Search

Introduction Knowledge about the cancer risk when initiating a biologic in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients with prior malignancy remains scarce, especially for vedolizumab. Our aim was to evaluate the rate of incident cancer in a cohort of IBD patients with prior non-digestive malignancy, according to the subsequent treatment given. Methods A multicentre retrospective study included consecutive IBD patients with prior non-digestive malignancy. Inclusion date corresponded to the diagnosis of index malignancy. Patients were categorized into different cohorts according to the first treatment [none, conventional immunosuppressant, anti-TNF, or vedolizumab] to which they were exposed after inclusion and before incident cancer [recurrent or new cancer]. Results Among the 538 patients {58% female; mean (standard deviation [SD]) age inclusion: 52 [15] years} analyzed, the most frequent malignancy was breast cancer [25%]. The first immunomodulator given after inclusion was a conventional immunosuppressant in 27% of patients, anti-TNF in 21%, or vedolizumab in 9%. With a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up duration of 55 [23-100] months, 100 incident cancers were observed. Crude cancer incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 47.0 for patients receiving no immunomodulator, 36.6 in the anti-TNF cohort, and 33.6 in the vedolizumab cohort [ p = 0.23]. Incident-cancer free survival rates were not different between patients receiving anti-TNF and those receiving vedolizumab [ p = 0.56]. After adjustment, incidence rates were not different between patients receiving no immunomodulator, anti-TNF, or vedolizumab. Conclusions In this large multicentre cohort study, there was no difference of cancer incidence in those IBD patients with prior non-digestive malignancy, treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Optimal management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] after anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] discontinuation due to severe induced skin lesions is unclear. Our study aimed to describe dermatological and IBD evolution after anti-TNF discontinuation for this side effect. Methods We conducted a multicentre retrospective study including consecutive IBD patients who discontinued anti-TNF due to severe induced skin lesions. Our objectives were to determine factors associated with dermatological remission [complete disappearance of skin lesions] and with IBD relapse in patients with inactive disease at inclusion, notably the impact of an early switch to another biological agent within 3 months of anti-TNF discontinuation. Results Among the 181 patients [134 women, 160 Crohn's disease] included in the 13 participating centres, dermatological remission occurred in 110 [62%] patients with a median [interquartile range, IQR] interval of 8.0 [6.8–11.0] months. Scalp location was independently associated with less remission of skin lesions (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64 [95% CI 0.43–0.94], p  = 0.02) while early switch was independently associated with a higher probability of remission of skin lesions (HR = 1.64 [95% CI 1.1–2.5], p  = 0.02). Among the 148 patients with inactive IBD at inclusion, disease relapse occurred in 75 [51%] patients with a median [IQR] interval of 26.0 [23.0–39.1] months. Survival rates without IBD relapse at 1 year were 85.8% [95% CI 77.5–94.9] in the early switch group and 59.3% [95% CI 48.9–71.9] in the other group [ p  < 0.01]. Conclusions Early switch to a new biological is associated with a higher probability of healing of anti-TNF-induced skin lesions and significantly reduces the risk of IBD relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Better patient knowledge on inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] could improve outcome and quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess if an education programme improves IBD patients' skills as regards their disease. Methods The GETAID group conducted a prospective multicentre randomised controlled study. IBD patients were included at diagnosis, or after a significant event in the disease course. Patients were randomised between 'educated' or control groups for 6 months. Education was performed by trained health care professionals. A psycho-pedagogic score [ECIPE] was evaluated by a 'blinded' physician at baseline and after 6 and 12 months [M6 and M12]. The primary endpoint was the increase of ECIPE score at M6 of more than 20%. Results A total of 263 patients were included in 19 centres (male:40%; median age:30.8; Crohn's disease [CD]:73%). Of these, 133 patients were randomised into the educated group and 130 into the control group. The median relative increase in ECIPE score at M6 was higher in the educated group as compared with the control group (16.7% [0–42.1%] vs 7% [0–18.8%], respectively, p = 0.0008). The primary endpoint was met in 46% vs 24% of the patients in the educated and control groups, respectively [ p = 0.0003]. A total of 92 patients met the primary endpoint. In multivariate analysis, predictors of an increase of at least 20% of the ECIPE score were randomisation in the educated group (odds ratio [OR] = 2.59) and no previous surgery [OR = 1.92]. Conclusions These findings support the set-up of education programmes in centres involved in