Search

Background Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and α-adrenergic blocking agents (α-blockers) are widely used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Aims To assess the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of tamsulosin and tadalafil compared with tadalafil monotherapy in patients with comorbid BPH-associated LUTS and ED. Methods A randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled trial was conducted of 510 men with BPH-associated LUTS and ED. Patients were treated with FDCs of tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus tadalafil 5 mg (FDC 0.4/5 mg), tamsulosin 0.2 mg plus tadalafil 5 mg (FDC 0.2/5 mg), or tadalafil 5 mg for a 12-week treatment period. For a subsequent 12-week extension period, the patients were administered FDC 0.4/5 mg. Outcomes The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain (IIEF-EF) score at week 12 to prove superiority and non-inferiority of FDCs compared with tadalafil 5 mg. The safety assessments were adverse reactions, laboratory test results, and vital signs at week 24. Results The mean changes in total IPSS and IIEF-EF scores were −9.46 and 9.17 for FDC 0.4/5 mg and −8.14 and 9.49 for tadalafil 5 mg, respectively, which indicated superiority in LUTS improvement ( P = .0320) and non-inferiority in ED treatment with FDC 0.4/5 mg compared with tadalafil 5 mg. However, the results from FDC 0.2/5 mg failed to demonstrate superiority in LUTS improvement. No clinically significant adverse events regarding the investigational products were observed during the 24-week period. Clinical Implications The FDC 0.4/5 mg is the first combined formulation of an α-blocker and a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that offers benefits in patient compliance and as add-on therapy in patients with comorbid BPH-associated LUTS and ED. Strengths and Limitations The study clearly demonstrated the advantage of FDC 0.4/5 mg. The main advantage of FDC 0.4/5 mg was the enhanced efficacy on BPH-associated LUTS comorbidity with ED, the lower incidence of side effects, and the simplification and convenience of therapy, which led to better overall patient compliance. However, the lack of a tamsulosin monotherapy control group was a limitation of this study. Conclusion The FDC 0.4/5 mg therapy was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious, indicating that combination therapy could provide clinical benefits for patients with BPH-associated LUTS complaints and ameliorate the comorbidity of ED. Kim SW, Park NC, Lee SW, et al. Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil for Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active-Controlled Trial. J Sex Med 2017;14:1018–1027. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials ( RCTs) is important to prevent the adoption of findings of low-quality trials into clinical practice. Aim The aim of this study was to analyze the quality of studies reporting RCTs in andrology journals ( The Journal of Sexual Medicine [ JSM], the Asian Journal of Andrology [ AJA], the Journal of Andrology [ JOA], the International Journal of Andrology [ IJA]). Methods A quality assessment was conducted on all studies identified as RCTs published in andrology journals ( JSM, AJA, JOA, IJA) until 2011. The review period was divided into three terms: early, mid, and late each journal. Main Outcome Measures The Jadad scale, van Tulder scale, and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool ( CCRBT) were employed. The RCTs were also categorized by country of origin, the inclusion of institutional review board ( IRB) approval, funding, and blindness. Results There were1,954 original articles published in the JSM, 893 articles in the AJA, 2,527 articles in the JOA, and 2,086 articles in the IJA for the review period. There were 172 studies reporting on RCTs in the JSM, 33 RCTs in the AJA, 63 RCTs in the JOA, and 29 RCTs in the IJA. No significant increase in Jadad or van Tulder scale scores were found over time, nor were there any significant changes in the number of high-quality articles as assessed by CCRBT. However, significant differences in quality analysis were found according to blinding, funding, and IRB approval. Conclusion The number of original articles and RCTs in andrology increased over time. However, the ratio of RCTs to original articles as well as RCT quality was statistically insignificant. It would be required for the researchers to focus efforts in performing high-quality studies to ensure appropriate randomization, reviews by IRB, financial support, and inclusion of allocation concealment during study performance. Jo JK, Chung JH, Kim KS, Song SH, and Lee SW. Reporting of randomized controlled trials in andrology journals: A quality assessment. J Sex Med 2015;12:350-357. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Quality assessment of randomized clinical trials ( RCTs) is important to prevent the adoption of findings of low-quality trials into clinical practice. Aim The aim if this study was to analyze the quality of studies reporting RCTs in the Journal of Sexual Medicine ( JSM) and to find relevant clinical impact. Methods A quality assessment was conducted in all studies identified as RCTs published in the JSM from 2004 to 2012. The review period was divided into three periods: early (2004-2006), mid (2007-2009), and late (2010-2012). Main Outcome Measures The Jadad scale, van Tulder scale, and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool ( CCRBT) quality scoring instruments were used. The RCTs were also categorized by country of origin, topic, the inclusion of institutional review board ( IRB) approval, funding, citation rate, and impact factor. Results A total of 2,418 original articles were published in the JSM during the review period, and 188 were reports of RCTs. There were 39 (14.89%), 70 (7.77%), and 76 (6.29%) RCTs published during the early, mid, and late terms, respectively ( P < 0.001). No significant increases in Jadad or van Tulder scale scores were found over time nor were there any significant changes in the number of low-risk articles as assessed by the CCRBT. However, significant differences in quality analysis were found in funding and IRB approval. Citation rates and impact factor were not correlated with RCT quality using any of the tools. Conclusions The number of original articles and RCTs published in the JSM increased over time. However, the ratio of RCTs to original articles did not increase significantly. Adequate randomization and blinding methods, IRB review, and financial support are required for the conduct of high-quality RCTs. Jo JK, Chung JH, Kim KS, Lee JW, Lee SW, and International Evidence-Based Medicine Research (IEMR) Group. Randomized controlled trials in the Journal of Sexual Medicine: A quality assessment and relevant clinical impact. J Sex Med 2014;11:894-900. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]