Search

The Danish SEQUEL cohort is a study that aims to investigate the inequalities and late effects experienced by cancer survivors in Denmark. The cohort includes adult survivors of breast, prostate, lung, colon and rectum cancer, melanoma, and lymphoma. It provides comprehensive data on tumor characteristics, cancer treatment, educational level, income, cohabitation, comorbidity, and more. The study has found that cancer survivors, especially those with lower education levels, have a greater need for healthcare services and experience impaired functioning and severe symptoms. The data from the cohort is not publicly available, but researchers can contact the principal investigator for collaborative research projects. The study has been approved by the National Board of Health Data and has received funding from various organizations. [Extracted from the article]

OBJECTIVES: The study has been performed to investigate the mortality within the first year after resection in patients with primary lung cancer, together with associated prognostic factors including gender, age, tumour stage, comorbidity, alcohol abuse, type of surgery and post-surgical complications. METHODS: All patients (n = 3363) from the nationwide Danish Lung Cancer Registry with first resection performed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011 were analysed by Kaplan–Meier techniques and Cox-regression analysis concerning death within the first year after resection. Covariates included gender, age, comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index), perioperative stage, type of resection, registered complications to surgery and alcohol abuse. RESULTS: The cumulative deaths after 30 days, 90 days, 180 days and 360 days were 72 (2.1%), 154 (4.6%), 239 (7.1%) and 478 (14.2%), respectively. Low stage, female gender, young age, no comorbidity, no postoperative complications, no alcohol abuse and lobectomy as type of resection were favourable for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that resection in primary lung cancer impacts mortality far beyond the initial 30 days after resection, which is conventionally considered a time window of relevance for the adverse outcome of surgery. Increased efforts should be made for optimizing the selection of patients suited for resection and for identifying patients at increased risk of death after resection. Furthermore, patients should be monitored more closely and more frequently, in particular those patients with high risk of death after resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: In 1998 The Danish Lung Cancer Group published the first edition of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. A national registry was implemented in the year 2000 with the primary objective to monitor the implementation of these guidelines and nationwide to secure and improve the quality of the clinical management of lung cancer. The results of this effort are reported with special focus on surgery. Methods: Through systematic nationwide registration a total of 24,153 patients have been included in the period 2000–2007. Indicators describing staging, surgical procedures, complications and survival have been registered in those 5007 patients who underwent surgery. Using an Internet based closed circle with a safe program (firewall and encryptation) more than 95% of this subgroup of patients have been notified. Each year the results have been audited locally, regionally and nationally and improvements have been proposed, implemented, monitored and consecutively evaluated by the audit-plenary. Results: This strategy has been a contributory factor to significantly improve the results in mortality, survival and surgical procedures. Thus, the 30-days mortality following surgery has decreased from 5.2% to 3.6% and survival has increased from an overall 1- and 2-year survival of 69% and 50% in 2000 to 77% and 60% in 2007, respectively. A number of other key indicators were also improved: the lobectomy rate has increased from 54% to 73% and the pneumonectomy rate has decreased from 23% to 11%. The proportion of patients having surgery within 14 days from referral has increased from 69% to 87%. Conclusions: Establishment of a national lung cancer group with the primary tasks to implement updated national guidelines and to secure valid registration of clinical baseline data and quality parameters has been a contributory factor to significantly improve the quality of lung cancer surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]