Search

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data in the pediatric population are limited, particularly in developing countries. This study assessed the AMR profile and key resistance phenotypes and genotypes for Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) isolates collected as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program from pediatric patients in Latin America, Africa-Middle East, and Asia in 2016–2020 versus 2011–2015. Methods Minimum inhibitory concentrations by broth microdilution methodology were interpreted per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints were used for interpreting colistin activity. β-lactamase genes were screened by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Results For Acinetobacter baumannii , low susceptibility (<60.0%) was observed for all antimicrobials, except colistin (≥92.9%), across regions and year periods. Ceftazidime-avibactam, amikacin, colistin, and meropenem were mostly active (78.6%–100.0%) against Enterobacter cloacae , Escherichia coli , and Klebsiella pneumoniae. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa , susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, amikacin, and colistin was ≥85.9%. Among resistance phenotypes, carbapenem-resistant (CR, ≥44.8%) and difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR, ≥37.1%) rates were the highest in A. baumannii. A consistent increase in CR and DTR K. pneumoniae was noted across regions over time. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing K. pneumoniae (32.6%–55.6%) were more frequent than ESBL-producing E. coli (25.3%–37.1%). CTX-M was the dominant ESBL among Enterobacterales. NDM-positive Enterobacterales species and VIM-positive P. aeruginosa were identified across regions. Conclusions This study identified high susceptibility to few agents for key GNB in pediatric patients. Continued surveillance of resistance phenotypes and genotypes at regional levels may help to guide appropriate treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world observational studies was conducted to summarize the impact of letermovir cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary prophylaxis (PP) among adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. Methods Systematic searches in Medline/PubMed, Embase, and conferences (from database inception to October 2021) were conducted to identify studies for inclusion. Random-effects models were used to derive pooled estimates on the relative effectiveness of letermovir PP compared to controls. Results Forty-eight unique studies (N = 7104 patients) were included, most of which were comparative, single-center, and conducted in the United States. Letermovir PP was associated with statistically significant reduction in odds of CMV reactivation (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 0.13 and 0.24; P <.05), clinically significant CMV infection (pOR, 0.09 and 0.19; P <.05), and CMV disease (pOR, 0.31 and 0.35; P <.05) by day +100 and day +200 after allo-HCT, respectively. Letermovir PP was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause (pOR, 0.73; P <.01) and nonrelapse mortality (pOR, 0.65; P =.01) beyond day 200 after allo-HCT. Conclusions Letermovir for CMV PP was effective in reducing the risk of CMV-related complications overall and mortality beyond day 200 among adult allo-HCT recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly third-generation cephalosporins, are routinely used in the treatment of nosocomial infections. The emergence of Extended Spectrum Β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens in Indian tertiary care hospitals warrants the need to reassess β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitors (BL-BLIs) as better alternative treatments. Methods An online survey was conducted by Pfizer India to understand the usage of BL-BLIs across Indian hospitals. The survey was administered to 334 clinicians across multiple specialties out of which 195 were from tertiary care hospitals. Results were analyzed using MS-Excel statistical tools. Results One-hundred ninety-five (195) clinicians from tertiary care hospitals completed the survey. About 78% of HCPs revealed the resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (e.g. ceftriaxone, ceftazidime) to be between 10–60% in their clinical settings. BL-BLIs were mostly preferred for treatment based on hospital antibiograms (64%) and used as first-line options for hospitalized adults with mild-moderate severe infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms (71%) and in mild-moderate infections caused by susceptible Gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae (54%). The average duration of IV BL-BLI treatment was 5–7 days (66%). The HCPs considerations while choosing BL-BLIs were mainly based on anti-microbial spectrum (81%), and rationality of BL/BLI combination (63%) and clinical experience with the BL-BLI molecule (63%). Cefoperazone-Sulbactam (CS) and Piperacillin–tazobactam (PT) were most commonly prescribed BL-BLIs and HCPs preferred the latter for pneumonia (67%), skin and soft-tissue infections (57%), bloodstream infections (67%) and cancer-associated febrile neutropenia (64%); while they preferred former for urinary tract infections (64%). CS and PT were preferred for intra-abdominal infections (57% and 64% respectively) and post-surgical infections (56% and 53% respectively). Conclusion CS and PT were the most commonly prescribed BL-BLIs probably due to their wide antimicrobial spectrum, rationality of the BL/BLI combination and the clinical experience with the molecules. BL-BLIs are still a mainstay of treatment for infections due to ESBL producing organisms. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]