The second PCA was conducted with the Spanish dominant sample alone (n = 50). PCAs were conducted using comparable scores and procedures reported by Strauss and Allen (2013), including scores for the four emotion categories (happiness, sadness, anger, anxiety), varimax rotation, and Kaiser-Guttman criteria to determine the number of components, allowing for direct comparisons between the current results and those previously reported. Results Both PCA's identified five components that accounted for 68.6 – 70.4 percent of the variance and attained simple structure. Based on factor loadings, these components were labeled Anger, Sadness, Happiness, Anxiety, and Short-Term Memory (STM). Conclusions The PCA analyses in this study were exploratory in nature but were remarkably consistent with prior results attained in a much larger sample (n = 329) of English speakers. Results provide preliminary support for a stable and generalizable EVLT latent structure in Spanish and English versions. Future studies with larger samples using confirmatory factor analyses are needed to further establish the factorial validity of the EVLT-S. References Strauss, G. P. & Allen, D. N. (2013). Emotional Verbal Learning Test: development and psychometric properties.  Archives of clinical neuropsychology ,  28 (5), 435-451. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This review aims to provide an update on the management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Sources of data: A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases was carried out. Areas of agreement: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective and easier to use than vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of DVT. Catheter-directed thrombolysis can reduce post thrombotic syndrome in patients with iliofemoral DVT. Compression bandaging can help heal a venous ulcer. Areas of controversy: Compression hosiery to prevent post thrombotic syndrome. Longterm evidence to show clinical benefit of using endovenous therapies to restore deep vein patency. Growing points: Developing imaging methods to identify patients who would benefit from venous thrombolysis. The evolution of dedicated venous stents. Areas timely for developing research: Understanding the mechanisms that lead to stent occlusion and investigation into the appropriate treatments that could prevent in-stent thrombosis is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]