Search

Objective The coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic has facilitated the emergence of telerehabilitation, but it is unclear which patients are most likely to respond to physical therapy provided this way. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between individual patient factors and substantial clinical benefit from telerehabilitation among a cohort of patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Methods This is a secondary analysis of data collected during a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Patients with chronic LBP (N  = 98) were provided with a standardized physical therapy protocol adapted for telerehabilitation. We examined the relationship between patient factors and substantial clinical benefit with telerehabilitation, defined as a ≥50% improvement in disability at 10 weeks, measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Results Sixteen (16.3%) patients reported a substantial clinical benefit from telerehabilitation. Patients reporting substantial clinical benefit from telerehabilitation had lower initial pain intensity, lower psychosocial risk per the STarT Back Screening Tool, higher levels of pain self-efficacy, and reported higher therapeutic alliance with their physical therapist compared to other patients. Conclusion Patients with lower psychosocial risk and higher pain-self efficacy experienced substantial clinical benefit from telerehabilitation for chronic LBP more often than other patients in our cohort. Therapeutic alliance was higher among patients who experienced a substantial clinical benefit compared to those who did not. Impact This study indicates that psychosocial factors play an important role in the outcomes of patients receiving telerehabilitation for chronic LBP. Baseline psychosocial screening may serve as a method for identifying patients likely to benefit from this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study sought to develop and validate an original prediction formula that estimated the probability of success for patients with low back pain (LBP) to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the Modified Low Back Disability Questionnaire (MDQ). Methods Patients were 10 to 90 years old in this retrospective cohort study. Data were extracted from Intermountain Healthcare's registry, Rehabilitation Outcomes Management System: 62,858 patients admitted to physical therapy from 2002 to 2013 formed the training dataset, and 15,128 patients admitted 2015 to 2016 formed the verification dataset. Predicted probability to achieve MCID was compared with the actual percentage who succeeded. Two models were developed: 6-point improvement and 30% improvement. MDQ assessed disability, and numeric pain score assessed pain intensity. Predictive models used restricted cubic splines on age, initial pain, and disability scores for non-linear effects. Sex, symptom duration, and payer type were included as indicator variables. Predicted chance of success was compared with the actual percentage of patients that succeeded. Relative change in R -squared was calculated to assess variable importance in predicting success. Odds ratios for duration of injury and payer were calculated. Results A positive trend was observed in both models between predicted and actual success achieved. Both "verification" models appear accurate and closely approximate the "training dataset." Baseline MDQ score was the most important factor to predict a 6-point improvement. Payer type and injury duration were important factors to predict 30% improvement. Best odds to achieve an MCID was having a workers compensation insurance payer and seeking care within 14 days. Conclusion The 2 models demonstrated an accurate visualization of the chance of patients achieving significant improvement compared with the usual representation of the average rate of improvement for all patients. Impact Enhancing physical therapists' understanding of the probability of a patient achieving significant clinical improvement can enhance decision-making processes and help physical therapists manage a patient's care more effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A clinical practice guideline on total knee arthroplasty was developed by an American Physical Therapy (APTA) volunteer guideline development group that consisted of physical therapists, an orthopedic surgeon, a nurse, and a consumer. The guideline was based on systematic reviews of current scientific and clinical information and accepted approaches to management of total knee arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require physical therapists document patients' functional limitations. The process is not standardized. A systematic approach to determine a patient's functional limitations and responsiveness to change is needed. Objective. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) responsiveness to change using 7-level severity/complexity modifier scale proposed by Medicare to a derived scale implemented by Intermountain Healthcare's Rehabilitation Outcomes Management System (ROMS). Design. This was a retrospective, observational cohort design. Methods. 165,183 PROs prior to July 1, 2013, were compared to 46,334 records from July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. Histograms and ribbon plots illustrate distribution and change of patients' scores. ROMS raw score ranges were calculated and compared to CMS' severity/complexity levels based on score percentage. Distribution of the population was compared based on the 2 methods. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for responsiveness to change based on minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Results. Histograms demonstrated few patient scores placed in CMS scale levels at the extremes, whereas the majority of scores placed in 2 middle levels (CJ, CK). ROMS distributed scores more evenly across levels. Ribbon plots illustrated advantage of ROMS' using narrower score ranges. Greater chance for patients to change levels was observed with ROMS when an MCID was achieved. ROMS narrower scale levels resulted in greater sensitivity and good specificity. Limitations. Geographic representation for the United States was limited. Without patients' global rating of change, a reference standard to gauge validation of improvement could not be provided. Conclusions. ROMS provides a standard approach to identify accurately functional limitation modifier levels and to detect improvement more accurately than a straight across transposition using the CMS scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors reflect on the challenges in research to enhance the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of patients with total knee replacement (TKA) by physical therapists. Also cited are the problems faced by researchers like the lack of true placebo-control groups, as well as some tips to overcome the challenges like designing clinical trials of rehabilitation solutions based on theory and conducting multisite trials to achieve higher samples.

Background. Medicare beneficiaries frequently receive physical therapy for musculoskeletal conditions. Little information is available about this care.Objective. The purposes of this study were: (1) to describe characteristics, clinical outcomes, and utilization for Medicare beneficiaries receiving physical therapy in outpatient clinics within one integrated health care system; (2) to compare characteristics, outcomes, and utilization based on the body region affected; and (3) to examine factors predictive of outcomes and utilization.Design. This was a prospective, longitudinal study. Methods. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older (n1,840 episodes of care) participated in the study. Descriptive statistics were calculated for patient characteristics and outcomes. Comparisons were made based on body region. Regression models evaluated factors associated with change in pain, improved outcome,and utilization. Results. The patients' mean age was 74.2 years (SD6.3), and 65.3% were female. The most common body regions were the lumbar spine, shoulder, and knee, collectively accounting for 71.3% of the episodes of care. Patients attended a mean of 6.8 visits (SD4.7), and 63.9% experienced an improved outcome. Episodes of care for lumbar spine conditions had less reduction in pain, whereas shoulder conditions and foot/ankle conditions showed the greatest improvement. Care for hip conditions was least likely to result in an improved outcome. Knee conditions were most likely to have an improved outcome. Care for shoulder and knee conditions had the highest number of visits. Factors associated with greater reduction in pain and improved outcomes included greater initial pain or disability and attending more visits. Factors associated with greater utilization included a postsurgical condition and higher initial pain rating. Limitations. The study was performed in one geographic region within a single health care delivery system. Conclusion. The results provide information on outcomes of physical therapy or Medicare beneficiaries in one health care system. Further research is needed to examine optimal utilization and care for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]