Search

To develop a breed assignment model, three main steps are generally followed: 1) The selection of breed informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); 2) The training of a model, based on a reference population, that allows to classify animals to their breed of origin; and 3) The validation of the developed model on external animals i.e., that were not used in previous steps. However, there is no consensus in the literature about which methodology to follow for the first step, nor about the number of SNP to be selected. This can raise many questions when developing the model and lead to the use of sophisticated methodologies for selecting SNP (e.g., with iterative algorithms, partitions of SNP, or combination of several methods). Therefore, it may be of interest to avoid the first step by the use of all the available SNP. For this purpose, we propose the use of a genomic relationship matrix (GRM), combined or not with a machine learning method, for breed assignment. We compared it with a previously developed model based on selected informative SNP. Four methodologies were investigated: 1) The PLS_NSC methodology: selection of SNP based on a partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and breed assignment by classification based on the nearest shrunken centroids (NSC) method; 2) Breed assignment based on the highest mean relatedness of an animal to the reference populations of each breed (referred to mean_GRM); 3) Breed assignment based on the highest SD of the relatedness of an animal to the reference populations of each breed (referred to SD_GRM) and 4) The GRM_SVM methodology: the use of means and SD of the relatedness defined in mean_GRM and SD_GRM methodologies combined with the linear support vector machine (SVM), a machine learning method used for classification. Regarding mean global accuracies, results showed that the use of mean_GRM or GRM_SVM was not significantly different (Bonferroni corrected P > 0.0083) than the model based on a reduced SNP panel (PLS_NSC). Moreover, the mean_GRM and GRM_SVM methodology were more efficient than PLS_NSC as it was faster to compute. Therefore, it is possible to bypass the selection of SNP and, by the use of a GRM, to develop an efficient breed assignment model. In routine, we recommend the use of GRM_SVM over mean_GRM as it gave a slightly increased global accuracy, which can help endangered breeds to be maintained. The script to execute the different methodologies can be accessed on [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the context of genetic research, but even more for routine genetic evaluations, a recurrent problem is the difficulty to obtain measurements for certain required phenotypes. This can be caused by limited facilities, difficulties in sampling, expensive analyses, limited staff relative to number of animals, and many other reasons. It may therefore be necessary to select which animals to phenotype while maintaining the phenotyping quality and avoiding bias or omitting some animals of interest. This implies developing strategies to do the phenotyping in a non-biased way using a priori available minimum knowledge. An example could be predicting post weaning growth of cattle based on earlier information as birth weight and weaning weight to optimize the use of feed intake or methane measurement facilities. In pigs, similar situations might occur for growth or emissions. However, another important example is boar taint (BT) which shows that not only sequential weighing, but also partial measurements of BT may require attention. BT is defined as urinary and fecal and associated with 2 major compounds, androstenone (AND) and skatole (SKA). The classical method of odor discrimination, "Human Nose Score" (HNS), is notoriously unreliable. Even if odor is known to be complex, adding AND and SKA to HNS would help reveal better the boar taint condition (i.e., phenotype). However, the measurements of AND and SKA or other compounds in fat are expensive. Therefore, it would be important to optimize these measurements by selecting relevant fat samples taken at slaughterhouses. We tested the following optimization strategy. The objective was to obtain a good distribution of a posteriori measured AND and SKA in the selected samples given initial asymmetric populations with positive HNS (3 to 10% declared positives). In a first step, the strategy pooled 2 available HNS for 997 across 22 contemporary groups (CG) and added limited chemical measurements (218/997) available for older samples. The data were obtained from a boar progeny testing scheme; therefore, CG were linked through connecting sires from artificial insemination having sons in different CG. A multi-trait BLUP model was used adjusting for metabolic weight using a 4-generation pedigree. A total of 15% of the animals in the last 6 contemporary groups were selected using first positive HNS (17/300), then keeping the highest and lowest predictions and maintaining diversity by not repeating boars from the same sire-family (i.e., when a family was already present, the next animal was taken). A posteriori chemical analyses were performed on selected samples to compare predicted and observed classifications in tainted and untainted. Research showed an accuracy of 0.73 (Table 1), leading to 58% tainted and 42% untainted compared with the expected ratio. Improvements of this strategy are currently in development, including using genomics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluating genetically heat stress (HS) of cattle is still a major challenge, also because of the need to have access to HS sensitive phenotypes relating their reaction to temperature and humidity as described by the temperature-humidity index (THI). A solution could be to add the information of data from sensors. However, activity (ACT) and rumination (RUM) sensors reflect no "production" [i.e., milk yields (MY), milk composition, but also intake or growth] related aspects which is suboptimal. Therefore, the objectives of this study were thus to assess the possible usefulness for adding sensors data for HS genetic evaluation based on a dairy situation. But the context described can be easily enlarged and include beef cattle and pigs. Strategy was illustrated using daily SenseHub collar records that were obtained from October 2019 to July 2022 in six dairy herds in Wallonia in Southern Belgium. A total of 453 Walloon Holstein cows were followed during this period for activity time. Meteorological data and a HS sensitive "production" trait (here MY) were also obtained from 2015 to 2022 for 1,740 cows from the same herds. In total 32,154 MY, 130,867 ACT and 130,848 RUM records were available. The thresholds at which the different traits start to be affected by HS were estimated at a THI of 63, 64 and 66, respectively, for MY, ACT and RUM. A three-trait random regression reaction norm model was fitted with these different thresholds. Estimated heritability values were 0.19 ± 0.03, 0.14 ± 0.06 and 0.21 ± 0.05 respectively for MY, ACT and RUM using AIREML. Ratios of variance associated to THI and constant genetic effect were 0.002, 0.02 and 0.04 indicating a stronger reaction by RUM but also ACT than MY to THI. However, it is uncertain if the reactions of these sensor traits are reflected in the production traits. Estimated genetic correlations of regressions on THI for ACT and RUM showed values of 0.51 ± 0.70 and 0.08 ± 0.54 with MY and 0.77 ± 0.69 between ACT and RUM. The first eigenvector of the correlation matrix explained 65% of the total variability and standardized coefficients of this eigenvector were 0.42, 0.69 and 0.59 for MY, ACT and RUM. A total of 50% of the variance associated with the regression on THI for MY could be explained by the regressions on THI for ACT and RUM. Adding the constant genetic effects for ACT and RUM only marginally increased to 51% the ability to explain the effect of THI on MY. Based on these results, reactions of different indicator traits, here sensor data, may reflect a different reaction than production and therefore economically important traits. Additional research, also beyond dairy cattle, should continue to address this topic that is very important for the validation of sensor data detecting HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Electronic cigarette use has raised concern worldwide regarding potential health risks and its position in tobacco cessation strategies. As part of any toxicity assessment, the chemical characterization of e-liquids and their related vapors are among fundamental data to be determined. Considering the lack of available reference methods, we developed and validated several analytical procedures in order to conduct a multicomponent analysis of six e-liquid refills and their resultant vapor emissions (generated by a smoking machine), and compared them with tobacco smoke. We combined several techniques including gas-chromatography, high and ultra-performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma with mass spectrometry or ultraviolet and flame ionization detection in order to identify the main e-liquid constituents (propylene glycol, glycerol and nicotine), as well as multiple potentially harmful components (trace elements, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides and carbonyl compounds). Regarding propylene glycol, glycerol and nicotine concentrations, the six tested e-liquids comply with the advertised composition and contain only traces of pollutants. Noticeable lower concentrations of trace elements (≤3.4 pg/ mL puff), pesticides (