Search

The Fermi /GBM instrument is a vital source of detections of gamma-ray bursts and has an increasingly important role to play in understanding gravitational-wave transients. In both cases, its impact is increased by accurate positions with reliable uncertainties. We evaluate the RoboBA and BALROG algorithms for determining the position of gamma-ray bursts detected by the Fermi /GBM instrument. We construct a sample of 54 bursts with detections both by Swift /BAT and by Fermi /GBM. We then compare the positions predicted by RoboBA and BALROG with the positions measured by BAT, which we can assume to be the true position. We find that RoboBA and BALROG are similarly precise for bright bursts whose uncertainties are dominated by systematic errors, but RoboBA performs better for faint bursts whose uncertainties are dominated by statistical noise. We further find that the uncertainties in the positions predicted by RoboBA are consistent with the distribution of position errors, whereas BALROG seems to be underestimating the uncertainties by a factor of about 2. Additionally, we consider the implications of these results for the follow-up of the optical afterglows of Fermi /GBM bursts. In particular, for the DDOTI wide-field imager we conclude that a single pointing is best. Our sample would allow a similar study to be carried out for other telescopes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present analytical and numerical models of the bright long GRB 210822A at z  = 1.736. The intrinsic extreme brightness exhibited in the optical, which is very similar to other bright GRBs (e.g. GRBs 080319B, 130427A, 160625A 190114C, and 221009A), makes GRB 210822A an ideal case for studying the evolution of this particular kind of GRB. We use optical data from the RATIR instrument starting at T + 315.9 s, with publicly available optical data from other ground-based observatories, as well as Swift /UVOT, and X-ray data from the Swift /XRT instrument. The temporal profiles and spectral properties during the late stages align consistently with the conventional forward shock model, complemented by a reverse shock element that dominates optical emissions during the initial phases (T < 300 s). Furthermore, we observe a break at T  = 80 000 s that we interpreted as evidence of a jet break, which constrains the opening angle to be about θj = (3–5) degrees. Finally, we apply a machine-learning technique to model the multiwavelength light curve of GRB 210822A using the afterglowpy library. We estimate the angle of sight θobs = (6.4 ± 0.1) × 10−1 degrees, the energy E 0 = (7.9 ± 1.6) × 1053 erg, the electron index p  = 2.54 ± 0.10, the thermal energy fraction in electrons ϵe = (4.63 ± 0.91) × 10−5 and in the magnetic field ϵB = (8.66 ± 1.01) × 10−6, the efficiency χ = 0.89 ± 0.01, and the density of the surrounding medium n 0 = 0.85 ± 0.01 cm−3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]