Search

Objectives Assessing occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) presents significant challenges due to the considerable variability in exposure levels within and between occupations. This spatial and temporal variability complicates the reliable evaluation of potential health risks associated with RF-EMF exposure in the workplace. Accurate assessment methods are crucial to understand the extent of exposure and to evaluate potential health risks, especially given the potential for higher exposures in occupational settings compared to the general population. This study compares the historical RF-EMF exposure estimates in the INTEROCC RF-EMF job-exposure matrix (RF-JEM) with recent personal measurement data collected in 2 countries as part of the OccRF-Health study, to assess the broader applicability of the RF-JEM. Methods Weighted kappa (k w) coefficients and Spearman rank correlation tests were performed to assess the alignment between RF-JEM estimates and measurements for 8 h time-weighted average exposure intensity and prevalence estimates across various occupations. The comparisons were mainly based on 22 jobs having ≥5 measured workers in the OccRF-Health study. Results Poor agreement was found for both exposure prevalence and intensity between both methods (k w < 0.1). RF-JEM values likely overestimated exposure levels for both electric (E) and magnetic (H) fields (mean percentage difference >194%) compared to current personal measurements. Conclusions Findings suggest that the INTEROCC-JEM likely overestimates current exposure intensity levels in the measured jobs. Adopting a semiquantitative JEM could also mitigate misclassification errors due to exposure variability, improving accuracy in exposure assessment. These findings indicate the need for more targeted personal measurements, including among highly exposed workers, and for potentially considering new exposure metrics to more accurately assess occupational RF-EMF exposures in occupational epidemiological research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of this study was to reconstruct the historical respirable silica (RS) and respirable dust (RD) exposures of workers in the Minnesota taconite industry from 1955 to 2010 as part of several epidemiological studies for assessing the association between exposure to components of taconite dusts and the development of respiratory diseases. A job-exposure matrix (JEM) was developed that uses 9127 RS and 19 391 RD occupational hygiene historical measurements. Historical RS and RD data were extracted from several sources and were grouped into seven mines and then into eight departments [Concentrating, Crushing, Janitor, Mining, Office/control room, Pelletizing, Shop (mobile), and Shop (stationary)]. Within each department, we applied a two-level random-intercept regression model which assumes that the natural log of Y (RD or RS concentration) changes over time at a constant rate. Among all predicted RD and RS values, we found that larger RD values were located in the following departments: Crushing, Concentrating, Pelletizing, and Shop (mobile). Larger RS values were located only in either Crushing or Shop (mobile). The annual rates of change for historical RD and RS exposures were between −3.3 and 3.2%. The silica percentage in the dust varied by mine/department with the highest value of 29.3% in Mine F (Crushing) and the lowest value of 2.1% in Mine B (Pelletizing). The predicted historical RD and RS arithmetic mean exposures ranged between <0.075 and 3.14 mg m−3, and between <0.005 and 0.36 mg m−3, respectively. The result of this study is a JEM by mine, department, and year for RD and RS for epidemiological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]