the management of IBD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims The aim of this study was to report a multicentric experience of segmental colectomy [SC] in ulcerative colitis [UC] patients without active colitis, in order to assess if SC can or cannot represent an alternative to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. Methods All UC patients undergoing SC were included. Postoperative complications according to ClavienDindo's classification, long term results, and risk factors for postoperative colitis and reoperation for colitis on the remnant colon, were assessed. Results: A total of 72 UC patients underwent: sigmoidectomy [ n = 28], right colectomy [ n = 24], proctectomy [ n = 11], or left colectomy [ n = 9] for colonic cancer [ n = 27], 'diverticulitis' [ n = 17], colonic stenosis [ n = 5], dysplasia or polyps [ n = 8], and miscellaneous [ n = 15]. Three patients died postoperatively and 5/69 patients [7%] developed early flare of UC within 3 months after SC. After a median followup of 40 months, 24/69 patients [35%] were reoperated after a median delay after SC of 19 months [range, 2–158 months]: 22/24 [92%] underwent total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis [ n = 9] or total coloproctectomy [TCP] [ n = 13] and 2/24 [8%] an additional SC. Reasons for reoperation were: colitis [ n = 14; 20%], cancer [ n = 3] or dysplasia [ n = 3], colonic stenosis [ n = 1], and unknown reasons [ n = 3]. Endoscopic score of colitis before SC was Mayo 23 in 5/5 [100%] patients with early flare vs 15/42 without early flare [36%; p = 0.0101] and in 9/12 [75%] patients with reoperation for colitis vs 11/35 without reoperation [31%; p = 0.016]. Conclusions After segmental colectomy in UC patients, postoperative early colitis is rare [7%]. Segmental colectomy could possibly represent an alternative to IPAA in selected UC patients without active colitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims:Very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease [VEO-IBD] is a form of IBD that is distinct from that of children with an older onset. We compared changes over time in the incidence and phenotype at diagnosis between two groups according to age at IBD diagnosis: VEO-IBD diagnosed before the age of 6 years, and early-onset IBD [EO-IBD] diagnosed between 6 and 16 years of age.Methods:Data were obtained from a cohort enrolled in a prospective French population-based registry from 1988 to 2011.Results:Among the 1412 paediatric cases [< 17 years], 42 [3%] were VEO-IBD. In the VEO-IBD group, the incidence remained stable over the study period. In contrast, the incidence of EO-IBD increased from 4.4/105 in 1988–1990 to 9.5/105 in 2009–2011 [+116%; p < 10–4]. Crohn’s disease [CD] was the most common IBD, regardless of age, but ulcerative colitis [UC] and unclassified IBD were more common in VEO-IBD cases [40% vs 26%; p = 0.04]. VEO-IBD diagnosis was most often performed in hospital [69% vs 43%; p < 10–3]. Rectal bleeding and mucous stools were more common in patients with VEO-IBD, whereas weight loss and abdominal pain were more frequent in those with EO-IBD. Regarding CD, isolated colonic disease was more common in the VEO-IBD group [39% vs 14%; p = 0.003].Conclusions:In this large population-based cohort, the incidence of VEO-IBD was low and stable from 1988 to 2011, with a specific clinical presentation. These results suggest a probable genetic origin for VEO-IBD, whereas the increase in EO-IBD might be linked to environmental factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammatory bowel diseases are characterized by a deregulated immune response targeting the gut bacterial flora. Mucosal-associated invariant T ( MAIT) cells are major histocompatibility complex ( MHC) class Ib-restricted innate-like lymphocytes with anti-bacterial functions. They display an effector/memory phenotype and are found in large numbers in the blood, mucosae and liver. They have also been implicated in inflammatory diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Therefore, we aimed to analyse the possible involvement of MAIT cells in Crohn's disease ( CD) and ulcerative colitis ( UC). To this end, a phenotypical and functional analysis of MAIT cells isolated from the blood of healthy subjects, CD and UC patients was undertaken. MAIT cells were also quantified in ileal biopsies of CD patients. The frequency of blood MAIT cells was specifically reduced in IBD patients compared with healthy donors, whereas it was dramatically greater in the inflamed versus healthy tissue. MAIT cells were activated as they expressed significantly more the Ki67 antigen, and this was accompanied by phenotypical changes such as increased expression of natural killer ( NK)G2 D and B and T lymphocyte attenuator ( BTLA). Finally, in-vitro-activated MAIT cells from CD and UC patients secreted significantly more interleukin ( IL)-17, together with a decreased interferon ( IFN)-γ in CD but an increased IL-22 in UC. These data show that MAIT cells are activated in IBD, which results in an increased recruitment towards the inflamed tissues, an altered phenotype and a switch in the pattern of cytokine secretion. This is the first demonstration that MAIT cells are immune players in IBD, whose precise functions in this context need to be addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]